Scolopendra clavipes C. L. Koch, 1836

Doménech, Carles & Nagel, Peter, 2022, On the dates of publication of four European species of Scolopendra Linnaeus 1758 described by C. L. Koch (Myriapoda, Chilopoda), Zootaxa 5159 (1), pp. 125-135 : 126-127

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5159.1.6

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1A7D0E04-D6EA-4C0B-ADC7-0B107E6564D5

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6775147

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F36DFF20-B15B-FF8A-1C8C-FCE66027AAB5

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Scolopendra clavipes C. L. Koch, 1836
status

 

Scolopendra clavipes C. L. Koch, 1836 View in CoL

S. clavipes C. L. Koch, 1836 is the currently accepted name of a species propria with the herewith corrected date “1836” instead of the widely used “1847” (see Bonato et al. 2016, founded on Würmli 1980). The name is not yet registered with Zoobank.

This species is often cited explicitly or with the implicit understanding that it was first published in C. L. Koch’s well-known monograph and catalogue “System der Myriapoda ” ( Koch 1847), see for example Attems (1902, 1930), Kraepelin (1903), and Bonato et al. (2016), and a posthumously published work of C. L. Koch himself ( Koch 1863a, see also Kohlrausch 1879, p. 72; 1881, p. 83). In fact, the text in Koch (1847, p. 169) is just the first comprehensive description, while the first illustration is found in Koch (1863a).

Publications before 1847 by Stein (1839, p. 278), Brandt (1840, p. 149) and Ranzani (1841, pp. 394, 441) as well as the coetaneous work of Walckenaer & Gervais (1847; p. 257), quoted the source of the description in two different ways. Stein (1839, p. 278) cited this as “Koch (in den von Dr. Herrich-Schäffer herausgeg. Deutschl. Krust. Myriap. und Arachn.)” while the other authors did it as “Koch (Deutschl. Crustaceen, Myriapoden und Arachniden, Heft [German term for “fascicle”] (or as Fasc.) 9, tab. [abbreviation of the Latin tabula = “plate”] (or as pl.) 1.)”, but not any of them specified the year of the paper’s release.

This work certainly was published in two versions, both with identical content but with different numbering and title ( Nagel & Grieder 2019, e.g. Figures 2 View FIGURE 2 - 7) ( Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 , 2 View FIGURE 2 ). The species S. clavipes was published by C. L. Koch in the section “Anmerkungen” (notes) of the letterpress associated with the text to index species Tab. 1 and plate 1 ( S. italica ), but not appearing in the index itself nor in an illustration in the following parts of the two parallel editions [Author of letterpress and illustrations in both editions: C. L. Koch] ( Fig. 1D View FIGURE 1 , 2D View FIGURE 2 ):

Koch, C.L. (1836a). Deutschlands Crustaceen, Myriapoden und Arachniden. Ein Beitrag zur deutschen Fauna. [Herausgegeben von Dr. Herrich-Schäffer] [N. B.: This statement “Edited by Dr. Herrich-Schäffer“ is true for the whole Koch series, despite it was printed only on few title pages]. 9th fascicle, 24 plates and associated letterpress. Regensburg: Fr. Pustet. [in the present paper quoted as the “Koch series”].

and Koch, C.L. (1836b) in Herrich-Schäffer G. A. W. (ed.). Deutschlands Insecten, herausgegeben von G. W. F. Panzer, fortgesetzt von Dr. G. A. W. Herrich-Schäffer. 142nd fascicle, 24 plates and associated letterpress. Regensburg: Fr. Pustet. (in the present paper quoted as the “Herrich-Schäffer series”)

The index pages (wrappers) of these Hefte of both editions display a footnote with the imprinted date “Den 1.

Oktober 1836” ( Figs. 1B View FIGURE 1 , 2B View FIGURE 2 ). This date was confirmed as the actual date of publication of both Hefte 9 and 142 ( Nagel & Grieder 2019). Consequently, the original description of S. clavipes has to be dated as “1 st. Oct. 1836 ” and the publication should be chosen as Heft 9 of the “Koch series” or as Heft 142 of the “Herrich-Schäffer series”.

The citation of Heft 9 as part of the Koch series in the form of a separate line of the text in Heft 142 of the Herrich-Schäffer series (see Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ) by Koch himself is an objective evidence of the precedence of Heft 9 in the case of a simultaneous publication ( Nagel & Grieder 2019).

The detailed statement in Nagel & Grieder (2019, p. 119) quoting “1836” rather than “1837” of Heft 9 in the Koch series “Deutschlands Crustaceen …” reveals a minor uncertainty: Indeed, a few subsequent references seem to support the publication date “1837”, without denying the wrapper date “1836” ( ICZN 1999, Article 21.2; Nagel & Grieder 2019, pp. 119-120). Identical description of S. clavipes in Heft 142 of the Herrich-Schäffer series “Deutschlands Insecten …” was equally dated as “ 1. Oktober 1836 ” with stronger evidence: Five subsequent records of Heft 142 have to be dated “1836” with the utmost probability ( Nagel & Grieder 2019, p. 70).

In summary, both Hefte 9 and 142 were published contemporaneously. Heft 9 was cited in Heft 142 and hence marked as the original publication (see above).

Consequently, the work containing the original description must be determined as follows:

Scolopendra clavipes C. L. Koch, 1836 in Koch, C.L., Deutschlands Crustaceen , Myriapoden und Arachniden. Ein Beitrag zur deutschen Fauna. Heft 9, unpaginated letterpress titled “Anmerkung [no.] 3)” [1 p.], listed subsequently to index species no. 9.1. Regensburg: Fr. Pustet. Date of publication 1 October 1836 (cf. Fig. 1B View FIGURE 1 ).

The application of this amendment will contribute to the stability of nomenclature with regard to the date and title of publication. However, some other nomenclatural issues such as the list of subspecies or eventual synonyms were not checked in detail as this would be beyond the scope of the present contribution.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF