Cladiopsocus, Roesler, 1940
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4378.2.2 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0FAAA8FA-83EC-404E-9C44-6ED1355B7FF7 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5959330 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F41EAC0D-FFCB-0A1E-0F9F-FEDDEAB2F856 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Cladiopsocus |
| status |
|
Key to neotropical species of Cladiopsocus View in CoL (males)
(Modified from González et al. 2016)
Males unknown of C. clarus , C. dolosus , C. fuscus , C. nebulosus and C. ocotensis
1. Paraproctal tubercle enlarged into a distinct “thumb” ( Figs 21 View FIGURES 15–21 , 49 View FIGURES 43–49 , 89 View FIGURES 83–89 ) or enlarged but without a distinct “thumb” ( Figs 56 View FIGURES 50–56 , 82 View FIGURES 76–82 ).................................................................................................... 2
- Paraproctal tubercle reduced, not enlarged nor with a distinct “thumb” ( Figs 7 View FIGURES 1–7 , 14 View FIGURES8–14 , 28 View FIGURES 22–28 , 35 View FIGURES29–35 )........................... 19
2. Forewing veins with spurs ( Figs 15 View FIGURES 15–21 , 57 View FIGURES 57–62 , 76 View FIGURES 76–82 ), sometimes restricted only to the margin ( Figs 50 View FIGURES 50–56 , 76 View FIGURES 76–82 ); epiproct emarginated apically ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 15–21 ), or with a broad posterior process ( Figs 55 View FIGURES 50–56 , 81 View FIGURES 76–82 ).................................................. 3
- Forewing veins without spurs ( Figs 43 View FIGURES 43–49 , 83 View FIGURES 83–89 ); epiproct emarginated apically ( Fig. 48 View FIGURES 43–49 ) or with bumps, prongs, papillae or flanges................................................................................................... 12
3. Paraproctal tubercle clearly enlarged into a distinct “thumb” ( Figs 21 View FIGURES 15–21 , 49 View FIGURES 43–49 , 89 View FIGURES 83–89 ); epiproct emarginated posteriorly ( Figs 20 View FIGURES 15–21 , 5 View FIGURES 1–7 0, 88), sometimes with a broad posterior process ( Figs 55 View FIGURES 50–56 , 81 View FIGURES 76–82 ).................................................... 4
- Paraproctal tubercle enlarged but without a distinct “thumb” ( Figs 56 View FIGURES 50–56 , 82 View FIGURES 76–82 ); epiproct emarginated or with a broad posterior process ( Figs 55 View FIGURES 50–56 , 81 View FIGURES 76–82 )...................................................................................... 8
4. Paraproctal prong proximally with a denticulate process on the inner margin; epiproct emarginate posteriorly ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 15–21 ).......................................................................................... C. caguanensis n. sp.
- Paraproctal prong proximally without a denticulate process on the inner margin ( Figs 132, 134 View FIGURES 120–136 )....................... 5
5. Paraproctal prong distally forked, with arms pointed ( Fig. 132 View FIGURES 120–136 ); epiproct obtusely concave posteriorly, postero-lateral corners pointed, setose ( Fig. 105 View FIGURES 103–119 )........................................................... C. panchei González et al.
- Paraproctal prong not distally forked, or with a short preapical tooth ( Fig. 134 View FIGURES 120–136 ); epiproct variable, with or without a distal process ( Fig. 116 View FIGURES 103–119 )........................................................................................ 6
6. Paraproctal prong with a short preapical tooth ( Fig. 134 View FIGURES 120–136 ); epiproct trapeziform, with widely emarginated posterior margin ( Fig. 116 View FIGURES 103–119 )........................................................................... C. julianae González et al.
- Paraproctal prong without a preapical tooth ( Figs 126, 130 View FIGURES 120–136 ), epiproct variable, sometimes trapeziform ( Fig. 103 View FIGURES 103–119 ), semi-oval, emarginated posteriorly or modified ( Fig. 118 View FIGURES 103–119 ).............................................................. 7
7. Epiproct trapeziform, posterior border projected, slightly concave ( Fig. 103 View FIGURES 103–119 ); paraproctal prong with a distal tooth, and a small proximal denticle on the inner margin ( Fig. 126 View FIGURES 120–136 )...................................... C. arboricolus Calderón et al.
- Epiproct strongly bilobed and raised distally ( Fig. 118 View FIGURES 103–119 ); paraproctal prong without a small proximal denticle on the inner margin ( Fig. 130 View FIGURES 120–136 )...................................................................... C. ramulosus (Enderlein)
8. Forewings with well developed spur veins (see Fig. 55 View FIGURES 50–56 in González et al. 2016); paraproctal prong single, pointed ( Fig. 133 View FIGURES 120–136 ); epiproct projected posteriorly, emarginate, postero-lateral corners rounded ( Fig. 115 View FIGURES 103–119 )............ C. tikunus González et al.
- Forewings with spur veins poorly developed ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 15–21 ); paraproctal prong single or double ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 15–21 ); epiproct variable...... 9
9. Paraproctal prong double ( Fig. 82 View FIGURES 76–82 ); epiproct with widened median posterior projection and rounded or emarginate posterior margin ( Fig. 81 View FIGURES 76–82 ); phallosome well sclerotized, with internal parameres as two narrow, sclerotized arches, touching each other on the midline ( Fig. 80 View FIGURES 76–82 )................................................................................ 10
- Paraproctal prong single ( Fig. 56 View FIGURES 50–56 ) or with rugose processes, epiproct emarginated or with posterior median process rounded distally; phallosome variable............................................................................ 11
10. Paraproctal prong with inner arm short, truncate ( Fig. 129 View FIGURES 120–136 ); epiproct with median process slightly emarginate posteriorly, postero-lateral corners round, small, slightly projected ( Fig. 108 View FIGURES 103–119 ); phallosome with internal parameres as two narrow arches (see Fig. 21 View FIGURES 15–21 in González et al. 2016).................................................... C. eertmoedi González et al.
- Paraproctal prong with inner arm almost as long as the outer arm, tapered ( Fig. 82 View FIGURES 76–82 ); epiproct with posteriorly rounded median process ( Fig. 81 View FIGURES 76–82 ); phallosome with internal parameres narrower than in the previous species ( Fig. 80 View FIGURES 76–82 )........ C. sixtoi n. sp.
11. Epiproct emarginated posteriorly; paraproctal prong with rugose processes......................... C. uncinatus (New)
- Epiproct with posterior median process of rounded apex ( Fig. 55 View FIGURES 50–56 ); paraproctal prong long, curved and tapered distally ( Fig. 56 View FIGURES 50–56 )............................................................................... C. norsantanderinus n. sp.
12. Paraproctal prong with a laminar oval process between it and the mesal tubercle ( Figs 89 View FIGURES 83–89 , 135 View FIGURES 120–136 ). Epiproct posteriorly emarginated, postero-lateral corners widely rounded ( Figs 88 View FIGURES 83–89 , 119 View FIGURES 103–119 ).................................................... 13
- Paraproctal prong without oval process between it and the mesal tubercle ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 43–49 ). Epiproct variable in shape ( Fig. 48 View FIGURES 43–49 )... 14
13. Paraproctal prong short, stout, distally blunt ( Fig. 135 View FIGURES 120–136 )............................. C. amacayacuensis González et al.
- Paraproctal prong long, distally pointed ( Fig. 89 View FIGURES 83–89 )................................................ C. tinigua n. sp.
14. Paraproctal prong short, widened distally, with two-three apical teeth ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 43–49 ), epiproct wider than long, posterior margin emarginated ( Fig. 48 View FIGURES 43–49 ).................................................................. C. laesperanza n. sp.
- Paraproctal prong well developed, pointed or stout and with one-three apical teeth; epiproct variable in shape........... 15
15. Epiproct with small posterior process ( Fig. 109 View FIGURES 103–119 ); paraproctal prong curved, with one apical tooth ( Fig. 125 View FIGURES 120–136 ).............................................................................................. C. pacificus Calderón et al.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.