Cremnomymar sagittifer (Fidalgo) Triapitsyn, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5463.1.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:77985F48-0E6A-4D2C-9D09-DFF1138DB673 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11627082 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F4708794-BC12-FFE7-FF77-F989FF00FCAF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cremnomymar sagittifer (Fidalgo) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Cremnomymar sagittifer (Fidalgo) , comb. n.
( Figs 23–35 View FIGURES 21–24 View FIGURES 25–28 View FIGURES 29–31 View FIGURES 32–35 )
Parapolynema sagittifer Fidalgo 1982: 98–101 View in CoL . Type locality: José C. Paz, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Subsequent references: De Santis 1989: 73 (catalog); Yoshimoto 1990: 67 (list); Fidalgo 1991: 152 (additions to diagnosis, comparison with P. tucumanum , distribution), 155 (illustrations); Loiácono et al. 2005: 15 (type series information); Luft Albarracin et al. 2009: 11 (list), 20–21 (illustrations); Luft Albarracin et al. 2014: 137 (list).
Type material examined. Holotype female and the entire paratype series of both sexes [MLPA, as in Figs 23–24 View FIGURES 21–24 and 32–33 View FIGURES 32–35 ], as listed in Fidalgo (1982, p. 101) and Loiácono et al. (2005, p. 15), as well as additional (non-type) material in MLPA listed in Fidalgo (1991, p. 132).
Additional material examined. ARGENTINA. Buenos Aires: Castelar, INTA, 34°36’20’’S 58°40’33’’W, 22 m, 6.xi–6.xii.2006, G.A. Logarzo [1 ♀, UCRC]. GoogleMaps Luján , agricultural field at Universidad Nacional de Luján , 34°35’07’’S 59°04’45’’W, 31 m, C.E. Coviella: 17.iii.2005 [1 ♂, UCRC]; GoogleMaps 31.iii.2006 [1 ♀, UCRC]; GoogleMaps 1.ix.2006 [1 ♀, UCRC]; GoogleMaps 20.x.2006 [6 ♀, UCRC]; GoogleMaps 2006 (no exact date) [1 ♀, UCRC] GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis. In addition to the female features mentioned in the key, C. sagittifer differs from C. fidalgoi , to which it is most similar, in the male having a distinct, complete or almost complete median carina on the propodeum (males of C. fidalgoi without such a carina).
Redescription (type and non-type specimens from Buenos Aires). FEMALE. Body length (dry-mounted specimens, as in Fig. 25 View FIGURES 25–28 ) 720–790 µm. Head dark brown and the rest of body brown to dark brown except petiole light brown ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 25–28 ), gaster often somewhat lighter than mesosoma; scape and pedicel light brown, funicle light brown or brown, and clava dark brown; legs including procoxa mostly light brown. Head ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 25–28 ) a little wider than high; face with fine, inconspicuous mesh-like sculpture above toruli. Antenna ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 25–28 ) with scape, excluding short radicle (not fused with the rest of scape), 3.1–3.5× as long as wide; pedicel slightly longer than any funicle segment and about 1.8× as long as wide; all funicle segments short, F1 (and sometimes F4 or F5) the shortest and F2 the longest, F6 the widest and without mps; clava 2.2–2.4× as long as wide, a little longer than combined length of the 3 preceding segments, with all mps in apical half. Mesosoma ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 25–28 ) 1.4–1.5× as long as wide; pronotum, mesoscutum and scutellum with reticulate mesh-like sculpture; mesoscutum much wider than long, with notauli indistinct; scutellum longer than mesoscutum; propodeum mostly smooth (except for the lateral carinae), without median carina. Fore wing ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 29–31 ) 3.0–3.5× as long as wide; marginal + stigmal vein with 2 very short, weak macrochaetae, apical process about as long as marginal + stigmal vein to notably longer than marginal + stigmal vein ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 29–31 ); disc with 2 wide transverse bands beyond venation, the proximal band about as wide as the distal one, densely setose beyond venation, the majority of discal setae (those on dark bands) modified; most fringe setae on anterior margin thickened, the basal ones short and subapical and apical ones long while apical ones not as thickened as subapical fringe setae; the longest marginal seta 0.8–0.95× greatest width of wing. Hind wing ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 29–31 ) 35–40× as long as wide, with disc slightly infumate (except basally) and sparsely setose beyond venation; the longest marginal seta 10–14× greatest width of wing. Metacoxa smooth. Petiole ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 29–31 ) cylindrical, with wrinkles dorsally. Ovipositor 0.8–0.85 length of gaster ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 29–31 ), not exserted beyond gastral apex, and 0.85–0.9× length of metatibia.
MALE. Body length (dry-mounted specimen, Fig. 34 View FIGURES 32–35 ) 660 µm. Similar to female in color except scape and pedicel light brown, and flagellum uniformly brown. Propodeum with a complete or almost complete median carina.
Distribution. Argentina: Buenos Aires ( Fidalgo 1982), and possibly Brazil (I have seen one unidentified female of a Cremnomymar sp. from São Paulo State that is likely C. sagittifer , although no positive identification has been made).
UCRC |
University of California, Riverside |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cremnomymar sagittifer (Fidalgo)
Triapitsyn, Serguei V. 2024 |
Parapolynema sagittifer
Luft Albarracin, E. & Aquino, D. & Triapitsyn, S. V. 2014: 137 |
Luft Albarracin, E. & Triapitsyn, S. V. & Virla, E. G. 2009: 11 |
Loiacono, M. S. & Diaz, N. B. & Margaria, C. B. & Gallardo, F. E. 2005: 15 |
Fidalgo, P. 1991: 152 |
Yoshimoto, C. M. 1990: 67 |
De Santis, L. 1989: 73 |
Fidalgo, A. P. 1982: 101 |