Pseudopinarus Heller, 1906: 33
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.683.12080 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D7FD86CA-6374-480C-821B-A10C26CDDF32 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F6A7FCE6-9B6D-8D61-AA87-1C20CF0D71CA |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Pseudopinarus Heller, 1906: 33 |
status |
|
Pseudopinarus Heller, 1906: 33 Figs 4 View Figures 1–9 , 41 View Figures 37–45 , 72 View Figures 71–74
= Paralatychus Voss, 1947: 60 [Syn.: Wibmer and O’Brien 1986: 7]. Type species: Paralatychus conotracheloides Voss, 1947 [by original designation] (= Piazurus dentipennis Fiedler, 1936).
Type species.
Piazurus rana Heller, 1906 [by subsequent designation: Rheinheimer 2011: 76].
Gender.
Masculine.
Diagnosis.
As a subgenus of Piazurus , Pseudopinarus was separated from Piazurus s. str., along with the other subgenus, Pseudopiazurus , by Heller (1906) and Fiedler (1936) for having a second abdominal ventrite that is shorter in length than the third and fourth ventrites combined. Pseudopiazurus is easily distinguished from Pseudopiazurus in body shape, which is much more robust in Pseudopiazurus , but as a whole Pseudopinarus is the most difficult piazurine genus to characterize. Most species can be further distinguished from Pseudopiazurus by the presence of a ventral tooth on the profemora. Some Pseudopinarus have an arcuate carina on the vertex of the head (Fig. 41 View Figures 37–45 ) similar to the South American Piazolechriops and Hedycera . The eyes are generally smaller and more separate than in Pseudopiazurus , but can be large and subcontiguous (as in Fig. 41 View Figures 37–45 ). The structure of the mesoventrite varies as well, with some species bearing ventrally produced posterolateral tubercles (as in Pseudopiazurus ) and others with nearly a cup-shaped receptacle. Additionally, the relatively small mesepipleura and the procoxae with a mesal process differentiates some Pseudopinarus from most species of Piazurus and the single Central American species of Pseudopiazurus .
Keys .
Fiedler 1936: 29, Heller 1906: 34.
Phylogenetic relationships.
The species of Pseudopinarus that have the arcuate carina on the vertex of the head are very similar to the South American genera Piazolechriops and Hedycera than to other Central American genera. The only character given by Heller (1906) to separate Pseudopinarus from Piazolechriops is the shorter hind femur of Pseudopinarus , which do not, or only very slightly, extend beyond the apex of the abdomen. Pseudopinarus differs from Hedycera by the short antennal setae and the pronotum in dorsal view, which is not widest just before the apex. Other species of Pseudopinarus , e.g. P. cerastes (Fabricius, 1801), are more similar to smaller species of Piazurus (e.g. P. alternans ), raising the question of the monophyly of the genus and the validity of the shorter second abdominal ventrite as a character separating monophyletic groups from Piazurus .
Host associations.
Some species have been reared from branches of various genera of Lecythidaceae ( Fassbender et al. 2014). Pseudopinarus guyanensis has been reared from seeds of Gnetum L. ( Gnetaceae Blume) [ASUHIC0086636, STRI_ENT_0082031].
Described species.
Seven species are known from the focal region ( Wibmer and O’Brien 1986: 263 add P. guyanensis to the Central American fauna) and an additional 13 species are known only from South America ( Wibmer and O’Brien 1986: 262).
Range.
Mexico, Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama; South America.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Pseudopinarus Heller, 1906: 33
Anzaldo, Salvatore S. 2017 |
Paralatychus
Voss 1947 |
Paralatychus conotracheloides
Voss 1947 |
Piazurus dentipennis
Fiedler 1936 |