Hornestheria sp.

Scholze, Frank & Matamales-Andreu, Rafel, 2021, Triassic clam shrimps (“ Conchostraca ”; Branchiopoda: Diplostraca) from Mallorca: Taxonomic description and interregional comparisons, Zootaxa 4964 (3), pp. 471-496 : 476

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4964.3.3

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B31AA81E-5462-4B4A-A686-B9C21890347C

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4741191

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FA0BD96D-E331-FFF8-FF32-0367B02CCF24

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Hornestheria sp.
status

 

Hornestheria sp. aff. Hornestheria sollingensis Kozur et Lepper (in Kozur & Weems 2010)

( Figures 2–7 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 )

Material. DA21/03/02/58, DA21/03/02/68, DA21/03/02/72, DA21/03/02/75, DA21/03/02/77, DA21/03/02/78, DA21/03/02/80, DA21/03/02/81.

Description. Carapace valve medium-sized to large, elongated-oval to oval shape; dorsal margin straight, short to long; larval carapace valve very small; umbo located submedial and marginal to inframarginal; anterior and posterior margins sharply curved to very sharply curved; points of maximum curvature along the anterior and posterior margins located in the median-dorsal to median-ventral region, and along the ventral margin in the median to median-posterior region; ornaments fine, indistinct or irregularly reticulated.

Size. Height (H) of the carapace valve between 1.6–3.9 mm; length (L) of the valve between 2.5–3.9 mm; 0.57<H/L<0.7; dorsal margin length (l) between 1.8–2.3 mm; 0.51<l/L<0.70; larval carapace valve height (h) between 0.1–0.5 mm; 0.04<h/H<0.19; up to 20 growth lines; all measurements based on 8 valves.

Occurrence. Pedra Alta site; upper part of Unit B; lower Anisian (lower Middle Triassic), dated as Aegean by Diez et al. (2010).

Remarks. H.W. Kozur and J. Lepper (in Kozur & Weems 2010) first defined Hornestheria sollingensis as a new species, providing the following parameters: total carapace valve length between 3.0– 3.8 mm, total height between 1.95–2.85 mm, length/height ratio values between 1.3–1.66 ( Kozur & Weems 2010). The morphotype of the specimens in the present study identified as Hornestheria sp. aff. H. sollingensis ( Figures 2–6 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 ) differ from H. sollingensis Kozur et Lepper in their larger size and wider range of the height/length ratio values. Additionally, the larval carapace valve (=“free umbonal area” in Kozur & Weems 2010: p. 397) of H. sollingensis is smaller than that of Hornestheria sp. aff. H. sollingensis . In accordance to the general description of the genus Hornestheria by Kozur & Weems (2010), the presence of a radial element on the larval carapace valve of Hornestheria sp. aff. H. sollingensis cannot be clearly observed, except for two individuals (collection numbers DA21/03/02/80, DA21/03/02/81; Figure 2B–E View FIGURE 2 ). Problematically, in most specimens the small larval carapace valve seems to be poorly preserved and the umbonal area has been almost without exception affected by deformation (i.e., sedimentary compaction). Generally, large sample sets, preferably including layers of mass occurrence (see Figure 2A View FIGURE 2 ), need to be analysed in order to better understand the full spectrum of preservation variability found in specimens attributable to Hornestheria .

When the radial sculpture cannot be clearly seen on the larval carapace valves, both H. sollingensis Kozur et Lepper (in Kozur & Weems 2010) and Hornestheria sp. aff. H. sollingensis (the present study) are morphologically reminiscent of both Euestheria albertii albertii (in the sense of Kozur et al. 1993; formerly designated as “ Isaura minuta albertii ( Voltz, 1835) ” by Reible 1962) and Euestheria albertii mahlerselli Kozur et Lepper (in Kozur & Weems 2010). By comparison with the literature, E. albertii albertii (figured by Kozur et al. 1993: figs. 3.1–3.2) shows a more rounded shape, whereas E. albertii mahlerselli (figured by Kozur et al. 1993: figs. 3.4, 3.6; for references to further figures see the synonymy list in Kozur & Weems 2010: p. 391) shows a more elongated shape than Hornestheria sp. aff. H. sollingensis . Additionally, E. albertii albertii and E. albertii mahlerselli have the strongest carapace valve convexity in the umbonal area, whereas in Hornestheria sp. aff. H. sollingensis it is more or less at the centre of the carapace valve.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF