Telaprocera, Harmer & Framenau, 2008
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1956.1.2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5242466 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FA57879D-FFCA-9454-D499-27A09F986DDF |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Telaprocera |
status |
gen. nov. |
Telaprocera View in CoL View at ENA gen. nov.
Type species. Telaprocera maudae View in CoL sp. nov., designated here.
Etymology. The genus name Telaprocera is formed by joining the Latin words tela, meaning web, and procerus, meaning long or tall. This name describes the remarkable elongated web built by the two species within this genus. The gender is feminine.
Diagnosis. Telaprocera gen. nov. shares with the Argiopinae ( Argiope , Gea and Neogea ) the procurved row of the posterior eyes, although the degree of this curvature ranges from almost straight to noticeably procurved ( Figs 18, 20 View FIGURES 18–21 , 28, 30 View FIGURES 28–31 ). A distinct, heavily sclerotised dorsal ‘keel’ on the cymbium of the male pedipalp serves as a putative synapomorphy of the genus and differentiates Telaprocera gen. nov. from all other currently known genera within the Argiopinae (and other Araneidae ) ( Figs 5 View FIGURES 4–9 , 23 View FIGURES 22–26 , 33 View FIGURES 32–36 ). Males also differ from the Argiopinae by the presence of a distinct terminal apophysis ( Figs 4, 7, 9 View FIGURES 4–9 , 22, 23 View FIGURES 22–26 , 32, 33 View FIGURES 32–36 ). Females differ from the Argiopinae in the presence of a scape, although it is very simple, short, and poorly differentiated ( Figs 10, 11 View FIGURES 10–15 , 24, 25 View FIGURES 22–26 , 35 View FIGURES 32–36 ). In addition, the epigynes lack the transverse rim and lateral depressions of the Argiopinae. In contrast to all other argiopine spiders, which build circular, often decorated, orb-webs, Telaprocera gen. nov. build elongated ladder-webs without decorations ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ).
Description. Small to medium sized araneids (TL 3.5–7), males of similar size as females but with comparatively longer legs and narrower abdomens ( Figs 18–21 View FIGURES 18–21 , 28–31 View FIGURES 28–31 ). Carapace moderately domed, pearshaped in dorsal view, and slightly longer than wide; moderately hirsute, particularly around eye region. AE row straight, PE row almost straight to distinctly procurved ( Figs 18, 20 View FIGURES 18–21 , 28, 30 View FIGURES 28–31 ). Clypeus less than or equal to the diameter of AME. AME larger than PME, PLE larger than ALE. Median ocular area narrower posteriorly than anteriorly. PME with centralised canoe-shaped tapetum. Abdomen in dorsal view approximately round, more tapered posteriorly in T. joanae sp. nov. ( Figs 18, 20 View FIGURES 18–21 , 28, 30 View FIGURES 28–31 ). Distinct white dorsolateral humeral projections ( T. joanae sp. nov.) or white unraised dorsolateral patches may be present ( T. maudae sp. nov.) ( Figs 18, 20 View FIGURES 18–21 , 28, 30 View FIGURES 28–31 ). Tibiae I and II with short, very stout spines, arranged linearly in T. maudae sp. nov. Male T. maudae sp. nov. tibiae II with fewer spines. Leg formula I> II> IV> III.
Male pedipalp patellae with one long macroseta. Cymbium of pedipalp with dorsal keel adjacent to paracymbium ( Figs 5 View FIGURES 4–9 , 23 View FIGURES 22–26 , 33 View FIGURES 32–36 ). Median apophysis smooth without prongs, flagella, spurs, serrations or other modifications, comparatively smaller in T. joanae sp. nov. ( Figs 4, 7 View FIGURES 4–9 , 22 View FIGURES 22–26 , 32 View FIGURES 32–36 ). Conductor with lobes of variable shape. Embolic division highly variable between both species, simple in T. maudae sp. nov. ( Figs 4 View FIGURES 4–9 , 22 View FIGURES 22–26 ), but with basoembolic apophysis and digitiform process in T. joanae sp. nov. ( Figs 7 View FIGURES 4–9 , 32, 33 View FIGURES 32–36 ).
Epigyne heavily sclerotised, as wide as long in T. maudae sp. nov. ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 22–26 ) or wider than long in T. joanae sp. nov. ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 32–36 ). Scape not well differentiated, forming a blunt, posterior protrusion. Extreme distal portion of scape tapered and folded either anteriorly or posteriorly ( Figs 10, 11 View FIGURES 10–15 , 24, 25 View FIGURES 22–26 , 35 View FIGURES 32–36 ). Spermathecae globular, copulatory ducts short ( Figs 26 View FIGURES 22–26 , 36 View FIGURES 32–36 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.