Typhlocarcinus kerala, Ng, Peter K. L., Devi, Suvarna & Kumar, Appukuttannair Biju, 2017
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4272.1.7 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5B053AE7-4871-4E79-9FCA-F0D71FC64078 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6034996 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FC4987B1-F20F-FFE5-E38C-AA8955CA04CB |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Typhlocarcinus kerala |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Typhlocarcinus kerala View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs. 3–6 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 , 7 View FIGURE 7 D–I)
Material examined. Holotype: male (17.0 × 11.4 mm) (ZSI/ WGRC /IR-INV 8237) off Kerala coast, Kollam port, Thiruvananthapuram , Kerala , India, from trawls, coll. A.B. Kumar, 22 February 2013. Paratypes: 2 males (19.4 × 14.0 mm, 18.3 × 13.0 mm) , 2 females (19.6 × 13.0 mm, 13.2 × 9.0 mm) (DABFUK), same data as holotype.
Diagnosis. Carapace transversely subovate, male width 1.38–1.51 times length, female width 1.51 times length; dorsal surfaces smooth, covered with short pubescence on surface, with longer plumose setae on lateral and frontal margins, regions demarcated, H-shaped gastric and cardiac grooves deep, distinct, surface adjacent appears crenulated in adults; anterolateral margin strongly convex, lined with small granules, appears entire throughout length, granules at junction with posterolateral margin appear separated by very short groove but no clear tooth visible; posterolateral margins subparallel, straight, margin and surface evenly covered with small rounded granules ( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 A–D, 4A–D). Frontal margin deflexed downwards, barely visible from dorsal view; bilobed with distinct median cleft, margin of each lobe distinctly convex ( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 D, 4A–D). Orbit ovate; eyes small, with stout peduncle, small cornea, fused to carapace, immovable in male, mobile in female, tip with small spot of pigment ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 A–C). Posterior margin of epistome gently convex, not clearly divided into lobes ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 D). Outer surface of ischium, merus and exopod of third maxilliped with numerous small granules; anteroexternal angle of merus rounded; exopod slender ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 D). Chelipeds stout, inner angle of carpus with low or sharp granules; margins of carpus and merus with numerous granules and dense setae; chela stout, dorsal and ventral margins with numerous rounded granules and dense setae; cutting edges of propodal finger with prominent broad teeth ( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 A–C, 4E, F, 5D, E). Ambulatory legs moderately short; propodus of last leg relatively short; dactylus of last leg straight from dorsal view, slightly curved on mesial view ( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 B, C, 5A–C). Male pleonal locking tubercle peg-like, near anterior edge of sternite 5. Male pleon relatively narrow, telson triangular ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 A). Female pleon ovate; telson broadly triangular ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 D). G1 distinctly sinuous, distal part slender, curved, tapering to rounded tip ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 E–H). Vulva relatively large, ovate ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 F).
Variation. The carapace proportions of the five specimens vary rather substantially. The holotype male has a width to length ratio of 1.49, which is similar to that of two paratype females (1.46 and 1.51). The two paratype males (both larger than the holotype) are distinctly less broad, with a width to length ratio of 1.38 and 1.41, respectively. They, however, agree in all other characters, with the two males possessing the same structures of the front, anterolateral margin, pleon and G1. As such, we are confident they are conspecific. The H-shaped gastric and cardiac grooves are deep in the adult specimens but in the smallest female (13.2 × 9.0 mm) which is still subadult, these grooves are relatively shallower and less distinct. The condition of the eyes has been described as fused in many rhizopines but it is not easy to determine the condition in some. In T. kerala sp. nov., the eyes are immovable in one paratype male (18.3´13.0 mm) but slightly mobile in the holotype and other paratypes, and we are not sure if its due to the preservation as the specimens had been preserved in formalin which has made the carapaces relatively softer. The tip of the cornea, however, appears to have a tiny spot of pigment in all the specimens. Colour. In life, the carapace and appendages are white, with the fine pubescence and setae light brown. Etymology. The species is named after the state of Kerala in India. The name is used as a noun in apposition. Remarks. The specimens collected were light brown and covered with a fine brown sediment; suggesting that like many rhizopines, they are luteophilous in habits, i.e. living in mud and fine sediment, with the waters usually turbid (see Ng 1987b, 1990).
See General Discussion for taxonomic comments.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.