Nischk & Otte, 2000 : 242 Paragryllus ( Aclogryllus ) crybelos Gorochov, 2009 : 575 Paragryllina Aclogryllus crybelos ( Nischk & Otte, 2000 ) Silvastella epiplatys ( Nischk & Otte, 2000 ) Paragryllina Aclogryllus Aclogryllus Paragryllus Aclogryllus Paragryllus A new status for Aclogryllus Gorochov, 2009 (Phalangopsidae; Phalangopsinae; Paragryllini) with a new species from Brazilian Amazon Silva, Lúciene Gimaque Da Martins, Luciano De Pinho Pereira, Marcelo Ribeiro Henriques, Augusto Loureiro Zootaxa 2018 2018-06-11 4433 1 101 110 8PWJP (Nischk & Otte, 2000) Silva & Martins & Pereira & Henriques 2018 Nischk & Otte 2000 [151,677,151,178] Insecta Phalangopsidae Aclogryllus GBIF Animalia Orthoptera 2 103 Arthropoda species crybelos comb. nov.  http://lsid.speciesfile.org/urn:lsid: Orthoptera.speciesfile.org:TaxonName:501200     Paragryllus crybelos  Nischk & Otte, 2000: 242; figs. 10, 34–37; table 7.    Paragryllus( Aclogryllus) crybelos;  Gorochov, 2009: 575; figs. 4(4–6), 5(4); Cigliano et al. (2017)(online database).  Additional information to the original description.Male genitalia ( Fig. 2): median epiphallic bridge (ep.b) short, four times wider than longer and with median portion of posterior margin showing a central notch ( Fig. 2A, D). Hind lateral lobe of median epiphallic bridge (ep.l) with one thin projection, in dorsal and ventral views ( Fig. 2A, B, D, E: *ph), and sub-rounded in lateral view ( Fig. 2C: *ph). Guiding rod (g) with rounded apex, in dorsal and ventral views ( Fig. 2A, B, D, E). Lateral epiphallic arm (ep.a) with external margin inward curved in its posterior third, in ventral and dorsal views ( Fig. 2A, B, D, E); presence of one finger-shaped projection posteriorly directed in apex of lateral epiphallic arm ( Fig. 2A–F: *ap = apical projection of the lateral epiphallic arm); subapical projection (*sp) triangular-shaped with acuminate apex at the inner margin of the lateral epiphallic arm (ep.a), in ventral view ( Fig. 2B, E: *sp). Endoparameral apodeme (en.a) dorsally curved, in lateral view ( Fig. 2C, F).   Geographic records.Ecuador: San Pablo de Kantesiya, Province Sucumbíos (0°15’S, 76°27’W) ( Nischk & Otte, 2000) and Eastern Plain, near the Lake “Lago Grande” on the river “Rio Cuyabeno” ( Gorochov, 2009).   Comments.Species of  Paragryllusand  Aclogrylluspresent very similar habitat and habitus. In both genera, the specimens are inhabitants of tree trunks and are rarely found in the ground ( Desutter-Grandcolas, 1992; Nischk & Otte, 2000; Gorochov, 2007). These characteristics were observed in all Paragryllinagenera:  Aclogryllus  n. stat.;  BenoistellaUvarov, 1939;  Bolivacla Gorochov, 2014;  ParagryllusDesutter, 1988;  RumeaDesutter, 1988and  Silvastella Desutter-Grandcolas, 1992( Desutter-Grandcolas, 1992; Nischk & Otte, 2000; Gorochov, 2014). With the exception of  Benoistellaand  Bolivacla, all other genera of Paragryllinaare found in Manaus municipality,  A. manauensis  n. sp. typelocality.   Paragryllinacomprise 24 species, of which only  Aclogryllus crybelos( Nischk & Otte, 2000)  n. comb.and  Silvastella epiplatys( Nischk & Otte, 2000)have had their calling songs described. Two factors make it difficult to record the calling songs of Paragryllinaspecies. The first is related to the tree stratum occupied during stridulation, which is usually> 3mabove the ground and sometimes in treetops ( Nischk & Otte, 2000; personal observation of second author). The second refers to the difficulty of obtaining stridulations from these individuals in the laboratory, which may be associated to conditions intrinsic to their stridulatory habitat that are difficult to simulate in captivity (personal observation of second author). In this work we proposed to raise  Aclogryllusto genus status based on characteristics of external morphology and male genitalia.  Aclogryllus  n. stat.has a simple supra-anal plate, without evident specializations ( Fig. 4H), while  Paragrylluspresents one pair of fine structures surpassing the tip of abdomen (see Desutter-Grandcolas, 1992: fig. 68). This structure is characterized as “appendices abdominaux” by Guérin-Méneville (1844), “lamelles dorsales” in Desutter-Grandcolas (1992)and “thin and long processes” by Gorochov (2007; 2009). Another useful external characteristic for distinguishing these genera is the condition of first internal apical spur of tibia III. In  Aclogryllus  n. stat., this spur is rather narrow ( Fig. 1Fand 4G, black arrow), being strongly swollen in  Paragryllus(see Desutter-Grandcolas, 1992: fig. 69; Gorochov, 2009).  Other conspicuous differences are found in the male genitalia.  Aclogryllus  n. stat.has a very long guiding rod and lateral epiphallic arms, as well as short endoparameral apodemes. Additionally, the endoparameral apodemes are shorter than the lateral epiphallic arms and in  Paragryllusthe reverse occurs.