Sciades Bagrus (Sciades) emphysetus Bagrus Hexanematichthys Bagrus sondaicus Sciadeichthys Bagrus (Sciades) emphysetus Selenaspis Silurus herzbergii Ariopsis Arius milberti Leptarius Leptarius dowii Systematics of the family Ariidae (Ostariophysi, Siluriformes), with a redefinition of the genera. Alexandre P. Marceniuk Naércio A. Menezes Zootaxa 2007 1416 1 126 Insecta Cerambycidae Sciades Animalia Coleoptera 102 Arthropoda genus  (fig. 89)   Sciades Mueller& Troschel, 1849: 6. Type species: Bagrus (Sciades) emphysetus Mueller& Troschel, 1849. Type by subsequent designation. Type apparently designated first by Bleeker 1862: 8 (subgenus of Bagrus). Gender: masculine.   HexanematichthysBleeker, 1858: 61, 126. Type species: Bagrus sondaicusValenciennes, 1840. Type by monotypy. Gender: masculine.  SciadeichthysBleeker, 1858: 62, 66. Type species: Bagrus (Sciades) emphysetus Mueller& Troschel, 1849. Type by monotypy. Gender: masculine.  SelenaspisBleeker, 1858: 62. Type species: Silurus herzbergiiBloch, 1794. Type by subsequent designation by Jordan & Evermann (1896: 119). Gender: feminine.  AriopsisGill, 1861: 56. Type species: Arius milbertiValenciennes, 1840. Type by monotypy. Gender: feminine.  LeptariusGill, 1863: 170. Type species: Leptarius dowiiGill, 1863. Type by monotypy. Gender: masculine.   FIGURE 89. Sciades emphysetus, USNM 215204, 193 mm TL. Lateral view.  Diagnosis. The species of Sciadescan be differentiated from all other genera of the Ariidaeby the combination of the following exclusive (1 to 5) and shared (6 to 8) characters: (1) medial groove of neurocranium delimited mostly or exclusively by frontal bones (fig. 90); (2) temporal fossa very reduced or entirely closed during ontogenetic development (fig. 90) (with exception of Sciades leptaspis); (3) otic capsules little developed; (4) space between transcapular process and otic capsule very wide; (5) subvertebral process indistinct or little differentiated; (6) posterior cranial fontanel absent (fig. 90) (with exception of Sciades platypogonand shared with Batrachocephalus); (7) epiphyseal bar indistinct (with exception of Sciades platypogonand shared with Batrachocephalus); (8) exoccipital posterior process sutured to Muller’s ramus (with exception of Sciades platypogonand shared with Potamarius izabalensis). Supplementary morphological characters. Cephalic shield conspicuously granulated visible under the skin; lateral ethmoid and frontal limiting a small fenestra not visible under the skin; medial groove of neurocranium limited by frontal bones and/or on supraoccipital distinct or not very distinct; posterior cranial fontanel always closed (except in S. platypogon); fenestra limited by supraoccipital, pterotic and sphenotic absent; fossa limited by pterotic, supracleithrum and extrascapular absent (except in S. leptaspis); epioccipital not invading dorsal portion of cephalic shield; occipital process triangular, its length and width variable, progressively narrower toward its posterior part; anterior and median nuchal plates fused and indistinct, forming a structure of semi-lunar aspect or broad in form of shield; tooth plates associated with vomer round; accessory tooth plates large, oval shaped or subtriangular, bearing conical teeth; maxillary barbel fleshy and cylindrical; two pairs of mental barbels; base of adipose fin moderately long, about half as long as anal-fin base; lateral line not bifurcated at caudal region, reaching caudal-fin upper lobe (with exception of S. couma); cleithrum wide, with second process on its upper portion; posterior cleithral process moderately long and distinct from dorsal process of cleithrum.  Remarks. Sciadescontains the largest number of ariid species from the eastern and western Americas, south and southeast Asia, southern New Guinea and northern Australia. The nominal genera Hexanematichthys , Selenaspisand Ariopsisrepresented by the respective type-species Pimelodus sagorHamilton, 1822, Silurus herzbergiiBloch, 1794 and Arius milbertiValenciennes, 1840 (= Silurus felisLinnaeus, 1766), are considered junior synonyms of Sciades. The genus Sciadesand Sciadeichthysare based on the same type-species, Bagrus (Sciades) emphysetus Mueller& Troschel, 1849 and the latter is considered an objective synonym of the former. The osteology of Leptarius dowiiGill, 1863, the type-species of Leptarius, was not examined but morphological information from preserved specimens indicates that this genus is junior synonym of Sciades. In addition to S. mastersi(Ogilby, 1898), S. paucus(Kailola, 2000) and S. utarus(Kailola, 1990) were considered to belong in the genus based on the presence of external diagnostic morphological characters available in the literature. The inclusion of S. sona(Hamilton, 1822) is only tentative. The species Sciades couma(Valenciennes, 1840), S. emphysetus, S. herzbergii, S. passany(Valenciennes, 1840) and S. proops(Valenciennes, 1840), form a subgroup well supported by the following exclusive characters, indicating that they might be considered a separate genus in future studies: lateral margin of premaxillary with a conspicuous concavity; mesopterygoid irregularly shaped (fig. 91); ectopterygoid very elongated (fig. 91); posterior nostrils connected by a groove (with exception of S. emphysetusand S. proops).  Distribution and habitat. Eastern and western America, south and southeast Asia, southern New Guinea and northern Australia.