Dactylorhiza umbrosa (Kar. & Kir.) Nevski, 1937

Kubentayev, Serik A., Efimov, Petr G., Alibekov, Daniyar T., Kupriyanov, Andrey N., Izbastina, Klara S., Khalymbetova, Aizhan E. & Perezhogin, Yuri V., 2023, Review of Orchidaceae of the northern part of Kazakhstan, PhytoKeys 229, pp. 185-213 : 185

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.229.105457

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4473B460-9C46-5BAC-B4C2-A324CD8902F9

treatment provided by

PhytoKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Dactylorhiza umbrosa (Kar. & Kir.) Nevski
status

 

Dactylorhiza umbrosa (Kar. & Kir.) Nevski View in CoL View at ENA

Distribution in adjacent reg.

Russia (Siberia), Kazakhstan (Altai, Western Tien Shan, Balkhash-Alakol Basin, Turanskaya lowlands).

Specimens examined and literature records.

Kokchetav: Akmola Region: Burabay District : near the Mirnaya Dolina cordon, the shore of Karabulak Stream , 25 Jun 1937, Sobolev s.n.. (AA!). Tobol-Ishim: Kostanay Region: Naurzum District : Nauryzym-Karagay Mountains , 20 May 1909, Savich and Kucherovskaya 649 (LE!); “Naurzum” State Nature Reserve , 4 Jun 1938, Siu s.n.. (MW 0816881!). Mugodzhary: Aktobe Region: Shalkar District : near Ber-Chogur, 10 Jun 1927, Rusanov s.n. (AA!); northwest of Ber-Chogur , on the road to Mugodzharsk, 25 Jun 1927, Krasheninnikov s.n. . (AA!). Western Upland : Karaganda Region: Zhanaarka District : Sarysu River Valley , “Kara-Agach” place, 13 Jun 1949, Goloskokov s.n.. (AA!). Eastern Upland : East Kazakhstan Region: Ayagoz District : Chingizstau, upper reaches of Kalguta River , 17 Jun 1958, Gamayunov s.n.. (AA!) .

Habitat and ecology.

Valleys of rivers and streams, along the damp edges of birch and aspen forests, through swamps, salt marshes, wet meadows, in the lowlands amongst birch thickets.

Phenology.

Flowering in Jun-Jul; fruiting in Aug-Sep.

Conservation status.

Not protected.

Notes.

Aipeisova (2012, 2013) reported D. majalis . for Mugodzhary (near Ber-Chogur and Mount Boktybai). Although corresponding herbarium specimens were not located, we believe that this report is an obvious mistake. It is more likely that the plants were D. umbrosa , as we found herbarium materials collected from the same place (near Ber-Chogur, 10 Jun 1927, Rusanov s.n. (AA!)). We consider D. umbrosa and D. salina to be closely-related species and determining plants with certainty can sometimes be challenging.