Eardasaurus powelli, Ketchum & Benson, 2022

Ketchum, Hilary F. & Benson, Roger B. J., 2022, A new pliosaurid from the Oxford Clay Formation of Oxfordshire, UK, Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 67 (2), pp. 297-315 : 299-312

Eardasaurus powelli sp. nov.

Figs. 1–13 .

ZooBank LCID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:E8E70687-2F84-4875-BDE8-820EB5D05A7E

Etymology: After H. Philip Powell, former Assistant Curator at the Oxford University Museum of Natural History.

Holotype: OUMNH PAL-J.2247; well-preserved, partially complete skeleton ( Fig. 1 ).

Type locality: Gravel pit near Yarnton, Oxfordshire, UK. National Grid Reference SP 479 108; latitude (decimal) 51.7938, longitude (decimal) -1.3069.

Type horizon: Kosmoceras jason Zone , Peterborough Member, Oxford Clay Formation, Ancholme Group, middle Callovian, Middle Jurassic.

Diagnosis.— Longirostrine pliosaurid with the following autapomorphies: (i) maxilla with a very high number of alveoli (34 or 35); (ii) jugal with “fluted” ornamentation along the orbital margin; (iii) step-like contact between the jugal and squamosal; (iv) “lacrimal” (neomorphic ossification in the anteroventral orbit margin of pliosaurids) dorsoventrally slen- der with a posterior rod-like projection. Eardasarus powelli gen. et sp. nov. can also be differentiated from other pliosaurids by the following combination of characters: (i) pattern of enamel ridges on larger (i.e., mesial) teeth similar to those of Peloneustes philarchus ( Seeley, 1869) (and different to other Oxford Clay Formation pliosaurids; Tarlo 1960), including relatively few enamel ridges on the convex (labial) tooth surface and most ridges terminate far short of tooth apex, except for a small number of “carina-like” apicobasal enamel ridges on each tooth; (ii) five-six premaxillary teeth; (iii) prominent mediolateral constriction of rostrum at premaxilla–maxilla suture, similar to most Middle Jurassic pliosaurids by only weakly developed in Marmornectes candrewi Ketchum and Benson, 2011a , and “ Pliosaurus ” andrewsi Tarlo, 1960; (iv) diastema between premaxillary and maxillary dentitions, similar to Liopleurodon ferox Sauvage, 1873 , but differing from other Middle Jurassic pliosaurids Marmornectes candrewi , Peloneustes philarchus , and “ Pliosaurus ” andrewsi; (v) maxilla excluded from medial margin of external naris by an anterior extension of the frontal, differing from other Middle Jurassic pliosaurids; (vi) frontal extends anterior to the external naris, excluding the maxilla from the medial margin, differing from Simolestes vorax Andrews, 1909 , and Liopleurodon ferox (among Middle Jurassic pliosaurids) in which the frontal does not extend as far anteriorly; (vii) proportionally elongate posterior interpterygoid vacuities compared to other Middle Jurassic pliosaurids, especially “ Pliosaurus ” andrewsi; (viii) mediolaterally expanded mandibular symphysis; (ix) nine pairs of dentary teeth adjacent to the mandibular symphysis, a relatively small count compared to other longirostrine Middle Jurassic pliosaurids (e.g., 13–15 symphysial alveoli in Peloneustes philarchus ; 12 in Marmornectes candrewi ) except for “ Pliosaurus ” andrewsi (11 symphysial alveoli); (x) splenial encloses the posterior margin of the anterior opening of Meckel’s canal (rather than being limited to the ventral margin as in most other pliosaurids); (xi) coronoid exposed on the lateral surface of the mandible; (xii) strongly convex medial expansion of the surangular in dorsal view; characters (xi) and (xii) are unlike in most pliosaurids except for NHMUK PV R2443

referred to “ Pliosaurus ” andrewsi by Tarlo 1960, but considered of uncertain taxonomic status herein); (xiii) proportionally short atlas-axis complex due to anteroposterior shortening of the axial centrum, similar to Liopleurodon ferox and Simolestes vorax but differing from the proportionally long atlas-axis complex of other Middle Jurassic pliosaurids, including Marmornectes candrewi , Peloneustes philarchus , “ Pliosaurus ” andrewsi, and the holotype of

Peloneustes ” evansi ( Seeley, 1869) (referred to Peloneustes philarchus by Tarlo [1960]), but considered of uncertain taxonomic status herein); (xiv) cervical centra with midline ventral ridges, shared only with Peloneustes philarchus and the holotype of “ Peloneustes ” evansi among Middle Jurassic pliosaurids; (xv) cervical neural spines with mediolaterally narrow cross-sections and only weak mediolateral expansion at their dorsal tips, similar to Peloneustes philarchus and Liopleurodon ferox , but differing from other Middle Jurassic pliosaurids including the holotype of “ Peloneustes ” evansi; (xvi) proportionally short epipodials, similar to those of “ Pliosaurus ” andrewsi and Marmornectes , but differing from other Middle Jurassic pliosaurids, including NHMUK PV R 2443.

Description.— Cranium: The skull of Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. measures 890 mm along the dorsal midline, with a pre-orbital portion 485 mm long, thus comprising 54 % of skull length ( Figs. 2 , 3 ). This is similar to the proportional snout length of Liopleurodon ferox (55% in NHMUK PV R2680) and longer than in Simolestes vorax (50%; Andrews 1913), but is shorter than the more longirostrine Middle Jurassic forms Peloneustes philarchus and “ Pliosaurus ” andrewsi (approximately 58–59%; Ketchum and Benson 2011b; NHMUK PV R3891). The posterior two-thirds of the cranium were preserved in a septarian concretion, which was partially removed using a combination of acid and manual preparation (H. Philip Powell and Juliet Hay, personal communication 2020 to HFK). The bone in this region is highly fragmented, with numerous areas of broken bone and coloured filler, making many sutures unclear. By comparison, the snout, which was outside of the concretion, is relatively well preserved, although it has been slightly crushed near the tip ( Fig. 4 ).

Premaxilla: The conjoined premaxillae form the anterior portion of the rostrum ( Fig. 4 ). They contact the maxillae laterally, the parietals posteromedially, and the frontals posterolaterally (in the region of the external naris and more posteriorly) ( Figs. 2 , 3 ). Anteriorly, the lateral and dorsal surfaces of the premaxillae bear numerous neurovascular foramina with diameters of 2–4 mm ( Fig. 4 ). The right premaxilla contains five alveoli, whereas the left contains six ( Figs. 4 , 5 ). Five or six premaxillary alveoli are also present in all other pliosaurids from the Oxford Clay Formation ( Andrews 1913; six are present in Peloneustes philarchus , Marmornectes candrewi , and “ Pliosaurus ” andrewsi; Ketchum and Benson 2011a, b, and five in Liopleurodon ferox , and possibly Simolestes vorax ). Five or six premaxillary alveoli are also present among species of Pliosaurus ( Tarlo 1960; Knutsen et al. 2012; Benson et al. 2013; O’Gorman et al. 2018). By contrast, seven premaxillary alveoli are present in species of the early pliosaurid Hauffiosaurus ( Benson et al. 2011; Vincent 2011)and the early brachauchenine Luskhan itilensis Fischer, Benson, Zverkov, Soul, Arkhangelsky, Lambert, Stenshin, Uspensky, and Druckenmiller, 2017 ( Fischer et al. 2017), whereas four are present in Brachauchenius lucasi Williston, 1903 ( Williston 1907), Megacephalosaurus eulerti Schumacher, Carpenter, and Everhart, 2013 ( Schumacher et al. 2013), Acostasaurus pavachoquensis Gómez-Pérez and Noè, 2017 ( Gómez-Pérez and Noè 2017), Sachicasaurus vitae Páramo-Fonseca, Benavides-Cabra, and Gutiérrez, 2018 ( Páramo-Fonseca et al. 2018), and Stenorhynchosaurus munozi Páramo-Fonseca, Gómez-Pérez, Noè, and Etayo-Serna, 2016 ( Páramo-Fonseca et al. 2019).

The premaxillary teeth of Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. are anisodont, and the penultimate premaxillary alveolus is the largest ( Fig. 4 ). The mesialmost and distalmost alveoli are small compared to adjacent alveoli. However, the mesialmost alveolus is not as substantially reduced as in most species of Pliosaurus ( Benson et al. 2013; Benson and Druckenmiller 2014; O’Gorman et al. 2018), in which is it reduced to less than half the diameter of the largest alveolus. The interdental spaces are relatively narrow, as in most other pliosaurids, with maximum lengths of less than half of one alveolar diameter. This differs from the condition in Marmornectes candrewi ( Ketchum and Benson 2011b) and Luskhan itilensis ( Fischer et al. 2017) in which the alveoli are more widely spaced. The rugose, triangular paradental plates are bounded medially by a groove for the replacement pits ( Fig. 4 ), positioned at the level of the interalveolar walls.

The premaxilla contacts the maxilla at an interdigitating suture that is present within a diastema between the distalmost premaxillary alveolus and the mesialmost maxillary alveolus ( Fig. 4 ). This region is also marked by a prominent mediolateral constriction of the snout, which is clearly evident in dorsal view and which is widespread among Jurassic pliosaurids (e.g., Andrews 1913; O’Keefe 2001), but is weak or absent in is weak or absent in species of Hauffiosaurus , Marmornectes candrewi , and “ Pliosaurus ” andrewsi ( Ketchum and Benson 2011a; Benson et al. 2011; Vincent 2011; NHMUK PV R3891, Andrews 1913). The length of the diastema exceeds (on the right) or is similar to (on the left) that of the largest maxillary alveolus, and the presence of this diastema differs from the condition in most other Middle Jurassic pliosaurids except for Liopleurodon ferox ( Andrews 1913; i.e., the diastema is absent in Marmornectes candrewi , Peloneustes philarchus , and “ Pliosaurus ” andrewsi; Ketchum and Benson 2011a, b; NHMUK PV R3891; the condition is not determined in Simolestes vorax ). The premaxilla/maxilla suture extends dorsally, then posterodorsally along the lateral surface of the snout, forming the medial margin of the posteromedian process of the premaxilla. The median contact between the premaxillae on the ventral surface of the skull extends from the anterior tip of the snout posteriorly, up to the level of the third/fourth premaxillary alveolus. In the posterior half of this contact, the ventral surface of the premaxilla bears a posterolaterally oriented, rugose ridge. Together, these ridges on the right and left premaxillae form a V-shaped notch that accommodates the anterior end of the vomer.

The median contact between the premaxillae on the dorsal surface of the skull is approximately straight, with some limited sinuosity in the region anterior to the rostral constriction ( Figs. 2–4 ). Just posterior to this, a mediolaterally narrow, slit-like median opening 38 mm long interrupts the suture. This opening is surrounded by an irregular, raised region marked by fine-scale rugosity and so appears to be pathological ( Fig. 4 ). A similar opening is absent in other pliosaurids, but is present in some rhomaleosaurids, in which it is generally larger and more well-defined (e.g., Smith and Dyke 2008; Smith and Benson 2014). The posteromedian process of the premaxilla extends posteriorly to approximately the level of the anterior margin of the orbit, where it contacts the parietal in an interdigitating suture that is somewhat obscured by fragmentation of the bone surface. This morphology is similar to that seen in many other thalassophoneans, including Peloneustes philarchus ( Ketchum and Benson 2011b) and some species of Pliosaurus ( Benson et al. 2013) . It is unlike the situation in Acostasaurus pavachoquensis , Pliosaurus westburyensis Benson, Evans, Smith, Sassoon, Moore-Fay, Ketchum, and Forrest, 2013 , and Simolestes vorax in which the premaxilla extends further posteriorly to around orbital midlength ( Andrews 1913; Taylor and Cruickshank 1993; Gómez-Pérez and Noè 2017), and unlike the condition in some brachauchenines such as Luskhan itilensis and Megacephalosaurus eulerti in which the premaxilla terminates further anterior to the orbit Schumacher et al. 2013; Fischer et al. 2017).

Maxilla: The maxillae form the lateral portions of the snout, including the central and posterior parts of the tooth row ( Figs. 2–5 ). The right maxilla bears 34 or 35 alveoli, and the less complete left maxilla likely bore a similar number only 30 are preserved but the posterior portion is missing). This is a high number compared to that in other pliosaurids, including early-diverging taxa such as Hauffiosaurus zanoni O’Keefe, 2001 (29; Vincent 2011) and Peloneustes philarchus (30–31; Ketchum and Benson 2011b), and especially in more derived forms such as “ Pliosaurus ” andrewsi (22; NHMUK PV R3891) Liopleurodon ferox (20; Andrews 1913), species of Pliosaurus (20–27; Knutsen 2012; Benson et al. 2013) and brachauchenines (e.g., 18–19 in Megacephalosaurus eulerti ; Schumacher et al. 2013); although the Early Cretaceous brachaucheninine Stenorhynchosaurus munozi has 28–30 ( Páramo-Fonseca et al. 2016, 2019). The maxillary dentition of Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. is highly anisodont, as in most pliosaurids. The fifth alveolus is the largest, and the diameters of the alveoli decrease posteriorly from there. The tooth row terminates ventral to the posterior part of the postorbital bar. As in the premaxilla and dentary, the maxillary alveoli are bound medially by subtriangular paradental plates.

The maxilla is excluded from the anteroventral and ventral margins of the orbit by the presence of a “lacrimal” a neomorphic ossification described below and not homologous to the lacrimal of other tetrapods; Figs. 2 , 3 , 6 ). The “lacrimal”-maxilla suture is clear in the antorbital region. However, sutures between the maxilla and most other elements in this region are not evident due to damage. Nevertheless, it is clear that the maxilla forms the lateral and anterior margins of the external naris only, and does not extend further posteriorly along the medial margin of the external naris ( Figs. 2 , 3 ). Instead, the maxilla terminates anteromedial to the external naris, forming a deeply interdigitating, anteromedially-oriented suture with the frontal ( Fig. 3A 3 ). This differs from other Middle Jurassic pliosaurids that preserve this region, in which the maxilla extends further posteriorly to form part of the medial margin of the external naris ( Liopleurodon ferox, NHMUK PV R2680 ; Peloneustes philarchus, Ketchum and Benson 2011b ; Simolestes vorax, Noè 2001 ). The portion of the maxilla anterior to the external naris bears two oval foramina approximately 6–7 mm in maximum anteroposterior diameter ( Fig. 3A 3 ). On the right side, these foramina participate in a deep, anteroposteriorly-oriented fissure in the maxilla anterior to the external naris ( Fig. 3A 3 ). On the left, both foramina contact the suture between the maxilla and frontal posteriorly.

Interorbital skull roof: Due to fragmentation of the interorbital portion of the skull roof, sutures in this region (between the frontal, prefrontal, postfrontal) are unclear. Nevertheless, the anterodorsal margin of the orbit is embayed by a convex lateral extension of the skull roof ( Figs. 2 , 3 ). This extension is widespread among thalassophonean pliosaurids (e.g., Ketchum and Benson 2011b; Gómez-Pérez and Noè 2017).

Jugal: The jugal forms the posteroventral margin of the orbit and is quite large in OUMNH PAL-J.2247 compared to other plesiosaurians ( Figs. 2 , 3 , 6 ). It extends posteriorly approximately one-third of the length of the temporal fenestra, where it contacts the anterior ramus of the squamosal. It extends dorsally as a convex eminence that contacts the postorbital, therefore forming the ventral part of the postorbital bar. It also extends anteriorly, forming the posteroventral margin of the orbit. At least three large foramina are present, distributed over the lateral surface of the jugal.

The jugal of OUMNH PAL-J.2247 is fluted by a series of grooves that extend posteriorly from the posteroventral margin of the orbit ( Fig. 6 ). A similar fluted texture is present on several bones forming the orbital rim, including the postfrontal, postorbital prefrontal and palpebral, of other thalassophoneans ( Ketchum and Benson 2010: fig. A3), and on many of the bones, including the frontal and postfrontal which form the orbital rim in cryptoclidids such as Muraenosaurus leedsii Seeley, 1874b ( Andrews 1910: pl. 3; Maisch 1998). However, the presence of this fluted ornamentation on the jugal in Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. is unique among pliosaurids reported so far, and is regarded here as an autapomorphy.

The contact between the jugal and squamosal of Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. has a step-like morphology in which a long anterior extension of the squamosal dorsally overlies a posterior process of the jugal for about 35 mm ( Fig. 6 ). This is unlike the condition seen in other pliosaurids, which mostly have a squamosal-jugal suture that is interdigitating and oriented approximately dorsoventrally, and may therefore be an autapomorphy. The morphology in Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. is most similar to the morphology in species of Pliosaurus , in which a dorsoventrally slender posterior process of the jugal underlies the squamosal ventrally ( Benson et al. 2013). However, it differs from this in that the posterior process of the jugal is thicker, constituting approximately half the dorsoventral height of the subtemporal bar in Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov.

“Lacrimal”: The presence of a distinct, neomorphic ossification, typically called the “lacrimal” (see Williston 1907; Andrews 1913; Benson et al. 2011; Ketchum and Benson 2011b; although not homologous to the lacrimal of other amniotes) in pliosaurids is debated, with some authors arguing that this is just a long anterior process of the jugal (e.g., Carpenter 1996; O’Keefe 2001; Schumacher et al. 2013). The specimen of Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. does not help to resolve this debate because of breakage ventral to the orbit ( Figs. 2 , 3 ). Nevertheless, because we have observed a “lacrimal”-jugal suture in other thalassophoneans ( Ketchum and Benson 2010, 2011a), we describe the morphology of OUMNH PAL-J.2247 as though it also had a distinct “lacrimal” ossification that is separate from the jugal. The suborbital portion of the “lacrimal” in OUMNH PAL-J.2247 is dorsoventrally thin, approximately 8 mm in dorsoventral thickness on both sides compared to 25 mm for the dorsoventral thickness of the underlying maxilla around orbital midlength ( Fig. 6 ). This narrow morphology of the “lacrimal” differs from other pliosaurids (e.g., Williston 1907; O’Keefe 2001; Ketchum and Benson 2011b), and is considered here to be an autapomophy of Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov.

Postorbital: The postorbital forms most of the postorbital bar from the skull roof dorsally, extending from its dorsal/ medialmost point just lateral to the parietal foramen, down to its ventral contact with the jugal ventrally and squamosal posteroventrally ( Figs. 2 , 3 ). Contact with the squamosal is evident from the morphology of the facet for the postorbital on the jugal. However, the posteroventral process of the (better-preserved) right postorbital, which would originally have contacted the squamosal, is broken. The ventral part of the postorbital is anteroposteriorly broad, and it tapers dorsally. It has a subtriangular cross-section, with a flat lateral surface and prominent medial crest ( Fig. 6 ). The lateral surface of the postorbital is rugose adjacent to the orbit. The posteroventral process of the postorbital extends posteriorly over the dorsal surface of the jugal to approximately one-quarter the length of the subtemporal bar.

Parietal: The parietals enclose a large, oval parietal foramen along the midline of the cranium, adjacent to the posterior margin of the orbit ( Figs. 2 , 3 ). Anterior to the parietal foramen, the parietals are ornamented with longitudinal ridges and grooves, and contact the premaxillae in an interdigitating suture adjacent to the anterior orbit margin, as in many Middle Jurassic pliosaurids (e.g., Andrews 1913; Ketchum and Benson 2011b). Posterior to the parietal foramen the parietal rises dorsally and forms a narrow sagittal crest. The sagittal crest may be broken along its dorsal margin, so its true original height cannot be confidently determined. More posteriorly, it contacts the squamosal forming a roof over the braincase.

Squamosal: The squamosal is a triradiate bone that forms the posterior and lateral margins of the temporal fenestra ( Figs. 2 , 3 ). The conjoined squamosals contact the parietal along the midline in a broad semi-circular suture. Posteriorly, the squamosals expand and rise in height towards the vertex at the posteriormost point of the skull. In Middle Jurassic pliosaurids such as Peloneustes philarchus , the squamosals are usually expanded at the vertex to form a mediolaterally narrow, but prominent “bulb” (e.g., Ketchum and Benson 2011b). In contrast to this, the squamosal morphology of Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. appears to be more similar to that of Late Jurassic pliosaurids such as Pliosaurus kevani Benson, Evans, Smith, Sassoon, Moore-Fay, Ketchum, and Forrest, 2013 , in which the conjoined squamosals form a mediolaterally broad convexity that projects posteriorly ( Benson et al. 2013). However, there is some damage in this area, and it is possible that a squamosal bulb was originally present.

Quadrate: A partial quadrate is preserved on the left side of the skull, bounded by the ventral ramus of the squamosal. However, it is crushed and the morphology is therefore difficult to determine ( Fig. 3 ).

Vomer: The vomer forms a single midline element that emerges anteriorly adjacent to the fourth premaxillary alveolus, as in other Oxford Clay pliosaurids ( Andrews 1913). It forms a narrow and ventrally convex bar along the midline, which is ornamented with anteroposteriorly oriented grooves ( Figs. 4 , 5 ). Posterior to the premaxilla–maxilla suture, the vomer is completely obscured by matrix, although the maxilla–vomer suture remains visible along the medial margin of the matrix. Posteriorly, the matrix obscures the contact between the vomer and palatine, and the location of the internal nares.

Palatine: The palatines are obscured by matrix for the majority of their length ( Fig. 5 ). Posteriorly, they are exposed at around skull midlength, contacting the maxilla laterally and pterygoid medially. The palatines are dorsoventrally thin and plate-like bones, and are highly fractured and fragmented. Due to the poor preservation in this region, many of the sutures between the palatine, pterygoid and ectopterygoid could not be recognised.

Ectopterygoid: A small fragment of the left ectopterygoid may be preserved lateral to the palatine, although the suture cannot be identified with confidence ( Fig. 5 ). The equivalent area on the right-hand-side of the palate is not preserved.

Pterygoid: The pterygoids are large, complex bones that form much of the palate ( Fig. 5 ). The anterior processes of the pterygoids extend anteriorly along the midline, contacting the ectopterygoids and palatines laterally. Posterior to this, the pterygoids underlap the braincase ventrally, and give rise to posterolateral processes that contact the quadrates. An area of matrix along the midline contact between the anterior processes indicates the possible presence of a slit-like interpterygoid vacuity. However, it is also possible that this results from breakage and partial displacement. Posterior to this, the pterygoids are separated along the midline by the cultriform process of the parasphenoid.

Anteroposteriorly elongate posterior interpterygoid vacuities are present ventral to the braincase, with a length:width ratio of approximately 2.75. This is similar to or slightly greater than the relative length of the posterior interpteryoid vacuities of most other Middle Jurassic pliosaurids (ratio 2.4–2.5 in Peloneustes philarchus , Liopleurodon ferox , and Simolestes vorax ; e.g., Andrews 1913; Ketchum and Benson 2011b; NHMUK PV R2680; HFK and RBJB, personal observation), and considerably greater than that of “ Pliosaurus ” andrewsi (ratio 1.75; NHMUK PV R3891). Lateral to these, the pterygoids form ventrolaterally directed flanges that extend anterolaterally from a point of midline contact posterior to the posterior interpterygoid vacuities. These flanges are present in all thalassophonean pliosaurids (e.g., Williston 1907; Andrews 1913; Schumacher et al. 2013; Ketchum and Benson 2011b), although they are often crushed dorsolaterally, and partially broken, as in Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. The flanges of Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. contact posteriorly along the midline, as in many early thalassophoneans, but unlike in some brachauchenines (e.g., Williston 1907; Schumacher et al. 2013; Gómez-Pérez and Noè 2017).

Braincase: The braincase is preserved, crushed between the skull roof and pterygoids. This limits the detail with which elements can be observed and we restrict our description to the visible portions, comprising the parabasisphenoid and basioccipital.

Parabasisphenoid: The parasphenoid and basisphenoid are conjoined, and the line of fusion between them cannot be discerned ( Fig. 5 ). The parabasisphenoid bisects the posterior interpterygoid vacuities as a narrow convex bar. Anteriorly, it widens and flattens, extending along the midline of the palate between the pterygoids as the cultriform process.

Basioccipital: The basioccipital forms the posterior part of the basicranium and bears the occipital condyle ( Fig. 5 ). It is highly abraded and the shape of the occipital condyle is difficult to discern, but appears to be low, hemispherical, and separated from the body of the basioccipital by a shallow groove ventrally.

Mandible: The mandible is almost complete and threedimensionally preserved, missing only the margins of the four anterior-most dentary alveoli ( Figs. 7–9 ). The mandible is 932 mm long, measured from the anterior tip to the posterior margin of the retroarticular process (873 mm long from the anterior tip to the posterior margin of the articular condyles), and 356 mm wide between the articular condyles. The symphysis is 200 mm long anteroposteriorly, with a maximum width of 127 mm adjacent to the fifth dentary alveolus ( Fig. 8 ). Thus, the symphysis is quite strongly expanded mediolaterally, similar to many Middle–Late Jurassic pliosaurids, which exhibit at least moderate expansion of the symphysis (e.g., Andrews 1913), although this expansion is weaker in Marmornectes candrewi ( Ketchum and Benson 2011a) and “ Pliosaurus ” andrewsi (NHMUK PV R3891).

Dentary: The dentary forms the major part of the mandible, including the symphysis, and terminates just posterior to the tooth row, at the level of the coronoid eminence ( Fig. 7 ). Each dentary bears 38 alveoli, of which nine are adjacent to the symphysis ( Figs. 7 , 8 ). Thus the symphysis is relatively shorter than those of other longirostrine pliosaurids from the Oxford Clay Formation, such as Peloneustes philarchus (13–15 symphysial alveoli; Ketchum and Benson 2011b), Marmonectes candrewi (12 symphysial alveoli; Ketchum and Benson 2011a), and “ Pliosaurus ” andrewsi (11; Tarlo 1960), but longer than in Simolestes vorax (five symphysial alveoli) and Liopleurodon ferox (6.5 symphysial alveoli; Andrews 1913). Dentary alveoli 3–7 of Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. are the largest in the mandible, and the fifth alveolus is marginally the largest of these, being located in the widest part of the symphysis ( Fig. 8 ). The eighth alveolus is much smaller, being approximately 60% of the diameter of the seventh. Alveolus size decreases gradually from here posteriorly. The posteriormost alveolus of the left dentary is infilled with rugose bone, similar to that described in Peloneustes philarchus ( Ketchum and Benson 2011b) , and likely pathological. As in the maxilla and premaxilla, the medial walls of the dentary aveoli are bounded by rugose, subtriangular paradental plates ( Fig. 8 ). Medial to the paradental plates is a longitudinal groove containing the replacement alveoli.

The dentaries are tightly joined anteriorly along the midline to form the majority of the mandibular symphysis, other than a small posteroventral contribution of the splenial Fig. 8A 6 ). The ventral exposure of the interdentary suture is tightly interdigitating at its anteriormost end and becomes straight at approximately midlength up to its posterior end, where it protrudes ventrally as a low median keel. Numerous grooves and foramina are present on the ventral and lateral surfaces of the dentary, and are smaller and more abundant anteriorly ( Figs. 7–9 ).

The dorsal exposure of the interdentary suture interdigitates along its entire length ( Fig. 8 ). The suture is located on a robust longitudinal ridge, delimited laterally on either side by the groove for replacement alveoli. This morphology is similar to that in most other pliosaurids, but is unlike the condition in Peloneustes philarchus in which the symphysis is raised up on an additional, narrower median ridge ( Ketchum and Benson 2011b). The median symphysial ridge in Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. is embayed by an oblique, posteromedially oriented groove on either side at the level of the fifth alveolus on the left, and between the fourth and fifth alveoli on the right ( Fig. 8 ). These grooves are widespread among plesiosaurians with long symphyses, including both pliosaurids (e.g., Noè et al. 2004; Albright et al 2007a; Gasparini and O’Gorman 2014; Gómez-Pérez and Noè 2017; Holland 2018) and polycotylids (e.g., Albright et al. 2007b; Schumacher and Martin 2015), and are at least slightly asymmetrical (as in Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov.) in several other pliosaurids, including Peloneustes philarchus ( Ketchum and Benson 2011b) , Marmornectes candrewi ( Ketchum and Benson 2011a) , Pliosaurus patagonicus O’Gorman, 2014 ( Gasparini and O’Gorman 2014) and Kronosaurus queenslandicus Longman, 1924 ( Holland 2018).

Posterior to the symphysis, the lateral surface of the dentary forms the lateral and alveolar surfaces of the mandible, and is overlapped medially by the surangular and angular ( Fig. 9 ). A longitudinal row of small, evenly spaced foramina is present on the lateral surface of the dentary at two-thirds of its total height. This row of foramina continues posteriorly to approximately half the length of the dentary.

The dentary bifurcates posteriorly into a dorsoventrally deep posterodorsal process and a narrower posteroventral process. The posterior margins of both processes are deeply crenulated. A large, anteroposteriorly-elongate fenestra, is present around midheight in the lateral surface of the mandible, just anterior to the coronoid eminence the splenial encloses the ventral and posterodorsal margins of the anteromedial opening of Meckel’s canal ( Fig. 11 ), as in Pliosaurus kevani ( Benson et al. 2013: figs. 16, 17), but unlike Peloneustes philarchus , Acostasaurus pavachoquensis , Pliosaurus almanzaensis O’Gorman, Gasparini, and Spalletti, 2018 , and possibly Sachicasaurus vitae , in which the splenial is limited to the ventral margin ( Ketchum and Benson 2011b: text-fig. 12; Gómez-Pérez and Noè 2017: text-fig. 11; O’Gorman et al. 2018: 248; Páramo-Fonseca et al. 2018: fig. 3). Posteriorly, a small, anteroposteriorly elongate foramen penetrates the splenial–angular contact (the lingual mandibular foramen, Fig. 9A 4 ), as in other pliosaurids (e.g., Ketchum and Benson 2011b; Benson et al. 2013).

Coronoid: The coronoid is an anteroposteriorly long, plate-like bone that covers the dorsal half of the medial surface of the mandible and forms the prominent medial portion of the coronoid eminence posteriorly ( Figs. 7 , 9 , 10 ). ( Figs. 9 , 10 ). We refer to this as the intramandibular fenestra. The anterior and dorsal margins of the intramandibular fenestra are bounded by the split between the posterodorsal and posteroventral processes of the dentary. The intramandibular fenestra penetrates to the medial surface of the mandible by extending posteromedially through the suture between the angular and surangular. A prominent intramandibular fenestra is also present in “ Pliosaurus ” andrewsi (NHMUK PV R3891; HFK and RBJB, personal observation). Unfortunately its presence or absence in other pliosaurids, including Peloneustes philarchus , is difficult to determine, because crushing and breakage is common in this region ( Ketchum and Benson 2011b).

Splenial: The splenial is an anteroposteriorly elongate bone that forms the ventral half of medial surface of the mandible ( Fig. 9 ), covering the medial surface of the dentary anteriorly, and of the angular posteriorly. It extends from the mandibular symphysis anteriorly, to the posterior opening of Meckel’s canal posteriorly, where it contacts the prearticular dorsally. The paired splenials contribute to the posterior half of the ventral surface of the mandibular symphysis ( Fig. 8 ) as in other pliosaurids (e.g., Andrews 1913; Ketchum and Benson 2011a, b; Schumacher et al. 2013; Fischer et al. 2017; Páramo-Fonseca et al. 2019). Their ventral surface is flat, and does not contribute to the median keel of the dentary symphysis. Posterior to the symphysis on the medial surface, Anteriorly, it forms the anterodorsal margin of the opening into Meckel’s canal ( Fig. 11 ). Its anteriormost extent cannot be determined due to the remnants of the septarian concretion obscuring the median surface of the mandible immediately posterior to the symphysis. However, it is not exposed on the posterodorsal surface of the symphysis, unlike in Peloneustes philarchus ( Ketchum and Benson 2011b) and Kronosaurus queenslandicus ( Holland 2018).

The coronoid portion of the coronoid eminence is tall and rugose, extending dorsal to both the surangular and dentary so it is distinctly visible in lateral view ( Fig. 10 ). This also occurs in NHMUK PV R2443 (Nikolay Zverkov, personal communication to RBJB), a specimen that was referred to Pliosaurus ” andrewsi by Tarlo 1960). However, it is unlike the situation in most other pliosaurids, including Liopleurodon ferox and Simolestes vorax ( Andrews 1913) , Peloneustes philarchus (e.g., Ketchum and Benson 2011b), Pliosaurus kevani ( Benson et al. 2013) , Stenorhynchosaurus munozi Páramo-Fonseca et al. 2016 ), Acostasaurus pavachoquensis Gómez-Pérez and Noè 2017 ) and Kronosaurus queenslandicus ( Holland 2018), in which the coronoid is low and therefore concealed by the dentary and surangular in lateral view. The coronoid is low and partially visible in Megacephalosaurus eulerti ( Schumacher et al. 2013: fig. 9C, D).

Angular: The angular is a large element, which first appears on the ventral surface of the mandible anteriorly as a narrow longitudinal splint of bone between the dentary and splenial at approximately mandibular midlength. Posteriorly, the external exposure of the angular expands mediolaterally and then dorsoventrally so that it forms the posterior half of the mandible from approximately the level of the coronoid eminence and more posteriorly, ventrally underlapping the articular, including both the glenoid and the retroarticular process ( Figs. 7 , 9 ). Ventral to the coronoid eminence, the dorsomedial surface of the angular forms a shallow trough that extends anteriorly to the intramandibular fenestra and posteriorly to the glenoid, where it is overlapped by a rugose anterior extension of the articular.

Surangular: The surangular forms the dorsal half of the mandible between the glenoid and the coronoid eminence, and encloses the dorsal margin of the intermandibular fenestra internally ( Figs. 7 , 9 ). The lateral surface of the surangular is overlapped by the deeply-crenulated posterodorsal process of the dentary anteriorly, ventral to the coronoid eminence Fig. 10 ). The dorsal surface of the surangular bears a shallow anteroposterorly elongate fossa, as in most other pliosaurids (e.g., Ketchum and Benson 2011a; Fig. 7 ). However, in Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. the medial margin of the surangular adjacent to the fossa is strongly expanded compared to most other pliosaurids including Marmornectes candrewi , Peloneustes philarchus ( Ketchum and Benson 2011a, b), Simolestes vorax , Liopleurodon ferox ( Noè 2001) , Kronosaurus queenslandicus ( Holland 2018), Acostasaurus pavachoquensis (Gómez Pérez and Noè 2017) , and Brachauchenius lucasi ( Albright et al. 2007a) . Nevertheless, a similar morphology is present in NHMUK PV R2443 ( Tarlo 1960)

and there may be scope for within-species variation in the morphology of this site of muscle attachment.

The extent of any contribution of the surangular to the ventral surface of the glenoid cannot be determined because its suture with the articular in this region is closed. However, it certainly contributes to the anterolateral margin of the glenoid as a dorsoventrally oriented, crescentic process. Anterior to this, on the medial surface of the jaw, the surangular encloses a small foramen, as in Peloneustes philarchus ( Ketchum and Benson 2011b; Fig. 9 ).

Prearticular: Both the left and right prearticulars are well preserved, which is unusual among pliosaurids, where it is frequently only partly preserved (e.g., Ketchum and Benson 2011b). The prearticular is an elongate, medioventrally thin, splint-like bone that articulates on to the dorsomedial surface of the angular ( Fig. 9C, D ). It extends anteriorly from its origin, anteroventral to the glenoid, tapering anteriorly to a point just anterior to the coronoid process. Together with the angular it forms the ventral margin of the intramandibular fenestra.

Articular: The articular forms the articular cotyles and the dorsal portion of the retroarticular process, both of which are rotated so their “dorsal” surfaces face dorsomedially ( Fig. 9 ). As in Marmornectes candrewi , but unlike Peloneustes philarchus , the articular also forms the ventrolateral surface of the retroarticular process ( Ketchum and Benson 2011a), forming a suture with the surangular at the widest point of the mandibular glenoid. As in other pliosaurids, a rugose, triangular anterior process of the articular extends from the glenoid along a shallow trough in the angular, just dorsal to the prearticular.

Sclerotic ring: Four disarticulated scleral ossicles are associated with the skull. They are irregular in shape, with crenulated margins ( Fig. 12A, B ). As in Peloneustes philarchus ( Ketchum and Benson 2011b) , the ossicles are very thin adjacent to the internal margin (forming the corneal aperture) and external margin of the sclerotic ring, and slightly more robust in between. The lateral (outwardly facing) surface of the sclerotic ring is gently convex.

Hyoids: Two elongate elements were found close by to the skull, and are almost certainly hyoid bones ( Fig. 12C ). As in the hyoid elements of Peloneustes philarchus (NHMUK PV R 8574; Ketchum and Benson 2011b), Pliosaurus almanzaensis ( O’Gorman et al. 2018) , and Sachicasaurus vitae ( Páramo-Fonseca et al. 2018) the shafts are narrow, elongate, and gently curved. However, in Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov., one end of the shaft tapers to a rounded point, unlike in Peloneustes philarchus and possibly Pliosaurus almanzaensis , in which both ends of the shaft are gently expanded ( Ketchum and Benson 2011b: text-fig. 11; O’Gorman et al. 2018: fig. 3).

Dentition: The mesial teeth of Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. are large, conical and slightly recurved, with approximately circular cross-sections ( Fig. 13 ). Several teeth bear apical wear facets. The enamel is ornamented with fine apicobasal enamel ridges, which are present on all surfaces of the tooth, but more densely packed on the recurved lingual (concave) surface ( Fig. 13A 2 ). Enamel ridges are finer and more widely spaced, mostly restricted to the basal region, on the labial (convex) surface ( Fig. 13A 4 ; note that reduction of enamel ornamentation on the lingual surface of the tooth may be a common pattern amongst aquatic predators; McCurry et al. 2019). On all surfaces of the crown, the majority of ridges originate from near the base of the enamel, but a small number originate part way up the tooth. In the largest teeth with intact crowns, between two and five of the enamel ridges are particularly prominent, and extend to the tip of the tooth from either side of the convex (mesial) surface, with the appearance of carinae ( Fig. 13A 8 ).

Tooth morphology varies among pliosaurid species and has a long history of use in defining morphotypes (e.g., Madzia and Machalski 2017; Zverkov et al. 2018) and species diagnoses (e.g., Tarlo 1960). The overall tooth morphology and pattern of enamel ridges in the larger (i.e., more mesial) teeth of Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. is somewhat similar in overall morphology to those of some other Middle Jurassic pliosaurids, especially those of Peloneustes philarchus , which show some variation but in general are similar to the description given above ( Ketchum and Benson 2011b), including the presence of a small number of especially prominent ridges that extend to the tooth apex (e.g., NHMUK PV R1253). The teeth of Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. differ from those of Marmornectes candrewi , which shows a set of ridges on either the mesial or distal surface that originate a short distance from the base of the crown Ketchum and Benson 2011a), and not at the crown base as seen in most other pliosaurids, including Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. They differ from those of Liopleurodon ferox and Simolestes vorax , which show a greater proportion of enamel ridges extending to the tooth apex, on all surfaces e.g., Noè 2001). The teeth of Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. differ substantially from those of “ Pliosaurus ” andrewsi, which bear few enamel ridges, most of which are on the lingual (concave) tooth surface and bear very large wear faces compared to other pliosaurids (NHMUK PV R3891; Andrews 1913; Tarlo 1960). The teeth of Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. differ from those of the holotype tooth of Pliosaurus ” grossouvrei ( Sauvage, 1873) from the Middle Jurassic (Callovian) of France, in which enamel ridges are almost entirely limited to the concave (lingual) surface of the tooth, and the “carina-like” ridge extends all the way to the tooth base ( Sauvage 1873; Foffa et al. 2018).

Smaller, more posterior teeth of Eardasaurus lack the carina-like ridges described above, but nevertheless have well-defined enamel ridges on most surface of the crown, with fewer present on the convex (mesial) surface Fig. 13B ). The apicobasal ridges of these smaller teeth are sinuous, with wavy undulations. Some ridges branch near the base, and some are interrupted by a short stretch of smooth enamel.

Stratigraphic and geographic range.— Type locality and horizon only.

Figures

Fig. 1. Holotype of the pliosaurid plesiosaur Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. (OUMNH PAL-J.2247) from the Middle Jurassic of Yarnton, Oxfordshire, UK. Photograph of the specimen on display in OUMNH. Skeleton laid out as discovered, with the exception of the left hindlimb (highlighted in black), which was originally disarticulated.An artist’s reconstruction of E. powelli is partially visible in the top right-hand side of the image.

Fig. 2. Holotype of the pliosaurid pleasiosaur Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. (OUMNH PAL-J.2247) from the Middle Jurassic of Yarnton, Oxfordshire, UK. Cranium in dorsal view. Photograph (A1), interpretive drawing (A2), light grey, broken bone; mid grey, filler; dark grey, matrix.

Fig. 3. Holotype of the pliosaurid pleasiosaur Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. (OUMNH PAL-J.2247) from the Middle Jurassic of Yarnton, Oxfordshire, UK. Cranium in right lateral view. Photograph (A1), interpretive drawing (A2), light grey, broken bone; mid grey, filler; dark grey, matrix; detail showing region around external naris including frontal–maxilla suture (A3).

Fig.4. Holotype of the pliosaurid plesiosaur Eardasaurus powelli gen.et sp.nov.(OUMNH PAL-J.2247) from the Middle Jurassic ofYarnton, Oxfordshire, UK. Rostrum in dorsal (A1, A2), left lateral (A3, A4), and ventral (A5, A6) views. Photographs (A1, A3, A5), interpretive drawings (A2, A4, A6), light grey, broken bone; mid grey, filler; dark grey, matrix.

Fig.5.Holotype of the pliosauridplesiosaur Eardasaurus powelli gen.et sp. nov.(OUMNH PAL-J.2247) from the Middle Jurassic of Yarnton,Oxfordshire, UK. Cranium in ventral view. Photograph (A1), interpretive drawing (A2), light grey, broken bone; mid grey, filler; dark grey, matrix.

Fig. 6. Holotype of the pliosaurid plesiosaur Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. (OUMNH PAL-J.2247) from the Middle Jurassic of Yarnton, Oxfordshire, UK. Detail of right ventral orbital margin in lateral view. Photograph (A1), interpretive drawing (A2), light grey, broken bone.

Fig.7. Holotype of the pliosaurid plesiosaur Eardasaurus powelli gen.et sp.nov.(OUMNH PAL-J.2247) from the Middle Jurassic ofYarnton, Oxfordshire, UK. Mandible in dorsal view. Photograph (A1), interpretive drawing (A2), light grey, broken bone; mid grey, filler; dark grey, matrix.

Fig.8. Holotype of the pliosauridplesiosaur Eardasaurus powelli gen.et sp. nov.(OUMNH PAL-J.2247) from the Middle Jurassic of Yarnton,Oxfordshire, UK. Mandibular symphysis in dorsal (A1, A2), left lateral (A3, A4), and ventral (A5, A6) views. Photographs (A1, A3, A5), interpretive drawings (A2, A4, A6), light grey, broken bone; mid grey, filler; dark grey, matrix.

Fig.9. Holotype of the pliosaurid plesiosaur Eardasaurus powelli gen.et sp.nov.(OUMNH PAL-J.2247) from the Middle Jurassic ofYarnton, Oxfordshire, UK. Mandible in right lateral (A1,A2) and medial (A3,A4) views. Photographs (A1,A3), interpretive drawings (A2,A4), light grey, broken bone; mid grey, filler; dark grey, matrix.

Fig. 10. Holotype of the pliosaurid plesiosaur Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. (OUMNH PAL-J.2247) from the Middle Jurassic of Yarnton, Oxfordshire, UK. Detail of right coronoid eminence in lateral view. Photograph (A1), interpretive drawing (A2), light grey, broken bone; dark grey, matrix.

Fig. 11. Holotype of the pliosaurid plesiosaur Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. (OUMNH PAL-J.2247) from the Middle Jurassic of Yarnton, Oxfordshire, UK. Detail of posterior end of mandibular symphysis. Photograph (A1), interpretive drawing (A2), light grey, broken bone; dark grey, matrix.

Fig. 12. Holotype of the pliosaurid plesiosaur Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. (OUMNH PAL-J.2247) from the Middle Jurassic of Yarnton, Oxfordshire, UK. A, B. Scleral ossicles. C. Hyoid element, orientation unknown.

Fig. 13. Holotype of the pliosaurid plesiosaur Eardasaurus powelli gen. et sp. nov. (OUMNH PAL-J.2247) from the Middle Jurassic of Yarnton, Oxfordshire, UK. A. Mesial tooth in anterior or posterior (A1), lingual (A2), anterior or posterior (A3), and labial (A4) views; close-up of crown of tooth showing detail of “carinae” in anterior or posterior (A5–A6), labial (A7), and tip (A8) views. B. Distal (“ratchet” type) tooth in anterior or posterior (B1), lingual (B2), anterior or posterior (B3), labial (B4), and tip (B5) views.