Enicospilus affinis Hedwig, 1957
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5023.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E3C8DC24-E3EB-454E-B4FF-E9DEEEAC34D6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5225704 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DCE839-FF95-CC55-A3DC-B9E0FDE2FF5C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Enicospilus affinis Hedwig, 1957 |
status |
stat. nov. |
Enicospilus affinis Hedwig, 1957 View in CoL stat. rev.
Figs 1A–D View FIGURE 1
Enicospilus affinis Hedwig, 1957: 105–106 View in CoL . Lectotype ♀ in SMNS from Iran, examined.
Material examined: IRAN: Lectotype ♀ of E. affinis Hedwig, Belutschistan Jranshar 800 m. a.s. 11–21 May 1954 Richter & Schäuffele leg. ( SMNS).
Remarks: Study of the type of Enicospilus affinis Hedwig, 1957 housed in SMNS shows that the previous synonymy with E. ocellatus Shestakov, 1926 proposed by Horstmann (1981) is erroneous and that E. affinis stat. rev. is a valid species. Possibly Horstmann was referring to E. ocellatus f. albopictus, described from Egypt by Aubert & Shaumar (1978), the type of which could not be located for this study. According to the description and pictures in Gadallah et al. 2017, Enicospilus pseudoculator Gadallah & Soliman, 2017 is morphologically very similar to E. affinis and the only distinguishing character is that the type of E. affinis has two additional narrow whitish stripes on the mesoscutum and that the anterior and posterior white spots on mesopleuron are connected. This seems likely to be a result of a variation in colour, but the type series, as well as all known specimens of E. pseudoculator are indeed very homogenous in colouration. None of the specimens studied by the first author or included in the description has any indication of more extensive pale markings as displayed by the type of E. affinis . As E. affinis is only known by the type female, any conclusion on its relation to E. pseudoculator needs to be investigated further and the two are here treated as separate species.
SMNS |
Staatliches Museum fuer Naturkund Stuttgart |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Enicospilus affinis Hedwig, 1957
Johansson, Niklas, Ameri, Ali, Riedel, Matthias, Talebi, Ali Asghar & Ebrahimi, Ebrahim 2021 |
Enicospilus affinis Hedwig, 1957: 105–106
Hedwig, K. 1957: 106 |