Golofa inermis Thomson, 1859
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010-065X-75.2.279 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:23DC47F9-AB1D-4237-854D-89D1815EDD7D |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A887D8-FFB0-7D5C-6E63-FA06068740D3 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Golofa inermis Thomson, 1859 |
status |
|
Golofa inermis Thomson, 1859 View in CoL
( Figs. 34–37 View Figs )
Golofa inermis Thomson 1859: 11 View in CoL (original combination).
Redescription. Length 20.0–25.0 mm; width 8.6–13.0 mm. Color uniformly dark yellowish brown or reddish brown except for black head, scutellum, sutural striae, tibiae, tarsi, pygidium, and venter. Head: Frons with moderately large, sparse punctures. Clypeus with erect, sharply acuminate tubercle; apex strongly narrowed, emarginate. Interocular width equals 2.7 transverse eye diameters. Antenna with 10 antennomeres, club slightly longer than antennomeres 2–7. Pronotum: Surface with punctures moderate in size and density.A shallow, short, longitudinal sulcus present just behind anterior margin. Base with marginal bead. Elytra: Surface with punctures moderate in size and density, shallow. Sutural stria a completely impressed line. Pygidium: Surface with punctures moderate in size and density. Propygidium lacking long, dense setae. Legs: Protibia tridentate, basal tooth removed from other teeth. Parameres: As in Fig. 36 View Figs .
Distribution. Golofa inermis occurs in Chile (the lectotype and three paralectotypes in MNHN) and Bolivia (two paralectotypes in MNHN).
Locality Records ( Fig. 37 View Figs ). 5 specimens from MNHN, Gutiérrez (1950), and Ferrú and Elgueta (2011) .
REGIÓN DE ARICA Y PARINACOTA (1): ARICA (1): Arica. REGIÓN DE TARAPACÁ (1): IQUIQUE (1): Miñita. NO DATA (3) .
Temporal Distribution. No data.
Diagnosis. The pronotum and elytra of G. inermis are monochromatic dark yellowish brown or reddish brown (except for the black elytral suture); the elytral suture is a complete, impressed stria; and the propygidium lacks long, dense setae. Conversely, G. minutus has dark areas on the pronotum, and the elytral margins are black; the elytral sutural stria is a row of closely spaced punctures; and the propygidium has long, dense setae. The parameres of the two species differ, with those of G. inermis being thicker and more robust (compare Figs. 36 View Figs and 40 View Figs ).
Nomenclature. Thomson (1859) indicated a size range when he described G. inermis , which clearly indicates he had at least two specimens. Endrödi (1977b) said the type of G. inermis was unknown to him, but Dechambre (1975) discovered the Thomson specimens in the MNHN and designated a lectotype ( Figs. 34–35 View Figs ) and five paralectotypes (three from Chile, two from Bolivia). We were unable to directly examine these specimens.
Natural History. Adults are attracted to lights, but we know nothing else of the species’ natural history.
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Golofa inermis Thomson, 1859
Ratcliffe, Brett C., Cave, Ronald D. & Mondaca, José 2021 |
Golofa inermis
Thomson, J. 1859: 11 |