Lesticus attenuatus, Fedorenko, 2022

Fedorenko, D. N., 2022, New or little-known Lesticus Dejean, 1828 (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Pterostichini) from Vietnam, Russian Entomological Journal 31 (3), pp. 260-275 : 266-268

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.15298/rusentj.31.3.06

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A30787C8-6D75-FF90-FCC6-FB5117029934

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Lesticus attenuatus
status

 

2. Lesticus nubilus Tschitschérine, 1900 View in CoL

Figs 1–2 View Figs 1–12 , 13–14 View Figs 13–24 , 27–28 View Figs 25–39 .

Tschitschérine, 1900: 173 (‘Cochinchine’); Csiki, 1929: 521; Roux et al., 2016: 328. — mouhoti : Bates, 1892: 356 (non mouhotii Chaudoir, 1868 ); Andrewes, 1926: 255; Csiki, 1929: 521; Roux et al., 2016: 328.

MATERIAL. 3♂♂, 3♀♀, ( SIEE), Vietnam, Dong Nai Province, Cat Tien National Park, at light HQL 450, 18.V–18.VI.2005 (D. Fedorenko); ♂ ♀ ( MPSU), southern Song Be Prov., ca 60 km N of Ho Chi Minh, env Phu Giao vill., 3–13.X.1994 (A. Napolov, D. Volkov); ♂ ( SIEE), Laos, 17 km N of Ventiane, Vang Vieng , 11– 27.IX. 2017 (V. Ustinov); ♂ ( ZIN), ‘ Phontioa , Laos, I. 55’; ♂ ( SIEE), Thailand, Prov. Nakhon Savan, 13 km N of Mae Wong vill., 15°54´N 99°33.3´44´´E, h~ 110 m, at light, 10.VIII.2009 (V. Zinchenko); ♀ ( SIEE), near Chiang Mai, VIII.2005 (A. Sokolov); ♀ , Phang Nga Prov., Chao Lang lake , 3.XI.2016 (E. Shankhiza); ♀ ( ZIN), Surat Thani Prov., Khao Sok NP, secondary forest, 7.XI.2010 (D.A. Gapon). — Internal sac of aedeagus examined in six males .

DIAGNOSIS. Body macropterous and large, metepisternum long. Protarsomere 1 with a rudimentary ventral pad in female (Fig. 54). Internal sac of aedeagus ( Figs 27–28 View Figs 25–39 ) as for L. praestans except as follows: bulbs c and d widely separat- ed; b simple tubiform, without additional basal vesicle on right side.

REDESCRIPTION. BL 25.4–30 mm. Mesofemur with 3–4 anteroventral setae.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION. Vietnam, Laos, Thailand; supposedly throughout Indochina.

HABITATS AND HABITS. No data, except that all the specimens from the Cat Tien National Park were taken at light positioned at the edge of a monsoon broad-leaved forest not far from the bank of the Dong Nai River.

COMMENTS. No constant differences, except for rather slight ones in shape of endophallus, have been found to discriminate between L. nubilus and L. praestans mouhotii from different localities. But the adults from sympatric populations of these two species are more different, which is especially true of southern Vietnam, the type locality of L. nubilus . In particular, specimens of L. nubilus are darker in colour than those of L. praestans mouhotii from there, the forebody contrasts with the elytra but a little, the basal foveae of the pronotum are densely punctate and rugulose, and all females have protarsomere 1 with rudimentary ventral pad. This argues that the two species do exist in nature.

Tschitschérine [1900] supposed that L. nubilus might be identical to the species from Bhamo, Burma, misidentified as L. mouhotii ( ‘ mouhoti ’) by Bates [1892], but Andrewes [1926] then doubted their identity. Roux et al. [2016] demonstrated that the holotype of L. nubilus was female, instead of male, as Tschitschérine wrongly believed, while they wrongly named the holotype lectotype and recognized L. mouhoti Bates as ‘new synonym’, even though Csiki [1929] had listed it as a junior synonym of L. nubilus .

MPSU

Department of Microbiology, Songkla University

ZIN

Russian Academy of Sciences, Zoological Institute, Zoological Museum

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Carabidae

Genus

Lesticus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Carabidae

Genus

Lesticus

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF