Neritopsis richeri, Lozouet, 2009
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/z2009n1a10 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DD7987DE-FFD3-FFCA-FCCF-FAD8B5717137 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Neritopsis richeri |
status |
sp. nov. |
Neritopsis richeri View in CoL n. sp.
( Figs 2 View FIG ; 3 View FIG A-D; 4)
? Neritopsis radula View in CoL – Salvat & Rives 1975: 262, fig. 36. Not N. radula (Linnaeus, 1758) View in CoL .
TYPE MATERIAL. — Holotype ( MNHN 21374 About MNHN ) and 6 paratypes ( MNHN 21375 About MNHN ) from BENTHAUS stn DW 1996.
TYPE LOCALITY. — French Polynesia, Austral Islands, Rurutu (Avera).
ETYMOLOGY. — Dedicated to Bertrand Richer de Forges who has carried out French Pacific explorations for more than a quarter of a century.
MATERIAL EXAMINED. — A total of 128 specimens (23 lots): 103 specimens, from Austral Islands ; 20 specimens from Marquesas ; 1 specimen from Moorea ; 4 specimens from Tuamotu ( Takapoto ) .
Austral Islands. BENTHAUS, Tubuai, 23°21’S, 149°34’W, stn CP 1965, 500- 1200 m, 19.XI.2002, 1 spm. — Banc “Président Thiers”, 24°41’S, 146°01’W, stn DW 1932, 500- 800 m, 14.XI.2002, 4 spm. — Banc “Président Thiers”, 24°40’S, 146°01’W, stn DW 1933, 500- 850 m, 14.XI.2002, 3 spm. — Nord de Raivavae, 23°48’S, 147°39’W, stn DW 1943, 950 m, 15.XI.2002, 2 spm. — Tubuai, 23°19’S, 149°25’W, stn DW 1953, 280- 390 m, 18.XI.2002, 1 spm. — Tubuai, 23°19’S, 149°29’W, stn DW 1957, 558- 1000 m, 18.XI.2002, 3 spm. — Tubuai, 23°25’S, 149°33’W, stn DW 1961, 470- 800 m, 19.XI.2002, 1 spm. — Banc Arago, 23°22’S, 150°43’W, stn DW 1972, 500- 1020 m, 20.XI.2002, 1 spm. — Banc Arago, 23°26’S, 150°44’W, stn DW 1985, 100 m, 21.XI.2002, 2 spm. — Rurutu, Avera, 22°29’S, 151°22’W, stn DW 1995, 212- 450 m, 23.XI.2002, 2 spm. — Rurutu, Avera, 22°29’S, 151°21.9’W, stn DW 1996, 489- 1050 m, 23.XI.2002, 7 spm. — East coast of Rurutu, 22°27’S, 151°19’W, stn DW 2003, 250- 330 m, 24.XI.2002, 2 spm. — East coast of Rurutu, 22°28’S, 151°19’W, stn DW 2004, 430- 850 m, 24.XI.2002, 4 spm. — East coast of Rurutu, 22°28’S, 151°18’W, stn DW 2005, 690- 1800 m, 24.XI.2002, 3 spm. — Rimatara, 22°28’S, 152°49’W, stn DW 2012, 270- 320 m, 25.XI.2002, 2 spm. — Rimatara, 22°39’S, 152°50W, stn DW 2013, 80- 93 m, 25.XI.2002, 6 spm. — Rimatara, 22°38’S, 152°49’W, stn DW 2015, 250- 280 m, 25.XI.2002, 6 spm. — Rimatara, 22°37’S, 152°49’W, stn DW 2018, 770 m, 25.XI.2002, 21 spm. — Rimatara, 22°37’S, 152°49’W, stn DW 2020, 920 m, 25.XI.2002, 19 spm. — Rimatara, 22°36.6’S, 152°49’W, stn DW 2021, 1200 m, 25.XI.2002, 13 spm.
Marquesas Islands. MUSORSTOM 9, Hiva Oa, 9°48’S, 139°09’W, stn DW 1208, 117 m, 28.VIII.1997, 20 spm.
Moorea. Tiahura, pente externe, 33 m, 1 spm.
Tuamotu. Takapoto, 1 spm, Hereheretue, 4 spm.
MEASUREMENTS (holotype). — Height 21.5 mm; maximum width 23.2 mm.
DESCRIPTION
Shell of relatively large size, heavy, globose, consisting of 3.25 convex teleoconch whorls, rapidly expanding, last whorl shouldered. Protoconch (abraded on the holotype), smooth, of at least 2 whorls delimited from teleoconch by obvious line; embryonic shell is partially eroded. Spire protruding weakly, occupying about 22% of the total shell height. Penultimate whorl with 4 strong nodulose spiral cords with 1 or 2 subordinate cords in the interspaces. Last whorl, a little wider than high, occupying 78% of the total height; sculpture consisting of 8 prominent, nodulose, unevenly spaced, primary cords, with 1 to 4 fine secondary spiral cords in each interspaces. Surface between spiral cords bearing numerous scabrous axial costae. Irregular growth lines cover entire surface, more rugose near aperture than elsewhere. Aperture subcircular; outer lip strongly prosocline, sharp, thickened within, bearing numerous coarse lirae, with a long semilunar ridge representing inner limit of the operculum retraction. Inner lip is strongly concave, thick, bearing elongate rightangled notch at centre. Umbilicus represented by shallow depression.
ONTOGENY OF SPIRAL CORDS ( Fig. 2 View FIG )
Relatively prominent, oblique axial costae commence at the beginning of the teleoconch and cross primary cords, forming regular square meshwork on the first 0.75 whorl. After 1 whorl, axial costae broader, scabrous, restricted to the interspaces between spiral cords. Four primary spiral cords detectable after 0.25 whorl (P1, P2, P3, P4), then P5, P6 detectable after 1.5 whorl. Secondary cords (S1-S3) detectable only after the first whorl: S1 between P3 and P4, S2 between P4 and P5, S3 between P2 and P3. After 1.5 whorl: S4 added between P1 and P2, S6 and S5 added between suture and P1. After 1.7 whorl, additional secondary cords (S1’, S2’, S3’) detectable, forming double row of spiral cords between primary cords.
COMPARISON
The calcareous operculum of Neritopsi s were described since long time from fossil deposits. For instance Eudes-Deslongchamps & Eudes-Deslongchamps (1858) described some opercula of Neritopsis from Jurassic deposits as new genus Peltarion Deslongchamps & Deslongchamps, 1858 . Living specimens of Neritopsis radula were collected in abundance only recently. The operculum of N. moniliformis has not been described previously, it is illustrated here for the first time ( Fig. 5 View FIG ). Batten (1984) considered that Neritopsis radula occurred since Eocene time in the Paris Basin and was present in Miocene rocks of the Paratethys but, in fact, the Paris Basin species is N. parisiensis Deshayes, 1864 and the Paratethys species is closer to N. moniliformis , a species that ranges from lower Oligocene to lower Miocene in the Aquitaine Basin ( Lozouet & Maestrati 1982). However, it is clear that these three species are
B
closely related and can be included in the Neritopsis radula species group.
All specimens were collected dead, and hence lacked the unusual trapezoidal calcareous operculum ( Fig. 5 View FIG ). Neritopsis specimens collected in the Marquesas ( Fig. 4 View FIG E-H), Tuamotu and Moorea have a multispiral protoconch, but have only one secondary spiral cord in the interspaces between the primary cords; the primary cords are also beaded. Compared with the Austral Islands population, they are also smaller and have a narrower sutural ramp. These specimens are only tentatively included in N. richeri n. sp.
Neritopsis richeri View in CoL n. sp. from the Austral Islands is highly distinctive in having one to four secondary spiral cords in each interspaces between the primary cords and so is readily distinguished from all other Neritopsis species known since Oligocene time (35 Ma): the recent species Neritopsis radula View in CoL , N. aqabaensi and N. atlantica View in CoL , the European fossils N. moniliformis View in CoL (lower Oligocene to lower Miocene), N. vokesorum Hoerle, 1972 (lower Miocene of Florida, Hoerle 1972) and N. cf. moniliformis View in CoL (middle Miocene of Europe). Moreover, the New World Neritopsis View in CoL are umbilicate (a slight umbilicus in the Florida species, a deep, narrow umbilicus in N. atlantica View in CoL ) whereas the others are not. Superficially, N. richeri View in CoL n. sp. resembles some Cretaceous species of the genus Hayamia Kase, 1980 View in CoL (see Kase & Maeda 1980: pl. 35 fig. 9a, b). Among others differential characters, Neritopsis richeri View in CoL n. sp. has a sutural ramp defined by a shoulder angle and a multispiral protoconch. The Indo-Pacific species N. radula View in CoL has a paucispiral protoconch ( Kano & Kase 2000: fig. 13) and a non-planktotrophic development can be inferred from its protoconch morphology ( Kano 2006). Despite this, N. radula View in CoL has a wide distribution in the Indo-West Pacific realm (from Japan, Okinawa to New Caledonia and Red Sea). In contrast, Neritopsis richeri View in CoL n. sp. with a multipiral protoconch indicating planktotrophic development, with a high dispersal ability, apparently has a geographical distribution restricted to French Polynesia. I suspect that this is probably an artefact resulting from confusion in the literature between N. richeri View in CoL n. sp. and N. radula View in CoL . Indeed, Bandel & Frýda (1999) figured from Mauritius (Indian Ocean), under the name Neritopsis radula View in CoL , a species that has a multispiral protoconch which may be close to N. richeri View in CoL n. sp. Careful examination of all material identified as N. radula View in CoL is required before we can exclude the possibility that N. richeri View in CoL n. sp. extends from Polynesia to the Indian Ocean.
The relationship with Neritopsis aqabaensis View in CoL from the Gulf of Aqaba (northern Red Sea) is more questionable. The protoconch of N. aqabaensis View in CoL has two whorls ( Bandel 2007) similar to that of N. richeri View in CoL n. sp., but the embryonic shell is sculptured with growth lines. Despite partially eroded embryonic and larval shells, the protoconch of N. richeri View in CoL n. sp. appears clearly to be smooth and is regarded as a multispiral protoconch of the planktotrophic type ( Kano 2006: figs A, D). Moreover, N. aqabaensis View in CoL was described from a juvenile specimen with only a half whorl of teleoconch, and the adult shells collected in the same locality were indicated by Bandel (2007) as identical to Neritopsis radula View in CoL . It is unclear whether they belong to one or the other species. Bandel (2007) did not mention the very characteristic secondary cords present in N. richeri View in CoL n. sp.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Neritopsis richeri
Lozouet, Pierre 2009 |
Neritopsis radula
SALVAT B. & RIVES C. 1975: 262 |