Notalina (Neonotalina) claudiofroehlichi Desidério & Calor, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1590/1806-9665-RBENT-2023-0065 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E6212861-FFCF-9A0A-8652-4E24FBA1FDB0 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Notalina (Neonotalina) claudiofroehlichi Desidério & Calor |
status |
sp. nov. |
Notalina (Neonotalina) claudiofroehlichi Desidério & Calor , sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:FE0218EC-ED2F-422D-A686-E8CEF21B87B0 ( Figs. 11A–E View Figure 11 , 12A–F View Figure 12 )
Diagnosis. This new species can be easily recognized by the tergum X with medium-sized spine-like setae covering 1/3 apical; basodorsal lobe strongly sclerotized and produced in dorsal view; dorsomesal process absent; apicolateral process strongly sclerotized with the rounded apex in lateral view; and basal portion of inferior appendages very broad, subtriangular in lateral view.
Description. Adult male (n=1). Head brown; maxillary and labial palps brown; antennae pale brown ( Figs. 11A, B View Figure 11 ). Thorax brown; pleuron pale brown ( Fig. 11C View Figure 11 ). Forewing brown, with small hyaline spot at thyridial cell; forewing length 7.55 mm; forks I and V present ( Fig. 11D View Figure 11 ); hind wing length 6.28 mm; forks I, III and V present; fork I very narrow, fork III with petiole ca. 1/3 its length ( Fig. 11E View Figure 11 ). Legs pale brown ( Fig. 11A View Figure 11 ); tibial spur formula 2,2,4. Male genitalia. Segment IX, in lateral view, dorsolaterally as long as ventrolaterally; anterior margin slightly concave; apicodorsal area with paired, poorly developed, closely situated protuberance; posterolateral margin strongly produced medially, bearing setae ( Fig. 12A View Figure 12 ). Preanal appendages setose, long, slender, ca. 2/3 length of segment X; in dorsal view, apex rounded, bearing long setae ( Figs. 12A, B View Figure 12 ). Segment X, in lateral view, saddle-shaped; anterodorsal area slightly convex; mid-dorsal area without lateral protuberance; distal area without dorsomesal and dorsolateral processes; apicolateral process strongly sclerotized, brownwish, rounded, bearing medium-sized spine-like setae ( Fig. 12A View Figure 12 ); in dorsal view, with strongly sclerotized and produced basolateral lobe; U-shaped apicomesal incision extending anteriorly ca.1/2 length of segment X; with numerous medium-sized spine-like setae covering 1/3 apical its length ( Fig.12B View Figure 12 ). Inferior appendage, in lateral view, with very broad basal portion, subtriangular, apical portion elongate, digitate, setose; basodorsal process rounded, smaller than basoventral process; mesodorsal process long and broad, apex acute, directed apicodorsad ( Fig. 12A View Figure 12 ); in ventral view, basoventral process well developed, symmetrical, obliquely rounded, apex directed mesad ( Fig. 12C View Figure 12 ); mesoventral process, in lateral view, indistinct ( Fig. 12A View Figure 12 ); in ventral view, distinctly pointed with subtruncated apex ( Fig. 12C View Figure 12 ). Phallic apparatus with a pair of strongly sclerotized, acuminate phallobase flanges ( Figs. 12 View Figure 12 D-F), apex directed posteroventrad ( Fig. 12D View Figure 12 ); phallotremal sclerite well developed, claw-shaped in lateral view ( Fig.12D View Figure 12 ); Y-shaped, apical portion mesally directed in ventral view ( Figs. 12E, F View Figure 12 ).
Holotype male. BRAZIL: Bahia: Rio dos Pires, Serra dos Barbados, Igarapé Forquilha , 13°17’25”S, 41°54’20”W, el. 1.690 m, iii.2020, Malaise trap, J Alencar, G Jorge, ECT Pereira & JO da Silva cols., 1 male (alcohol) ( INPA-TRI 000138 ) ( INPA). GoogleMaps
Distribution ( Figs. 20A, B View Figure 20 ). Brazil (BA, Caatinga domain).
Remarks. Notalina (Neonotalina) is currently divided into two species groups ( brasiliana and roraima), which are defined based mainly on characters of the male genitalia ( Holzenthal, 1986; Calor et al., 2006). Notalina (Neonotalina) claudiofroehlichi sp. nov. is herein assigned to the brasiliana group due having a complex phallic apparatus with acuminate lateral flanges at the apex and a well-developed phallotremal sclerite. It is most similar to N. (Neonotalina) ralphi Silva-Pereira, Oliveira, Desidério, Calor & Hamada, 2022 mainly by the tergum X with slightly convex anterodorsal area, absence of processes on the median portion and the inferior appendage with indistinct ventromesal process in lateral view. However, N. (Neonotalina) claudiofroehlichi sp. nov. has the preanal appendages with rounded apex, which are acuminate in N. (Neonotalina) ralphi . In the new species the incision apicomesal of segment X has U-shaped, extending anteriorly ca.1/2 of its length, whereas inN. (Neonotalina) ralphi this incision has V-shaped, extending anteriorly ca.1/3 length of segment. Additionally, the phallotremal sclerite of the phallic apparatus in N. (Neonotalina) claudiofroehlichi sp. nov. is claw-shaped in lateral view, while in N. (Neonotalina) ralphi this sclerite is Y-shaped.
Although N. (Neonotalina) claudiofroehlichi sp. nov. is a member of the brasiliana group, the morphology of tergum X resembles that of N. (Neonotalina) matthiasi Holzenthal, 1986 from Colombia, a member of the roraima group.Both species share the presence of spine-like setae on the tergum X, but in N. (Neonotalina) claudiofroehlichi sp. nov. these setae are medium-sized, distributed on the dorsal and lateral regions of 1/3 apical, whereas in N. (Neonotalina) matthiasi they are short, distributed along the lateroventral margin of the tergite and another alone seta on the apex of each apicolateral process.
Etymology. The new species is named in honor of Prof.Dr.Claudio Gilberto Froehlich (Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil) in recognition of his efforts to the advancement of the knowledge on Neotropical aquatic insects and his contributions in supervising new entomologists.
INPA |
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |