Pseudanaphothrips parvus (Bagnall)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3209.1.4 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C087DA-754E-FFFA-64C0-5D3AB30EF87B |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pseudanaphothrips parvus (Bagnall) |
status |
|
Pseudanaphothrips parvus (Bagnall) View in CoL
Pseudothrips parvus Bagnall, 1916: 222 View in CoL
Physothrips nativus Girault, 1929a: 29 View in CoL . Syn. n.
Homochaetothrips pallipennis Sakimura, 1968: 62 View in CoL . Syn. n.
Several Pseudanaphothrips species remain known from very few specimens, and are particularly difficult to distinguish from each other ( Mound & Palmer, 1981). In contrast to related members of the genus, P. parvus View in CoL has rather less shaded fore wings, and shorter and paler antennal segments, and has ocellar setae pair III slightly more anterior in position. The lectotype is in poor condition, but recently collected specimens from various localities indicate that the body size is more variable than was assumed by Sakimura (1968) from a study of that original specimen. Measurements of P. pallipennis View in CoL , including recently studied paratypes, fall within the range of P. parvus View in CoL as here recognised. The holotype of P. nativus View in CoL is a severely shrunken female on which insufficient details can be seen to distinguish it from P. parvus View in CoL . These three names are considered to represent a single widespread Australian thrips that lives in the yellow flowers of several native Asteraceae View in CoL species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pseudanaphothrips parvus (Bagnall)
Mound, Laurence A. 2012 |
Homochaetothrips pallipennis
Sakimura, K. 1968: 62 |
Physothrips nativus
Girault, A. A. 1929: 29 |
Pseudothrips parvus
Bagnall, R. S. 1916: 222 |