Siphonaria gemina, B. W. Jenkins & Köhler, 2024

Jenkins, Bruce & Köhler, Frank, 2024, Hidden in plain sight: Systematic review of Indo-West Pacific Siphonariidae uncovers extensive cryptic diversity based on comparative morphology and mitochondrial phylogenetics (Mollusca, Gastropoda), Megataxa 13 (1), pp. 1-217 : 149-153

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.13.1.1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14989349

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0D49832F-FF09-8284-FCCA-F962FE06F7D6

treatment provided by

Plazi (2025-03-05 09:04:49, last updated 2025-03-07 14:54:03)

scientific name

Siphonaria gemina
status

sp. nov.

Siphonaria gemina View in CoL sp. nov.

( Figs 56G–T View FIGURE 56 , 57A–B View FIGURE 57 , 58G–J View FIGURE 58 , 59A–D View FIGURE 59 )

Siphonaria cf normalis View in CoL — Maes 1967: 119, pl. 14, fig. l; Wells 1994: 19; Tan & Low 2014: 367 (not S. normalis Gould, 1846 View in CoL ).

Siphonaria normalis View in CoL — Willan et al. 2015: 330 (not S. normalis View in CoL Gould, 1846 (not 1856)).

Siphonaria sp. — Wells & Bryce 1995: 113; 1996: 63.

Siphonaria ‘ atra group, unit 51’— Ossenbrügger et al. 2023: 38, fig. 2a–b.

Material examined. Type material. Holotype, from Nightcliff 12°22.836’S, 130°50.402’E, Darwin, NT; coll. B.W. Jenkins, NT23-1, 8 Sept 2017 ( AM C.585485 [M088, SK089], Fig. 56G View FIGURE 56 ) GoogleMaps . Paratype, from Cox Peninsula 2 , 12°25.558’S, 130°44.593’E; coll. B.W. Jenkins, NT25- 2, 10 Sept 2017 ( AM C.585487 p [M089], Fig. 56H View FIGURE 56 ), GoogleMaps 2 paratypes, from Native Point oyster reef, Dundee Beach 12°42.906’S, 130°20.653’E, NT; coll. B.W. Jenkins, NT26-6, 11 Sept 2017 ( AM C.585096 p [M140], AM C.585099 p [M141]) GoogleMaps .

Other, non-type material. Australia, Qld : Sweers Is , 12°03.456’S, 96°52.329’E, Q56-2 ( AM C.585188p [M091]). GoogleMaps NT: Luxmore Hd, Melville Is, 11°20.639’S, 130°23.149’E, NT24-1 ( AM C.585336 p); GoogleMaps Nightcliff, Darwin, 12°22.836’S, 130°50.402’E NT23-1 ( AM C.585090 p [SK078 protoconch C5], C.585091 p [SK089]); GoogleMaps Cox Peninsula 2, 12°25.558’S, 130°44.593’E NT25-2 ( AM C.585092 p [M144], C.585093 p [M145], C.585094 p [M090, SK091], C.585098 p [M143]); GoogleMaps N of Native Point, Dundee Beach, 12°42.182’S, 130°20.881’E NT26-1 ( AM C.585095 p [SK103], C.585337 p [SK088]); GoogleMaps Native Point oyster reef, Dundee Beach, 12°42.906’S, 130°20.653’E NT26-6 ( AM C.585097 p [M094]); GoogleMaps Native Point reef, Dundee Beach, 12°42.981’S, 130°20.807’E NT26-3 ( AM C.585488 p [M146]). GoogleMaps WA: Tait Point, Mission Bay, 14°05.442’S, 126°41.143’E, WA04-1 ( AM C.584669 p [SK246]; GoogleMaps Raft Point Collier Bay, 16°04.045’S, 124°26.814’E, WA17-2 ( AM C.584668 p [M464, SK199]); GoogleMaps CatamaranBay, 16°27.622’S, 123°00.242’E,WA22-3 ( AM C.585301p[M071, SK090],C.585302 p[M072],C.585303 p [M043]); GoogleMaps Cape Keraudren, 19°57.393’S, 119°46.358’E, WA29-2 ( AM C.585308 p [M032]) GoogleMaps . Mauritius: Nth Albion Is, Mauritius, 20°12.258’S, 57°24.252’E, MRU2- 2 ( AM C.584971 [M249], Fig. 56I View FIGURE 56 , C.585976 20p, AM C.584972 p [M250], Fig. 56J View FIGURE 56 ) GoogleMaps . Australia, CKI: E coast of Home Is, 12°06.917’S, 96°53.835’E, CKI04-1 ( WAM S74044 View Materials [M317, SK255], Fig. 56K View FIGURE 56 , AM C.608183 15p, C.584666 p [M318], C.584667 p [M319]); GoogleMaps S coast of West Is , 12°12.210’S, 96°50.372’E, CKI02-2 ( AM C.584849 p [M315], Fig. 56L View FIGURE 56 , C.584850 p [M316]); GoogleMaps West Island , N point (Trannies), 12°08.540’S, 96°49.013’E, CKI01- 1 ( AM C.585372 10p); GoogleMaps S coast of West Is , 12°12.210’S, 96°50.372’E, CKI02-2 ( AM C.585373 10p, C.584665 p [M314], C.585933 p [SK092], C.585942 p [SK086]); GoogleMaps N coast Direction Is, 12°03.456’S, 96°52.329’E, CKI03-1 ( AM C.585374 10p, C.585941 p [SK535]). GoogleMaps Marquesas Islands : Nuku Hiva, Baie des Controleurs, 08°53.92’S, 140°02.92’W, MQ7-M ( MNHN IM-2013-74895 [M574], Fig. 57A View FIGURE 57 ), GoogleMaps Baie d’Hakatea, 08°56.53’S, 140°09.69’W, MQ25-M, ( MNHN IM-2013-74904 p [M566], Fig. 57B View FIGURE 57 ; IM-2013-74902 p [M571], IM-2013-74900 p [M576], IM-2013-74903 p [M572], MNHN IM-2013-74901 p [M573]), GoogleMaps Baie des Controleurs, 08°53.92’S, 140°02.92’W, MQ7- M ( MNHN IM-2013-67892p [M578], IM-2013-74894 p [M575], IM-2013-74896 p [M564]) GoogleMaps .

External morphology ( Fig. 56M View FIGURE 56 ). Foot sole and foot wall evenly pale yellowish grey, paler at foot/wall edge; foot wall and mantle more yellowish, without black pigmentation; mantle strongly lobed, translucent, as wide as foot wall, covers exposed inner shell lip; genital pore inconspicuous, located on foot wall to right anterior of right cephalic fold; two small black epithelial eye spots centralised on two centrally touching unpigmented cephalic folds; pneumostomal lobe long, under the mantle, unpigmented, between the right ADMs.

Shell ( Fig. 56G–T View FIGURE 56 , 57A–B View FIGURE 57 ; Table S9). Shell ribbing and colouration variable; small sizing (max sl mean = 9.3 mm, SD = 1.7 mm, n = 8); ovate to elongate, height medium; apex often tall, pointed (protoconch very tall when intact), slightly offset posteriorly and left; protoconch direction heterostrophic (n = 2; Fig. 56T View FIGURE 56 ) to upright (n = 2; Fig. 56Q View FIGURE 56 ), shell whorl dextral; apical sides weakly convex, posterior concave; protoconch area distinctly darker brown, growth lines usually distinct undulating; rib count (mean = 28, SD = 5.3, n = 8), primary ribs white, curved, wavy, moderately flare at and extend beyond shell edge, rib ridges rounded, rib interstices dark brown/black; paired primary ribs form siphonal ridge, extend well beyond line of shell lip, strongly to weakly flared upwardly at shell edge; none to one secondary ribs between primary ribs, either side of siphonal ridge the number of secondary ribs greater; interior shell lip uneven, corrugated to no corrugations, shell lip with white blotches or rays under primary ribs, dark brown/ black under rib interstices; white rays may extend over shell margin; spatula usually evenly dark brown/black but may be white to dull white; siphonal groove usually white, may be dark brown/black, bounded on either side by prominent dark brown/black axial patches aligning with primary rib interstices. WA and NT specimens often with heavy and strongly raised ribbing with corrugations on shell lip, CKI specimens possess flatter ribs and few to no corrugations on shell lip; thickening of inner shell lip and spatula not observed.

Reproductive system ( Fig. 58G, I View FIGURE 58 , 59A; n View FIGURE 59 = 5). Positioned within coelom under the respiratory cavity, occupies the entire right side of coelom, hermaphroditic glands positioned to posterior against right foot wall and over foot sole, epiphallic parts positioned to anterior between BM and RAM; GA small, with singular GP through foot wall; AO very small, bluntly pointed, joined to upper GA alongside ED; ED short, broad, slightly bent (without prominent MA), joins to side of GA; GA, AO, ED all white muscular fibrous tissue; EG large, soft whitish tissue, slightly folded, joins ED; single narrow flagellum (F1; possible 2 nd flagellum), similar length and width to ED, appears as a continuous extension of ED to EG, laid over BM, often centrally bent; BD and CD connect together into GA between ED / AO joint and GP, both ducts short, straight, smooth, thickened, whitish, featureless, pass closely together through RAM ( BD over CD) into soft white folded tissues of MG; MG / AG complex relatively large; BC embedded in folds of AG / MG close to embedded SV; BD on posterior side only, unlooped, similar thickness to CD; BC relatively large, spherical, thin translucent test; HD short, not thickened, coiled, links ducts in soft white folded tissues of AG to yellowish granulated HG; outer edge of MG lobbed; AG much larger than HG, sides match curvature of inner foot wall.

Spermatophore ( Fig. 58H, J View FIGURE 58 , 59B View FIGURE 59 ). Broad head with short flagellum (length = 4.0 ± 2.9 mm, 64% of AL, n = 4), head section cylindrical, bulbous, centrally bent, rounded tip; test thin, smooth, featureless, translucent encasing a white opaque central core; short tapering section merges head to filamentous flagellum; head shorter, wider than translucent flagellum (head length = 1.8 ± 0.18 mm, ~ 82% of SPM length, head width = 171 ± 14.8 μm, flagellum width = 24 ± 1.3 μm, n = 4); 1 SPM coiled in one BC ( AM C.585488). The SPM of specimens from Mauritius differs somewhat in having a shorter flagellum ( Fig. 58J View FIGURE 58 , length = 4.34 ± 3.42, n = 3, AM C.584971). Specimens from the Cocos (Keeling) Islands have a broad head with short flagellum (length = 5.8 ± 3.2 mm, n = 2), head section cylindrical, bulbous, centrally bent, rounded tip; test thin, smooth, featureless, translucent encasing a white opaque central core; short tapering section merges head to filamentous flagellum; head shorter, wider than translucent flagellum (length = 4.0 ± 2.1 mm, ~ 69% of SPM length, head width = 249 ± 20.2 μm; flagellum width = 29 ± 2.1 μm, n = 4); 1–2 SPM in each of two BC ( WAM S74044 View Materials , AM C.585942).

Comparative remarks. In our mitochondrial phylogeny ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 , 4 View FIGURE 4 ), S. gemina populations from northwestern Australia, CKI, Mauritius, and the Marquesas Islands form a clade with little apparent genetic differentiation between them ( normalis group, unit 78). COI sequences of this unit differ from each other by genetic distances of up to 6.2% (Table S8). We observed minor, yet consistent morphological differences between populations from mainland Australia, Mauritius, the Marquesas Islands, and the Cocos Keeling Islands in features of the shell, BC, and SPM. However, we consider these differences to represent intraspecific morphological variation. Siphonaria gemina sp. nov. is the sister species of an unidentified Siphonaria sp. (unit 11, from NT, Australia and Yap Is). These two clades differ by COI distances of ≥ 14.1% (Table S8). Throughout its range in tropical WA, we found S. gemina gemina in sympatry with five congeners: For comparisons with S. alba , S. normalis , S. zelandica , and S. viridis refer to comparative remarks under these species. Siphonaria restis sp. nov. has a larger, lower, sturdier shell with a less prominent siphonal ridge, stronger edge scalloping, a larger AO and BC, longer ED and BD, and a shorter SPM. Specimens figured as ‘ Siphonaria unit 51’ by Ossenbrügger et al. (2023) belong to the same MOTU, unit 78 and correspond well with specimens examined here.

Distribution and habitat. Siphonaria gemina has a wide distribution spanning Mauritius, the Seychelles, the Cocos (Keeling) Islands, Tropical Australia, between Cape Keraudren in northern WA and the Sweers Is, Gulf of Carpentaria, Qld, to the Marquesas Islands ( Fig. 55 View FIGURE 55 ). In this study, found on moderately exposed rocky shores, in upper littoral level ( Fig. 56S View FIGURE 56 ).

Etymology. From ‘geminus’ (Latin = paired), referring to the prominence of paired siphonal primary ribs accentuated by dark flanking bands on the shell of this species; adjective.

Gould, A. A. (1846) Descriptions of new shells, collected by the United States Exploring Expedition. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History. 2: 141-145, 148 - 152 [July]; 153 - 156, 159 - 162, 165 - 167 [August]; 170 - 173, 175 - 176 [September]; 177 - 179, 180 - 184, 185 - 187, 190 - 192 [November].

Maes, V. O. (1967) The littoral marine mollusks of Cocos-Keeling Islands (Indian Ocean). Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences Philadelphia, 119 (4), 93-217.

Ossenbrugger, H., Neiber. M. T. & Hausdorf, B. (2023) Diversity of Siphonaria Sowerby I, 1823 (Gastropoda, Siphonariidae) in the Seychelles Bank and beyond. Zoologica Scripta, 51, 31-45.

Tan, K. S. & Low, M. E. Y. (2014) Checklist of the Mollusca of Cocos (Keeling) / Christmas Island ecoregion. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, Suppl. 30, 313-375.

Wells, F. E. (1994) Marine Molluscs of the Cocos (Keeling) Islands. Atoll Research Bulletin, 410, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00775630.410.1

Wells, F. E. & Bryce, C. W. (1995) Part 8. Molluscs. In: Wells, F. E., Hanley, J. R. & Walker, D. I. (Eds.), Survey of the marine biota of the southern Kimberley Islands, Western Australia. Western Australian Museum, pp. 101-117.

Wells, F. E. & Bryce, C. W. (1996) Molluscs. In: Walker, D. I., Wells, F. E. & Hanley, J. R. (Eds.), Marine biological survey of the eastern Kimberley, Western Australia. The University of Western Australia, Western Australian Museum and Museum and Art Gallery of Northern Territory, pp. 54-64. [unpublished report]

Gallery Image

FIGURE 1. Maximum Likelihood phylogram based on analyses of a concatenated sequence data set of 16S and COI. Branches are collapsed at the species level. Branch labels give unit numbers and accepted species names. Numbers on branches indicate branch support employing 10,000 ultrafast bootstraps.Available genus-group names are shown next to their type species. Scale bar indicating modelled sequence divergence.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 4. Maximum Likelihood phylogram (partial, species not collapsed). Clades C–F (normalis, lateralis and pectinata groups) of the tree shown in Fig. 1. Branch labels give specimen identifiers for new sequences or Genbank accession numbers for imported sequences from other studies and geographic regions (see Tables S1–S2 for details). Identical haplotypes are merged into single tips. Numbers on branches indicate branch support by employing 10,000 ultrafast bootstraps. Clade names give unit numbers and accepted species names. Scale bar indicating modelled sequence divergence.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 55. Known occurrence records of S. camura sp. nov., S. caubianensis sp. nov., S. christmasensis sp. nov., S. costellata sp. nov., S. delicata sp. nov., S. forticosta sp. nov. and S. gemina sp. nov.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 56. Shells of S. delicata sp. nov., S. forticosta sp. nov., S. gemina sp. nov. A–C, M. S. delicata sp. nov., CI, Ethel Beach. A. Holotype AM C.585322 [M421, SK108]. B. Paratype AM C608199 [SK093]. C. Paratype WAM S74041 [M307]. M. In situ. D–F, P. S. forticosta sp. nov., Timor-Leste, Dili. D. Holotype AM C.584829 [M441]. E. Paratype AM C.585318 [SK546]. F. Paratype AM C.584825 [M445]. P. Protoconch, AM C.584830 [SK228]. G–T. S. gemina sp. nov. G. NT, Darwin, holotype AM C.585485 [M088]. H. NT, Cox Peninsula, paratype AM C.585487 [M089]. Q. NT, protoconch,AM C.585337 [SK088]. S. Darwin, animal. T. Darwin, in situ. I–J, N. Mauritius, North Albion. I. AM C.584971 [M249]. J. AM C.584972 [M250]. N. In situ. K–L, O, R. CKI. K. WAM S74044 [M317]. L. AM C.584849 [M315]. O. Animal. R. In situ. Scale bars 5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 57. Shells of S. gemina sp. nov., S. griffithsorum sp. nov., S. tongatapuensis sp. nov. and S. hienghenensis sp. nov. A–B. S. gemina sp. nov., Marquesas, Nuku Hiva. A. IM-2013-74895 [M574]. B. IM-2013-74904 [M566]. C–E, M–N, T. S. griffithsorum sp. nov., Mauritius, Souillac. C. Holotype AM C.584963 [M256]. D. Paratype AM C.584966 [M257]. E. Paratype AM C.585909 [SK389]. M. Animal. N. In situ. T. Protoconch, AM C.585909 [SK389]. F–H, O–P, S. S. tongatapuensis sp. nov., Tongatapu, Halafuoleva Bch. F. Holotype AM C.585279 [M420, SK107]. G. Paratype AM C.585281 [SK224]. H. Paratype AM C.585911 [SK387]. O. Protoconch, AM C.585282 [SK222]. P. In situ. S. Animal. I–L, Q–R. S. hienghenensis sp. nov., NC, Ponerihouen. I. Holotype AM C.584989 [SK127]. J. Paratype AM C.584985 [M355]. K. Ouassé, paratype AM C.584990 [SK170]. L. Ouassé paratype AM C.584805 [M375]. Q. Ponerihouen, animal. R. Ponerihouen, in situ. Scale bars = 10 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 58. Reproductive morphology of S. costellata sp. nov., S. delicata sp. nov., S. forticosta sp. nov. and S. gemina sp. nov. A–B. Holotype of S. costellata sp. nov. ZRC.MOL.24890 [M416, SK100], Singapore, Lazarus Is. C–D. Paratype of S. delicata sp. nov. AM C.608199 [SK093], CI. E. Holotype of S. forticosta sp. nov. AM C.584829 [M441, SK227], Timor-Leste, Dili. F. S. forticosta sp. nov., AM C.585991 [SK547]. G–H. Holotype of S. gemina sp. nov. AM C.585485 [M088], NT, Darwin. I–J. S. gemina sp. nov., Mauritius AM C.584971 [M249]. Unlabelled scale bars 1 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 59. Reproductive morphology of S. gemina sp. nov., S griffithsorum sp. nov., S. tongatapuensis sp. nov. and S. hienghenensis sp. nov. A–B. S. gemina sp. nov., CKI, WAM S74044 [M317, SK255]. C–D. S. gemina sp. nov., Marquesas, Nuku Hiva, MNHN IM-2013-74904 [M566 SK484]. E–F. Paratype of S. griffithsorum sp. nov. AM C.584966 [M257], Mauritius. G–H. Holotype of S. tongatapuensis sp. nov. AM C.585279 [M420, SK107], Tongatapu, Halafuoleva Beach. I–J. Holotype of S. hienghenensis sp. nov. AM C.584989 [SK127], NC, Ponerihouen. Scale bars = 1 mm.

AM

Australian Museum

WAM

Western Australian Museum

MNHN

Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle

BM

Bristol Museum

GP

Instituto de Geociencias, Universidade de Sao Paulo

MG

Museum of Zoology

SPM

Sabah Parks

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Mollusca

Class

Gastropoda

Order

Siphonariida

Family

Siphonariidae

Genus

Siphonaria