Smicridea (Rhyacophylax) dumasi, Santana & Desiderio & Hamada, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4941.1.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:90B3063C-0AA3-4E0F-AFB6-5A5C4AFE5C3A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4594829 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F05B195A-0747-43F7-809C-ABE93B82518F |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:F05B195A-0747-43F7-809C-ABE93B82518F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Smicridea (Rhyacophylax) dumasi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Smicridea (Rhyacophylax) dumasi sp. nov. Santana, Desiderio & Hamada
Figs 3–5 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:F05B195A-0747-43F7-809C-ABE93B82518F
Diagnosis. Smicridea (Rhyacophylax) dumasi sp. nov. is similar to S. (Rhyacophylax) fogasa Oláh & Johanson 2012 ( Ecuador) , S. (Rhyacophylax) kampoka Oláh & Johanson 2012 ( Peru) , S. (Rhyacophylax) nemorosa Holzenthal & Blahnik 1995 ( Costa Rica), and S. (Rhyacophylax) salta Flint 1974 ( Mexico) based on the presence of a midlateral process on the ventrolateral margin of tergum X. However, in this region of the tergum, S. (R.) dumasi sp. nov. also has one small pointed, process subapically, which is absent in those species mentioned above. The new species has 11 medium-sized, ventral spines and three lateroventral spines on the middle and apex of the phallic apparatus, respectively, whereas S. (R.) fogasa , S. (R.) kampoka , S. (R.) nemorosa , and S. (R.) salta have processes or lobes in various other forms, number, and positions on the apex of the phallic apparatus.Additionally, S. (R.) dumasi sp. nov. can be recognized by six long, stout spines on the dorsal periphallic cap of the phallic apparatus.
Description. Adult male. Length of each forewing 7.56–8.40 mm (mean = 7.92 mm, SD = ±0.22, n = 5). General color pale brown (in alcohol) ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ). Antennae pale brown ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ). Head pale brown, with pale setae on dorsum ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 ); dorsally with well-pronounced coronal suture; with five setal warts; anteromesal wart small, rounded; anterolateral pair partially divided, weakly delimited; posterolateral pair large, ovoid ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 ). Eye width, in dorsal view, 1/2 that of interocular distance ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 ). Maxillary palp with segment 3 about 2X longer than segments 1 or 2 and about same length as segment 4, segment 5 about 1.2X longer than all previous segments combined ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ). Thorax pale brown, covered with brown setae ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ); legs pale brown, with tarsi of the fore- and midlegs yellowish ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ). Wing venation typical for subgenus ( Figs 4D, 4E View FIGURE 4 ). Forewings, in alcohol, pale yellow, with large, brown, transverse band subapically arising on R2+3 and reaching apex of Cu1a+b, and brown spots on crossveins and another along bases of C and Sc ( Fig. 4D View FIGURE 4 ). Sternum V with pair of anterolateral glandular processes slightly shorter than sternum. Abdominal segments VI and VII without internal glands ( Fig. 4F View FIGURE 4 ).
Male genitalia. Segment IX in lateral view with anterolateral margin nearly straight, weakly sclerotized ( Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 ); posterodorsal margin strongly produced, rounded, bearing small spicules ( Figs 5A, 5B View FIGURE 5 ). Tergum X elongate; in lateral view, ventrolateral margin strongly sclerotized; in dorsal view, asymmetrical, with one medium-sized, pointed, midlateral process, curved mesad on insect’s right side, two on left side: larger process with apex bifid and curved mesad, smaller process halfway between larger process and tergum apex; apex of tergum produced and slightly upturned ( Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 ); lateral margins slightly sinuous beyond midlateral processes; dorsomesal setose area bearing six to seven medium-sized pairs of fine setae; divided apicomesally by V-shaped incision about 1/2 its length; apices of tergum obliquely truncate, each with about five short, fine setae ( Fig. 5B View FIGURE 5 ). Inferior appendages each 2-segmented; basal segment long, slightly inflated distally, covered with medium-sized to long, thin setae, with three long, stout apical spine-like setae on internal margin; apical segment about 1/3 as long as basal segment, thick, covered with medium-sized, fine setae, curved mesad, apex rounded ( Figs 5A, 5B View FIGURE 5 ). Phallic apparatus long and tubular; basal section, in lateral view, enlarged, 3X diameter of phallotheca at its narrowest portion, forming angle of about 83° with apical section; median section of phallotheca slightly curved ventrad with 8 to 11 mediumsized, ventral spines, and with dorsal periphallic cap sclerotized and bearing six long, stout spines ( Fig. 5C View FIGURE 5 ); apex, in dorsal view, not enlarged ( Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5 ); in lateral view, with three medium-sized, lateroventral spines, directed posterad ( Fig. 5C View FIGURE 5 ); endothecal membranes, in dorsal view, without spines; phallotremal sclerite, in dorsal view, distinct, strongly sclerotized, divided into two slender, paired lobes with obliquely truncated apices ( Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5 ); in lateral view, slender, upturned apically ( Fig. 5C View FIGURE 5 ). Ejaculatory duct of endophallus, in lateral view, distinct, slightly sclerotized. When endothecal membranes everted, distinctly reticulated, wrapping around phallotremal sclerite, fully extended and shown in Figs 5E, 5F View FIGURE 5 .
Female and immature stages. Unknown.
Material examined. Holotype male. BRAZIL: São Paulo: Salesópolis, Estaç „o Biológica de Boracéia , Casa Grande , Pedreira , 15.xi.1974; C.G. Froehlich leg., ( MZUSP).
Paratypes: same data as holotype, 4 males ( MZUSP) . Paraná: Guarapeçaba, RPPN Salto Morato, Rio Morato , near the dormitory, 25°10’58.3”S, 48°17’57.2”W, 8 m a.s.l., 4 males, 25.i.2011, L.L. Dumas & J.L. Nessimian legs., ( DZRJ) GoogleMaps ; same data, except 4 males (INPA-TRI 000105), 4 males ( DZUP) GoogleMaps .
Distribution. BRAZIL (Atlantic Forest: Paraná and S„o Paulo states) ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ).
Etymology. This new species is named in honor of Dr. Leandro Lourenço Dumas (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ, Brazil) in recognition of his contributions to the study of Brazilian caddisflies.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Smicrideinae |
Genus |