Trichotichnus (s. str.) subrobustus, Kataev & Hongbin & Wrase, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5159.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:13308111-EF49-4710-9C45-CF69DABE2C5D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6781699 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D364737A-2403-1706-FF60-B27617971BC2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Trichotichnus (s. str.) subrobustus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Trichotichnus (s. str.) subrobustus sp. n.
( Figs. 10 View FIGURES 8–10 , 22 View FIGURES 18–22 , 29–34 View FIGURES 29–33 View FIGURE 34 )
Type material. Holotype. Male , “ CHINA, Yunnan Provin., Gongshan, Dulongjiang Bapo, Mabiluo, riverside 27.76208°N, 98.34567°E ”, “ 1503 m, 2004.10.27 day Liang Hongbin collector California Academy & IOZ., Chinese. Acad. Sci.” ( IOZ). GoogleMaps
Paratypes. China. YUNNAN: 1 male, Gongshan Co., Dulongjiang, Elidang Village , beach, 28.00287°N 98.32145°E, 1640 m, 3.XI.2004, D. Kavanaugh, D.Z. Dong leg. ( ZIN) GoogleMaps ; 1 female, Gongshan, Dulongjiang , 0.5 km N Kongdang, 27.88111°N 98.34062°E, 1500 m, 7.XI.2004, D. Kavanaugh leg. ( IOZ) GoogleMaps ; 1 female, Gongshan, Dulongjiang , 0.6 km N Dizhengdang, 28.08442°N 98.32652°E, 1880 m, 29.X.2004, D. Kavanaugh leg. ( CAS) GoogleMaps ; 1 female, Gongshan, Dulongjiang, Moqiewang , riverside, 27.89924°N 98.35877°E, 1580 m, 6.XI.2004, H.B. Liang leg. ( CAS) GoogleMaps .
Description (2 males and 3 females measured). Body length 9.2–10.0 mm. Habitus as in Fig. 10 View FIGURES 8–10 . Morphological character states are as described for H. angustitarsis sp. n., but differing or limited as follows.
Dorsal side of body black, shiny, very slightly iridescent on elytra; ventral side blackish brown. Base of mandibles and occasionally the very narrow lateral margins of pronotum reddish brown; palpi and antennae brownish yellow; legs brownish yellow or light brown, occasionally femora very slightly infuscate.
Head comparatively large (HWmax/PWmax 0.71–0.74, HWmin/PWmax 0.58– 0.62). Eyes smaller and less convex than in T. angustitarsis sp. n. (HWmax/HWmin 1.17–1.27), in lateral view oval. Genae wider, about as wide as antennomere 1. Tempora longer (about 0.3–0.4 as long as eye diameter and more oblique. Fronto-clypeal suture more impressed and clypeus more convex. Supraorbital furrows slightly wider. Supraorbital setigerous pores situated slightly behind level of posterior margin of eye and removed from supraorbital furrows by distance wider than width of antennomere 1. Left mandible sharply bent approximately in the apical quarter, subtruncate at tip. Dorsal microsculpture highly obliterated, meshes on frons not recognizable. Antennae shorter, not reaching pronotal basal edge, with antennomeres 4–8 about 2.7–3.0 as long as wide. Basal antennomere about as long antennomere 3.
Pronotum similar to that of T. angustitarsis sp. n. (PWmax/PL 1.50–1.58), also widest at the end of the anterior third, but more strongly narrowed basally (PWmax/PWmin 1.22–1.26), slightly more convex, more deeply emarginate apically and with apical angles more narrowly rounded. Microsculpture even more obliterated, meshes not recognizable medially on disc in some specimens.
Elytra relatively shorter (EL/EW 1.45–1.49, EL/PL 2.81–2.98; EW/PWmax 1.26–1.30), with less distinct humeral denticle, acuter sutural angle and narrower and more convex intervals apically; discal pore on interval 3 more distinct.
Metepisternum ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 18–22 ) shorter, only slightly longer than wide.
Tarsi shorter; metatarsus slightly shorter than HWmin; metatarsomeres 1–4 comparatively sparsely setose ventrally. In male, pro- and mesotarsomeres 1–4 comparatively weakly widened, with tarsomeres 2 and 3 about as long as wide. In both sexes, mesotarsomere 1 shorter than mesotarsomeres 2 and 3 combined.
Median lobe of aedeagus ( Figs. 29–31 View FIGURES 29–33 ) robust, with a small transverse apical capitulum, in lateral view arcuate on dorsal side; its ventral margin almost straight in middle portion and slightly convex before apex; ventral side edged laterally in apical part and very shallowly depressed between margins; terminal lamella ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 29–33 ) in dorsal view wide and short, much wider than long, concave, with sides roundly converging to very widely rounded apex. Apical orifice in dorsal position, wide apically. Internal sac with a small, angularly curved apical spine.
Female genitalia ( Figs. 32 & 33 View FIGURES 29–33 ): gonocoxite comparatively narrow and weakly curved in ventral view, about 0.7 times as long as gonosubcoxite, with moderately wide base.
Etymology. The specific name is a combination of the Latin prefix sub - and the Latin adjective robustus, referring to the rather robust body.
Comparison. In combination of characters, including coloration, shape of pronotum, not sulcate protibia with three similar sized preapical spines on outer margin and one pair of marginal setae on last abdominal sternite of male, this new species is similar to T. angustitarsis sp. n., but well differing from it in having body smaller, more robust, appendages shorter, head larger, genae wider, left mandible subtruncate at apex and metepisternum shorter. In the same characters and having one pair of marginal setae on last abdominal sternite of male, T. subrobustus sp. n. also differs from T. fukuharai which shares with the latter new species strongly obliterated dorsal microsculpture and rather narrow and markedly convex elytral intervals apically. Other distinctive characters of T. subrobustus sp. n. are listed in the description.
Distribution ( Fig. 34 View FIGURE 34 ). Known from northwestern Yunnan ( China), within Gongshan County, where it occurs at altitudes of 1500–1880 m. This new species occurs sympatricly with T. angustitarsis sp. n.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |