Trochosa humicola Bertkau, 1880
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5414.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3B1DFADA-C20E-473B-A5E9-843548B54AD3 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E887D2-BA48-FE60-FDDB-FF196117FECF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Trochosa humicola Bertkau, 1880 |
status |
|
Trochosa humicola Bertkau, 1880 comb. rest.
Figs 59‒61 View FIGURE 59 View FIGURE 60 View FIGURE 61 , 66 View FIGURE 66
Trochosa humicola Bertkau, 1880: 65 , pl. 1, figs 20, 20a (four female syntypes from Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, lost,
see remarks). Bonnet 1959: 4703. Lycosa humicola : Mello-Leitão 1947: 262. Lycosa inconspicua Bryant, 1948: 355 , pl. 2, fig. 16 (Female holotype from Ennery, Haiti, 7.ix.1934, Darlington leg., MCZ
21626, examined by photos, Fig. 61 View FIGURE 61 ) syn. nov. Arkalosula inconspicua : Roewer 1955: 232. Triccosta humicola : Roewer 1955: 298. Tricca humicola : Braun 1963: 81. Arctosa humicola : World Spider Catalog 2023
Other material examined. BRAZIL: Rio Grande do Norte: 1♂, Atol das Rocas, Parque Nacional do Atol das Rocas , ca. 3°52'20.88"S 33°48'40.22"W, - 1 m, 4.ix.2005, C.E. Almeida leg. ( IBSP 12055 View Materials ) GoogleMaps . Pernambuco: 3♂ 2♀, Fernando de Noronha Archipelago, Fernando de Noronha Island , 3º50'S 32º15'W, 16 m, 9–19.x.2005 ( IBSP 70343 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 3♂ 2♀, ditto, ( IBSP 70345 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♂ 4♀, ditto, ( IBSP 70344 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♂ 4♀, ditto, ( IBSP 70346 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♂ 4♀, ditto, ( IBSP 70347 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♂ 4♀, ditto, ( IBSP70348 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♂ 1♀, ditto, 16 m, 17.iv.2006 ( UFPE) GoogleMaps , all collected manually in houses by G.C.C. Freitas. Sergipe: 1♀, Aracaju, Atalaia Velha , ca. 10°58'43.32"S 37°2'12.61"W, 1 m, 23.viii.1978, I. Pinho leg. ( IBSP 7648 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♂, Santa Luzia do Itanhy, Crasto , ca. 11°21'14.76"S 37°27'30.67"W, 55 m, 12–14.xi.1996, A.D. Brescovit leg. ( IBSP 10160 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♂, São Cristóvão, Campus UFSE, ca. 10°55'35.21"S 37°6'9.19"W, 9 m, 25.ix.1979 ( IBSP 10396 View Materials ) GoogleMaps , 1♂, ditto, 25.iv.1989 ( IBSP 10408 View Materials ) GoogleMaps . Bahia: 1♂ Central , ca. 11°7'54.13"S 42°7'2.39"W, 648 m, 12.vii.1997, E.F. Ramos leg. ( IBSP 13393 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♂ 1♀, Riachão do Jacuípe, Rio Jacuípe , ca. 11°48'25.92"S 39°23'5.01"W, 221 m, 1980, S. Lucas leg. ( IBSP 4607 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, Feira de Santana , ca. 12°11'53.51"S 38°57'52.59"W, 240 m, 1.x.1991, V. dos Santos leg. ( IBSP 7120 View Materials ) GoogleMaps . Minas Gerais: 1♀, Cambuí , ca. 22°36'45.60"S 46°3'8.66"W, 895 m, viii.1995, L.C. Gregorio leg. ( IBSP 14170 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 4♂ 3♀, Belo Horizonte, Estação Ecológica da UFMG, 19°52'38"S 43°58'16"W, 845 m, v.1999, E.S.S. Álvares leg. ( UFMG 75 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, Belo Horizonte, Campus UFMG, ca. 19°51'41"S 43°57'48"W, 845 m, 6.iv.2000, E.S.S. Álvares et al. leg. ( UFMG 195 View Materials ) GoogleMaps . Rio de Janeiro: 1♀, Rio de Janeiro, ( MNRJ) . 4♀, ditto ( MNRJ 1918 View Materials ) . São Paulo: 1♂, Campinas , ca. 22º54'11.15"S 47º1'25.63"W, 699 m, x.1978 ( IBSP 4217 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 2♀, Tietê , ca. 23°5'52.81"S 47°42'47.41"W, 482 m, 15.v.2002 ( IBSP 34996 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, Sorocaba , 23º30'6"S 47º27'29"W, 599 m, viii.1983, M. Ianelle leg. ( IBSP 3744 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, São Paulo, 23º33'S 46º38'W, 756 m, 9.xii.1967, A.A. Miranda leg. ( IBSP 2066 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, ditto, 7.vii.1969, N.S. Junior leg. ( IBSP 2284 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, ditto, 14.vii.1969, G.R. Sobrinho leg. ( IBSP 8427 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, ditto, 3.ix.1969 ( IBSP 2357 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 10♀, 1.x.1973, ditto, G.C. Netto leg. ( IBSP 2711 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 3♀, vi.1988, ditto, R.G. Silva leg. ( IBSP 5021 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, iii.1991, ditto, V.J. Topein leg. ( IBSP 41790 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♂, ditto, 3.iv.1995, L.S. Belfi leg. ( IBSP 6182 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♂, xi.1997, ditto, L.S. Rocha leg. ( IBSP 13937 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, ditto, 13.viii.2003, L. de França leg. ( IBSP 40611 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, Bairro Freguesia do Ó, ca. 23º30'4.99"S 46º41'51.27"W, 770 m, 4.iv.1966, A.M. Baptista leg. ( IBSP 1987 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, Bairro Pinheiros , ca. 23º33'46.49"S 46º41'29.28"W, 747 m, 9.iv.1968, J.R. Cerrato leg. ( IBSP 2115 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♂ 3♀, Bairro Butantã , ca. 23º33'56.59"S 46º43'16.48"W, 788 m, iii.1983, W.M. Sportoni leg. ( IBSP 3651 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, Campus IBSP, ca. 23º33'57.83"S 46º43'49.08"W, 786 m, iii.1983, W.M. Sportoni leg. ( IBSP 3717 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, Osasco , ca. 23º32'16.93"S 46º47'30.21"W, 765 m, 30.iv.1996, M. Padilha leg. ( IBSP 14350 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, Itapevi , 23º32'56"S 46º56'3"W, 768 m, 8.xi.2002, F. Peit leg. ( IBSP 37318 View Materials ) GoogleMaps , 1♀, ditto, 5.xii.2002, W. Valim leg. ( IBSP 37323 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, Dois Córregos , ca. 22º22'29.97"S 48º23'19.90"W, 702 m, 1–6.iv.2002, G.Q. Romero leg. ( IBSP 34964 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, Louveira , ca. 23º5'31.03"S 46º56'58.74"W, 700 m, 11.x.1995, D. Tremori leg. ( IBSP 6413 View Materials ) GoogleMaps . Rio Grande do Sul: 1♂, Barros Cassal , em riacho, 29°37'22.7"S 52°30'15.6"W, 85 m, 5.viii.2015, V.S.R. Diniz & L.E.C. Schmidt leg. ( UFMG 20948 View Materials ) GoogleMaps .
Remarks. As originally described by Bertkau, the average size of Trochosa humicola is larger than other Arctosa species (13 mm in T. humicola versus average 7 mm in neotropical Arctosa ). We examined non-type specimens from Rio de Janeiro as well as localities and states bordering the state of Rio de Janeiro, as well as from central and northeastern regions of Brazil. Although the holotype is lost as mentioned in Levi (1964): "...The whereabouts of the types and other specimens of this collection are not known. They may have been lost..." referring to the specimens collected by the Belgian professor Van Beneden in 1873 and given to Bertkau for further examination, we conclude that the specimens examined correspond to T. humicola . The prosoma pattern described by Bertkau (1880) correspond to the Trochosa pattern ( Brady 1979), as well as the typical inverted T-shaped epigynum. The specimens examined by us have epigynal hoods curved internally, transversal septum (TS) height equal when compared with median septum (MS) width. Arctosa epigynum is commonly a trapezoidal piece with MS and TS undistinguishable among them. The presence of a rounded, visible palea in males also excludes the specimens we examined from Arctosa , whose species possess a reduced palea. The size and shape of the ventral projection of the median apophysis in T. humicola is triangular and short, different from a pronounced and acute one seen in Arctosa species.
Bryant (1948) records this species from the island of Hispaniola, which nowadays comprises Haiti and Dominican Republic. The specimens described in Bryant (1948) were collected in the eastern side of the island, in Haiti. We did not found any published record from Guyana, as reported in the World Spider Catalog (2023).
Diagnosis. Males of Trochosa humicola can be recognized by the short, triangular ventral projection and the folded tip of the median apophysis ( Fig. 59c View FIGURE 59 ). Females are recognized by curved and deep hoods, which are internally convergent, and the head of spermatheca narrower than its stalk ( Fig. 60e View FIGURE 60 ).
Description. Male (UFMG 75). Carapace brown, covered by short white and black bristles, except on the longitudinal median band, which is broad, yellow, and tapering towards the back. Sparse black bristles between the ocular area and the thoracic groove; ocular area black covered with white bristles, cephalic portion of the prosoma covered by sparse, large white bristles. Sternum longer than wide, uniformly light brown, covered by short black bristles, sparsely covered in its entire surface ( Fig. 60d View FIGURE 60 ). First row of eyes straight, shorter than the second row; AME slightly larger than the ALE; PME separated by a length same as their radii. Chelicerae with three promarginal teeth, the median the largest; retromargin with three teeth, the basal the shorter. Chelicerae creamy, covered frontally with sparse black setae in the frontal part and white setae in distal borders; chillum membranous, divided with the mesal portion sclerotized; boss clearer than the chelicerae. Frontal protuberance on both cheliceral teeth ( Fig. 59g View FIGURE 59 ). Endites dully brown and convergent; labium square-shaped, darker than the endites; both endites and labium yellowish in their distal portion. Legs: All segments dully brown except tarsi and metatarsi, which are darker. Opisthosoma all covered by tiny white bristles, the background olive, with dispersed black bristles mainly on dorsal part; cardiac mark indistinguishable; with a group of strong, curved black bristles on dorsum, near the prosoma. Venter with a longitudinal, yellow tapered band, which is sparsely covered by black bristles and has two median, pale brown lines from epigastric furrow to spinnerets; anterior spinnerets the same size as the posteriors, both cylindrical ( Fig. 60d View FIGURE 60 ).
Pedipalp ( Figs 59a–f, h, i View FIGURE 59 ), tibia cylindrical. Cymbium fusiform. Subtegulum lenticular and visible in ventral view. Tegulum with a curved, L-shaped sperm duct ( Figs 59b, e View FIGURE 59 ). Median apophysis laminar, triangular, and with unsharpened tip; ventral process short and slightly curved ventrally ( Fig. 59d, h View FIGURE 59 ). Terminal apophysis laminar, distally sharp ( Figs 59e, h View FIGURE 59 ). Embolus thin and curved, not twisted at the tip; pars pendula present ( Fig. 59e View FIGURE 59 ).
Leg formula IV>I>III>II. Spination pattern: femur I p 0-0-1 d 1-1-1 r 1-1, II p 1-1 d 1-1-1 r 1-1-0-1, III p 1-1 d 1-1-1 r 0-1-1, IV p 1-0-1 d 1-1-1 r 0-0-1; patella I-IV p 1 r 1; tibia I-II p 1-1 v 2-2-2ap r 1-1, III-IV p 1-1 d 1-1 r 1-1 v 2-2-2ap; metatarsus I-II p 0-1-1 r 0-1-1 v 2-2-2ap, III-IV p 1d-1d-1d r 1d-1d-1d v 2-2-2ap.
Measurements: TL 8.78, CL 4.56, CCW 1.80, CTW 3.50, CCH 1.70, CTH 1.70. Eyes: AME 0.13, ALE 0.11, PME 0.35, PLE 0.20, interdistances: AME-AME 0.12; AME-ALE 0.10; PME-PME 0.38; PLE-PLE 0.90. POQ long 0.88, POQ posterior width 1.33, POQ anterior width 0.98. Chelicerae: length 1.98. Opisthosoma: length 4.33, width 2.61. Legs: (femur + patella + tibia + metatarsus + tarsus = total length): pedipalp 1.90 + 0.80 + 1.15 + - + 1.38 = 5.23, I 3.56 + 1.43 + 3.21 + 3.02 + 2.07 = 13.29, II 3.00 + 1.33 + 2.86 + 2.86 + 1.98 = 12.02, III 2.89 + 1.33 + 2.71 + 3.31 + 1.98 = 12.22, IV 4.11 + 1.48 + 3.86 + 5.02 + 1.98 = 16.44.
Female (UFMG 75). General pattern as in male. First row of eyes straight, shorter than the second row; AME slightly larger than the ALE; PME separated by their radii ( Fig. 60h View FIGURE 60 ). Chelicerae with three promarginal teeth, the median the largest; retromargin with three teeth, the basal the shorter. Chelicerae creamy, covered frontally with sparse black setae in the frontal part and white setae in distal borders; chillum membranous, divided with the mesial portion sclerotized; boss clearer than the chelicerae. Sternum endites and labium as in males but slightly darker ( Fig. 60f View FIGURE 60 ). Legs and opisthosoma as in males ( Fig. 60i View FIGURE 60 ).
Genitalia ( Figs 60b, e View FIGURE 60 ), median septum and transversal septum forming a T shape plate. in ventral view, hoods triangular, atrium smooth and wide ( Fig. 60b View FIGURE 60 ). Copulatory openings at the anterior border of transversal septum ( Fig. 60e View FIGURE 60 ). Internally, head of spermatheca as narrow as the stalk; base of spermatheca bulbous, vulval chamber absent, hoods curved and convergent ( Fig. 60e View FIGURE 60 ).
Leg formula IV>I>II>III. Spination pattern: femur I p 0-0-2 d 1-1-1 r 0 - 1-1, II p 0-1d-1d d 1-1-1 r 0-d1-1d, III p 0-1d-1d d 1-1-1 r 0-1d-1d, IV p 1d-1d-1d d 1-1-1 r 0-0-d1; patella I d 0-1bristle; II p 1 d 0-1bristle, III-IV p 1 d 1-1 r 1; tibia I-II p 1-1 d 1bristle-1bristle v 2-2-2ap, III-IV p 1d-1d d r1-1 r 1d-1d v 2-2-2ap; metatarsus I p 0-1 d 1bristle-1bristle v 2-2-1 r 0-1d, II p 1-1-2 d 1bristle-1bristle r 0-0-1 v 2-2-1ap, III-IV p 1d-1d-2 r 1d-1d-2 v 2-2-1ap.
Measurements: TL 13.66, CL 6.22, CCW 2.89, CTW 4.78, CCH 2.00, CTH 2.00. Eyes: AME 0.29, ALE 0.19, PME 0.51, PLE 0.43, interdistances: AME-AME 0.09; AME-ALE 0.38; PME-PME 0.38; PLE-PLE 1.28. POQ long 0.83, POQ posterior width 1.55, POQ anterior width 0.88. Chelicerae: length 2.62. Opisthosoma: length 7.55, width 5.00. Legs: (femur + patella + tibia + metatarsus + tarsus = total length): pedipalp 2.22 + 1.23 + 1.44 + - + 1.77 = 4.44, I 4.44 + 2.22 + 4.32 + 3.33 + 2.22 = 16.53, II 4.33 + 2.44 + 3.44 + 3.22 + 2.11 = 15.54, III 4.05 + 2.34 + 3.22 + 3.78 + 1.89 = 15.28, IV 5.33 + 2.33 + 4.72 + 6.16 + 2.33 = 20.87.
Distribution. Brazil (northeast, central and southern regions) and Haiti ( Fig. 66 View FIGURE 66 )
MNRJ |
Museu Nacional/Universidade Federal de Rio de Janeiro |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.