Chimarrhometra yunnanensis, Ye, Zhen, Zhou, Yanyan & Bu, Wenjun, 2016

Ye, Zhen, Zhou, Yanyan & Bu, Wenjun, 2016, Description of a new species of Chimarrhometra Bianchi, 1896 (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Gerridae) from China, Zootaxa 4175 (2), pp. 180-188 : 182-186

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4175.2.6

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:35E2165D-B019-4DF1-A7A8-9E6B1B12EE1A

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6088706

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D087CA-FFD8-FFE0-9A8F-FB49F3ABFE13

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Chimarrhometra yunnanensis
status

sp. nov.

Chimarrhometra yunnanensis View in CoL sp. n.

( Figs. 3, 4 View FIGURES 1 – 4 , 7, 8 View FIGURES 5 – 8 , 11, 12 View FIGURES 9 – 12 , 16, 17, 18 View FIGURES 13 – 18 , 21 View FIGURES 19 – 21 , 22, 23 View FIGURES 22 – 23. 22 , 24 View FIGURE 24 )

Material examined. Holotype: apterous male, China, Yunnan Prov., Yingjiang county, Tongbiguang village (24°35'N, 97°39'E), 1326 m, 13.VII.2016, coll. Zhen Ye ( NKUM) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 2 apterous males, 3 apterous females, same data as holotype ( NKUM) GoogleMaps . 1 apterous male, 2 apterous females, Yingjiang county, Tongbiguang village, Dadieshui (24°36'N, 97°39'E), 20.V.2009, coll. Min Li ( NKUM) GoogleMaps .

Diagnosis. The diagnostic features of C. yunnanensis sp. n. are the strongly incrassate male fore femur ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ); abdominal segment VIII dorsally with a distinct depression in lateral view ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 5 – 8 ); the sub-ovate pygophore ( Figs. 11, 12 View FIGURES 9 – 12 ); the antler-shaped processes on the caudal margin of the pygophore bear a narrower posterior lobe and a longer triangular anterior lobe ( Figs. 11, 12 View FIGURES 9 – 12 ); the proctiger is slender and with dense hairs on the posterior margin ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ); the parameres are falciform, with the medial part bending inwards and with apices crossing beneath the pygophore and gradually tapering ( Figs. 17, 18 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ); the inner lobe of the first gonopophysis is relatively slender, less infuscated, and with several setae concentrated apically ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 19 – 21 ).

Description. Apterous male ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ). Colour: ground colour yellowish brown; head dorsum yellowish brown with broad median blackish band, ventrally yellowish; antennal segments I–II brownish yellow, apex of segments darker, III–IV brownish; pronotum yellowish brown, with median and lateral narrow yellowish stripes; mesonotum yellowish brown, with pair of triangular dark, frosted spots; longitudinal bands on thoracic pleura and spots on acetabula blackish with prominent silvery pubescence; legs yellowish brown, with apices of femora, tibiae and tarsi weakly infuscated, fore femora and tibiae ventrally with rows of black spine-like hairs; abdominal dorsum brown, covered with minute golden hairs; ventrally, body including genital segments brownish yellow; abdominal segment VIII dorsally weakly infuscated; pygophore and paramere yellowish, strongly infuscated apically.

Structural characteristics: body length 7.60–7.80 (holotype: 7.75), body width (across acetabula) 2.68–2.72 (holotype: 2.70), body elongate and stout, bearing short, golden or silver, appressed pubescence; head directed forward, head length: 1.15–1.20, head width: 1.41–1.50, head width about 1.23 times length; eyes large, globose, with inner margin emarginated in posterior half; antennal segment I longest, without spine-like hairs, antenna about 0.80 times as long as body, lengths of antennal segments I–IV: 1.90, 1.47, 1.32, 1.38; pronotum width: 1.50–1.57, length: 1.06–1.10, about 1.55 times as wide as long; intersegmental suture between mesothorax and metathorax distinct laterally,; mesonotum about 3.6 times as long as metanotum; fore femur strongly incrassate ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ); fore tibia slightly curved; middle tarsus about two fifths tibial length; hind femur shorter than middle femur; hind tibia shorter than hind femur; middle and hind tibiae and tarsi ventrally with rows of spine-like hairs; pretarsus inserted slightly before apex of last tarsal segment; lengths of leg segments (femur, tibia and tarsus): fore leg: 2.44, 2.30 and 0.59 (0.21+0.38), middle leg: 6.60, 4.61 and 1.97 (1.35+0.62), hind leg: 5.70, 3.41 and 1.50 (1.00+0.50); pregenital abdominal venter distinctly depressed posteriorly, connexiva slightly widened. Genital segments: abdominal segment VIII much shorter ventrally than dorsally, length: 1.30, width: 1.05, about 1.24 times as long as wide, posterior margin with short, erect, blackish hairs ( Figs. 7, 8 View FIGURES 5 – 8 ); abdominal segment VIII dorsally with distinct depression in lateral view ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 5 – 8 ); pygophore sub-ovate ( Figs. 11, 12 View FIGURES 9 – 12 ), forked into pair of prominent, vertically raised, antler-shaped processes ( Figs. 11, 12 View FIGURES 9 – 12 ), lateral processes bear a narrower posterior lobe and a longer triangular anterior lobe ( Figs. 11, 12 View FIGURES 9 – 12 ); proctiger slender, with dense hairs on posterior margin ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ); paramere large, falciform, medial part bending inwards, with apices crossing beneath pygophore and gradually tapering ( Figs. 17, 18 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ).

Apterous female ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ). Body slightly longer and wider than male, other coloration and markings similar to that of male; body length 8.20–8.55, body width (across acetabula) 2.90–3.05; structure of head including antennae as in male, head length: 1.18–1.20; head width: 1.45–1.50; about 1.23 times as wide as long; antenna about 0.72 times as long as body; lengths of antennal segments I–IV: 1.88, 1.34, 1.30, 1.40; pronotum width: 1.50–1.62, length: 1.00–1.05, about 1.43 times as wide as long; legs similar to those of male except fore femur relatively slender ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ); lengths of leg segments (femur, tibia and tarsus): fore leg: 2.61, 2.50 and 0.64 (0.23+0.41), middle leg: 6.80, 4.69 and 2.03 (1.38+0.65), hind leg: 5.90, 3.35 and 1.29 (0.78+0.51); genital segments protruding from abdominal apex, proctiger small and cone-shaped; inner lobe of first gonopophysis relatively slender, less infuscated, and with several setae concentrated apically ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 19 – 21 ).

Macropterous male and female: unknown.

Etymology. The specific name is derived from the type locality (Yunnan, China).

Distribution. China (Yunnan) ( Fig. 24 View FIGURE 24 ).

Comparative notes: The general appearance of the new species, C. yunnanensis sp. n. is similar to C. orientalis . However, there are clear differences between the two species as follows. Abdominal segment VIII of C.

yunnanensis sp. n. has a distinct dorsal depression in lateral view ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 5 – 8 ), whereas that of C. orientalis has only a subtle depression ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 5 – 8 ). The antler-shaped processes on the caudal margin of the pygophore in C. yunnanensis sp. n. each bear a narrower posterior lobe and longer triangular anterior lobe ( Figs. 11, 12 View FIGURES 9 – 12 ), but those of C. orientalis bear a broad posterior lobe and shorter triangular anterior lobe ( Figs. 9, 10 View FIGURES 9 – 12 ). The apical half of the paramere in C. yunnanensis sp. n. is slightly longer than in C. orientalis ( Figs. 14, 15, 17, 18 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ). In addition, the inner lobe of the first gonopophysis in C. yunnanensis sp. n. is relatively slender, less infuscated, and with several setae concentrated apically ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 19 – 21 ), whereas the inner lobe of first gonopophysis in C. orientalis is relatively stout, infuscated, and with several uniformly distributed setae ( Figs. 19, 20 View FIGURES 19 – 21 ).

NKUM

Nankai University

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Gerridae

Genus

Chimarrhometra

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF