Pachydellus furcifer ( Oudemans, 1902 )
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3776.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:20BC10E3-3C51-4EBB-A5BD-5E214595D3A7 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5048027 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/52084A62-FFA4-FFAF-FF23-6AB59F1DFC04 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Pachydellus furcifer ( Oudemans, 1902 ) |
| status |
|
Pachydellus furcifer ( Oudemans, 1902) View in CoL
Pachylaelaps furcifer Oudemans, 1902: 52 . Type locality: Netherlands.
Pachylaelaps furcifer . — Oudemans, 1904: 107.
Pachylaelaps laeuchlii Schweizer, 1922: 37 . Type locality: Switzerland. Synonymy by Sellnick (1931: 749), followed by Koroleva (1977b: 429) and confirmed by Mašán (2007a: 216).
Pachylaelaps furcifer . — Sellnick, 1931: 749; Koroleva, 1977b: 429, 469.
Pachylaelaps laeuchlii . — Schweizer, 1961: 107; Hirschmann & Krauss, 1965: 5; Karg, 1993: 124.
Pachylaelaps (Pachylaelaps) laeuchlii .— Karg, 1971: 145.
Pachydellus furcifer View in CoL . — Mašán, 2007a: 178, 212, 214.
not Pachylaelaps furcifer . — Evans & Hyatt, 1956: 121 (= Pachydellus aff. problematicus View in CoL ); Hirschmann & Krauss, 1965: 5 (= Pachydellus sculptus View in CoL ); Karg, 1971: 152; 1993: 127 (= Pachydellus aff. problematicus View in CoL ).
Notes. According to Mašán (2007a), none of the four original slides of Pachydellus furcifer View in CoL available in the Oudemans Collection bears a type designation, but without doubt the two slides from Haarlem belong to the original series of Oudemans. These two slides from Haarlem (№ P3602, № P3603) contain a single dissected female, which may be considered as holotype (the original description is based only on female stage). This female is in good agreement with those redescribed by Koroleva (1977b) and Mašán (2007a). The other two slides from Arnhem bear a female (№ P3604) and male (№ P3605) of Pachydellus sculptus View in CoL . Unfortunately, these misidentified specimens were illustrated by Hirschmann & Krauss (1965) under the name furcifer View in CoL , and incorrectly considered to be conspecific with Pachydellus angulatipes ( Berlese, 1903) View in CoL (see notes to that species). Karg’s concept (1971, 1993) of furcifer View in CoL is confused because he considered it as a species having clunal setae J5 normal in size, not minute (see his identification keys for the genus Pachylaelaps View in CoL ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Pachydellus furcifer ( Oudemans, 1902 )
| MAŠÁN, PETER & HALLIDAY, BRUCE 2014 |
Pachydellus furcifer
| Masan, P. 2007: 178 |
Pachylaelaps (Pachylaelaps) laeuchlii
| Karg, W. 1971: 145 |
Pachylaelaps laeuchlii
| Karg, W. 1993: 124 |
| Hirschmann W. & Krauss, W. 1965: 5 |
| Schweizer, J. 1961: 107 |
Pachylaelaps furcifer
| Karg, W. 1993: 127 |
| Karg, W. 1971: 152 |
| Hirschmann W. & Krauss, W. 1965: 5 |
| Evans, G. O. & Hyatt, K. H. 1956: 121 |
Pachylaelaps furcifer
| Koroleva, E. V. 1977: 429 |
| Sellnick, M. 1931: 749 |
Pachylaelaps laeuchlii
| Masan, P. 2007: 216 |
| Koroleva, E. V. 1977: 429 |
| Sellnick, M. 1931: 749 |
| Schweizer, J. 1922: 37 |
Pachylaelaps furcifer
| Oudemans, A. C. 1904: 107 |
Pachylaelaps furcifer
| Oudemans, A. C. 1902: 52 |