31. subherculeana Filipjev, 1924 (Figs 33, 66)

Polychrosis subherculeana Filipjev, 1924 . Jahrbuch des Martjanov’schen Staatsmuseums in Minussinsk 2(3): 55. TL: Russia, “Джойское оЗ. [Dzhoyskoye Lake]” (Krasnoyarsk Region, Dzhoyka Lake).

Types. Lectotype ♂ (here designated): “Окр. Минусинска 15.VI 1923 Кожанчиковъ [ Outskirts of Minusinsk 15.VI 1923 Kozhantschikov]”, “ Polychrosis subherculeana Fil. ♂ Type”, “praep. micr. № 329”, “к. Н. Филипьева [coll. of N. Filipjev]”, “Holotypus Polychrosis subherculeana Fil. ♂ ”, “ ZISP INS _LEP_0001982”.

Paralectotypes: 2 ♂ – “Окр. Минусинска 10.VI 1923 Кожанчиковъ [ Outskirts of Minusinsk 10.VI 1923 Kozhantschikov]”, gold circle, “ Polychrosis subherculeana Fil. ♂ Type”, “к. Н. Филипьева [coll. of N. Filipjev]”, “Paralectotypus Polychrosis subherculeana Fil. ♂ ”; “Окр. Минусинска 14.VI 1923 Кожанчиковъ [Outskirts of Minusinsk 14.VI 1923 Kozhantschikov]”, gold circle, “ Polychrosis subherculeana Fil. ♂ Type”, “к. Н. Филипьева [coll. of N. Filipjev]”, “Paralectotypus Polychrosis subherculeana Fil. ♂ ”, “Photograph Marek Kopeć” .

Present status. Lobesia subherculeana (Filipjev, 1924) .

Comments. In Gilligan at al. (2018), the type locality was given erroneously as “Siberia, Minsk” and the holotype sex was marked as unknown.

Taxonomic notes. The genitalia slide of the male lectotype was prepared by Falkovitsh, and the label “Holotypus Polychrosis subherculeana Fil. ♂ ” was likely written by him. However, since the holotype of subherculeana was not designated in the original description, this specimen should be treated as the lectotype (here designated).