30. strigifera Filipjev, 1931 (Figs 32, 43)

Peronea strigifera Filipjev, 1931 . Annuaire du Musée Zoologique de l’Académie des Sciences de l’URSS 1931 (1930): 518. Plate B, figs 1-3; Plate XXVI, fig. 2; Plate XXXII, fig. 2. TL: Russia, “Vinogradovka” (Far East, Vinogradovka).

Types. Holotype ♂: “Виноградовка Уссур. кр. 28. V.929 ДьЯконов, Филип. [ Vinogradovka, Ussuri Region, 28.V.1929 Djakonov, Filipjev]”, gold circle, “praep. micr. № 1778”, “Holotypus Peronea strigifera Fil. ”, “ ZISP INS _LEP_0001977”, “Praep. micr. SVN 24190 Acleris strigifera (Filipjev, 1931) S. Nedoshivina pr. 2024”.

Paratypes: ♂ and ♀ – ♂ “Виноградовка Уссур. кр. 20. V.929 ДьЯконов Филип. [ Vinogradovka Ussuri Region 20. V.929 Djakonov, Filipjev]”, gold circle, “praep. micr. 1773 | Per. strigifera Fil. ”, “Paratypus Peronea strigifera Fil. ” ; ♀ “Виноградовка Уссур. кр. 22. V.929 ДьЯконов Филип. [ Vinogradovka Ussuri Region 22. V.929 Djakonov, Filipjev]”, gold circle, “praep. micr. 1773 | Per. strigifera Fil. ”, “Gemalt von Mgr. R. Zawada-Skrzyński für Micr. Pal. ”, “Allotypus Peronea strigifera Fil. ” .

Present status. Acleris strigifera (Filipjev, 1931) .

Comments. Gilligan et al. (2018) listed the type locality imprecisely as “Ussuri” and marked the holotype sex as “unknown”. Genitalia of both sexes were illustrated in the original description. The genitalia of the male holotype were also illustrated in Razowski (2008), and those of the female paratype were illustrated in Razowski (1984).