" Oreonetides longembolus Wunderlich et Li, 1995 Figs 10‒23

? Oreonetides longembolus Wunderlich & Li, 1995: 338, figs 18-22 (♂). Oreonetides longembolus: Song et al., 1999: 199, figs 114A-B (♂).

MATERIAL EXAMINED. Russia: Primorskii krai, environs of Vladivostok, Botanical garden, 43°13' N, 131°58' E, summer 2010, 1♂, coll. V.M. Loktionov, S.A. Shabalin (ZMMU) ; Ussuriyskii District, Kamenushka vill., 43°36.45' N, 132°13.60' E, 29.VIII 2001, 10♀, coll. G.N. Azarkina, Y.M. Marusik (ZMMU, ISEA) .

NOTES. This species was described based on the holotype male from Liaoning Province, China, and the female of this species was unknown until our discovery. Wunderlich & Li (1995) doubted that this species belong to Oreonetides Strand, 1901 . It is smaller than other species (1.4–1.5 mm, whereas other Oreonetides species are longer than 1.6 mm) and has a long, filamentous embolus (Figs 19, 20), unknown in other Micronetinae . Here we provide diagnostic figures of the poorly known male (Figs 10, 13,14, 15–20) and previously unknown female (Figs 11, 12, 21–23).

The discovery of the female and study of the embolic division of the male still do not allow correct taxonomic placement of this species. On one hand, the epigyne (Figs 12, 21, 22) is characteristic of Maro O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1906, with the triangular epigynal plate (cf. Saaristo, 1971; Eskov, 1991; Tanasevitch, 2006), but on the other hand, it lacks the posterior median plate characteristic of illustrated Maro species (Eskov, 1991; Tanasevitch, 2006). The paracymbium (Figs 15, 18) looks like that found in Oreonetides and has a ventral triangular outgrowth (To) as in O. vaginatus (Thorell, 1 8 7 2) and other congeners (cf. Eskov, 1 9 9 1). This outgrowth is lacking in Maro (cf. Saaristo, 1971; Tanasevitch, 2006). There are several other characters indicating close relationships with either Oreonetides or Maro, but the shape of the embolic division (Figs 19, 20) and particularly the embolus (Em) is unique for Micronetinae . All other Micronetinae (cf. Marusik & Koponen, 2008: Plates 1-4) genera have a membranous embolus, but O. longembolus has a long, whiplike embolus. Most likely this species should be attributed to a separate genus