Arachnospila (Arachnospila) sogdiana (Morawitz 1893)
(Figs 1, 4, 8, 9, 29, 40, 41)
Pompilus sogdianus Morawitz 1893: 401, 3 nec Ƥ [lectotype, designated here, 3 "Jagnob. Kol" (Tajikistan) [ZIN]]. Psammochares pamirus Haupt 1930: 226, 3 nec Ƥ (holotype, Ƥ).
Arachnospila (Arachnospila) sogdiana koenigsmanni Wolf 1970: 72, 3 [holotype, 3, "Zentral-Pamir, VII–VIII.[19]28, leg. Reinig // Ak-balik, 3960 m, 2.8.[1928] // Type // Psammochares pamirus Hpt. 3 det. Haupt 1930 // Holotypus, H. Wolf det. 1970 // Arachnospila sogdiana koenigsmanni n. n. 3, H. Wolf det. 1970" (Tajikistan)]. New name for Psammochares pamirus Haupt 1930, 3 nec Ƥ. Junior subjective synonym of Pompilus sogdianus Morawitz 1893 according to Wahis 1986: 19. Synonymy is confirmed.
Diagnosis of male. Hypopygium basally with sharp differences between sclerotized and unsclerotized parts (Figs 8, 9); scape ventrally with very long dense erect setae; T1 laterally with scattered long erect setae; metasoma black (Fig. 1). FEMALE. Unknown.
Redescription. MALE (lectotype). Body length 11.6 mm. Fore wing length 9.0 mm. Head width 1.1 × its height. Frons evenly convex. Ocelli small, POD: OOD 0.7 ×. Ratio of genal median length to eye median length 0.8 ×. Malar space 0.1 × pedicel width. Clypeus longitudinally convex with anterior border weakly emarginated. Flagellomere 1 length 2.2 × its width. Relation of scape, pedicel and two first flagellomeres 40: 13: 43: 47. Mesosoma length dorsally 1.5 × its width. Pronotum median length 0.3 × its width, posterior pronotal border angulate. Metanotum median length 2.7 × metapostnotum median length. Metapostnotum laterally with transversal striae. Propodeum evenly convex, its median length 0.8 × maximum width. Longer spur of mid and hind tibia 0.6 × mid and hind tarsomere 1 respectively. Fore claws asymmetrical with subbasal tooth, mid and hind claws symmetrical with subbasal tooth. Wings infuscate with darker apical part, venation as in Figs 40, 41. Pterostigma small, 1.4 × longer than first abscissa of R. Second abscissa of R 1.4 × third abscissa of R. T2 baso-laterally with transversal groove. Median emargination on posterior border of S6 as in Fig. 4. S8 (hypopygium) with median longitudinal carina, slightly divergent apically, basally with distinct emargination and sharp differences between sclerotized and unsclerotized parts (Figs 8, 9). Genitalia as in Fig. 29.
Head, scape ventrally, propleuron, fore coxa with dense long erect brownish setae. Mesopleuron and propodeum laterally and posteriorly with very long erect brownish setae. Pronotum, mesonotal scutum and T1 laterally with scattered long erect setae. Scutellum, fore and mid femur, mid and hind coxa, S1, S2 with sparse erect setae. T2–T6 and S3–S6 without setae. Lower part of face with silver pubescence with brownish tint. Body with iridescent brown pubescence; T1–T5 apically with denser brown pubescence. Body regularly micropunctate. Body and legs black, outer eye orbit near vertex with small pale patch, T1 and T2 laterally with indistinct ferruginous-red patches.
Type material. Lectotype, designated here, 3 "Jagnob. Kol. // к. Ф. Моравица [cyrillic] // Pompilus colensis 3. F. Moraw. // Lectotypus Pompilus sogdianus F. Morawitz, 1893 3 design. Lelej & Loktionov, 2010 // Arachnospila (s.str.) sogdiana (F. Moraw.) Lelej & Loktionov det. [ZIN]. Additional material. Tajikistan. 1 3, Gissarskii Mountain Ridge, Anzob Pass, 3600 m, 31.VII.1937 (Pavlovskii) [ZIN].
Distribution. Tajikistan.
Remarks. During our study of the Morawitz collection in the Zoological Institute, St. Petersburg, we found a male and a female of Pompilus colensis from "Jagnob. Kol" [Tajikistan] (Figs 1, 2). No species under this name has been described by Morawitz and no types of Pompilus sogdianus Morawitz has been known before that. The description of P. sogdianus includes many characters that totally agree with the specimens of P. c o l e n s i s. This is a case where Morawitz likely mislabeled the specimens. The name colensis originates from Kol (Kul), the river in the Jagnob basin, while sogdianus refers to the ancient people who lived in these places of Tajikistan. The male and female of Pompilus sogdianus sensu Morawitz 1893 remarkably differ by wing venation (Figs 40, 41 vs. 42, 43, 66) and definitely belong to different species. We conserved the name sogdianus for male (lectotype). The female (paralectotype) belongs to Psammochares binaevus Haupt 1930 .