Protodasyapha (Protodasyapha) hirtuosa (Philippi, 1865)

Tabanus hirtuosus Philippi, 1865: 719–720 .

Tabanus ? obscuratus Philippi, 1865: 720 (preocc. Walker, 1854). Syntypes. Two females (one in MNNC), Chile: Santiago. Hunter, 1901: 142 (cat.); Porter, 1902: 248 (Chile spp.); Kertész, 1908: 266 (cat.); Stuardo: 1946: 69 (cat.); Philip, 1968a: 11 (tax., Philippi’s types).

Veprius rufopilosus Bigot, 1892: 620–621 . Holotype. Male (NHMUK), “ Chile ”. Kertész, 1900: 26 (cat., Silvius); Ricardo, 1901: 293 (com., Silvius), 294 (in key, redes.); Porter, 1902: 246 (Chile spp., Silvius); Kertész, 1908: 179 (cat., Silvius); Surcouf, 1921: 144 (dist., Mesomyia); Enderlein, 1925: 315 (tax.); Kröber, 1930c: 236–237 (redes.); Kröber, 1930e: 139 (in key, diag.); Kröber, 1934: 231 (cat.); Fraga, 1937a: 192 (in key), 194 (com., dist.); Fairchild, 1956: 28 (com.); Fairchild, 1971: 4 (cat.); Moucha, 1976: 17 (cat.); Chainey, 1990: 305 (NHMUK types).

Syntypes. Two males (one in MNNC). Type-locality: Chile, Santiago .

Distribution. Chile: Región Metropolitana (Cordillera, Santiago); Región de O’Higgins (Cachapoal); Región del Maule (Curicó); Región de la Araucanía (Malleco).

References. Kertész, 1900: 54 (cat., Tabanus); Hunter, 1901: 141 (cat., Tabanus); Kertész, 1908: 249 (cat., Tabanus); Surcouf, 1921: 71 (dist., Tabanus); Kröber, 1930b: 169 (in key), 170 (redes.); Kröber, 1930e: 122 (in key); Kröber, 1934: 238 (cat.); Philip, 1968a: 11 (dist., tax., Philippi’s types); Fairchild, 1971: 4 (cat.); Coscarón, 1976: 79–82 (redes., figs. 1A–E, 2A–H); Coscarón et al., 1979: 303 (com.); Coscarón & González, 1991: 127 (Chile spp.); González, 1993: 110–111 (sea. occ.); Fairchild & Burger, 1994: 30 (cat.); Coscarón, 1998: 349 (list, dist.); González, 1998: 466 (imm. sta.); González & Flores, 2004: 6–7 (mou. par., figs. 8–13); Coscarón & Papavero, 2009a: 35 (female, figs. 7A–H), 36 (male, figs. 8A–E); Coscarón & Papavero, 2009b: 32 (cat.).