supernumerarius Brunner v. Wattenwyl, 1907: 261 [ Lonchodes]. (Fig. 10)

HT, ♁: S. Celebes, Bua-Kraeng, 5000' Febr. 1896, H. Fruhstorfer; Brunner v. W. et Redtenbacher det. 1903 Type; Lonch. supernumerarius Br. v. W.

Comment: There is another ♁, with identical data, but without a type label. However, as the HT lacks both front legs and Brunner v. Wattenwyl (1907: 261) inserted a “?” for foreleg length in his table of measurements, it must be presumed that the author had not examined the second specimen. Hence, it cannot be a type.

Valid name: Ramulus supernumerarius (Brunner v. Wattenwyl, 1907)