Labomimus bannaus Yin & Li, 2013

Labomimus bannaus Yin & Li, 2013 in Y I N et al. (2013a: 344)

Type locality. China: Yunnan, Xishuangbanna, Menglun Town, Mandajiu Villege, 21.93429°N, 101.27697°E, alt. 640 m.

Additional material examined (57 specimens). LAOS: KHAMMOUAN: 36 ♂♂, ‘LAOS centr., Ehammouan pr., BAN EHOUN NGEUN viii.env., 17.v.-6.vi.2007, ~ 300 m, M. Štrba lgt’ (MHNG, SNUC) ; 1 ♂, ‘same locality, 4-16.xi., 25-30.xi.2000, 18°07′N, 104°29′E, 250 m Jendek & Šauša’ (MHNG); 1 ♂, ‘same locality, 17°43′N, 105°09′E, 22.V.-8.VI.2001, alt. 500-600m, E. Jendek & O. Šauša leg’ (MHNG) . ATTAPEU: 3♂♂, ‘ LAOS, ATTAPEU prov. Annam Highlands Mts, Dong Amphan NBCA, ca. 1160 m. NONG FA C crater lake], env. 15°05.9′N, 107°25.6′E, Jiří Hájek leg. 30.iv.- 6.v.2010 ’ (NMPC) ; 1 ♂, ‘ LAOS, Attapu prov., Bolaven Plateau, 18-30.IV. 99, 15 km SE of Ban Houaykong, 900 m, Štrba lgt’ (MHNG) . CHAMPASAK: 2♂♂, ‘ LAOS, Champasak prov., Bolaven Plateau, 10-18. IV.99, route Pakse-Paksong, Banitou env., 800 m, Štrba lgt’ (MHNG) ; 1 ♂, ‘ S Laos, Champasak prov. Bolaven Plateau, 10- 18.4.99, Route No.23, Pakse-Paksong, Banitou env, 900 m, Jendek & Šauša’ (MHNG) . BOLIKHAMSAI: 1 ♂, ‘ LAOS, 1-18.v.2001, Bolikhamsai prov., 18°21′N, 105°08′E, Ban Nape (8 km NE), ~ 600 m, V. Eubáň leg’ (MHNG); 1 ♀, ‘ LAOS: 27.iv-1.v.97, 70 km NE Vientiane BAN PHABAT, 150 m, N18°16′, E103°11′, Sausa & Jendek’ (MHNG) . VIETNAM: ĐỒNG NAI: 6 ♂♂, ‘S-VIETNAM, Nam Cat Tien Nat. Park, 1.-15. 5. 1994, Pacholatko & Dembicky’ (MHNG, SNUC) . NINH B ÌNH: 3 ♂♂, ‘ VIETNAM N, 100 km s from Hanoi CUC-PHUONG nat. Park, 02.- 12.5.1991, leg. E. Jendek’ (VBGG); 1 ♂, ‘ VIETNAM N, 02.- 12.5.91, 100 km S from Hanoi CUC-PHUONG nat. park, E. Jendek leg’ (VBGG) .

Comments. The male of Labomimus bannaus can be readily recognized by a large disc-like process at the apex of antennomere 9, basally expanded antennomere 10, curved antennomere 11, as well as by the unique form of aedeagus. This species was originally described from Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, southern China, and is here newly recorded from Vietnam and Laos. There is no obvious morphological difference between the population from China and those from Laos and Vietnam.

Distribution. China: Yunnan; Vietnam: Ninh Bình, Đồng Nai; Laos: Bolikhamsai, Ehammouan, Champasak, Attapeu (Y I N et al. 2013a; this paper). First country records for Laos and Vietnam.