identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
F7272E51FF8D0F32FF3FFD03FA70485E.text	F7272E51FF8D0F32FF3FFD03FA70485E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hormius Nees 1818	<div><p>Genus Hormius Nees, 1819</p><p>Hormius Nees, 1819: 305; Shenefelt 1975: 1143; Belokobylskij 1989: 380; Papp 1990: 179; Wharton 1993: 136; Belokobylskij 1995: 189; van Achterberg 1995: 64; Belokobylskij 1998: 131; Yu et al. 2016.</p><p>Anhormius Belokobylskij, 1989: 387 (Type species: Anhormius propodealis Belokobylskij, 1989); van Achterberg 1995: 65; (as subgenus of Hormius); Belokobylskij 2001: 468; Yu et al. 2016.</p><p>Chlidonia Herrich-Schäffer, 1838: 157 (Type species: Bracon moniliatus Nees, 1811); Shenefelt 1975: 1143; Yu et al. 2016.</p><p>Hormiellus Enderlein, 1912: 20 (Type species: Hormiellus solocipes Enderlein, 1912); Belokobylskij 1993: 149 (as synonym); Yu et al. 2016.</p><p>Hormisca Telenga, 1941: 115 (Type species: Hormisca tatianae Telenga, 1941); Belokobylskij 2001: 468 (as subgenus of Hormius); Yu et al. 2016.</p><p>Mediella Hedqvist, 1963: 52 (Type species: Mediella romani Hedqvist, 1963); Belokobylskij 1989: 380 (as synonym); Yu et al. 2016.</p><p>Type species: Bracon moniliatus Nees, 1811 .</p><p>Hosts. Ectoparasitiods of the microlepidopteran larvae from the families Coleophoridae, Crambidae, Depressariidae, Gelechiidae, Geometridae, Gracillariidae, Pyralidae, Tortricidae and Scythrididae ( Lepidoptera).</p><p>Distribution. Almost cosmopolitan.</p><p>Key to subgenera of the genus Hormius</p><p>1. Second radiomedial vein (r-m) of fore wing absent.............................. Anhormius Belokobylskij, 1989</p><p>- Second radiomedial vein (r-m) of fore wing always present................................................ 2</p><p>2. Radial (marginal) cell of fore wing strongly shortened; metacarp (1-R1) very short, less than 0.5 × as long as pterostigma. Sometimes first radiomedial vein (2-SR) absent...................................... Hormisca Telenga, 1941</p><p>- Radial (marginal) cell of fore wing not or only weakly shortened; metacarp (1-R1) not or only weakly shortened, not or only weakly less than length of pterostigma. First radiomedial vein (2-SR) always present............ Hormius Nees, 1819</p><p>Notes. The present morphological delimitation of the genus Hormius on subgenera is based on the types of fore wing venation (veins reduction and shortening of the radial (marginal) cell). However, these peculiarities are impossible to study in the specimens with strongly shortened wings and significant reduction of the wing venation discussed in current paper. In that case, I prefer to classify conditionally the brachypterous, micropterous or apterous species of this genus as belonging to the subgenus Hormius s. str. until receiving contrary (perhaps molecular) data.</p><p>Checklist of the known brachypterous and micropterous Hormius species:</p><p>Hormius (s.str.) dispar Brues, 1907 ( H. micropterus Hedqvist, 1963)— USA (nine states)</p><p>Hormius (s.str.) haeselbarthi Belokobylskij, sp. nov. — South Africa</p><p>Hormius (s.str.) helleni Belokobylskij, sp. nov. — Russia (Leningradskaya Province)</p><p>Hormius (s.str.) minialatus Tobias, 1977 — Mongolia, Russia (Zabaikalskiy Territory)</p><p>Hormius (s.str.) stauropolicus Belokobylskij, 2002 — Russia (Stavropol Territory)</p><p>Key to the world brachypterous and micropterous species of Hormius</p><p>1. Vertex and mesoscutum almost entirely densely granulate and with reticulation at least partly (Figs 2A, D, G; 3B, E, G; 4C, D; 5B, E, F)...................................................................................... 2</p><p>- Vertex and mesoscutum mostly smooth (Figs 1A, E, G)................................................... 4</p><p>2. Palpi dark, reddish-brown (Fig. 2E). Mesopleuron entirely densely granulate (Fig. 2F); scutellum almost entirely densely granulate (Fig. 2G). Second metasomal tergite shorter, its median length 0.4 × maximum posterior width, 0.9 × posterior width of first tergite (Fig. 2K). Ovipositor short, weakly protruding behind apex of metasoma; its sheath short and wide (Fig. 2J). Body length 2.1 mm.— Russia (Leningradskaya Province).......... H. (s.str.) helleni Belokobylskij, sp. nov.</p><p>- Palpi light, yellow or light brown (Figs 3F; 4E; 5D, G). Mesopleuron widely smooth or sometimes only partly striate on wide area, without granulation (Figs 3F; 4E; 5G); scutellum smooth or mostly finely coriaceous (Figs 3G; 4D; 5F). Second metasomal tergite longer, its median length 0.5–0.6 × maximum posterior width, 1.1 × posterior width of first tergite (Figs 3J; 4F; 5J). Ovipositor longer, distinctly protruding behind apex of metasoma; its sheath long and narrow (Figs 3K; 4G; 5 K) ............................................................................................. 3</p><p>3. First metasomal tergite medially usually extensively carinate-rugulose or sometimes only rugulose (Figs 3G, J; 4F). Head (dorsal view) less strongly narrowed behind eyes (Figs 3E; 4C). Vertex rugulose-granulate (Figs 3E; 4C). Body length 1.9–2.4 mm.— Mongolia, Russia (Zabaikalskiy Terr.)............................... H. (s.str.) minialatus Tobias</p><p>- First metasomal tergite smooth on wide medial area (Figs 5F, J). Head (dorsal view) more strongly narrowed behind eyes (Figs 5E). Vertex only granulate, without rugulosity (Figs 5E). Body length 2.3 mm.— Russia (Stavropol Terr.).......................................................................... H. (s.str.) stauropolicus Belokobylskij</p><p>4. Malar space 0.8 × as long as eye broad (Fig. 1D). Scutellum with antero-lateral rugulose areas (Fig. 1G). First metasomal tergite striate with rugulosity laterally (Figs 1G, J). Ovipositor sheath long, 1.7 × longer than hind basitarsus (Figs 1J, K). Reduced fore wing with distinct and sclerotised basal (1-M) vein (Fig. 1I). Body only partly covered by short setae, mainly glabrous (Fig. 1B). Body widely with reddish brown or black colour (Fig. 1B). Body length 2.0– 2.2 mm — South Africa ............................................................... H. (s.str.) africanus Belokobylskij, sp. nov.</p><p>- Malar space equal to eye broad. Scutellum without antero-lateral rugulose areas. First metasomal tergite mostly smooth, with rugulose areas laterally. Ovipositor sheath short, nearly as long as hind basitarsus. Reduced fore wing without basal (1-M) vein. Body entirely covered by long setae. Body mostly yellowish brown. Body length 2.1 mm — USA ........................................................................................ H. (s.str.) dispar Brues</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F7272E51FF8D0F32FF3FFD03FA70485E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	BELOKOBYLSKIJ, SERGEY A	BELOKOBYLSKIJ, SERGEY A (2026): Brachypterous and micropterous species of the genus Hormius Nees (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Hormiinae). Zootaxa 5763 (3): 435-447, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5763.3.8, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5763.3.8
F7272E51FF8E0F35FF3FFA4DFCF14FA3.text	F7272E51FF8E0F35FF3FFA4DFCF14FA3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hormius haeselbarthi BELOKOBYLSKIJ 2026	<div><p>Hormius (s.str.) haeselbarthi Belokobylskij, sp. nov.</p><p>http://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: C4CA156A-97C4-4878-B1B5-CB43781D5B86</p><p>Fig. 1</p><p>Type material. Holotype: female, South Africa, “ Storms River, Knysna, C.P. Forest, 13.12.[19]64, Haeselb. [art leg.]” (ZSM).</p><p>Paratypes: 2 females, 1 male, with same label as holotype (ZSM, ZISP)</p><p>Description. Female. Body length 2.0– 2.2 mm; fore wing length 0.5–0.6 mm.</p><p>Head (dorsal view) 1.4–1.6 × as wide as median length, 1.7–1.8 × as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Head behind eyes distinctly, evenly and weakly roundly narrowed. Transverse diameter of eye 1.3–1.5 × longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli very small, configured in almost equilateral triangle. POL 1.0–1.5 × Od, 0.2–0.4 × OOL. Antennal socket diameter 1.2 × distance between sockets, 1.5–2.2 × distance between socket and eye. Eye without setae, without emargination opposite antennal sockets, 1.3–1.4 × as high as broad. Malar space 0.6–0.7 × as high as eye, 1.6–1.7 × as high as basal width of mandible. Malar suture mainly indistinct, almost entirely absent. Face weakly convex, clypeus strongly convex, high of face with clypeus 1.1–1.2 × eye height, 0.8–1.0 × width of face. Tentorial pits large. Hypoclypeal depression narrow, transverse-oval, its width 0.6–0.9 × distance from depression to eye, almost 0.4 × width of face. Occipital carina coarse, complete dorsally, not or very weakly angulated to ocelli medio-dorsally, joined ventrally with hypostomal carina above base of mandible. Hypostomal flange wide. Head below eyes rather distinctly and weakly roundly narrowed (front view).</p><p>Antenna relatively slender, weakly widened towards apex, with 17 antennomeres, 1.1 × longer than body. Scape rather long and not thick, 1.7–2.0 × longer than width, 1.3–1.4 × longer than pedicel. First flagellar segment 4.5–5.0 × longer than its apical width, 1.15–1.20 × longer than second flagellomere; second flagellomere 3.7–4.2 × longer than width. Penultimate flagellomere 2.6–2.8 × longer than wide, 0.6 × as long as first flagellomere, 0.8–0.9 × as long as apical flagellomere; the latter weakly acuminate apically and without ‘spine’.</p><p>Mesosoma weakly reduced, its length 1.8–1.9 × height. Pronotum long, weakly convex dorsally (lateral view), its anterior margin with short flange and weakly concave (dorsal view), pronotal keel indistinct or fine in anterior third. Mesoscutum very weakly and curvedly elevated above pronotum, 0.9–1.0 × as long as wide. Notauli distinct, deep, rather wide, complete, sparsely and coarsely crenulate; fine and short median furrow present on posterior half or third of median lobe of mesoscutum. Prescutellar depression distinct, rather long, with high median carina and two low lateral rugae. Scutellum separated, with weak lateral carinae anteriorly, with shallow and narrow but rather distinct rugulose areas antero-laterally. Subalar depression relatively deep and narrow, mainly smooth, but anteriorly shortly crenulate. Precoxal suture present, shallow anteriorly and deep posteriorly, oblique, almost smooth, running along anterior half of lower part of mesopleuron. Prepectal carina distinct. Postpectal carina absent. Propodeum weakly convex in anterior two–thirds and almost vertically abrupt in posterior third (lateral view), without lateral tubercles, with distinctly delineated short areola and with long or short baso-medial carina. In dorsal view, mesonotum 2.0–3.0 × longer than pronotum, 1.6–2.0 × longer than propodeum. Tegulae present.</p><p>Wings. Fore wing distinctly reduced, narrow, lanceolate, pointed distally, with distinct basal venation, without sclerotised areas, protruding weakly or rather distinctly behind apex of propodeum.</p><p>Legs. Femora rather slender. Hind femur claviform, 5.3–5.6 × longer than maximum width. Hind tarsus 0.7–0.8 × as long as hind tibia. Hind tibia weakly thickened distally. Hind basitarsus not thickened and without row of bristles along its ventral margin, 0.7–0.9 × as long as second to fifth segments combined. Second segment of hind tarsus about 0.3 × as long as basitarsus, 0.8–0.9 × as long as fifth segment (without pretarsus).</p><p>Metasoma 1.6–1.8 × longer than its maximum width, 0.9–1.0 × as long as head and mesosoma combined. First tergite weakly and regularly widened from base to apex, with dorsal carinae complete, subparallel, but weakly convergent posteriorly, rather widely separated; length of tergite 1.0–1.2 × its posterior width, 1.3–1.5 × length of propodeum; posterior width of tergite 1.4–1.6 × its basal width. Suture between second and third tergites rather distinct laterally, but almost absent medially. Second tergite basally with shallow and strongly oblique sublateral furrows, almost straight or weakly curved and situated subparallel to anterior margins of tergite. Median length of second tergite 1.3–1.4 × longer than posterior width of first tergite, 1.6–1.8 × length of third tergite. Median length of second and third tergites combined 0.8 × their maximum width. Ovipositor weakly upcurved and relatively long, its sheath (prominence behind tip of metasoma) weakly thickened towards apex, 1.5–1.7 × longer than first metasomal tergite, 0.50–0.55 × as long as hind tibia, 0.45–0.55 × as long as mesosoma.</p><p>Sculpture and pubescence. Head mainly smooth; only face very weakly and narrowly rugulose laterally. Mesoscutum and scutellum almost entirely smooth. Mesopleuron smooth. Propodeum entirely coarsely rugose, with distinctly delineated areola and separated subsquare petiolate area, areola short and relatively narrow, about as long as its maximum width, separated from base of propodeum by relatively long basal carina equal to half or third of propodeum length. Hind femur distinctly and very sparsely punctate, mostly smooth. First tergite entirely distinctly and more or less densely striate, finely rugulose in postero-lateral half, without smooth areas, medial area delineated by high lateral carinae. Tergites posterior to first tergite entirely shagreened. Vertex with rather sparse, short and semi-erect setae marginally, glabrous medially. Mesonotum mainly glabrous, with very sparse, short and semi-erect setae configured along notauli and laterally in single lines. Hind tibia dorsally with rather dense, elongated, and semi-erect setae, length of those setae 0.8–1.0 × maximum width of hind tibia.</p><p>Colour. Head reddish brown; mesosoma yellowish brown to light reddish brown in anterior 0.3–0.4, almost black on remaining part; metasoma mainly black, second and third or second–fifth tergites medially on wide area light brown or light reddish brown. Antenna light brown, yellow basally and faintly infuscate distally. Palpi yellow. Setae on vertex, mesonotum and hind tibia white. Fore and middle legs mainly yellow, only middle femur faintly infuscate in posterior half or third; hind leg mainly yellow, but femur brown widely medially or in distal two–thirds and tibia reddish brown in posterior half or two–thirds. Ovipositor sheath light brown in basal half and dark brown in posterior half.</p><p>Male. Body length 1.6 mm; fore wing length 0.15 mm. Antenna with 16 antennomeres. Mesosoma length 2.0 × its height. Fore wing strongly reduced, oval, rounded distally, without distinct basal venation, with sclerotized costal vein, protruding weakly behind base of propodeum. Hind femur 4.7 × longer than maximum width. First tergum distinctly widened anteriorly and subparallel on rest part. First tergite length smooth medially in anterior half. Body mainly brown to reddish brown, only partly pale reddish brown. Otherwise similar to female.</p><p>Etymology. The species is named in honour of the late Dr Erasmus Haeselbarth, the German entomologist and braconidologist, the collector of the type material of this new species.</p><p>Comparative diagnosis. This new species is similar to Nearctic H. dispar Brues, 1907 (USA) (Hedqvist, 1963), but differs from it in the malar space 0.8 × as long as eye broad (equal in H. dispar), scutellum with antero-lateral rugulose areas (without such areas in H. dispar), first metasomal tergite striate with rugulosity laterally (smooth in H. dispar), ovipositor sheath long, 1.7 × longer than basitarsus of hind tarsus (short, nearly as long as basitarsus in H. dispar), basal veins of reduced fore wing distinct and sclerotised (wing without veins in H. dispar), body covered by short and sparse setae, mainly glabrous (entirely covered by long setae in H. dispar), and body widely reddish brown or black (mainly yellowish brown in H. dispar).</p><p>Host. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. South Africa (Western Cape Province).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F7272E51FF8E0F35FF3FFA4DFCF14FA3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	BELOKOBYLSKIJ, SERGEY A	BELOKOBYLSKIJ, SERGEY A (2026): Brachypterous and micropterous species of the genus Hormius Nees (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Hormiinae). Zootaxa 5763 (3): 435-447, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5763.3.8, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5763.3.8
F7272E51FF890F37FF3FFCD1FA694B4D.text	F7272E51FF890F37FF3FFCD1FA694B4D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hormius helleni BELOKOBYLSKIJ 2026	<div><p>Hormius (s.str.) helleni Belokobylskij, sp. nov.</p><p>http://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 9A610A49-EE83-49F5-8DCA-5CDD3D82131A</p><p>Fig. 2</p><p>Type material. Holotype: female, Russia, “ Vammeljoki ” (= Leningradskaya Province, Serovo, Chyornaya rechka), “ Hellen ”, “3113” (= 17.07.1936) (ZMHF).</p><p>Description. Female. Body length 2.1 mm; fore wing length 0.6 mm.</p><p>Head (dorsal view) 1.6 × as wide as median length, 1.4 × as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Head behind eyes evenly and weakly roundly narrowed. Transverse diameter of eye 1.45 × longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli small, configured in equilateral triangle. POL 2.0 × Od, 0.4 × OOL. Antennal socket diameter 1.2 × distance between sockets, 1.2 × distance between socket and eye. Eye with short and sparse setae, with very shallow emargination opposite antennal sockets, 1.2 × as high as broad. Malar space 0.6 × as high as eye, about 1.5 × as high as basal width of mandible. Malar suture absent. Face and clypeus distinctly convex, high of face with clypeus almost equal to eye height. Occipital carina coarse, complete dorsally, very weakly arched to ocelli medio-dorsally, not joined ventrally with hypostomal carina directly, but connected with help of several transverse carinae above base of mandible. Hypostomal flange wide. Head below eyes distinctly and weakly roundly narrowed (front view).</p><p>Antenna thick, filiform, with 18 antennomeres, 0.8 × as long as body. Scape rather short and thick, 1.6 × longer than width, 1.6 × longer than pedicel. First flagellomere 2.3 × longer than apical width, as long as second flagellomere; second flagellomere 2.0 × longer than width. Penultimate flagellomere 1.8 × longer than wide, 0.8 × as long as first flagellomere, 0.9 × as long as apical flagellomere; the latter weakly acuminate apically and without ‘spine’.</p><p>Mesosoma weakly reduced, its length 1.75 × height. Pronotum rather long, convex dorsally (lateral view), its anterior margin with distinct flange and weakly concave (dorsal view), pronotal keel low and obtuse in anterior quarter. Mesoscutum weakly and roundly elevated above pronotum, 0.8 × as long as wide. Notauli distinct, rather deep, narrow, complete, sparsely crenulate; complete fine median furrow present on median lobe of mesoscutum. Prescutellar depression relatively deep, not long, with single high median carina and several lateral rugae. Scutellum separated, with weak lateral carinae. Subalar depression relatively deep, wide, striate-coriaceous. Precoxal suture present, distinct, coarse crenulate, running along anterior 0.6 of lower part of mesopleuron. Prepectal carina distinct. Postpectal carina absent. Propodeum regularly convex-roundly narrowed posteriorly (lateral view), without lateral tubercles, but with distinct long areola. In dorsal view, mesonotum 6.0 × longer than pronotum, 2.2 × longer than propodeum. Tegulae present.</p><p>Wings. Fore wing distinctly reduced, narrow, lanceolate, pointed distally, with distinct basal venation, without sclerotised areas, protruding weakly behind apex of propodeum.</p><p>Legs. Femora thickened. Hind femur 3.9 × longer than its maximum width. Hind tarsus 0.9 × as long as hind tibia. Hind tibia weakly thickened. Hind basitarsus thickened and with dense row of rather long bristles along its ventral margin, 0.7 × as long as slender second to fifth segments combined. Second segment of hind tarsus 0.4 × as long as basitarsus, almost as long as fifth segment (without pretarsus).</p><p>Metasoma 1.4 × longer than its maximum width, 0.8 × as longer as head and mesosoma combined. First tergite distinctly and rather regularly widened from base to apex, with dorsal carinae complete, curved and distinctly convergent posteriorly, widely separated; length of tergite 0.8 × its posterior width, almost equal to length of propodeum; posterior width of tergite 2.2 × its basal width. Suture between second and third tergites fine and weakly curved. Second tergite basally with distinct but shallow sublateral oblique furrows, which are curved and subparallel to lateral margins of tergite. Median length of second tergite 0.9 × as long as posterior width of first tergite, about 1.5 × length of third tergite. Median length of second and third tergites combined 0.6 × their maximum width. Ovipositor straight and short, its sheath (prominence behind tip of metasoma) 0.6 × as long as first metasomal tergite, 0.2 × as long as hind tibia, 0.2 × as long as mesosoma.</p><p>Sculpture and pubescence.Vertex very densely and distinctly granulate, without additional striation or rugulosity; frons densely granulate-striate, striae oblique and divergent posteriorly; face distinctly and densely granulate with rugosity at least partly; temple entirely and very densely distinctly granulate with additional sparse and oblique striae in its lower half. Mesoscutum entirely, distinctly and densely granulate, without rugosity along notauli, with narrow transverse smooth line in posterior margin. Scutellum entirely distinctly granulate. Mesopleuron entirely granulate, granulation fine below. Propodeum densely granulate anteriorly and coarsely areolate-rugose posteriorly, with distinctly delineated areola and separate petiolate area, areola long and narrow, about 2.5 × longer than maximum width, separated from base of propodeum by very short basal carina. Hind femur mostly coarsely and densely rugulose-granulate, but almost smooth below. First tergite entirely, relatively finely and more or less densely rugulose, without smooth areas laterally, medial area delineated by complete high sublateral carinae finely reticulatecoriaceous in basal and baso-lateral parts. Tergites posterior to first tergite almost smooth to shagreened. Vertex almost entirely with rather sparse, short and semi-erect setae. Mesonotum mainly glabrous, with sparse, relatively short and semi-erect white setae configured along notauli and laterally in single lines. Hind tibia dorsally with dense, relatively short, and semi-erect white setae, length of those setae 0.5–0.7 × maximum width of hind tibia.</p><p>Colour. Body predominantly dark reddish brown to black, prothorax light reddish brown.Antenna predominantly black, three basal antennomeres dark reddish brown. Palpi reddish brown. Legs light reddish brown, hind tibia paler basally. Ovipositor sheath entirely almost black.</p><p>Male. Unknown.</p><p>Etymology. The species is named in honour of the Dr Wolter E. Hellén, the Finish hymenopterist and the collector of the holotype of this new species.</p><p>Comparative diagnosis. The new species is similar to Eastern Palaearctic H. minialatus Tobias (Mongolia and Russia (south of East Siberia)), but differs from the latter by the mesopleuron distinctly and entirely granulatecoriaceous (mostly smooth in lower half in H. minialatus), scutellum entirely densely granulate (mainly smooth in H. minialatus), and hind femur short and thick (long and slender in H. minialatus).</p><p>Host. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Leningradskaya Province).</p><p>Remarks. This specimen was initially determined as a member of the Eastern Palaearctic H. minialatus Tobias supposing distinct variability of its morphological characters (Belokobylskij &amp; Kula, 2012). However, the restudy of this specimen as well as additional investigation of the material from Mongolia and Zabaikalskiy Territory (former Chita Province) of Russia and a search of available diagnostic characters with an estimation of their taxonomical meaning allowed me to separate it as new Hormius species in the group with sculptured vertex and mesoscutum.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F7272E51FF890F37FF3FFCD1FA694B4D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	BELOKOBYLSKIJ, SERGEY A	BELOKOBYLSKIJ, SERGEY A (2026): Brachypterous and micropterous species of the genus Hormius Nees (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Hormiinae). Zootaxa 5763 (3): 435-447, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5763.3.8, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5763.3.8
F7272E51FF8B0F3AFF3FF9A9FB594CC3.text	F7272E51FF8B0F3AFF3FF9A9FB594CC3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hormius minialatus Tobias 1977	<div><p>Hormius (s.str.) minialatus Tobias, 1977</p><p>Figs 3, 4</p><p>Hormius minialatus Tobias, 1977: 473; Belokobylskij &amp; Kula 2012: 30 (redescription); Yu et al. 2016.</p><p>Material examined. Mongolia: 2 females (holotype and paratype), “ Mongolia, Vostochnyi [East = Dornod] aymak [aimag], 60 km VSV [ENE] of Bayan-Burda, g.[ora] Derkhin-Tsagan-Obo, 3.VIII.[1]976, Kerzhner ” ZISP ); 1 female, Vostochnyi [East = Dornod] aymak [aimag], Khalkhin-Gol River, 33 km SE of Khalkh-Gol somon, 19.VII.1971 (I. Kerzhner) (ZISP) . Russia: 1 female, Chita Province [= Zabaikalskiy Territory], Onon District, Nizhniy Tsasuchey, pine forest, 24.VII.1990 (A. Kotenko) (IZANU) ; 2 females (with less shortened wing), Chita Province [= Zabaikalskiy Territory], Kharanor, 9.VII.1963 (A. Emelyanov) (ZISP) .</p><p>Distribution. Mongolia, Russia (Zabaikalskiy Territory).</p><p>Remarks. The detailed redescription of this species on the basis of present material was realised by Belokobylskij &amp; Kula (2012). The specimen collected by Dr Hellén in the south part of Karelia (1 female, “Vammeljoki”, “Hellen”, “3113”) was erroneously determined as H. minialatus (Belokobylskij &amp; Kula 2012) and is described above as a new species H. helleni sp. nov.</p><p>Besides this, the female from Austria (labelled as “Ebelsb[er]g, Schiltenb[er]g, Autob. Dst. Mönchsgr., 22.7.[19]49, leg. Hamann” and housed in the Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria) is excluded from material of this species (mentioned by Belokobylskij &amp; Kula 2012) because this locality of a flightless species is situated too far from its original type locality (Mongolia), and requires a careful re-study of this specimen.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F7272E51FF8B0F3AFF3FF9A9FB594CC3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	BELOKOBYLSKIJ, SERGEY A	BELOKOBYLSKIJ, SERGEY A (2026): Brachypterous and micropterous species of the genus Hormius Nees (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Hormiinae). Zootaxa 5763 (3): 435-447, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5763.3.8, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5763.3.8
F7272E51FF870F3BFF3FFF59FD464CC6.text	F7272E51FF870F3BFF3FFF59FD464CC6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hormius stauropolicus Belokobylskij 2012	<div><p>Hormius (s.str.) stauropolicus Belokobylskij, 2012</p><p>(Fig. 5)</p><p>Hormius stauropolicus Belokobylskij in Belokobylskij &amp; Kula 2012: 32; Yu et al. 2016.</p><p>Material examined. Russia: 1 female (holotype), “ Stavropol’skiy kray, Shpakovskoe, sukhoy lug [Stavropol Territory, Shpakovskoe settlement, dry meadow], 10.07.1988, Belokobylskij [leg.]” (ZISP) .</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Stavropol Territory).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F7272E51FF870F3BFF3FFF59FD464CC6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	BELOKOBYLSKIJ, SERGEY A	BELOKOBYLSKIJ, SERGEY A (2026): Brachypterous and micropterous species of the genus Hormius Nees (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Hormiinae). Zootaxa 5763 (3): 435-447, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5763.3.8, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5763.3.8
