taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
EE5387F2A473DF6EFE3EB19DFE99C7E5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15627296/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15627296	Figs 1–13. Pleurotomaria nodulocostulata n. sp. – 1–8. Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0001/01).– 1–2. Apertural view (×2.3 and ×1). – 3–4. Apical view (×2.3 and ×1). – 5–6. Basal view (×2.3 and ×1). – 7. The best preserved shelly side (×2.3). – 8. Details of the ornament (×5.5). – 9–12. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0001/02), having a thin coating of granulose calcite. – 9–10. Apical view (×2.3 and ×1). – 11–12. Lateral view (×2.3 and ×1). – 13. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0001/03), an early shell in a slightly oblique view, with the onset of the specific spiral thread, developing on the ramp along the angulation of the whorl surface (×5.5)	Figs 1–13. Pleurotomaria nodulocostulata n. sp. – 1–8. Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0001/01).– 1–2. Apertural view (×2.3 and ×1). – 3–4. Apical view (×2.3 and ×1). – 5–6. Basal view (×2.3 and ×1). – 7. The best preserved shelly side (×2.3). – 8. Details of the ornament (×5.5). – 9–12. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0001/02), having a thin coating of granulose calcite. – 9–10. Apical view (×2.3 and ×1). – 11–12. Lateral view (×2.3 and ×1). – 13. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0001/03), an early shell in a slightly oblique view, with the onset of the specific spiral thread, developing on the ramp along the angulation of the whorl surface (×5.5)	2017-12-31	Szabó, János		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János			
EE5387F2A476DF6DFE78B018FEABC40F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15627299/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15627299	Figs 14–28. Pleurotomaria wiesberghausensis n. sp. – 14–19. Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0002/01). – 14–15. Lateral view better showing the early shell (×3 and ×1). – 16–17. Lateral view for the best outline (×3 and ×1). – 18–19. Apical view (×3 and ×1). – 20–22. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0002/02), the largest specimen. – 20. Apical view (×1). – 21. Lateral view (×1). – 22. Basal view (×1). – 23–28. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0002/03) to display the early shell morphology. – 23–24. Lateral view (×4.3 and ×1). – 25–26. Apical view (×4.3 and ×1). – 27. Basal view (×4.3). – 28. Details of the early ornament (×13)	Figs 14–28. Pleurotomaria wiesberghausensis n. sp. – 14–19. Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0002/01). – 14–15. Lateral view better showing the early shell (×3 and ×1). – 16–17. Lateral view for the best outline (×3 and ×1). – 18–19. Apical view (×3 and ×1). – 20–22. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0002/02), the largest specimen. – 20. Apical view (×1). – 21. Lateral view (×1). – 22. Basal view (×1). – 23–28. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0002/03) to display the early shell morphology. – 23–24. Lateral view (×4.3 and ×1). – 25–26. Apical view (×4.3 and ×1). – 27. Basal view (×4.3). – 28. Details of the early ornament (×13)	2017-12-31	Szabó, János		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János			
EE5387F2A475DF63FE2FB073FEABC06F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15627301/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15627301	Figs 29–46. Pleurotomaria nodulocincta n. sp. – 29–38. Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0003/01). – 29–30. Apertural view (×3 and ×1). – 31. Details of the ornament from the penultimate whorl (×6). – 32–33. Apical view (×3 and ×1). – 34–35. Dorsal view (×3 and ×1). – 36. Details of the ornament from the last whorl (×6). – 37–38. Basal view (×3 and ×1). – 39–40. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0003/02), an early shell of the species, having sparser nodules along the ramp than P. wiesberghausensis in the same growth stage; nodules below the selenizone of its latest whorl are just appearing, lateral view (×5 and ×1). – 41–46. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0003/03), young specimen, with well-preserved growth threads; the sparse nodes on the ramp indicate its belonging also to P.nodulocincta though the abapical belt of the outer face is similar to that of P.wiesberghausensis. – 41–42. Lateral view (×5 and ×1). – 43–44. Basal view (×5 and ×1). – 45–46. Slightly oblique lateral view (×5 and ×1)	Figs 29–46. Pleurotomaria nodulocincta n. sp. – 29–38. Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0003/01). – 29–30. Apertural view (×3 and ×1). – 31. Details of the ornament from the penultimate whorl (×6). – 32–33. Apical view (×3 and ×1). – 34–35. Dorsal view (×3 and ×1). – 36. Details of the ornament from the last whorl (×6). – 37–38. Basal view (×3 and ×1). – 39–40. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0003/02), an early shell of the species, having sparser nodules along the ramp than P. wiesberghausensis in the same growth stage; nodules below the selenizone of its latest whorl are just appearing, lateral view (×5 and ×1). – 41–46. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0003/03), young specimen, with well-preserved growth threads; the sparse nodes on the ramp indicate its belonging also to P.nodulocincta though the abapical belt of the outer face is similar to that of P.wiesberghausensis. – 41–42. Lateral view (×5 and ×1). – 43–44. Basal view (×5 and ×1). – 45–46. Slightly oblique lateral view (×5 and ×1)	2017-12-31	Szabó, János		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János			
EE5387F2A478DF66FE15B313FBDDC375.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15627303/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15627303	Figs 47–60. Pleurotomaria seminodosa n. sp. – 47–53. Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0004/01). – 47– 48. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 49. Development of the ornament in the best preserved section (×9.5). – 50–51. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 52–53. Apical view (×3 and ×1). – 54–59. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0004/02), the ornament of the base is preserved only on this specimen. – 54. Lateral view (×1). – 55. Lateral view (×1). – 56. Basal view (×1). – 57. Lateral view (×6). – 58. Basal view (×8). – 59. Lateral view (×3). – 60. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0004/03), an inner mould with shell particles, the undulation of the periphery does not appear on the outside of the shell (×3)	Figs 47–60. Pleurotomaria seminodosa n. sp. – 47–53. Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0004/01). – 47– 48. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 49. Development of the ornament in the best preserved section (×9.5). – 50–51. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 52–53. Apical view (×3 and ×1). – 54–59. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0004/02), the ornament of the base is preserved only on this specimen. – 54. Lateral view (×1). – 55. Lateral view (×1). – 56. Basal view (×1). – 57. Lateral view (×6). – 58. Basal view (×8). – 59. Lateral view (×3). – 60. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0004/03), an inner mould with shell particles, the undulation of the periphery does not appear on the outside of the shell (×3)	2017-12-31	Szabó, János		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János			
EE5387F2A47EDF65FE11B768FBEEC0B0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15689710/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15689710	Figs 61–73. Pleurotomaria indistincta n. sp. – 61–65. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0005/02), bearing poorly developed angulation and ramp on the whorl surface. – 61–62. Apertural view (×4 and ×1). – 63. Dorsal view (×4). – 64. Basal view (×4). – 65. Details of the earliest whorls (×7). – 66–68. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0005/03) with rather clearly visible angulation, outer face and ramp. – 66–67. Lateral view (×4 and ×1). – 68. Apertural view (×4). – 69–73. Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0005/01), the ramp and angulation have vanished from this specimen for the latest whorls, only the row of weak nodules indicates their former position. – 69–71. Lateral views (×3, ×3 and ×1). – 72–73. Basal view (×2.7 and ×1)	Figs 61–73. Pleurotomaria indistincta n. sp. – 61–65. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0005/02), bearing poorly developed angulation and ramp on the whorl surface. – 61–62. Apertural view (×4 and ×1). – 63. Dorsal view (×4). – 64. Basal view (×4). – 65. Details of the earliest whorls (×7). – 66–68. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0005/03) with rather clearly visible angulation, outer face and ramp. – 66–67. Lateral view (×4 and ×1). – 68. Apertural view (×4). – 69–73. Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0005/01), the ramp and angulation have vanished from this specimen for the latest whorls, only the row of weak nodules indicates their former position. – 69–71. Lateral views (×3, ×3 and ×1). – 72–73. Basal view (×2.7 and ×1)	2017-12-31	Szabó, János		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János			
EE5387F2A462DF78FE14B313FBCAC5D5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15627305/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15627305	Figs 74–84. Pleurotomaria nongradata n. sp. – 74–81. Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0006/01). – 74. Details of the ornament in a slightly oblique lateral view (×6.5). – 75. Apical view (×3). – 76–77. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 78–79. Basal view (×3 and ×1). – 80–81. “Best outline” view (×3 and ×1). – 82–84. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0006/02), a larger specimen, which probably represents fully or near fully grown stage (see more in remarks). – 82–83. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 84. Basal view (×1)	Figs 74–84. Pleurotomaria nongradata n. sp. – 74–81. Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0006/01). – 74. Details of the ornament in a slightly oblique lateral view (×6.5). – 75. Apical view (×3). – 76–77. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 78–79. Basal view (×3 and ×1). – 80–81. “Best outline” view (×3 and ×1). – 82–84. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0006/02), a larger specimen, which probably represents fully or near fully grown stage (see more in remarks). – 82–83. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 84. Basal view (×1)	2017-12-31	Szabó, János		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János			
EE5387F2A460DF79FDCDB608FB17C5D5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15627307/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15627307	Figs 85–96. Pleurotomaria sp. 1 and Pleurotomaria sp. 2, new species for the Hierlatz Alpe fauna but are either unidentifiable or notsuitable to outline new species owing to their poor preservation. – 85–90. Pleurotomaria sp.1 (GBA 2018/002/0007). – 85–86. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 87–88. Basal view (×3 and ×1). – 89–90. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 91–96. Pleurotomaria sp. 2 (GBA 2018/002/0008). – 91–92. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 93–94. Apical view (×3 and ×1). – 95–96. Basal view (×3 and ×1)	Figs 85–96. Pleurotomaria sp. 1 and Pleurotomaria sp. 2, new species for the Hierlatz Alpe fauna but are either unidentifiable or notsuitable to outline new species owing to their poor preservation. – 85–90. Pleurotomaria sp.1 (GBA 2018/002/0007). – 85–86. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 87–88. Basal view (×3 and ×1). – 89–90. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 91–96. Pleurotomaria sp. 2 (GBA 2018/002/0008). – 91–92. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 93–94. Apical view (×3 and ×1). – 95–96. Basal view (×3 and ×1)	2017-12-31	Szabó, János		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János			
EE5387F2A461DF7FFD9EB608FB17C42A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15627307/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15627307	Figs 85–96. Pleurotomaria sp. 1 and Pleurotomaria sp. 2, new species for the Hierlatz Alpe fauna but are either unidentifiable or notsuitable to outline new species owing to their poor preservation. – 85–90. Pleurotomaria sp.1 (GBA 2018/002/0007). – 85–86. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 87–88. Basal view (×3 and ×1). – 89–90. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 91–96. Pleurotomaria sp. 2 (GBA 2018/002/0008). – 91–92. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 93–94. Apical view (×3 and ×1). – 95–96. Basal view (×3 and ×1)	Figs 85–96. Pleurotomaria sp. 1 and Pleurotomaria sp. 2, new species for the Hierlatz Alpe fauna but are either unidentifiable or notsuitable to outline new species owing to their poor preservation. – 85–90. Pleurotomaria sp.1 (GBA 2018/002/0007). – 85–86. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 87–88. Basal view (×3 and ×1). – 89–90. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 91–96. Pleurotomaria sp. 2 (GBA 2018/002/0008). – 91–92. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 93–94. Apical view (×3 and ×1). – 95–96. Basal view (×3 and ×1)	2017-12-31	Szabó, János		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János			
EE5387F2A467DF7DFE32B05EFB17C310.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15627309/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15627309	Figs 97–109. Pleurotomaria? homoruspira n. sp. – 97–102. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0009/02), representing early shell parts of the species. – 97. Lateral view (×3). – 98–99. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 100.Basal view (×3). – 101. The early selenizone (×2.8).– 102. Ornament of the base (×7). – 103–109.Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0009/01), a full grown specimen.– 103–104. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 105–106. Apical view (×3 and ×1). – 107. Apertural view (×3). – 108. Basal view (×3). – 109. A relatively well preserved part of the selenizone on the last whorl, oblique lateral view (×5)	Figs 97–109. Pleurotomaria? homoruspira n. sp. – 97–102. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0009/02), representing early shell parts of the species. – 97. Lateral view (×3). – 98–99. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 100.Basal view (×3). – 101. The early selenizone (×2.8).– 102. Ornament of the base (×7). – 103–109.Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0009/01), a full grown specimen.– 103–104. Lateral view (×3 and ×1). – 105–106. Apical view (×3 and ×1). – 107. Apertural view (×3). – 108. Basal view (×3). – 109. A relatively well preserved part of the selenizone on the last whorl, oblique lateral view (×5)	2017-12-31	Szabó, János		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János			
EE5387F2A465DF70FDD9B754FE99C450.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15627311/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15627311	Figs 110–115. Pleurotomaria? laponya n. sp., holotype (GBA 2018/002/0010). – 110–111. Apical view (×2 and ×1). – 112–113. Lateral view (×2 and ×1). – 114. Oblique lateral view to make the cord along the peripheral angulation of the penultimate whorl visible (×2). – 115. Details of the ornament and selenizone (×5, cut from Fig. 114)	Figs 110–115. Pleurotomaria? laponya n. sp., holotype (GBA 2018/002/0010). – 110–111. Apical view (×2 and ×1). – 112–113. Lateral view (×2 and ×1). – 114. Oblique lateral view to make the cord along the peripheral angulation of the penultimate whorl visible (×2). – 115. Details of the ornament and selenizone (×5, cut from Fig. 114)	2017-12-31	Szabó, János		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János			
EE5387F2A468DF71FE3FB097FD92C0B3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15627299/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15627299	Figs 14–28. Pleurotomaria wiesberghausensis n. sp. – 14–19. Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0002/01). – 14–15. Lateral view better showing the early shell (×3 and ×1). – 16–17. Lateral view for the best outline (×3 and ×1). – 18–19. Apical view (×3 and ×1). – 20–22. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0002/02), the largest specimen. – 20. Apical view (×1). – 21. Lateral view (×1). – 22. Basal view (×1). – 23–28. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0002/03) to display the early shell morphology. – 23–24. Lateral view (×4.3 and ×1). – 25–26. Apical view (×4.3 and ×1). – 27. Basal view (×4.3). – 28. Details of the early ornament (×13)	Figs 14–28. Pleurotomaria wiesberghausensis n. sp. – 14–19. Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0002/01). – 14–15. Lateral view better showing the early shell (×3 and ×1). – 16–17. Lateral view for the best outline (×3 and ×1). – 18–19. Apical view (×3 and ×1). – 20–22. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0002/02), the largest specimen. – 20. Apical view (×1). – 21. Lateral view (×1). – 22. Basal view (×1). – 23–28. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0002/03) to display the early shell morphology. – 23–24. Lateral view (×4.3 and ×1). – 25–26. Apical view (×4.3 and ×1). – 27. Basal view (×4.3). – 28. Details of the early ornament (×13)	2017-12-31	Szabó, János		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János			
EE5387F2A468DF71FE3FB097FD92C0B3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15627301/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15627301	Figs 29–46. Pleurotomaria nodulocincta n. sp. – 29–38. Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0003/01). – 29–30. Apertural view (×3 and ×1). – 31. Details of the ornament from the penultimate whorl (×6). – 32–33. Apical view (×3 and ×1). – 34–35. Dorsal view (×3 and ×1). – 36. Details of the ornament from the last whorl (×6). – 37–38. Basal view (×3 and ×1). – 39–40. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0003/02), an early shell of the species, having sparser nodules along the ramp than P. wiesberghausensis in the same growth stage; nodules below the selenizone of its latest whorl are just appearing, lateral view (×5 and ×1). – 41–46. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0003/03), young specimen, with well-preserved growth threads; the sparse nodes on the ramp indicate its belonging also to P.nodulocincta though the abapical belt of the outer face is similar to that of P.wiesberghausensis. – 41–42. Lateral view (×5 and ×1). – 43–44. Basal view (×5 and ×1). – 45–46. Slightly oblique lateral view (×5 and ×1)	Figs 29–46. Pleurotomaria nodulocincta n. sp. – 29–38. Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0003/01). – 29–30. Apertural view (×3 and ×1). – 31. Details of the ornament from the penultimate whorl (×6). – 32–33. Apical view (×3 and ×1). – 34–35. Dorsal view (×3 and ×1). – 36. Details of the ornament from the last whorl (×6). – 37–38. Basal view (×3 and ×1). – 39–40. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0003/02), an early shell of the species, having sparser nodules along the ramp than P. wiesberghausensis in the same growth stage; nodules below the selenizone of its latest whorl are just appearing, lateral view (×5 and ×1). – 41–46. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0003/03), young specimen, with well-preserved growth threads; the sparse nodes on the ramp indicate its belonging also to P.nodulocincta though the abapical belt of the outer face is similar to that of P.wiesberghausensis. – 41–42. Lateral view (×5 and ×1). – 43–44. Basal view (×5 and ×1). – 45–46. Slightly oblique lateral view (×5 and ×1)	2017-12-31	Szabó, János		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János			
EE5387F2A46EDF77FE63B312FEABC286.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15627313/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15627313	Figs 116–130. Neorotomaria obertraunensis n. sp. and Neorotomaria subgradata n. sp. – 116–119. Neorotomaria obertraunensis n. sp., holotype (GBA 2008/69/43/2/2). – 116–117. Lateral view (×1 and ×3). – 118. Apertural view (×1). – 119. Basal view (×1). – 120–128. Neorotomaria subgradata n. sp. – 120–124. Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0014/01). – 120–121. Lateral view to show the outline of the shell (×2 and ×1). – 122. Apical view (×2). – 123. Lateral view with the largest surface of preserved ornament (×2). – 124.Basal view to document the presenceof a broad umbilicus (×1). – 125–128. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0014/02) representing early shell parts of the species. – 125–126. Lateral view (×4 and ×1). – 127–128. Apical view (×4 and ×1). 129–130. Comparative images of two Neorotomaria species to follow the similarities and divergences in the development of the shells. – 129. Neorotomaria subgradata n. sp. (×3). – 130. Neorotomaria obertraunensis (×3)	Figs 116–130. Neorotomaria obertraunensis n. sp. and Neorotomaria subgradata n. sp. – 116–119. Neorotomaria obertraunensis n. sp., holotype (GBA 2008/69/43/2/2). – 116–117. Lateral view (×1 and ×3). – 118. Apertural view (×1). – 119. Basal view (×1). – 120–128. Neorotomaria subgradata n. sp. – 120–124. Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0014/01). – 120–121. Lateral view to show the outline of the shell (×2 and ×1). – 122. Apical view (×2). – 123. Lateral view with the largest surface of preserved ornament (×2). – 124.Basal view to document the presenceof a broad umbilicus (×1). – 125–128. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0014/02) representing early shell parts of the species. – 125–126. Lateral view (×4 and ×1). – 127–128. Apical view (×4 and ×1). 129–130. Comparative images of two Neorotomaria species to follow the similarities and divergences in the development of the shells. – 129. Neorotomaria subgradata n. sp. (×3). – 130. Neorotomaria obertraunensis (×3)	2017-12-31	Szabó, János		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János			
EE5387F2A46FDF4AFE23B6FCFE99C40F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15627313/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15627313	Figs 116–130. Neorotomaria obertraunensis n. sp. and Neorotomaria subgradata n. sp. – 116–119. Neorotomaria obertraunensis n. sp., holotype (GBA 2008/69/43/2/2). – 116–117. Lateral view (×1 and ×3). – 118. Apertural view (×1). – 119. Basal view (×1). – 120–128. Neorotomaria subgradata n. sp. – 120–124. Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0014/01). – 120–121. Lateral view to show the outline of the shell (×2 and ×1). – 122. Apical view (×2). – 123. Lateral view with the largest surface of preserved ornament (×2). – 124.Basal view to document the presenceof a broad umbilicus (×1). – 125–128. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0014/02) representing early shell parts of the species. – 125–126. Lateral view (×4 and ×1). – 127–128. Apical view (×4 and ×1). 129–130. Comparative images of two Neorotomaria species to follow the similarities and divergences in the development of the shells. – 129. Neorotomaria subgradata n. sp. (×3). – 130. Neorotomaria obertraunensis (×3)	Figs 116–130. Neorotomaria obertraunensis n. sp. and Neorotomaria subgradata n. sp. – 116–119. Neorotomaria obertraunensis n. sp., holotype (GBA 2008/69/43/2/2). – 116–117. Lateral view (×1 and ×3). – 118. Apertural view (×1). – 119. Basal view (×1). – 120–128. Neorotomaria subgradata n. sp. – 120–124. Holotype (GBA 2018/002/0014/01). – 120–121. Lateral view to show the outline of the shell (×2 and ×1). – 122. Apical view (×2). – 123. Lateral view with the largest surface of preserved ornament (×2). – 124.Basal view to document the presenceof a broad umbilicus (×1). – 125–128. Paratype (GBA 2018/002/0014/02) representing early shell parts of the species. – 125–126. Lateral view (×4 and ×1). – 127–128. Apical view (×4 and ×1). 129–130. Comparative images of two Neorotomaria species to follow the similarities and divergences in the development of the shells. – 129. Neorotomaria subgradata n. sp. (×3). – 130. Neorotomaria obertraunensis (×3)	2017-12-31	Szabó, János		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János			
EE5387F2A452DF4AFE7FB0DAFC8AC04B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15627315/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15627315	Figs 131–139. Laevitomaria species.– 131–133.Laevitomaria? sp. (GBA 2018/002/0013).– 131– 132. Lateral view (×3.6 and ×1). – 133. Basal view (×3.6). – 134–136. Laevitomaria periferialis (Szabó, 1980) (GBA 2018/002/0011/01). – 134–135. Lateral view (×2 and ×1). – 136. Apertural view (×2). – 137–139. Laevitomaria sp. (GBA 2018/002/0012). – 137–138. Lateral view (×1 and ×3). – 139. Apical view (×3)	Figs 131–139. Laevitomaria species.– 131–133.Laevitomaria? sp. (GBA 2018/002/0013).– 131– 132. Lateral view (×3.6 and ×1). – 133. Basal view (×3.6). – 134–136. Laevitomaria periferialis (Szabó, 1980) (GBA 2018/002/0011/01). – 134–135. Lateral view (×2 and ×1). – 136. Apertural view (×2). – 137–139. Laevitomaria sp. (GBA 2018/002/0012). – 137–138. Lateral view (×1 and ×3). – 139. Apical view (×3)	2017-12-31	Szabó, János		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János			
EE5387F2A450DF48FDC2B36CFBDDC251.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15627315/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15627315	Figs 131–139. Laevitomaria species.– 131–133.Laevitomaria? sp. (GBA 2018/002/0013).– 131– 132. Lateral view (×3.6 and ×1). – 133. Basal view (×3.6). – 134–136. Laevitomaria periferialis (Szabó, 1980) (GBA 2018/002/0011/01). – 134–135. Lateral view (×2 and ×1). – 136. Apertural view (×2). – 137–139. Laevitomaria sp. (GBA 2018/002/0012). – 137–138. Lateral view (×1 and ×3). – 139. Apical view (×3)	Figs 131–139. Laevitomaria species.– 131–133.Laevitomaria? sp. (GBA 2018/002/0013).– 131– 132. Lateral view (×3.6 and ×1). – 133. Basal view (×3.6). – 134–136. Laevitomaria periferialis (Szabó, 1980) (GBA 2018/002/0011/01). – 134–135. Lateral view (×2 and ×1). – 136. Apertural view (×2). – 137–139. Laevitomaria sp. (GBA 2018/002/0012). – 137–138. Lateral view (×1 and ×3). – 139. Apical view (×3)	2017-12-31	Szabó, János		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János			
EE5387F2A451DF4FFDC4B094FEABC240.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15627317/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15627317	Figs 140–145. Granulizona mandli n. sp., holotype (GBA 2018/002/0015). – 140–141. Lateral view with the best preserved spots of the ornament (×1 and ×2.8).– 142–143.Lateral views, which clearly show the trochiform outline (×1). – 144. Basal view (×1). – 145. Details of the ornament and the alteration of the sculpture between the early and latest whorls (×6)	Figs 140–145. Granulizona mandli n. sp., holotype (GBA 2018/002/0015). – 140–141. Lateral view with the best preserved spots of the ornament (×1 and ×2.8).– 142–143.Lateral views, which clearly show the trochiform outline (×1). – 144. Basal view (×1). – 145. Details of the ornament and the alteration of the sculpture between the early and latest whorls (×6)	2017-12-31	Szabó, János		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János			
