taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
D31CECC9D7C25341A630C7A36ED449BD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1380731	https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.66.160212.figures3-7	Figures 3–7. Atherigona species: 3. Lateral habitus Atherigona adelinahae sp. nov. holotype male; 4. Lateral habitus Atherigona adelinahae sp. nov. paratype female; 5. Posterodorsal view of Atherigona adelinahae sp. nov. paratype female abdomen; 6. Lateral habitus of Atherigona angolaensis sp. nov. holotype male; 7. Lateral habitus of Atherigona cuanavaleensis sp. nov. holotype male. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Figures 3–7. Atherigona species: 3. Lateral habitus Atherigona adelinahae sp. nov. holotype male; 4. Lateral habitus Atherigona adelinahae sp. nov. paratype female; 5. Posterodorsal view of Atherigona adelinahae sp. nov. paratype female abdomen; 6. Lateral habitus of Atherigona angolaensis sp. nov. holotype male; 7. Lateral habitus of Atherigona cuanavaleensis sp. nov. holotype male. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2025-07-23	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.		Zenodo	biologists	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.			
D31CECC9D7C25341A630C7A36ED449BD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1380732	https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.66.160212.figures8-19	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	2025-07-23	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.		Zenodo	biologists	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.			
080A77310D0F5898BF755AA51ADF5CB4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1380732	https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.66.160212.figures8-19	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	2025-07-23	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.		Zenodo	biologists	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.			
231966CE16FD546DAD2722544B4F4141.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1380731	https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.66.160212.figures3-7	Figures 3–7. Atherigona species: 3. Lateral habitus Atherigona adelinahae sp. nov. holotype male; 4. Lateral habitus Atherigona adelinahae sp. nov. paratype female; 5. Posterodorsal view of Atherigona adelinahae sp. nov. paratype female abdomen; 6. Lateral habitus of Atherigona angolaensis sp. nov. holotype male; 7. Lateral habitus of Atherigona cuanavaleensis sp. nov. holotype male. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Figures 3–7. Atherigona species: 3. Lateral habitus Atherigona adelinahae sp. nov. holotype male; 4. Lateral habitus Atherigona adelinahae sp. nov. paratype female; 5. Posterodorsal view of Atherigona adelinahae sp. nov. paratype female abdomen; 6. Lateral habitus of Atherigona angolaensis sp. nov. holotype male; 7. Lateral habitus of Atherigona cuanavaleensis sp. nov. holotype male. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2025-07-23	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.		Zenodo	biologists	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.			
231966CE16FD546DAD2722544B4F4141.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1380732	https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.66.160212.figures8-19	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	2025-07-23	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.		Zenodo	biologists	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.			
4E0F542F00735D0F879495DD6DFDE16B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1380732	https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.66.160212.figures8-19	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	2025-07-23	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.		Zenodo	biologists	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.			
10E27CE565BF5288860B2CF55BE5E829.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1380732	https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.66.160212.figures8-19	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	2025-07-23	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.		Zenodo	biologists	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.			
04334E29B7F95168B8B6A9FBB6C1281C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1380731	https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.66.160212.figures3-7	Figures 3–7. Atherigona species: 3. Lateral habitus Atherigona adelinahae sp. nov. holotype male; 4. Lateral habitus Atherigona adelinahae sp. nov. paratype female; 5. Posterodorsal view of Atherigona adelinahae sp. nov. paratype female abdomen; 6. Lateral habitus of Atherigona angolaensis sp. nov. holotype male; 7. Lateral habitus of Atherigona cuanavaleensis sp. nov. holotype male. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Figures 3–7. Atherigona species: 3. Lateral habitus Atherigona adelinahae sp. nov. holotype male; 4. Lateral habitus Atherigona adelinahae sp. nov. paratype female; 5. Posterodorsal view of Atherigona adelinahae sp. nov. paratype female abdomen; 6. Lateral habitus of Atherigona angolaensis sp. nov. holotype male; 7. Lateral habitus of Atherigona cuanavaleensis sp. nov. holotype male. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2025-07-23	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.		Zenodo	biologists	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.			
04334E29B7F95168B8B6A9FBB6C1281C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1380732	https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.66.160212.figures8-19	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	2025-07-23	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.		Zenodo	biologists	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.			
0663571B3E1650DCB6004D83D340CEEB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1380732	https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.66.160212.figures8-19	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	2025-07-23	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.		Zenodo	biologists	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.			
092D77646998514FBA263456C7294C42.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1380732	https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.66.160212.figures8-19	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	2025-07-23	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.		Zenodo	biologists	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.			
D03088059E845CE1B9162CFDDFF59D48.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1380732	https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.66.160212.figures8-19	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	2025-07-23	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.		Zenodo	biologists	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.			
5D723B08FA1352DD8D9AB6EF5BCFDF9E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1380732	https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.66.160212.figures8-19	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	2025-07-23	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.		Zenodo	biologists	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.			
FC1A252034715667A405B79D5438D102.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1380732	https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.66.160212.figures8-19	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	2025-07-23	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.		Zenodo	biologists	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.			
04C76A829ECB5A2F82ED76EAEA29C0E3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1380732	https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.66.160212.figures8-19	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	Figures 8–19. Trifoliate process and hypopygial prominence of 8. A. adelinahae sp. nov.; 9. A. albistyla; 10. A. angolaensis sp. nov.; 11. A. bedfordi; 12. A. campestris; 13. A. cuanavaleensis sp. nov.; 14. A. laevigata; 15. A. lineata ssp. lineata; 16. A. lineata ugandae; 17. A. matilei; 18. A. mirabilis ssp. mirabilis; 19. A. ruficornis. Trifoliate process: a posterior view b profile. Hypopygial prominence c dorsal view d posterior view e profile f female tergite 8. (17, 19 adapted from Muller (2015), 11, 12, 15, 18 adapted from Muller and Mostovski (2018), 14, 16 adapted from Magoai and Muller (2024)).	2025-07-23	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.		Zenodo	biologists	Magoai, Mokome M. J.;Muller, Burgert S.;Bellingan, Terence A.			
