taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
E329D91AFFD7FFBE656BFCECFDA5FA7A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4524868/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4524868	FIG. 3. — Strict consensus of six maximum parsimony trees using the combined data. Taxa with one, two or three genes indicated. Heuristic search, 1371 sites unweighted 50 random additions tree bisection reconnection with steepest decent, with bootstrap consensus values from 500 resamplings (heuristic search, unweighted, five random additions, tree bisection reconnection with steepest descent). 1, 28S (12S only for Rhododrilus glandifera Jamieson, 1995); 2, 28S + 12S; 3, 28S + 12S + 16S.	FIG. 3. — Strict consensus of six maximum parsimony trees using the combined data. Taxa with one, two or three genes indicated. Heuristic search, 1371 sites unweighted 50 random additions tree bisection reconnection with steepest decent, with bootstrap consensus values from 500 resamplings (heuristic search, unweighted, five random additions, tree bisection reconnection with steepest descent). 1, 28S (12S only for Rhododrilus glandifera Jamieson, 1995); 2, 28S + 12S; 3, 28S + 12S + 16S.	2002-12-27	Jamieson, Barrie G. M.;Tillier, Simon;Tillier, Annie;Justine, Jean-Lou;Ling, Edmund;James, Sam;Mcdonald, Keith;Hugall, Andrew F.		Zenodo	biologists	Jamieson, Barrie G. M.;Tillier, Simon;Tillier, Annie;Justine, Jean-Lou;Ling, Edmund;James, Sam;Mcdonald, Keith;Hugall, Andrew F.			
E329D91AFFD7FFBE656BFCECFDA5FA7A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4524870/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4524870	FIG. 4. — Maximum likelihood tree from the sum of the 28S rDNA and mtDNA partitions optimized for GTR-Γ model separately (SUM model best tree). Selected from 14586 near parsimonious reverse constraint trees. The maximum parsimony bootstrap tree is the same. Dashed lines indicate the two topology differences found in the combined data model maximum likelihood tree (COMBO model). Bold letters are clade labels for Table 4. Maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood boostrap values above and below branches respectively. Partition support shown in Table 4.	FIG. 4. — Maximum likelihood tree from the sum of the 28S rDNA and mtDNA partitions optimized for GTR-Γ model separately (SUM model best tree). Selected from 14586 near parsimonious reverse constraint trees. The maximum parsimony bootstrap tree is the same. Dashed lines indicate the two topology differences found in the combined data model maximum likelihood tree (COMBO model). Bold letters are clade labels for Table 4. Maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood boostrap values above and below branches respectively. Partition support shown in Table 4.	2002-12-27	Jamieson, Barrie G. M.;Tillier, Simon;Tillier, Annie;Justine, Jean-Lou;Ling, Edmund;James, Sam;Mcdonald, Keith;Hugall, Andrew F.		Zenodo	biologists	Jamieson, Barrie G. M.;Tillier, Simon;Tillier, Annie;Justine, Jean-Lou;Ling, Edmund;James, Sam;Mcdonald, Keith;Hugall, Andrew F.			
E329D91AFFD6FFBF656BFB2CFC9AFB3A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4524870/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4524870	FIG. 4. — Maximum likelihood tree from the sum of the 28S rDNA and mtDNA partitions optimized for GTR-Γ model separately (SUM model best tree). Selected from 14586 near parsimonious reverse constraint trees. The maximum parsimony bootstrap tree is the same. Dashed lines indicate the two topology differences found in the combined data model maximum likelihood tree (COMBO model). Bold letters are clade labels for Table 4. Maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood boostrap values above and below branches respectively. Partition support shown in Table 4.	FIG. 4. — Maximum likelihood tree from the sum of the 28S rDNA and mtDNA partitions optimized for GTR-Γ model separately (SUM model best tree). Selected from 14586 near parsimonious reverse constraint trees. The maximum parsimony bootstrap tree is the same. Dashed lines indicate the two topology differences found in the combined data model maximum likelihood tree (COMBO model). Bold letters are clade labels for Table 4. Maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood boostrap values above and below branches respectively. Partition support shown in Table 4.	2002-12-27	Jamieson, Barrie G. M.;Tillier, Simon;Tillier, Annie;Justine, Jean-Lou;Ling, Edmund;James, Sam;Mcdonald, Keith;Hugall, Andrew F.		Zenodo	biologists	Jamieson, Barrie G. M.;Tillier, Simon;Tillier, Annie;Justine, Jean-Lou;Ling, Edmund;James, Sam;Mcdonald, Keith;Hugall, Andrew F.			
E329D91AFFD6FFBF656BFB2CFC9AFB3A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4524868/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4524868	FIG. 3. — Strict consensus of six maximum parsimony trees using the combined data. Taxa with one, two or three genes indicated. Heuristic search, 1371 sites unweighted 50 random additions tree bisection reconnection with steepest decent, with bootstrap consensus values from 500 resamplings (heuristic search, unweighted, five random additions, tree bisection reconnection with steepest descent). 1, 28S (12S only for Rhododrilus glandifera Jamieson, 1995); 2, 28S + 12S; 3, 28S + 12S + 16S.	FIG. 3. — Strict consensus of six maximum parsimony trees using the combined data. Taxa with one, two or three genes indicated. Heuristic search, 1371 sites unweighted 50 random additions tree bisection reconnection with steepest decent, with bootstrap consensus values from 500 resamplings (heuristic search, unweighted, five random additions, tree bisection reconnection with steepest descent). 1, 28S (12S only for Rhododrilus glandifera Jamieson, 1995); 2, 28S + 12S; 3, 28S + 12S + 16S.	2002-12-27	Jamieson, Barrie G. M.;Tillier, Simon;Tillier, Annie;Justine, Jean-Lou;Ling, Edmund;James, Sam;Mcdonald, Keith;Hugall, Andrew F.		Zenodo	biologists	Jamieson, Barrie G. M.;Tillier, Simon;Tillier, Annie;Justine, Jean-Lou;Ling, Edmund;James, Sam;Mcdonald, Keith;Hugall, Andrew F.			
E329D91AFFD6FFBF656BFF4DFEFAFBFA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4524868/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4524868	FIG. 3. — Strict consensus of six maximum parsimony trees using the combined data. Taxa with one, two or three genes indicated. Heuristic search, 1371 sites unweighted 50 random additions tree bisection reconnection with steepest decent, with bootstrap consensus values from 500 resamplings (heuristic search, unweighted, five random additions, tree bisection reconnection with steepest descent). 1, 28S (12S only for Rhododrilus glandifera Jamieson, 1995); 2, 28S + 12S; 3, 28S + 12S + 16S.	FIG. 3. — Strict consensus of six maximum parsimony trees using the combined data. Taxa with one, two or three genes indicated. Heuristic search, 1371 sites unweighted 50 random additions tree bisection reconnection with steepest decent, with bootstrap consensus values from 500 resamplings (heuristic search, unweighted, five random additions, tree bisection reconnection with steepest descent). 1, 28S (12S only for Rhododrilus glandifera Jamieson, 1995); 2, 28S + 12S; 3, 28S + 12S + 16S.	2002-12-27	Jamieson, Barrie G. M.;Tillier, Simon;Tillier, Annie;Justine, Jean-Lou;Ling, Edmund;James, Sam;Mcdonald, Keith;Hugall, Andrew F.		Zenodo	biologists	Jamieson, Barrie G. M.;Tillier, Simon;Tillier, Annie;Justine, Jean-Lou;Ling, Edmund;James, Sam;Mcdonald, Keith;Hugall, Andrew F.			
E329D91AFFD6FFBF656BFF4DFEFAFBFA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4524870/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4524870	FIG. 4. — Maximum likelihood tree from the sum of the 28S rDNA and mtDNA partitions optimized for GTR-Γ model separately (SUM model best tree). Selected from 14586 near parsimonious reverse constraint trees. The maximum parsimony bootstrap tree is the same. Dashed lines indicate the two topology differences found in the combined data model maximum likelihood tree (COMBO model). Bold letters are clade labels for Table 4. Maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood boostrap values above and below branches respectively. Partition support shown in Table 4.	FIG. 4. — Maximum likelihood tree from the sum of the 28S rDNA and mtDNA partitions optimized for GTR-Γ model separately (SUM model best tree). Selected from 14586 near parsimonious reverse constraint trees. The maximum parsimony bootstrap tree is the same. Dashed lines indicate the two topology differences found in the combined data model maximum likelihood tree (COMBO model). Bold letters are clade labels for Table 4. Maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood boostrap values above and below branches respectively. Partition support shown in Table 4.	2002-12-27	Jamieson, Barrie G. M.;Tillier, Simon;Tillier, Annie;Justine, Jean-Lou;Ling, Edmund;James, Sam;Mcdonald, Keith;Hugall, Andrew F.		Zenodo	biologists	Jamieson, Barrie G. M.;Tillier, Simon;Tillier, Annie;Justine, Jean-Lou;Ling, Edmund;James, Sam;Mcdonald, Keith;Hugall, Andrew F.			
E329D91AFFD6FFBF656BFF4DFEFAFBFA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4524872/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4524872	FIG. 5. — Semistrict consensus trees for the Megascolecid 28S and mtDNA data-sets; A, consensus of 28S and mtDNA maximum likelihood trees; B, consensus of SUM model reverse constraint tree showing conflict between 28S and mtDNA partitions (see Table 4); C, COMBO model partition conflict consensus.	FIG. 5. — Semistrict consensus trees for the Megascolecid 28S and mtDNA data-sets; A, consensus of 28S and mtDNA maximum likelihood trees; B, consensus of SUM model reverse constraint tree showing conflict between 28S and mtDNA partitions (see Table 4); C, COMBO model partition conflict consensus.	2002-12-27	Jamieson, Barrie G. M.;Tillier, Simon;Tillier, Annie;Justine, Jean-Lou;Ling, Edmund;James, Sam;Mcdonald, Keith;Hugall, Andrew F.		Zenodo	biologists	Jamieson, Barrie G. M.;Tillier, Simon;Tillier, Annie;Justine, Jean-Lou;Ling, Edmund;James, Sam;Mcdonald, Keith;Hugall, Andrew F.			
