identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
821BBD4E852058ADAE4627F7334423BA.text	821BBD4E852058ADAE4627F7334423BA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Rhipidoglossum acuminifolium A. R. Macedo & Farminhao 2026	<div><p>Rhipidoglossum acuminifolium A. R. Macedo &amp; Farminhão sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 2, 3, 4, Table 1</p><p>Type.</p><p>Cameroon • Southwest: Fako District, Mount Cameroon, Mann’s Spring, 2150 m, 16 Aug 2019, Š. Janeček s. n. (holotype BRLU s. n.!, isotype YA!) .</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Rhipidoglossum acuminifolium is most similar to Rhipidoglossum delepierreanum, but can be distinguished by the following characteristics: leaf shape (narrowly elliptic-falcate to narrowly oblong-falcate vs. elliptic-falcate to oblong-falcate), including the apex (very unequally bilobed, larger lobe acute to acuminate, 12–19 mm long vs. unequally bilobed, larger lobe 7–11 mm long), and longer spur (14.2–15 mm long vs. 6–8 mm long) (Table 1).</p><p>Description.</p><p>Epiphytic herb, pendent, up to 120 cm long. Roots slender, basal and axillary, usually one per node, greenish-whitish, ca. 300 mm × 2 mm. Stem pendent, slender, rarely branched, up to 300 × 2–5 mm, internodes 20–30 mm long. Leaves up to 15, distichous, concolorous, narrowly elliptic-falcate to narrowly oblong-falcate, entire, margin slightly undulate, apex unequally bilobed, larger lobe 12–19 mm long, acuminate, base attenuate, 56–197 × 14–37 mm. Inflorescences up to 7, dense, 1 (– 2) per node, axillary, pendent, shorter than leaves, 17–25 - flowered, 40–102 mm long; peduncle glabrous, 3–6 mm long; rachis glabrous, green, 37–96 mm long; bracts ochreate, whitish, 1.5 × 2 mm. Flowers whitish to pale green, pale orange during late anthesis. Pedicel and ovary cylindrical, scurfy, with dark brown scales, 5–6 × 1–1.3 mm; dorsal sepal elliptic, apex acute, base obtuse, entire, 5–5.5 × 3–3.2 mm, lateral sepal narrowly elliptic, apex and base attenuate, entire, 8–8.5 × 2.3–2.5 mm; petals elliptic to ovate, apex acute to slightly acuminate, base obtuse, entire, 5.8–6 × 3.3–3.5 mm, lip flabellate, apex bilobed, lateral margin crenulate, apical margin incised, convex, ecallose, 5.6–7.5 × 11–12 mm; spur cylindrical, acute at apex, curved, whitish to pale green 14.2–15 × 0.2–2 mm; column whitish to pale green, 2.2–2.4 mm long; anther cap galeate, frontal margin slightly undulate, whitish, 1.7–1.8 × 1.7–1.8 mm, stipites two, obclavate, translucid, viscidia two, depressed ovate, yellowish; pollinia two, orbicular, yellowish, 0.7 × 0.7 mm; rostellum trilobed, lateral lobes reduced, subtriangular, midlobe oblong with a globose apex, 1.7–1.8 × 0.7 mm. Fruit a capsule, elliptic, ribbed, 15.5–17.9 × 6.3–6.5 mm.</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Equatorial Guinea (Bioko) and Cameroon (Fig. 4). Rhipidoglossum acuminifolium occurs in submontane to montane forest patches along the Cameroon Volcanic Line, between 550–2165 m a. s. l.</p><p>Habitat and ecology.</p><p>Rhipidoglossum acuminifolium is a trunk epiphyte, occasionally growing on lianas, occurring in primary and secondary montane and submontane forests, in partly shaded areas, at 2–5 meters above the ground, often forming large clumps hanging from the phorophyte (see Suppl. material 2). In the studies on the plant – pollinator interactions on Mount Cameroon, the first flower visitor records of R. acuminifolium were identified (Klomberg et al. 2022; Sakhalkar et al. 2023; Uceda-Gómes et al. 2023) (Fig. 5). The moth Afroracotis cf. squalida ( Lepidoptera, Erebidae) successfully removed the pollinia from the column and carried them away dorsally attached to the proximal (basal) part of the proboscis (Fig. 5 A, B). Another settling moth species, Paschiodes sp. ( Lepidoptera, Erebidae), was observed visiting the flowers (Fig. 5 C). In addition, insect visitors included an unidentified ametroidine raspy cricket, cf. Glomeremus sp. ( Orthoptera, Gryllacrididae, Ametroidini) (Fig. 5 D, E), fruit flies of the genera Zaprionus Coquillett, 1902 (Fig. 5 F), Drosophila Fallén, 1823 and or Scaptodrosophila Fallén, 1823 ( Diptera, Drosophilidae) (Fig. 5 G), and two unidentified species of calyptrate muscoid flies ( Diptera, Calyptratae) (Fig. 5 H, I). The records also include an unidentified parasitoid wasp (Hymenoptera) (Fig. 5 J) (Klomberg et al. 2022). The only bird visitor recorded was the Northern Double-collared Sunbird ( Cinnyris reichenowi Sharpe, 1891) (Fig. 5 K), which was observed feeding on nectar obtained directly from the spur (Fig. 5; Suppl. materials 3 –11). This species is unlikely to play a role in the effective pollination of R. acuminifolium, acting instead as a nectar thief. In contrast, settling moths are considered the most likely primary pollinator group, owing to pollinia removal and their frequent contact with the column (Klomberg et al. 2022). Rhipidoglossum acuminifolium has been recorded in association with a diverse assemblage of orchid species, such as Aerangis gravenreuthii (Kraenzl.) Schltr., Angraecopsis tridens (Lindl.) Schltr., Bulbophyllum deshmukhii U. B. Deshmukh &amp; J. M. H. Shaw, Polystachya cooperi Summerh., and Rhipidoglossum confusum (P. J. Cribb) Farminhão and Stévart. (African Plant Database 2025; GBIF 2025; V. Droissart pers. obs.).</p><p>Phenology.</p><p>Flowers in the wet season from June to late August, and January. Fruits observed in November.</p><p>Etymology.</p><p>The specific epithet acuminifolium refers to the shape of the larger lobe on the leaves of this species. This feature is the most evident trait used to differentiate it from its closest relative.</p><p>Preliminary IUCN conservation assessment.</p><p>Rhipidoglossum acuminifolium is known from six herbarium and spirit samples and one observation representing seven occurrences, the most recent made in 2021. Except for one (photographic) observation (in Bandoumkassa, Cameroon), all occurrences were made inside or associated with officially protected areas (Mount Cameroon National Park and Sanctuaire de Banyang Mbo, Cameroon; Gran Caldera de Luba Scientific Reserve, Equatorial Guinea (Bioko Island)), and they can be considered as still existing occurrences. These occurrences represent four biogeographical subpopulations. Three subpopulations occur in each of the three protected areas cited above. Four locations were identified with respect to the most serious plausible threat known to the ecosystems in the Cameroon Volcanic Line: habitat degradation due to the combined effects of deforestation for small-scale agriculture, road and urban expansion and potentially small-scale timber extraction (Solefack et al. 2012; Lézine et al. 2025). Evidence of direct human impact on the vegetation, small-scale agriculture, presence of buildings, and landscape changes is notable close to the Gran Caldera de Luba Scientific Reserve, Equatorial Guinea, as well as in the limits of the Mount Cameroon National Park, in Cameroon. The Sanctuaire de Banyang Mbo, also in Cameroon, appears to be a relatively stable conservation unit, with little evidence of landscape and vegetation changes, presence of crop species and buildings. The Bandoumkassa population is the most vulnerable, occurring outside any protected area and adjacent to human settlements, with intense evidence of urban expansion, agricultural encroachment, landscape alteration and clearance of primary and secondary forests. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is calculated as 6,775 km 2 (falling within the limits for Vulnerable status under criterion B 1), whereas its area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated at 16 km 2 (within the limits for Endangered status under criterion B 2), and the number of locations being equal to 4, within the limits for Endangered status under criterion Ba. The projected loss of the Bandoumkassa subpopulation, and contraction of its area of occupancy, is associated with a continuing decline in EOO, AOO, habitat extent and quality, and mature individuals (b i, ii, iii, iv). Rhipidoglossum acuminifolium is thus assigned a preliminary risk of extinction status of Endangered: EN B 2 ab (i, ii, iii, iv).</p><p>Paratypes.</p><p>Cameroon • Southwest: Koupé-Manengouba, Sanctuaire de Banyang Mbo, Village de Bejange, 550 m, 1 Feb 2008, st., V. Droissart 648 (BRLU s. n.) ; • District Fako, Mount Cameroon, “ loc. 11 ”, 17–18 Jun 1973, fl., R. Linnavuori s. n. (H [H 1259726, H 1210167]) ; • ibid. loc., near Mann’s spring, 2165 m, 14 Aug 2019, fl., Š. Janeček s. n. (BRLU s. n.) . Equatorial Guinea • Bioko: Caldera [de] San Carlos to Ruiché, 11 Jan 1967, fl., W. W. Sanford 4360 (K s. n.) .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/821BBD4E852058ADAE4627F7334423BA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Macedo, Arthur;Droissart, Vincent;Janeček, Štěpán;Klomberg, Yannick;Trovó, Marcelo;Stévart, Tariq;Farminhão, João	Macedo, Arthur, Droissart, Vincent, Janeček, Štěpán, Klomberg, Yannick, Trovó, Marcelo, Stévart, Tariq, Farminhão, João (2026): Two new species of Rhipidoglossum (Orchidaceae, Angraecinae) from Central Africa, probably pollinated by settling moths. PhytoKeys 274: 1-30, DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.274.184429
F3A9596D0B9658DD80A3DB74DDF61174.text	F3A9596D0B9658DD80A3DB74DDF61174.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Rhipidoglossum delepierreanum (J. - P. Lebel & Geerinck) Eb. Fisch., Killmann, J. - P. Lebel and Delep.	<div><p>Rhipidoglossum delepierreanum (J. - P. Lebel &amp; Geerinck) Eb. Fisch., Killmann, J. - P. Lebel and Delep., Die Orchidee 62 (6): 445 (2011).</p><p>Diaphananthe delepierreana J. - P. Lebel &amp; Geerinck, Belg. J. Bot. 130: 136 (1998). Basionym.</p><p>Type.</p><p>Rwanda • Western Province (Cyangugu): forêt de Nyungwe-Kibazi, alt. 1800 m, G. Delepierre 39 (holotype BR [BR 0000008809643!], isotypes BR [BR 6102001375171 - spirit!, BR 6102016350385 - spirit!]) .</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Uganda, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Rwanda, and Burundi, being a new country record for Uganda, the DRC and Burundi. Rhipidoglossum delepierreanum is found in the montane forests in the Western Rift System, between 1600–2000 m a. s. l.</p><p>Specimens examined.</p><p>Uganda • Western Province: Bushenyi District, S. Kasyoha-Kitomi Forest, Nzozi, 1330 m, Jun 1998, st. inf., D. L. N. Hafashimana 0643 (K s. n.) ; • Rukungiri district, Kayonza, Bwindi Impenetrable Forest National Reserve, 1520 m, Aug 1998, st. inf., D. L. N Hafashimana 0684 (K s. n.) ; • ibid. loc., ca. 1700 m (5500 ft), 4 Sep 1994, fl., Spurrier U. 16 (K s. n.); • sine loco accurato, cultivated by L. N. Mason, Talbot Manor, Fincham, Norfolk, Nov 1960, fl., Burgess s. n. (cult. num. 661) (K [KSPC 8301]) . Democratic Republic of the Congo • Ituri: Baniari, Irimu, 14 Oct 1948, fl., J. de Wilde 140 (BR [BR 0000006803803], P [P 00388678], MO non visum, WAG [WAG.1134679]) ; • ibid. loc., Vallée de la Maginda, 1450 m, 19 Oct 1948, fl., J. de Wilde 167 (BR [BR 0000009930506]) ; • South-Kivu: Kalehe, km 110 route Kavumu-Walikale, 850 m, 13 Jul 1956, st., A. R. Christiaensen 974 (BR [BR 0000021827938]) ; • ibid. loc., km 40 route Kavumu-Walikale, 1700 m, 23 Jun 1956, fr., A. R. Christiaensen 928 (BR [BR 0000016158931]) . Rwanda • Western Province (Cyangugu): Nyamasheke district, Route Pindura-Burundi, 2000 m, 1975, st. inf., G. Troupin 15739 (BR [BR 0000006627393, BR 6102009937432, spirit]) ; • ibid. loc., Piste Nyungwe, Piste Bweyeye, 1700 m, 22 Mar 2002, fl., G. Delepierre 105 (BR [BR 6102016348610, spirit]) ; • ibid. loc., Kibazi, 1800 m, Mar – Apr 1997, fl., G. Delepierre s. n. (BR [BR 0000006803575]) ; • Without locality: cultivated in Kigali, 20 Apr 2005, fl., G. Delepierre 150 (BR [BR 6102016351412]) . Burundi • (Probably) Bujumbura Province: Plaine de Buhoro, 12 April 1942, fl., M. Arbonnier 330 (BR [BR 0000009931909; BR 0000021311871]) ; Mabaye, (river) Lua, 1650 m, 22 Jun 1969, st. inf., J. Lewalle s. n. (K s. n.) .</p><p>Notes.</p><p>From Uganda, R. delepierreanum is here reported based on two non-flowering specimens previously identified in herbaria as Rhipidoglossum bilobatum (Summerh.) Szlach. &amp; Olszewski; one cultivated specimen of unknown exact provenance first identified as Diaphananthe sp.; and one flowering specimen previously identified as R. xanthopollinium (Rchb. f.) Schltr. Seven specimens from the Democratic Republic of the Congo were located, including two gatherings from Ituri (J. de Wilde 140 and 167) and two gatherings from South-Kivu (A. Christiaensen 928 and 974), all originating in Eastern DRC, close to the borders with Rwanda and Uganda. They were previously identified as Diaphananthe sp. or Rhipidoglossum rutilum . Two vouchers from Burundi were located. A first gathering from Mabaye — Lua, was previously identified as Diaphananthe aff. tenuicalcar at K, while a second collection (M. Arbonnier 330, Fig. 1 D), previously identified as Diaphananthe bidens (Afzel. ex Sw.) Schltr. at BR, lacks an exact locality, being only labelled as “ plaine de Buhororo ”. This locality is here interpreted as being near the village of Buhororo (Bujumbura), in northern Burundi, based on its relative proximity to Parc National de la Kibira. This area represents a plausible ecological extension of the species habitat from Nyungwe National Park (the type locality) along the same forest block.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F3A9596D0B9658DD80A3DB74DDF61174	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Macedo, Arthur;Droissart, Vincent;Janeček, Štěpán;Klomberg, Yannick;Trovó, Marcelo;Stévart, Tariq;Farminhão, João	Macedo, Arthur, Droissart, Vincent, Janeček, Štěpán, Klomberg, Yannick, Trovó, Marcelo, Stévart, Tariq, Farminhão, João (2026): Two new species of Rhipidoglossum (Orchidaceae, Angraecinae) from Central Africa, probably pollinated by settling moths. PhytoKeys 274: 1-30, DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.274.184429
55ADA4E8B451514CBB52D13B38BB1D98.text	55ADA4E8B451514CBB52D13B38BB1D98.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Rhipidoglossum falcatulum Farminhao & A. R. Macedo 2026	<div><p>Rhipidoglossum falcatulum Farminhão &amp; A. R. Macedo sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 4, 6, 7, Table 2</p><p>Type.</p><p>Central African Republic • Lobaye: Mbaiki, Région de Boukoko, 20 Jul 1951, C. Tisserant et al. 2185 (holotype P [P 00388648!], isotypes P [P 00388649!], G [G 208985!]) .</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Rhipidoglossum falcatulum is similar to Rhipidoglossum curvatum but can be distinguished by the following characteristics: stems (up to 15 vs. up to 5 leaves); leaf shape (linear to falcate leaves, with a strongly acute apex vs. obovate to rarely elliptic, apex acuminate to bilobed); shorter inflorescences (up to 151 mm long vs. 570 mm long); and smaller flowers, with a minute semilunular, convex to slightly concave, ecallose lip lamina (vs. conspicuous, broadly ovate, concave lip lamina, with a rim-like semicircular callus) (see Table 2).</p><p>Description.</p><p>Small epiphytic herb, up to 60 mm long. Roots slender, mostly basal and numerous, axillary only at the lower nodes of the stem, one per node, greenish-whitish, 20–61 × 1–2 mm. Stem pendent, slender, unbranched, up to ca. 60 × 1–2 mm, internodes 2.5–5 mm long. Leaves up to 15, distichous, linear-lanceolate to falcate, entire, apex strongly acute, base attenuate, 35–95 × 5–8.5 mm. Inflorescences 1–6, lax, up to 2 per node, axillary, pendent, usually longer than leaves, 16–28 - flowered, 48–151 mm long; peduncle glabrous, 11–34 mm long; rachis glabrous, 37–117 mm long; bracts ochreate, 1 × 1 mm, peduncle bracts larger. Flowers small, pale yellow-green, except for greenish white spur. Pedicel and ovary cylindrical, slender, sparsely scaly, 4–5 × 0.5–0.6 mm; dorsal sepal elliptic, apex obtuse, base rounded, entire, 2.3–2.5 × 1–1.2 mm, lateral sepal lanceolate, apex acuminate, base shortly oblong, entire, 2.3–2.5 × 1–1.2 mm; petals elliptic to ovate, apex obtuse, base rounded, entire, 1.2–1.5 × 1–1.2 mm, lip semilunular, apex obtuse, margin entire, convex to slightly concave, ecallose, 0.7–0.8 × 1.5–1.7 mm; spur cylindrical, acute at apex, slightly to strongly curved, 10–12 × 0.5–1.7 mm; column whitish, 1–1.2 mm long; anther cap frontal margin slightly bilobed, with irregularly serrate lobes, whitish-translucent, 0.8–0.9 × 0.8–0.9 mm; stipites two, obclavate, 0.4 mm long, viscidia two, piriform, whitish-translucent; pollinia orbicular, whitish, 0.3 × 0.3 mm; rostellum trilobate, lateral lobes reduced, subtriangular, midlobe oblong, finger-shaped, slightly prominent, apex rounded, shortly longer than the lateral lobes, decurved, 0.46–0.48 × 0.1 mm. Fruit not seen.</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of the Congo, 550–1045 m a. s. l. (Fig. 4). Its small size makes detection difficult, which may partly explain the limited number of specimens and the apparent c. 1,200 km disjunction between known localities in the northern and southern DRC. We therefore expect R. falcatulum to be more widely distributed across the lowland Guineo-Congolian forests of Central Africa. Additional botanical surveys are needed to clarify the species distribution range.</p><p>Habitat and ecology.</p><p>Rhipidoglossum falcatulum is a rare trunk epiphyte. It was documented in the lowland semi-deciduous Congolian rainforest (approx. 550 m a. s. l.) in the Central African Republic (CAR), in the wetter lowland Congolian rainforest characterised by monodominant patches of Gilbertiodendron dewevrei (De Wild.) J. Léonard (approx. at 420 m a. s. l.) in the northern DRC, and in the Central Zambezian miombo woodland, specifically within the muhulu vegetation fragments (ca. 1,045 m a. s. l.) in southern DRC. In northern DRC, it was recorded growing on Isolona hexaloba (Pierre) Engl. et Diels. In southern DRC, it was recorded growing on Englerophytum magalismontanum (Sond.) T. D. Penn. In CAR, it was collected together with Cyrtorchis brownii (Rolfe) Schltr., a species typical of seasonally tropical dry forests (Azandi et al. 2016).</p><p>Phenology.</p><p>Flowers from June to late August, and January. Fruits not observed to date.</p><p>Etymology.</p><p>The specific epithet refers to the small falcate leaves, and spur, important diagnostic character of this taxon.</p><p>Preliminary IUCN conservation assessment.</p><p>Rhipidoglossum falcatulum is known from seven occurrences based solely on herbarium samples, the most recent collected in 1986. No occurrences were found inside or associated with official protected areas. The seven occurrences represent a total of four biogeographical subpopulations known so far, still believed to exist, considering the presence of native vegetation. They were recorded in the lowland Guineo-Congolian forests close to Boukoko (CAR) and Kisangani (northern DRC), and in dry evergreen forests (“ muhulu ”) forests, among miombo woodland, close to Kyamasumba (Upper Katanga, DRC). It occurs in four locations with respect to the most serious plausible threat: small-scale agriculture, commercial logging, urban expansion, and slash-and-burn methods for animal husbandry (Blankespoor 1991; Logan and D’Andrea 2012; Burivalova et al. 2015; Delan 2021). Direct human impacts on the vegetation are evident in all locations, including buildings and marked landscape changes for agriculture and animal cultivation. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is calculated as 509,612 km 2 (being considered as Least Concerned status under criterion B 1), whereas its area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated at 16 km 2 (within the limits for Endangered status under criterion B 2), and the number of locations being equal to 3, within the limits for Endangered status under criterion Ba. The projected loss of both subpopulations due to the factors cited above, and contraction of their area of occupancy is associated with a continuing decline in EOO, AOO, habitat extent and quality, and mature individuals. Based on the currently available data, considering our current interpretation of its biology and the potential area of distribution for this taxon, Rhipidoglossum falcatulum is assigned a preliminary extinction risk status of Endangered: EN B 2 ab (i, ii, iii, vi, v).</p><p>Paratypes.</p><p>Central African Republic • Lobaye: Mbaiki, Région de Boukoko, ca. 550 m, 19 Jul 1949, R. P. Tisserant et al. 1537 (P [P 00388650, P 00388651], G [G 208970]) ; • ibid. loc., 10 Aug 1950, R. P. Tisserant et al. 2626 (BM [BM 000540025], P [P 388644, P 00388645]) . Democratic Republic of Congo • Tshopo: Banalia, 23 km along road from Kisangani to Bengamisa, 21 Jun 1973, J. Bokdam 4189 (WAG [WAG.1140141]) . • Lualaba: Mutshatsha, muhulu de Kyamasumba, 42 km NNW of Kolwezi, 1040 m, 2 Jan 1982, M. Schaijes 1298 (BR [BR 25200010, BR 6102008084335 - spirit] ; • ibid loc.; fl. in cult. 1983, M. Schaijes 1918 (K [K-SPC 47374]); • ibid. loc., forêt dense sèche sur sable, 1075 m, 20 Jan 1986, M. Schaijes 2838 (K [K-SPC 50377]) .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/55ADA4E8B451514CBB52D13B38BB1D98	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Macedo, Arthur;Droissart, Vincent;Janeček, Štěpán;Klomberg, Yannick;Trovó, Marcelo;Stévart, Tariq;Farminhão, João	Macedo, Arthur, Droissart, Vincent, Janeček, Štěpán, Klomberg, Yannick, Trovó, Marcelo, Stévart, Tariq, Farminhão, João (2026): Two new species of Rhipidoglossum (Orchidaceae, Angraecinae) from Central Africa, probably pollinated by settling moths. PhytoKeys 274: 1-30, DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.274.184429
