identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
CD1F6B00212D8108AB42F88AFA17FEDF.text	CD1F6B00212D8108AB42F88AFA17FEDF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Scapteriscus basioconica	<div><p>S. basioconica</p> <p>Each antennal segment had on average 5-6 (range, 3 to 12) s. basioconica (18.1 μm long, 2.25 μm base diameter) near the tip of each segment (Fig. 5). These sensilla had non-flexible sockets and a thin wall pierced with numerous pores, and most likely had an olfactory function. For all of the mole cricket species, all the sensilla types were about the same size, although the s. basiconica of N. hexadactyla were shorter (7.5 μm long, 1.85 μm wide) than in the other species (Fig. 6).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CD1F6B00212D8108AB42F88AFA17FEDF	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Kostromytska, Olga;Scharf, Michael E.;Buss, Eileen A.	Kostromytska, Olga, Scharf, Michael E., Buss, Eileen A. (2015): Types and functions of mole cricket (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae) antennal and palpal sensilla. Florida Entomologist 98 (2): 593-605, DOI: 10.1653/024.098.0232, URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/10.1653/024.098.0232
CD1F6B00212D8109A80AF889FB4EF8E6.text	CD1F6B00212D8109A80AF889FB4EF8E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Scapteriscus chaetica (Keil 1999)	<div><p>S. chaetica</p> <p>These sensilla were the most abundant on mole cricket antennae (up to 120 per segment) (Table 2). The surface of these sensilla had transverse ridges with no evidence of wall pores (Fig. 3 A, B). Three types of s. chaetica were observed based on their size and distribution pattern on the antennae. Type I were relatively large s. chaetica (~100 μm long and 5 μm wide) and they created ring–like transverse patterns (relative to the antennal axis) at the base of an antennal segment (Fig. 1 B, D and Fig. 3 C). They were relatively straight, in contrast to other types of sensilla which were medium (type II) in size and curved toward the following antennal segment. Medium s. chaetica (~60 μm long and 3 μm base diameter) usually were observed in the rows at the distal part of the segment. The smallest s. chaetica (type III) were distributed evenly on the antennal segment (40 μm long and 2 μm base diameter). Wall pores were not observed on the s. chaetica and TEMs showed that the larger s. chaetica (types I and II) were filled with dense material with no evidence of dendritic processes in the lumen (Fig. 4 A, B). However small (type III) s. chaetica were innervated (Fig. 4 C, D).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CD1F6B00212D8109A80AF889FB4EF8E6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Kostromytska, Olga;Scharf, Michael E.;Buss, Eileen A.	Kostromytska, Olga, Scharf, Michael E., Buss, Eileen A. (2015): Types and functions of mole cricket (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae) antennal and palpal sensilla. Florida Entomologist 98 (2): 593-605, DOI: 10.1653/024.098.0232, URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/10.1653/024.098.0232
CD1F6B00212C8108AB32FE85FA87FDA2.text	CD1F6B00212C8108AB32FE85FA87FDA2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Scapteriscus trichodea	<div><p>S. trichodea</p> <p>These hair-like structures were on the distal (top) part of each segment (Fig. 7 A). One to 2 s. trichodea were on each flagellomere. Each sensillum was ~40 μm long with a basal diameter of 2 μm. External morphology of these sensilla was similar to s. basioconica; sensilla had smooth surfaces pitted with pores, but were more slender and longer than s. basioconica. S. trichodea could be confused with s. chaetica, although the former lacks a flexible pocket and their surface was pitted, not ridged. TEM examination of s. trichodea revealed the presence of dendrites in the sensilla lumen and wall pore (Fig. 7 B).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CD1F6B00212C8108AB32FE85FA87FDA2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Kostromytska, Olga;Scharf, Michael E.;Buss, Eileen A.	Kostromytska, Olga, Scharf, Michael E., Buss, Eileen A. (2015): Types and functions of mole cricket (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae) antennal and palpal sensilla. Florida Entomologist 98 (2): 593-605, DOI: 10.1653/024.098.0232, URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/10.1653/024.098.0232
CD1F6B00212C810AAB32FD62FE8DFA47.text	CD1F6B00212C810AAB32FD62FE8DFA47.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Scapteriscus coeloconica	<div><p>S. coeloconica</p> <p>Two main types of s. coeloconica (0 to 6 per antennal segment) occurred on mole cricket antennae. Type I s. coeloconica were located in the cuticular pits (Fig. 8 A). An external diameter of bulging cuticle surrounded its round opening. Type II s. coeloconica were located on the cuticle surface (Fig. 8 B). These sensilla varied in size, but as with s.</p> <p>basioconica and s. trichodea, were almost always located on the apical part of each segment.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CD1F6B00212C810AAB32FD62FE8DFA47	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Kostromytska, Olga;Scharf, Michael E.;Buss, Eileen A.	Kostromytska, Olga, Scharf, Michael E., Buss, Eileen A. (2015): Types and functions of mole cricket (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae) antennal and palpal sensilla. Florida Entomologist 98 (2): 593-605, DOI: 10.1653/024.098.0232, URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/10.1653/024.098.0232
CD1F6B00212E8105A8FAFA01FE13F918.text	CD1F6B00212E8105A8FAFA01FE13F918.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Scapteriscus campaniformia	<div><p>S. campaniformia</p> <p>These sensilla were on the palps and nearly every flagellomere. They had a round or ovoid central area (cap of the sensilla) encircled by a cuticular ring. The dimensions of s. campaniformia of the antennae were on average 3 and 6 μm for the inner and outer circles, respectively (Fig. 8 C, D). Their dimensions ranged from 9 × 16 μm to 5 × 65 μm. This type of sensilla was present on various parts of the insect body and occurred on each mole cricket species examined.</p> <p>TYPES, ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF SENSILLA ON MOLE CRICKET MAXILLARY AND LABIAL PALPS</p> <p>The tips of the maxillary and labial palps were weakly sclerotized, with a distinct sensillar field of about 0.35 mm ², which was densely covered with sensilla of different types and functions (Fig. 9A). About 0.2 sensilla were found per μm² on the palps. Most of the observed sensilla on maxillary and labial palps matched the description of s. chaetica (Keil 1999), which are usually associated with mechanoreception and contact chemoreception (Fig. 9 B). SEM inspection indicated that they had slits/grooves at least on one side, which suggested they might be multifunctional. Other sensilla on the maxillary and labial palps were s. coeloconica with tip pores (Fig. 9 C, D), tip-pore sensilla (Fig. 9 E), and club-like s. basioconica (Fig. 9 F).</p> <p>DIFFERENCES IN SENSILLA TYPES, SIZES, ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION AMONG MOLE CRICKET SPECIES, SEXES AND LIFE STAGES</p> <p>The numbers of s. chaetica (I, II and III types combined) and s. basioconica varied depending on mole cricket species, sex and location on the antennae. On average, S. borellii and S. abbreviatus had more s. chaetica compared to S. vicinus (F = 17.5; df = 1, 567; P &lt;0.001). The middle part of the antennae had more s. chaetica (F = 95; df = 3, 567; P &lt;0.001) and s. basioconica (F = 60.4; df = 3, 567; P &lt;0.001) than the distal and basal parts. Sensilla were more abundant on female antennae (F = 51.2; df = 1, 567; P &lt;0.001) than on male antennae for all species.</p> <p>All described types of sensilla were found on the nymphal antennae, and the 3 Scapteriscus species doubled the number of segments and sensilla per segment during their development. On average, S. abbreviatus had more s. chaetica per flagellomere than S. vicinus (F = 97.9; df = 1, 559; P &lt;0.001). Scapteriscus abbreviatus had the most s. basioconica and S. borellii had the fewest of these sensilla among the 3 species (F = 92.7; df = 1, 559; P &lt;0.001).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CD1F6B00212E8105A8FAFA01FE13F918	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Kostromytska, Olga;Scharf, Michael E.;Buss, Eileen A.	Kostromytska, Olga, Scharf, Michael E., Buss, Eileen A. (2015): Types and functions of mole cricket (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae) antennal and palpal sensilla. Florida Entomologist 98 (2): 593-605, DOI: 10.1653/024.098.0232, URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/10.1653/024.098.0232
