taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
CF4867C651EF568E9B2E3BFE26A32AF2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756051	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure4	Figure 4. Aspergillus baeticus (GMBCC 2264, new geographical record). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (30 days old culture); D, H Conidiophore with conidium head and conidia; I Conidia; Scale bars: 50 μm (D, E); 30 μm (F – H); 10 μm (I).	Figure 4. Aspergillus baeticus (GMBCC 2264, new geographical record). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (30 days old culture); D, H Conidiophore with conidium head and conidia; I Conidia; Scale bars: 50 μm (D, E); 30 μm (F – H); 10 μm (I).	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
CF4867C651EF568E9B2E3BFE26A32AF2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756050	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure3	Figure 3. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, BenA, CaM, and rpb 2) alignment of the analyzed Aspergillus section Usti sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 20276.030668. This tree was generated from 602, 595, 575, and 1,008 base pairs of ITS, BenA, CaM, and rpb 2 characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 813 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.90 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.234792, C = 0.272713, G = 0.265844, T = 0.226651; substitution rates AC = 1.106181, AG = 4.456639, AT = 1.721038, CG = 0.962803, CT = 7.239247, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.551494; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 1.467907. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) showed identical topologies. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	Figure 3. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, BenA, CaM, and rpb 2) alignment of the analyzed Aspergillus section Usti sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 20276.030668. This tree was generated from 602, 595, 575, and 1,008 base pairs of ITS, BenA, CaM, and rpb 2 characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 813 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.90 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.234792, C = 0.272713, G = 0.265844, T = 0.226651; substitution rates AC = 1.106181, AG = 4.456639, AT = 1.721038, CG = 0.962803, CT = 7.239247, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.551494; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 1.467907. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) showed identical topologies. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
5934A62C0DDC502DB6B977185147FBD1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756052	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure5	Figure 5. Aspergillus dehongensis (GMBCC 2269, ex-ype). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (30 days old culture); D, F Conidiophore with a conidium head and conidia; G Conidia. Scale bars: 50 μm (D, E); 20 μm (F); 10 μm (G).	Figure 5. Aspergillus dehongensis (GMBCC 2269, ex-ype). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (30 days old culture); D, F Conidiophore with a conidium head and conidia; G Conidia. Scale bars: 50 μm (D, E); 20 μm (F); 10 μm (G).	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
5934A62C0DDC502DB6B977185147FBD1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756050	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure3	Figure 3. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, BenA, CaM, and rpb 2) alignment of the analyzed Aspergillus section Usti sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 20276.030668. This tree was generated from 602, 595, 575, and 1,008 base pairs of ITS, BenA, CaM, and rpb 2 characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 813 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.90 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.234792, C = 0.272713, G = 0.265844, T = 0.226651; substitution rates AC = 1.106181, AG = 4.456639, AT = 1.721038, CG = 0.962803, CT = 7.239247, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.551494; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 1.467907. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) showed identical topologies. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	Figure 3. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, BenA, CaM, and rpb 2) alignment of the analyzed Aspergillus section Usti sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 20276.030668. This tree was generated from 602, 595, 575, and 1,008 base pairs of ITS, BenA, CaM, and rpb 2 characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 813 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.90 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.234792, C = 0.272713, G = 0.265844, T = 0.226651; substitution rates AC = 1.106181, AG = 4.456639, AT = 1.721038, CG = 0.962803, CT = 7.239247, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.551494; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 1.467907. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) showed identical topologies. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
5934A62C0DDC502DB6B977185147FBD1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756053	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure6	Figure 6. Split graphs showing the results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of the new taxa and closely related taxa using LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. A Aspergillus dehongensis; B 1 Trichoderma dehongense and T. mangshiense; B 2 T. hongheense; B 3 T. neogongcheniae and T. nujiangense; B 4 T. neopyramidale; B 5 T. yingjiangense; C Cosmospora cavernicola; D Pithoascus cavernicola; E Neoachaetomiella cavernicola; F Trichocladium cavernicola. PHI test result P-value (Φw) ≤ 0.05 indicates that there is significant recombination between the isolates included in the alignment. The new taxa are in red, “ T ” indicates the type species, and each PHI test value and scale bars are given in the bottom right corner.	Figure 6. Split graphs showing the results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of the new taxa and closely related taxa using LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. A Aspergillus dehongensis; B 1 Trichoderma dehongense and T. mangshiense; B 2 T. hongheense; B 3 T. neogongcheniae and T. nujiangense; B 4 T. neopyramidale; B 5 T. yingjiangense; C Cosmospora cavernicola; D Pithoascus cavernicola; E Neoachaetomiella cavernicola; F Trichocladium cavernicola. PHI test result P-value (Φw) ≤ 0.05 indicates that there is significant recombination between the isolates included in the alignment. The new taxa are in red, “ T ” indicates the type species, and each PHI test value and scale bars are given in the bottom right corner.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
F2F8316446DE55148785041F863F60DC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756069	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure22	Figure 22. Chaetomium subaffine (GMBCC 2271, new substrate record in cave habitat) A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C, D Mature ascomata on PDA; E Terminal ascomatal hairs; F – H Asci and ascospores; I Ascospores. Scale bars: 100 μm (D), 50 μm (E – G), 20 μm (H, I).	Figure 22. Chaetomium subaffine (GMBCC 2271, new substrate record in cave habitat) A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C, D Mature ascomata on PDA; E Terminal ascomatal hairs; F – H Asci and ascospores; I Ascospores. Scale bars: 100 μm (D), 50 μm (E – G), 20 μm (H, I).	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
F2F8316446DE55148785041F863F60DC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756067	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure20	Figure 20. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2) alignment of the analyzed Chaetomiaceae sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 12849.664027. This tree was generated from 558, 760, 690, and 562 base pairs of ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2 characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 813 distinct alignment patterns, with 41.73 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.235448, C = 0.266594, G = 0.270116, T = 0.227842; substitution rates AC = 1.422656, AG = 5.592205, AT = 1.731116, CG = 1.058597, CT = 10.946369, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.631370; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 1.261061. The tree topologies from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	Figure 20. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2) alignment of the analyzed Chaetomiaceae sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 12849.664027. This tree was generated from 558, 760, 690, and 562 base pairs of ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2 characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 813 distinct alignment patterns, with 41.73 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.235448, C = 0.266594, G = 0.270116, T = 0.227842; substitution rates AC = 1.422656, AG = 5.592205, AT = 1.731116, CG = 1.058597, CT = 10.946369, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.631370; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 1.261061. The tree topologies from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
EE4A841EC93F5EE3AB6D42051841B875.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756064	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure17	Figure 17. Cosmospora cavernicola (GZCC 25-0728, ex-type). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (35 days old culture); D – H Conidiophores, phialides, and conidia; I Conidia. Scale bars: 50 μm (D – H); 10 μm (I).	Figure 17. Cosmospora cavernicola (GZCC 25-0728, ex-type). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (35 days old culture); D – H Conidiophores, phialides, and conidia; I Conidia. Scale bars: 50 μm (D – H); 10 μm (I).	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
EE4A841EC93F5EE3AB6D42051841B875.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756063	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure16	Figure 16. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2) alignment of the analyzed Cosmospora sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 12849.664027. This tree was generated from 558, 760, 690, and 562 base pairs of ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2 characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 813 distinct alignment patterns, with 41.73 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.235448, C = 0.266594, G = 0.270116, T = 0.227842; substitution rates AC = 1.422656, AG = 5.592205, AT = 1.731116, CG = 1.058597, CT = 10.946369, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.631370; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 1.261061. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	Figure 16. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2) alignment of the analyzed Cosmospora sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 12849.664027. This tree was generated from 558, 760, 690, and 562 base pairs of ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2 characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 813 distinct alignment patterns, with 41.73 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.235448, C = 0.266594, G = 0.270116, T = 0.227842; substitution rates AC = 1.422656, AG = 5.592205, AT = 1.731116, CG = 1.058597, CT = 10.946369, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.631370; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 1.261061. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
EE4A841EC93F5EE3AB6D42051841B875.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756053	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure6	Figure 6. Split graphs showing the results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of the new taxa and closely related taxa using LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. A Aspergillus dehongensis; B 1 Trichoderma dehongense and T. mangshiense; B 2 T. hongheense; B 3 T. neogongcheniae and T. nujiangense; B 4 T. neopyramidale; B 5 T. yingjiangense; C Cosmospora cavernicola; D Pithoascus cavernicola; E Neoachaetomiella cavernicola; F Trichocladium cavernicola. PHI test result P-value (Φw) ≤ 0.05 indicates that there is significant recombination between the isolates included in the alignment. The new taxa are in red, “ T ” indicates the type species, and each PHI test value and scale bars are given in the bottom right corner.	Figure 6. Split graphs showing the results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of the new taxa and closely related taxa using LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. A Aspergillus dehongensis; B 1 Trichoderma dehongense and T. mangshiense; B 2 T. hongheense; B 3 T. neogongcheniae and T. nujiangense; B 4 T. neopyramidale; B 5 T. yingjiangense; C Cosmospora cavernicola; D Pithoascus cavernicola; E Neoachaetomiella cavernicola; F Trichocladium cavernicola. PHI test result P-value (Φw) ≤ 0.05 indicates that there is significant recombination between the isolates included in the alignment. The new taxa are in red, “ T ” indicates the type species, and each PHI test value and scale bars are given in the bottom right corner.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
864F18BF63865C47BD75CECD37E16390.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756072	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure25	Figure 25. Daldinia eschscholtzii (GMBCC 2475, new substrate record in cave habitat) A, B Colony characteristics on PDA (above and below); C Mycelium on PDA (after 50 days old culture); D – J Conidiogenous cells and conidia; K – S Conidia. Scale bars: 30 μm (D, H, K); 20 μm (E – G, I, J); 5 μm (L – S).	Figure 25. Daldinia eschscholtzii (GMBCC 2475, new substrate record in cave habitat) A, B Colony characteristics on PDA (above and below); C Mycelium on PDA (after 50 days old culture); D – J Conidiogenous cells and conidia; K – S Conidia. Scale bars: 30 μm (D, H, K); 20 μm (E – G, I, J); 5 μm (L – S).	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
864F18BF63865C47BD75CECD37E16390.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756071	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure24	Figure 24. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2) alignment of the analyzed Daldinia sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 25842.101346. This tree was generated from 579, 776, 1029, and 840 base pairs of ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2 characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 1,106 distinct alignment patterns with 9.64 % of gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.224919, C = 0.285712, G = 0.281671, T = 0.207698 with substitution rates AC = 1.029107, AG = 3.610183, AT = 1.189562, CG = 1.444536, CT = 5.566958, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.521952; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.924023. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) showed identical topologies. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). The sequences of new strains are in red. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	Figure 24. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2) alignment of the analyzed Daldinia sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 25842.101346. This tree was generated from 579, 776, 1029, and 840 base pairs of ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2 characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 1,106 distinct alignment patterns with 9.64 % of gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.224919, C = 0.285712, G = 0.281671, T = 0.207698 with substitution rates AC = 1.029107, AG = 3.610183, AT = 1.189562, CG = 1.444536, CT = 5.566958, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.521952; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.924023. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) showed identical topologies. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). The sequences of new strains are in red. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
9D64FAC16EE95853A0BDAD17D1DC945D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756074	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure27	Figure 27. Mucor phayaoensis (GMBCC 2471, new substrate and geographical record). A, B Colony on the PDA (above and below); C, D Sporulation on PDA; E, F Sporangiophores; G – J Sporangia; J, K Columellae with collars; P Chlamydospores; Q Rhizoids. L Sporangiospores; Scale bars: 500 μm (C, D); 50 μm (E, F); 20 μm (G – O, Q): 30 μm (P, R).	Figure 27. Mucor phayaoensis (GMBCC 2471, new substrate and geographical record). A, B Colony on the PDA (above and below); C, D Sporulation on PDA; E, F Sporangiophores; G – J Sporangia; J, K Columellae with collars; P Chlamydospores; Q Rhizoids. L Sporangiospores; Scale bars: 500 μm (C, D); 50 μm (E, F); 20 μm (G – O, Q): 30 μm (P, R).	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
9D64FAC16EE95853A0BDAD17D1DC945D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756073	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure26	Figure 26. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS and LSU) alignment of the analyzed Mucor sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood of - 22170.939495, based on 505 and 1,017 base pairs of ITS and LSU characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 962 distinct alignment patterns with 34.76 % of gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.302975, C = 0.170643, G = 0.228297, T = 0.298085 with substitution rates AC = 0.955315, AG = 4.107112, AT = 1.801966, CG = 0.674002, CT = 6.356781, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.404084; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.569486. The tree topologies from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). The sequences of new strains are in blue. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	Figure 26. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS and LSU) alignment of the analyzed Mucor sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood of - 22170.939495, based on 505 and 1,017 base pairs of ITS and LSU characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 962 distinct alignment patterns with 34.76 % of gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.302975, C = 0.170643, G = 0.228297, T = 0.298085 with substitution rates AC = 0.955315, AG = 4.107112, AT = 1.801966, CG = 0.674002, CT = 6.356781, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.404084; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.569486. The tree topologies from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). The sequences of new strains are in blue. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
A5503B5FEC045EB7B7F8FAB188F9000B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756068	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure21	Figure 21. Neoachaetomiella cavernicola (GMBCC 2270, ex-type) A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C, D Mature ascomata on PDA; E Ascomatal hairs; G Ascospores; F, H – L Asci. H – L Stained with 1 % Congo red solution. Scale bars: 200 μm (D); 10 μm (E – L).	Figure 21. Neoachaetomiella cavernicola (GMBCC 2270, ex-type) A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C, D Mature ascomata on PDA; E Ascomatal hairs; G Ascospores; F, H – L Asci. H – L Stained with 1 % Congo red solution. Scale bars: 200 μm (D); 10 μm (E – L).	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
A5503B5FEC045EB7B7F8FAB188F9000B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756067	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure20	Figure 20. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2) alignment of the analyzed Chaetomiaceae sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 12849.664027. This tree was generated from 558, 760, 690, and 562 base pairs of ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2 characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 813 distinct alignment patterns, with 41.73 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.235448, C = 0.266594, G = 0.270116, T = 0.227842; substitution rates AC = 1.422656, AG = 5.592205, AT = 1.731116, CG = 1.058597, CT = 10.946369, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.631370; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 1.261061. The tree topologies from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	Figure 20. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2) alignment of the analyzed Chaetomiaceae sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 12849.664027. This tree was generated from 558, 760, 690, and 562 base pairs of ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2 characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 813 distinct alignment patterns, with 41.73 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.235448, C = 0.266594, G = 0.270116, T = 0.227842; substitution rates AC = 1.422656, AG = 5.592205, AT = 1.731116, CG = 1.058597, CT = 10.946369, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.631370; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 1.261061. The tree topologies from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
A5503B5FEC045EB7B7F8FAB188F9000B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756053	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure6	Figure 6. Split graphs showing the results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of the new taxa and closely related taxa using LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. A Aspergillus dehongensis; B 1 Trichoderma dehongense and T. mangshiense; B 2 T. hongheense; B 3 T. neogongcheniae and T. nujiangense; B 4 T. neopyramidale; B 5 T. yingjiangense; C Cosmospora cavernicola; D Pithoascus cavernicola; E Neoachaetomiella cavernicola; F Trichocladium cavernicola. PHI test result P-value (Φw) ≤ 0.05 indicates that there is significant recombination between the isolates included in the alignment. The new taxa are in red, “ T ” indicates the type species, and each PHI test value and scale bars are given in the bottom right corner.	Figure 6. Split graphs showing the results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of the new taxa and closely related taxa using LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. A Aspergillus dehongensis; B 1 Trichoderma dehongense and T. mangshiense; B 2 T. hongheense; B 3 T. neogongcheniae and T. nujiangense; B 4 T. neopyramidale; B 5 T. yingjiangense; C Cosmospora cavernicola; D Pithoascus cavernicola; E Neoachaetomiella cavernicola; F Trichocladium cavernicola. PHI test result P-value (Φw) ≤ 0.05 indicates that there is significant recombination between the isolates included in the alignment. The new taxa are in red, “ T ” indicates the type species, and each PHI test value and scale bars are given in the bottom right corner.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
8A34F430A8CB52B0891E9B1A9AC80AD1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756068	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure21	Figure 21. Neoachaetomiella cavernicola (GMBCC 2270, ex-type) A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C, D Mature ascomata on PDA; E Ascomatal hairs; G Ascospores; F, H – L Asci. H – L Stained with 1 % Congo red solution. Scale bars: 200 μm (D); 10 μm (E – L).	Figure 21. Neoachaetomiella cavernicola (GMBCC 2270, ex-type) A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C, D Mature ascomata on PDA; E Ascomatal hairs; G Ascospores; F, H – L Asci. H – L Stained with 1 % Congo red solution. Scale bars: 200 μm (D); 10 μm (E – L).	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
8A34F430A8CB52B0891E9B1A9AC80AD1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756067	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure20	Figure 20. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2) alignment of the analyzed Chaetomiaceae sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 12849.664027. This tree was generated from 558, 760, 690, and 562 base pairs of ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2 characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 813 distinct alignment patterns, with 41.73 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.235448, C = 0.266594, G = 0.270116, T = 0.227842; substitution rates AC = 1.422656, AG = 5.592205, AT = 1.731116, CG = 1.058597, CT = 10.946369, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.631370; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 1.261061. The tree topologies from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	Figure 20. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2) alignment of the analyzed Chaetomiaceae sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 12849.664027. This tree was generated from 558, 760, 690, and 562 base pairs of ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2 characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 813 distinct alignment patterns, with 41.73 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.235448, C = 0.266594, G = 0.270116, T = 0.227842; substitution rates AC = 1.422656, AG = 5.592205, AT = 1.731116, CG = 1.058597, CT = 10.946369, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.631370; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 1.261061. The tree topologies from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
DD513932F2505309AF495F939073BA32.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756066	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure19	Figure 19. Pithoascus cavernicola (GMBCC 2294, ex-type). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Conidiophores arise from the colony (60 days old culture); D – F, I, J Conidiophores, annellides and conidia; H Conidia. Scale bars: 20 μm (D, I, J); 10 μm (E – H).	Figure 19. Pithoascus cavernicola (GMBCC 2294, ex-type). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Conidiophores arise from the colony (60 days old culture); D – F, I, J Conidiophores, annellides and conidia; H Conidia. Scale bars: 20 μm (D, I, J); 10 μm (E – H).	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
DD513932F2505309AF495F939073BA32.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756065	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure18	Figure 18. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, LSU, tef 1 - α, and tub 2) alignment of the analyzed Pithoascus sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 22169.941997. This tree was generated from 639, 583, 950, and 414 base pairs of ITS, LSU, tef 1 - α, and tub 2 characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 1,205 distinct alignment patterns with 13.01 % of gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.213314, C = 0.304675, G = 0.278843, T = 0.203169 with substitution rates AC = 0.902039, AG = 1.725203, AT = 1.373249, CG = 0.985292, CT = 4.374981, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.191583; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.445769. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) showed identical topologies. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). The sequences of new strains are in red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	Figure 18. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, LSU, tef 1 - α, and tub 2) alignment of the analyzed Pithoascus sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 22169.941997. This tree was generated from 639, 583, 950, and 414 base pairs of ITS, LSU, tef 1 - α, and tub 2 characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 1,205 distinct alignment patterns with 13.01 % of gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.213314, C = 0.304675, G = 0.278843, T = 0.203169 with substitution rates AC = 0.902039, AG = 1.725203, AT = 1.373249, CG = 0.985292, CT = 4.374981, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.191583; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.445769. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) showed identical topologies. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). The sequences of new strains are in red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
DD513932F2505309AF495F939073BA32.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756053	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure6	Figure 6. Split graphs showing the results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of the new taxa and closely related taxa using LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. A Aspergillus dehongensis; B 1 Trichoderma dehongense and T. mangshiense; B 2 T. hongheense; B 3 T. neogongcheniae and T. nujiangense; B 4 T. neopyramidale; B 5 T. yingjiangense; C Cosmospora cavernicola; D Pithoascus cavernicola; E Neoachaetomiella cavernicola; F Trichocladium cavernicola. PHI test result P-value (Φw) ≤ 0.05 indicates that there is significant recombination between the isolates included in the alignment. The new taxa are in red, “ T ” indicates the type species, and each PHI test value and scale bars are given in the bottom right corner.	Figure 6. Split graphs showing the results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of the new taxa and closely related taxa using LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. A Aspergillus dehongensis; B 1 Trichoderma dehongense and T. mangshiense; B 2 T. hongheense; B 3 T. neogongcheniae and T. nujiangense; B 4 T. neopyramidale; B 5 T. yingjiangense; C Cosmospora cavernicola; D Pithoascus cavernicola; E Neoachaetomiella cavernicola; F Trichocladium cavernicola. PHI test result P-value (Φw) ≤ 0.05 indicates that there is significant recombination between the isolates included in the alignment. The new taxa are in red, “ T ” indicates the type species, and each PHI test value and scale bars are given in the bottom right corner.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
A3393D272D24571EB4A3221B1BFF1952.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756070	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure23	Figure 23. Trichocladium cavernicola (GZCC 25-0715, ex-type). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Mycelium on PDA (50 days old culture); D – K Hyphae, conidiophores, and conidia; L – O Conidia. Scale bars: 20 μm (D – K); 10 μm (L – O).	Figure 23. Trichocladium cavernicola (GZCC 25-0715, ex-type). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Mycelium on PDA (50 days old culture); D – K Hyphae, conidiophores, and conidia; L – O Conidia. Scale bars: 20 μm (D – K); 10 μm (L – O).	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
A3393D272D24571EB4A3221B1BFF1952.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756067	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure20	Figure 20. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2) alignment of the analyzed Chaetomiaceae sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 12849.664027. This tree was generated from 558, 760, 690, and 562 base pairs of ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2 characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 813 distinct alignment patterns, with 41.73 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.235448, C = 0.266594, G = 0.270116, T = 0.227842; substitution rates AC = 1.422656, AG = 5.592205, AT = 1.731116, CG = 1.058597, CT = 10.946369, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.631370; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 1.261061. The tree topologies from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	Figure 20. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2) alignment of the analyzed Chaetomiaceae sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 12849.664027. This tree was generated from 558, 760, 690, and 562 base pairs of ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and tub 2 characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 813 distinct alignment patterns, with 41.73 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.235448, C = 0.266594, G = 0.270116, T = 0.227842; substitution rates AC = 1.422656, AG = 5.592205, AT = 1.731116, CG = 1.058597, CT = 10.946369, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.631370; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 1.261061. The tree topologies from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
A3393D272D24571EB4A3221B1BFF1952.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756053	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure6	Figure 6. Split graphs showing the results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of the new taxa and closely related taxa using LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. A Aspergillus dehongensis; B 1 Trichoderma dehongense and T. mangshiense; B 2 T. hongheense; B 3 T. neogongcheniae and T. nujiangense; B 4 T. neopyramidale; B 5 T. yingjiangense; C Cosmospora cavernicola; D Pithoascus cavernicola; E Neoachaetomiella cavernicola; F Trichocladium cavernicola. PHI test result P-value (Φw) ≤ 0.05 indicates that there is significant recombination between the isolates included in the alignment. The new taxa are in red, “ T ” indicates the type species, and each PHI test value and scale bars are given in the bottom right corner.	Figure 6. Split graphs showing the results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of the new taxa and closely related taxa using LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. A Aspergillus dehongensis; B 1 Trichoderma dehongense and T. mangshiense; B 2 T. hongheense; B 3 T. neogongcheniae and T. nujiangense; B 4 T. neopyramidale; B 5 T. yingjiangense; C Cosmospora cavernicola; D Pithoascus cavernicola; E Neoachaetomiella cavernicola; F Trichocladium cavernicola. PHI test result P-value (Φw) ≤ 0.05 indicates that there is significant recombination between the isolates included in the alignment. The new taxa are in red, “ T ” indicates the type species, and each PHI test value and scale bars are given in the bottom right corner.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
3521FADF769E5685B61B58AFF2D57C80.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756055	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure8	Figure 8. Trichoderma dehongense (GZCC 25-0719, ex-type). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (35 days old culture); D, I Conidiophores, phialides, and conidia; J Chlamydospores; K Conidia. Scale bars: 10 μm (D – K).	Figure 8. Trichoderma dehongense (GZCC 25-0719, ex-type). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (35 days old culture); D, I Conidiophores, phialides, and conidia; J Chlamydospores; K Conidia. Scale bars: 10 μm (D – K).	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
3521FADF769E5685B61B58AFF2D57C80.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756054	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure7	Figure 7. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α) alignment of the analyzed Trichoderma sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 44522.773404. This tree was generated from 630, 1,005, and 566 base pairs of ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 1514 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.35 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.239220, C = 0.269107, G = 0.247011, T = 0.244663, substitution rates AC = 1.236378, AG = 3.614687, AT = 1.134273, CG = 0.838985, CT = 5.208442, GT = 1.000000, proportion of invariable sites I = 0.327543, gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.714228. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	Figure 7. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α) alignment of the analyzed Trichoderma sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 44522.773404. This tree was generated from 630, 1,005, and 566 base pairs of ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 1514 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.35 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.239220, C = 0.269107, G = 0.247011, T = 0.244663, substitution rates AC = 1.236378, AG = 3.614687, AT = 1.134273, CG = 0.838985, CT = 5.208442, GT = 1.000000, proportion of invariable sites I = 0.327543, gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.714228. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
0D6F27D929C8554788966EED7FA0B33B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756056	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure9	Figure 9. Trichoderma hongheense (GMBCC 2297, ex-type). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (35 days old culture); D – G, I – K Conidiophores, phialides and conidia; H Chlamydospores; L Conidia. Scale bars: 20 μm (D – F, I, K); 10 μm (G, H, J, L).	Figure 9. Trichoderma hongheense (GMBCC 2297, ex-type). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (35 days old culture); D – G, I – K Conidiophores, phialides and conidia; H Chlamydospores; L Conidia. Scale bars: 20 μm (D – F, I, K); 10 μm (G, H, J, L).	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
0D6F27D929C8554788966EED7FA0B33B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756054	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure7	Figure 7. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α) alignment of the analyzed Trichoderma sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 44522.773404. This tree was generated from 630, 1,005, and 566 base pairs of ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 1514 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.35 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.239220, C = 0.269107, G = 0.247011, T = 0.244663, substitution rates AC = 1.236378, AG = 3.614687, AT = 1.134273, CG = 0.838985, CT = 5.208442, GT = 1.000000, proportion of invariable sites I = 0.327543, gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.714228. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	Figure 7. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α) alignment of the analyzed Trichoderma sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 44522.773404. This tree was generated from 630, 1,005, and 566 base pairs of ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 1514 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.35 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.239220, C = 0.269107, G = 0.247011, T = 0.244663, substitution rates AC = 1.236378, AG = 3.614687, AT = 1.134273, CG = 0.838985, CT = 5.208442, GT = 1.000000, proportion of invariable sites I = 0.327543, gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.714228. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
BC16036C0CF5502492A444683FFD2086.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756057	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure10	Figure 10. Trichoderma mangshiense (GMBCC 2300, ex-type). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (35 days old culture); D, G Conidiophores, phialides and conidia; E, F Chlamydospores; H Conidia. Scale bars: 20 μm (D – F); 10 μm (G, H).	Figure 10. Trichoderma mangshiense (GMBCC 2300, ex-type). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (35 days old culture); D, G Conidiophores, phialides and conidia; E, F Chlamydospores; H Conidia. Scale bars: 20 μm (D – F); 10 μm (G, H).	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
BC16036C0CF5502492A444683FFD2086.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756054	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure7	Figure 7. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α) alignment of the analyzed Trichoderma sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 44522.773404. This tree was generated from 630, 1,005, and 566 base pairs of ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 1514 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.35 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.239220, C = 0.269107, G = 0.247011, T = 0.244663, substitution rates AC = 1.236378, AG = 3.614687, AT = 1.134273, CG = 0.838985, CT = 5.208442, GT = 1.000000, proportion of invariable sites I = 0.327543, gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.714228. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	Figure 7. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α) alignment of the analyzed Trichoderma sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 44522.773404. This tree was generated from 630, 1,005, and 566 base pairs of ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 1514 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.35 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.239220, C = 0.269107, G = 0.247011, T = 0.244663, substitution rates AC = 1.236378, AG = 3.614687, AT = 1.134273, CG = 0.838985, CT = 5.208442, GT = 1.000000, proportion of invariable sites I = 0.327543, gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.714228. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
4F56C2A3B64752258BBE377EB43038BD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756058	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure11	Figure 11. Trichoderma neogongcheniae (GZCC 25-0721, ex-type). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (35 days old culture); D – F Conidiophores, phialides and conidia; G Conidia. Scale bars: 10 μm (D – G).	Figure 11. Trichoderma neogongcheniae (GZCC 25-0721, ex-type). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (35 days old culture); D – F Conidiophores, phialides and conidia; G Conidia. Scale bars: 10 μm (D – G).	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
4F56C2A3B64752258BBE377EB43038BD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756054	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure7	Figure 7. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α) alignment of the analyzed Trichoderma sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 44522.773404. This tree was generated from 630, 1,005, and 566 base pairs of ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 1514 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.35 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.239220, C = 0.269107, G = 0.247011, T = 0.244663, substitution rates AC = 1.236378, AG = 3.614687, AT = 1.134273, CG = 0.838985, CT = 5.208442, GT = 1.000000, proportion of invariable sites I = 0.327543, gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.714228. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	Figure 7. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α) alignment of the analyzed Trichoderma sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 44522.773404. This tree was generated from 630, 1,005, and 566 base pairs of ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 1514 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.35 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.239220, C = 0.269107, G = 0.247011, T = 0.244663, substitution rates AC = 1.236378, AG = 3.614687, AT = 1.134273, CG = 0.838985, CT = 5.208442, GT = 1.000000, proportion of invariable sites I = 0.327543, gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.714228. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
E7FF4B15354053C399574FCCD8DAFDCC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756059	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure12	Figure 12. Trichoderma neopyramidale (GMBCC 2303, ex-type). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (35 days old culture); D – F, H – J Conidiophores, phialides and conidia; G Chlamydospores; K Conidia. Scale bars: 20 μm (D, E, I, J); 10 μm (F – H, K).	Figure 12. Trichoderma neopyramidale (GMBCC 2303, ex-type). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (35 days old culture); D – F, H – J Conidiophores, phialides and conidia; G Chlamydospores; K Conidia. Scale bars: 20 μm (D, E, I, J); 10 μm (F – H, K).	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
E7FF4B15354053C399574FCCD8DAFDCC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756054	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure7	Figure 7. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α) alignment of the analyzed Trichoderma sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 44522.773404. This tree was generated from 630, 1,005, and 566 base pairs of ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 1514 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.35 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.239220, C = 0.269107, G = 0.247011, T = 0.244663, substitution rates AC = 1.236378, AG = 3.614687, AT = 1.134273, CG = 0.838985, CT = 5.208442, GT = 1.000000, proportion of invariable sites I = 0.327543, gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.714228. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	Figure 7. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α) alignment of the analyzed Trichoderma sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 44522.773404. This tree was generated from 630, 1,005, and 566 base pairs of ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 1514 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.35 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.239220, C = 0.269107, G = 0.247011, T = 0.244663, substitution rates AC = 1.236378, AG = 3.614687, AT = 1.134273, CG = 0.838985, CT = 5.208442, GT = 1.000000, proportion of invariable sites I = 0.327543, gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.714228. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
8589527AC95F5EACAEDFB92991322655.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756060	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure13	Figure 13. Trichoderma nujiangense (GMBCC 2304, ex-type). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (35 days old culture); D – F Conidiophores, phialides and conidia; G Conidia. Scale bars: 10 μm (D – G).	Figure 13. Trichoderma nujiangense (GMBCC 2304, ex-type). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (35 days old culture); D – F Conidiophores, phialides and conidia; G Conidia. Scale bars: 10 μm (D – G).	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
8589527AC95F5EACAEDFB92991322655.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756054	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure7	Figure 7. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α) alignment of the analyzed Trichoderma sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 44522.773404. This tree was generated from 630, 1,005, and 566 base pairs of ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 1514 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.35 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.239220, C = 0.269107, G = 0.247011, T = 0.244663, substitution rates AC = 1.236378, AG = 3.614687, AT = 1.134273, CG = 0.838985, CT = 5.208442, GT = 1.000000, proportion of invariable sites I = 0.327543, gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.714228. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	Figure 7. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α) alignment of the analyzed Trichoderma sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 44522.773404. This tree was generated from 630, 1,005, and 566 base pairs of ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 1514 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.35 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.239220, C = 0.269107, G = 0.247011, T = 0.244663, substitution rates AC = 1.236378, AG = 3.614687, AT = 1.134273, CG = 0.838985, CT = 5.208442, GT = 1.000000, proportion of invariable sites I = 0.327543, gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.714228. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
BD6427DDFF7A5C4E9EE1F43241308B7E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756061	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure14	Figure 14. Trichoderma obovatum (GMBCC 2473, new substrate record in cave habitat). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (35 days old culture); D – I Conidiophores, phialides, and conidia; J Conidia. Scale bars: μm (D, E); 30 μm (H, I); 10 μm (F, G, J).	Figure 14. Trichoderma obovatum (GMBCC 2473, new substrate record in cave habitat). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (35 days old culture); D – I Conidiophores, phialides, and conidia; J Conidia. Scale bars: μm (D, E); 30 μm (H, I); 10 μm (F, G, J).	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
BD6427DDFF7A5C4E9EE1F43241308B7E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756054	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure7	Figure 7. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α) alignment of the analyzed Trichoderma sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 44522.773404. This tree was generated from 630, 1,005, and 566 base pairs of ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 1514 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.35 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.239220, C = 0.269107, G = 0.247011, T = 0.244663, substitution rates AC = 1.236378, AG = 3.614687, AT = 1.134273, CG = 0.838985, CT = 5.208442, GT = 1.000000, proportion of invariable sites I = 0.327543, gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.714228. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	Figure 7. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α) alignment of the analyzed Trichoderma sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 44522.773404. This tree was generated from 630, 1,005, and 566 base pairs of ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 1514 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.35 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.239220, C = 0.269107, G = 0.247011, T = 0.244663, substitution rates AC = 1.236378, AG = 3.614687, AT = 1.134273, CG = 0.838985, CT = 5.208442, GT = 1.000000, proportion of invariable sites I = 0.327543, gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.714228. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
5FAAC4214FAF5E2C90A04437D671E1F7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756062	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure15	Figure 15. Trichoderma yingjiangense (GZCC 25-0723, ex-type). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (35 days old culture); D – H, J, K Conidiophores, phialides and conidia; I Chlamydospores; L Conidia. Scale bars: 20 μm (D, E, G, J, K); 10 μm (F, H, I, L).	Figure 15. Trichoderma yingjiangense (GZCC 25-0723, ex-type). A, B Colony on PDA (above and below); C Sporulation on PDA (35 days old culture); D – H, J, K Conidiophores, phialides and conidia; I Chlamydospores; L Conidia. Scale bars: 20 μm (D, E, G, J, K); 10 μm (F, H, I, L).	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
5FAAC4214FAF5E2C90A04437D671E1F7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1756054	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.190343.figure7	Figure 7. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α) alignment of the analyzed Trichoderma sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 44522.773404. This tree was generated from 630, 1,005, and 566 base pairs of ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 1514 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.35 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.239220, C = 0.269107, G = 0.247011, T = 0.244663, substitution rates AC = 1.236378, AG = 3.614687, AT = 1.134273, CG = 0.838985, CT = 5.208442, GT = 1.000000, proportion of invariable sites I = 0.327543, gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.714228. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	Figure 7. Consensus phylogram of 1,000 trees resulting from a RAxML analysis of the (ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α) alignment of the analyzed Trichoderma sequences. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree, with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 44522.773404. This tree was generated from 630, 1,005, and 566 base pairs of ITS, rpb 2, and tef 1 - α characters, respectively. The matrix comprises 1514 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.35 % of the sequences containing gaps and indeterminate traits. Base frequencies were estimated as follows A = 0.239220, C = 0.269107, G = 0.247011, T = 0.244663, substitution rates AC = 1.236378, AG = 3.614687, AT = 1.134273, CG = 0.838985, CT = 5.208442, GT = 1.000000, proportion of invariable sites I = 0.327543, gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.714228. The trees from both analyses (ML and BI) were identical. RAxML bootstrap support values (ML equal to or above 70 %) and Bayesian inference (BYPP equal to or above 0.90) are given at the nodes (ML / BYPP). Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue and red. Type strains are denoted with T. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.	2026-08-26	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.		Zenodo	biologists	Liu, Xiang-Fu;Tibpromma, Saowaluck;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Lu, Li;Hyde, Kevin D.;Lu, Wen-Hua;Xu, Rui-Fang;Chen, Xue-Mei;Zhang, Xian;Chen, Ming-Xiu;Xiao, Xing-Juan;Zhao, Chang-Lin;Du, Tian-Ye;Dai, Dong-Qin;Al-Arjani, Al-Bandari F.;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Kumla, Jaturong;Yu, Fu-Qiang;Wang, Mei-Mei;Karunarathna, Samantha C.			
