taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
36D1968F583B5F34A99C0641972C3A13.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1789469	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.141.200822.figure2	Figure 2. Morphological features of Inosperma fibrifugum (MHHNU 34360, holotype). a, b, c. Basidiomata (a, b. MHHNU 34360; c. MHHNU 34361); d, e. Basidiospores; f. Lamellae trama; g. Basidia; h, i. Cheilocystidia; j. Pileipellis; k. Stipitipellis; l. Caulocystidia; m, n, o. Basidiospores under SEM. Scale bars: 5 cm (a – c); 10 μm (d, e, g – i, l); 20 μm (f, j, k); 5 μm (m – o).	Figure 2. Morphological features of Inosperma fibrifugum (MHHNU 34360, holotype). a, b, c. Basidiomata (a, b. MHHNU 34360; c. MHHNU 34361); d, e. Basidiospores; f. Lamellae trama; g. Basidia; h, i. Cheilocystidia; j. Pileipellis; k. Stipitipellis; l. Caulocystidia; m, n, o. Basidiospores under SEM. Scale bars: 5 cm (a – c); 10 μm (d, e, g – i, l); 20 μm (f, j, k); 5 μm (m – o).	2026-09-25	Wu, Rui;Duan, Peng-Ping;Lai, Meng-Meng;He, Zheng-Mi;Chen, Zuo-Hong		Zenodo	biologists	Wu, Rui;Duan, Peng-Ping;Lai, Meng-Meng;He, Zheng-Mi;Chen, Zuo-Hong			
36D1968F583B5F34A99C0641972C3A13.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1789468	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.141.200822.figure1	Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of Inosperma inferred from maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses of the combined dataset (ITS, nrLSU, and rpb 2). Maximum likelihood bootstrap values (MLBS) > 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) > 0.90 are shown at the nodes (MLBS / BPP). The new species are highlighted in red.	Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of Inosperma inferred from maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses of the combined dataset (ITS, nrLSU, and rpb 2). Maximum likelihood bootstrap values (MLBS) > 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) > 0.90 are shown at the nodes (MLBS / BPP). The new species are highlighted in red.	2026-09-25	Wu, Rui;Duan, Peng-Ping;Lai, Meng-Meng;He, Zheng-Mi;Chen, Zuo-Hong		Zenodo	biologists	Wu, Rui;Duan, Peng-Ping;Lai, Meng-Meng;He, Zheng-Mi;Chen, Zuo-Hong			
56B36D11C85D5AA291262A01DC50EB4F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1789470	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.141.200822.figure3	Figure 3. Morphological features of Inosperma glomerisquamulosum (MHHNU 35000, holotype). a, b, c. Basidiomata (a, b. MHHNU 35000; c. MHHNU 34870); d, e. Basidiospores; f, g. Basidia; h, i. Cheilocystidia; j. Lamellae trama; k. Stipitipellis; l, m. Pileipellis and hyphae; n, o, p. Basidiospores under SEM. Scale bars: 5 cm (a – c); 10 μm (d – i, m); 20 μm (j – l); 5 μm (n – p).	Figure 3. Morphological features of Inosperma glomerisquamulosum (MHHNU 35000, holotype). a, b, c. Basidiomata (a, b. MHHNU 35000; c. MHHNU 34870); d, e. Basidiospores; f, g. Basidia; h, i. Cheilocystidia; j. Lamellae trama; k. Stipitipellis; l, m. Pileipellis and hyphae; n, o, p. Basidiospores under SEM. Scale bars: 5 cm (a – c); 10 μm (d – i, m); 20 μm (j – l); 5 μm (n – p).	2026-09-25	Wu, Rui;Duan, Peng-Ping;Lai, Meng-Meng;He, Zheng-Mi;Chen, Zuo-Hong		Zenodo	biologists	Wu, Rui;Duan, Peng-Ping;Lai, Meng-Meng;He, Zheng-Mi;Chen, Zuo-Hong			
56B36D11C85D5AA291262A01DC50EB4F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1789468	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.141.200822.figure1	Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of Inosperma inferred from maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses of the combined dataset (ITS, nrLSU, and rpb 2). Maximum likelihood bootstrap values (MLBS) > 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) > 0.90 are shown at the nodes (MLBS / BPP). The new species are highlighted in red.	Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of Inosperma inferred from maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses of the combined dataset (ITS, nrLSU, and rpb 2). Maximum likelihood bootstrap values (MLBS) > 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) > 0.90 are shown at the nodes (MLBS / BPP). The new species are highlighted in red.	2026-09-25	Wu, Rui;Duan, Peng-Ping;Lai, Meng-Meng;He, Zheng-Mi;Chen, Zuo-Hong		Zenodo	biologists	Wu, Rui;Duan, Peng-Ping;Lai, Meng-Meng;He, Zheng-Mi;Chen, Zuo-Hong			
678F89F1AC965AE28CEC7E3C477FB02A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1789471	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.141.200822.figure4	Figure 4. Morphological features of Inosperma lilacinifolium (MHHNU 34956, holotype). a, b, c. Basidiomata (a. MHHNU 34956; b. MHHNU 34951; c. MHHNU 34953); d, e. Basidiospores; f. Lamellae trama; g. Basidia; h, i. Cheilocystidia; j. Stipitipellis; k. Caulocystidia; l, m. Pileipellis and hyphae; n, o. Basidiospores under SEM. Scale bars: 2 cm (a – c); 10 μm (d, e, g – i, k); 20 μm (f, j, l, m); 5 μm (n, o).	Figure 4. Morphological features of Inosperma lilacinifolium (MHHNU 34956, holotype). a, b, c. Basidiomata (a. MHHNU 34956; b. MHHNU 34951; c. MHHNU 34953); d, e. Basidiospores; f. Lamellae trama; g. Basidia; h, i. Cheilocystidia; j. Stipitipellis; k. Caulocystidia; l, m. Pileipellis and hyphae; n, o. Basidiospores under SEM. Scale bars: 2 cm (a – c); 10 μm (d, e, g – i, k); 20 μm (f, j, l, m); 5 μm (n, o).	2026-09-25	Wu, Rui;Duan, Peng-Ping;Lai, Meng-Meng;He, Zheng-Mi;Chen, Zuo-Hong		Zenodo	biologists	Wu, Rui;Duan, Peng-Ping;Lai, Meng-Meng;He, Zheng-Mi;Chen, Zuo-Hong			
678F89F1AC965AE28CEC7E3C477FB02A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1789468	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.141.200822.figure1	Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of Inosperma inferred from maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses of the combined dataset (ITS, nrLSU, and rpb 2). Maximum likelihood bootstrap values (MLBS) > 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) > 0.90 are shown at the nodes (MLBS / BPP). The new species are highlighted in red.	Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of Inosperma inferred from maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses of the combined dataset (ITS, nrLSU, and rpb 2). Maximum likelihood bootstrap values (MLBS) > 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) > 0.90 are shown at the nodes (MLBS / BPP). The new species are highlighted in red.	2026-09-25	Wu, Rui;Duan, Peng-Ping;Lai, Meng-Meng;He, Zheng-Mi;Chen, Zuo-Hong		Zenodo	biologists	Wu, Rui;Duan, Peng-Ping;Lai, Meng-Meng;He, Zheng-Mi;Chen, Zuo-Hong			
