taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
CECF8F030AD5568BAE7E9110C260BDB5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1553863	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.184484.figure4	Figure 4. Symptoms and morphology of Erysiphe rosae on Rosa omeiensis (HMJAU - PM 92697). a Symptoms. b 1, b 2 Hyphal appressoria. c 1, c 2 Conidiophores with conidia formed singly. d 1, d 2 Conidia. e Chasmothecium. f Peridium cells. g Short appendages. h 1, h 2 Long appendages. i 1 – i 3 Asci. j 1, j 2 Ascospores. Scale bars: 10 μm (b 1, d 2, f, j 1, j 2); 20 μm (e, g – i 3).	Figure 4. Symptoms and morphology of Erysiphe rosae on Rosa omeiensis (HMJAU - PM 92697). a Symptoms. b 1, b 2 Hyphal appressoria. c 1, c 2 Conidiophores with conidia formed singly. d 1, d 2 Conidia. e Chasmothecium. f Peridium cells. g Short appendages. h 1, h 2 Long appendages. i 1 – i 3 Asci. j 1, j 2 Ascospores. Scale bars: 10 μm (b 1, d 2, f, j 1, j 2); 20 μm (e, g – i 3).	2026-03-04	Jin, Dan-Ni;Wang, Shuang-Bao;Guan, Le-Ping;Wu, Xue-Lian;Feng, Jing;Liu, Li;Bradshaw, Michael;Braun, Uwe;Yang, Jing-Han;Yu, Shou-Rong;Li, Yu;Liu, Shu-Yan		Zenodo	biologists	Jin, Dan-Ni;Wang, Shuang-Bao;Guan, Le-Ping;Wu, Xue-Lian;Feng, Jing;Liu, Li;Bradshaw, Michael;Braun, Uwe;Yang, Jing-Han;Yu, Shou-Rong;Li, Yu;Liu, Shu-Yan			
CECF8F030AD5568BAE7E9110C260BDB5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1553860	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.184484.figure1	Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of Erysiphaceae based on 28 S rDNA sequences. Bootstrap values larger than 80 % for the maximum likelihood (ML) analyses conducted are displayed, followed by posterior probabilities ≥ 80. The newly generated sequences in this study are highlighted in red. Byssoascus striatosporus is used as the outgroup taxon.	Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of Erysiphaceae based on 28 S rDNA sequences. Bootstrap values larger than 80 % for the maximum likelihood (ML) analyses conducted are displayed, followed by posterior probabilities ≥ 80. The newly generated sequences in this study are highlighted in red. Byssoascus striatosporus is used as the outgroup taxon.	2026-03-04	Jin, Dan-Ni;Wang, Shuang-Bao;Guan, Le-Ping;Wu, Xue-Lian;Feng, Jing;Liu, Li;Bradshaw, Michael;Braun, Uwe;Yang, Jing-Han;Yu, Shou-Rong;Li, Yu;Liu, Shu-Yan		Zenodo	biologists	Jin, Dan-Ni;Wang, Shuang-Bao;Guan, Le-Ping;Wu, Xue-Lian;Feng, Jing;Liu, Li;Bradshaw, Michael;Braun, Uwe;Yang, Jing-Han;Yu, Shou-Rong;Li, Yu;Liu, Shu-Yan			
A58C0F16B9A659658855B877253C0723.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1553864	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.184484.figure5	Figure 5. Symptoms and morphology of Erysiphe simulans on the type host, Rosa multiflora (HMAS 13631). a 1 – a 3 Symptoms. b Chasmothecium. c Peridium cells. d 1 – d 4 Long appendages. e 1 – e 3 Short appendages. f 1 – f 6 Asci. g 1, g 2 Ascospores. Scale bars: 50 μm (b); 20 μm (c – d 4, f 1 – f 6); 10 μm (e 1 – e 3, g 1, g 2).	Figure 5. Symptoms and morphology of Erysiphe simulans on the type host, Rosa multiflora (HMAS 13631). a 1 – a 3 Symptoms. b Chasmothecium. c Peridium cells. d 1 – d 4 Long appendages. e 1 – e 3 Short appendages. f 1 – f 6 Asci. g 1, g 2 Ascospores. Scale bars: 50 μm (b); 20 μm (c – d 4, f 1 – f 6); 10 μm (e 1 – e 3, g 1, g 2).	2026-03-04	Jin, Dan-Ni;Wang, Shuang-Bao;Guan, Le-Ping;Wu, Xue-Lian;Feng, Jing;Liu, Li;Bradshaw, Michael;Braun, Uwe;Yang, Jing-Han;Yu, Shou-Rong;Li, Yu;Liu, Shu-Yan		Zenodo	biologists	Jin, Dan-Ni;Wang, Shuang-Bao;Guan, Le-Ping;Wu, Xue-Lian;Feng, Jing;Liu, Li;Bradshaw, Michael;Braun, Uwe;Yang, Jing-Han;Yu, Shou-Rong;Li, Yu;Liu, Shu-Yan			
A58C0F16B9A659658855B877253C0723.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1553865	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.184484.figure6	Figure 6. Symptoms and morphology of Erysiphe simulans “ var. rosae-rubi ” on Rosa rubus (HMAS 11418). a 1 – a 4 Symptoms. b Chasmothecium. c Peridium cells. d 1 – d 4 Long appendages. e 1 – e 3 Short appendages. f 1 – f 5 Asci. g 1, g 2 Ascospores. Scale bars: 50 μm (b); 20 μm (c – d 4, f 1 – f 5); 10 μm (e 1 – e 3, g 1, g 2).	Figure 6. Symptoms and morphology of Erysiphe simulans “ var. rosae-rubi ” on Rosa rubus (HMAS 11418). a 1 – a 4 Symptoms. b Chasmothecium. c Peridium cells. d 1 – d 4 Long appendages. e 1 – e 3 Short appendages. f 1 – f 5 Asci. g 1, g 2 Ascospores. Scale bars: 50 μm (b); 20 μm (c – d 4, f 1 – f 5); 10 μm (e 1 – e 3, g 1, g 2).	2026-03-04	Jin, Dan-Ni;Wang, Shuang-Bao;Guan, Le-Ping;Wu, Xue-Lian;Feng, Jing;Liu, Li;Bradshaw, Michael;Braun, Uwe;Yang, Jing-Han;Yu, Shou-Rong;Li, Yu;Liu, Shu-Yan		Zenodo	biologists	Jin, Dan-Ni;Wang, Shuang-Bao;Guan, Le-Ping;Wu, Xue-Lian;Feng, Jing;Liu, Li;Bradshaw, Michael;Braun, Uwe;Yang, Jing-Han;Yu, Shou-Rong;Li, Yu;Liu, Shu-Yan			
17EF615C56625F30A2A42B9457C570C7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1553866	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.184484.figure7	Figure 7. Symptoms and morphology of Podosphaera pannosa on Rosa chinensis (HMJAU - PM 92727). a 1 – a 7 Symptoms. b Secondary hyphae. c Hyphal appressoria. d 1 – d 3 Conidiophores with catenescent conidia. e 1 – e 5 Conidia. f 1, f 2 Germ tubes. g Chasmothecium. h Peridium cells. i 1 – i 3 Appendages. j 1 – j 4 Asci. k 1, k 2 Ascospores. Scale bars: 20 μm (b – k 2).	Figure 7. Symptoms and morphology of Podosphaera pannosa on Rosa chinensis (HMJAU - PM 92727). a 1 – a 7 Symptoms. b Secondary hyphae. c Hyphal appressoria. d 1 – d 3 Conidiophores with catenescent conidia. e 1 – e 5 Conidia. f 1, f 2 Germ tubes. g Chasmothecium. h Peridium cells. i 1 – i 3 Appendages. j 1 – j 4 Asci. k 1, k 2 Ascospores. Scale bars: 20 μm (b – k 2).	2026-03-04	Jin, Dan-Ni;Wang, Shuang-Bao;Guan, Le-Ping;Wu, Xue-Lian;Feng, Jing;Liu, Li;Bradshaw, Michael;Braun, Uwe;Yang, Jing-Han;Yu, Shou-Rong;Li, Yu;Liu, Shu-Yan		Zenodo	biologists	Jin, Dan-Ni;Wang, Shuang-Bao;Guan, Le-Ping;Wu, Xue-Lian;Feng, Jing;Liu, Li;Bradshaw, Michael;Braun, Uwe;Yang, Jing-Han;Yu, Shou-Rong;Li, Yu;Liu, Shu-Yan			
17EF615C56625F30A2A42B9457C570C7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1553862	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.184484.figure3	Figure 3. Phylogenetic analysis of related Podosphaera sect. Sphaerotheca species based on ITS + 28 S + IGS sequences. Bootstrap values larger than 80 % for the maximum likelihood (ML) analyses conducted are displayed, followed by posterior probabilities ≥ 80. The newly generated sequences in this study are highlighted in red. Cystotheca lanestris is used as the outgroup taxon.	Figure 3. Phylogenetic analysis of related Podosphaera sect. Sphaerotheca species based on ITS + 28 S + IGS sequences. Bootstrap values larger than 80 % for the maximum likelihood (ML) analyses conducted are displayed, followed by posterior probabilities ≥ 80. The newly generated sequences in this study are highlighted in red. Cystotheca lanestris is used as the outgroup taxon.	2026-03-04	Jin, Dan-Ni;Wang, Shuang-Bao;Guan, Le-Ping;Wu, Xue-Lian;Feng, Jing;Liu, Li;Bradshaw, Michael;Braun, Uwe;Yang, Jing-Han;Yu, Shou-Rong;Li, Yu;Liu, Shu-Yan		Zenodo	biologists	Jin, Dan-Ni;Wang, Shuang-Bao;Guan, Le-Ping;Wu, Xue-Lian;Feng, Jing;Liu, Li;Bradshaw, Michael;Braun, Uwe;Yang, Jing-Han;Yu, Shou-Rong;Li, Yu;Liu, Shu-Yan			
939B626CC8095AA2B5B58DC411D12293.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1553867	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.184484.figure8	Figure 8. Symptoms and morphology of Podosphaera rosae on Rosa rugosa (HMJAU - PM 92763). a 1 – a 4 Symptoms. b Secondary hyphae. c 1, c 2 Hyphal appressoria. d 1, d 2 Conidiophores with catenescent conidia. e 1 – e 4 Conidia. f 1 – f 4 Germ tubes. g Chasmothecium. h Peridium cells. i 1 – i 3 Appendages. j 1, j 2 Asci. k 1 – k 3 Ascospores. Scale bars: 20 μm (b – k 3).	Figure 8. Symptoms and morphology of Podosphaera rosae on Rosa rugosa (HMJAU - PM 92763). a 1 – a 4 Symptoms. b Secondary hyphae. c 1, c 2 Hyphal appressoria. d 1, d 2 Conidiophores with catenescent conidia. e 1 – e 4 Conidia. f 1 – f 4 Germ tubes. g Chasmothecium. h Peridium cells. i 1 – i 3 Appendages. j 1, j 2 Asci. k 1 – k 3 Ascospores. Scale bars: 20 μm (b – k 3).	2026-03-04	Jin, Dan-Ni;Wang, Shuang-Bao;Guan, Le-Ping;Wu, Xue-Lian;Feng, Jing;Liu, Li;Bradshaw, Michael;Braun, Uwe;Yang, Jing-Han;Yu, Shou-Rong;Li, Yu;Liu, Shu-Yan		Zenodo	biologists	Jin, Dan-Ni;Wang, Shuang-Bao;Guan, Le-Ping;Wu, Xue-Lian;Feng, Jing;Liu, Li;Bradshaw, Michael;Braun, Uwe;Yang, Jing-Han;Yu, Shou-Rong;Li, Yu;Liu, Shu-Yan			
7C92D18CB9D556D4AB37B080690134EE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1553868	https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.184484.figure9	Figure 9. Symptoms and morphology of Podosphaera rosae-xanthinae on Rosa xanthina (HMJAU - PM 92790). a 1 – a 5 Symptoms. b 1, b 2 Secondary hyphae. c Hyphal appressoria. d 1, d 2 Conidiophores with catenescent conidia. e 1 – e 4 Conidia. f 1, f 2 Germ tubes. g 1, g 2 Chasmothecia. h Peridium cells. i 1 – i 3 Appendages. j 1 – j 3 Asci. k 1, k 2 Ascospores. Scale bars: 20 μm (b 1 – k 2).	Figure 9. Symptoms and morphology of Podosphaera rosae-xanthinae on Rosa xanthina (HMJAU - PM 92790). a 1 – a 5 Symptoms. b 1, b 2 Secondary hyphae. c Hyphal appressoria. d 1, d 2 Conidiophores with catenescent conidia. e 1 – e 4 Conidia. f 1, f 2 Germ tubes. g 1, g 2 Chasmothecia. h Peridium cells. i 1 – i 3 Appendages. j 1 – j 3 Asci. k 1, k 2 Ascospores. Scale bars: 20 μm (b 1 – k 2).	2026-03-04	Jin, Dan-Ni;Wang, Shuang-Bao;Guan, Le-Ping;Wu, Xue-Lian;Feng, Jing;Liu, Li;Bradshaw, Michael;Braun, Uwe;Yang, Jing-Han;Yu, Shou-Rong;Li, Yu;Liu, Shu-Yan		Zenodo	biologists	Jin, Dan-Ni;Wang, Shuang-Bao;Guan, Le-Ping;Wu, Xue-Lian;Feng, Jing;Liu, Li;Bradshaw, Michael;Braun, Uwe;Yang, Jing-Han;Yu, Shou-Rong;Li, Yu;Liu, Shu-Yan			
