taxonID	type	description	language	source
A80287A06859FFA7FE60FB21D7E3CC87.taxon	description	(2), Germany (4), Czech Republic (3), Switzerland (3) and Hungary (1). From these, 63 samples from 103 localities in Belgium, 14 samples from 47 localities in France, 2 samples from 2 localities in The Netherlands, 2 samples from 2 localities in Germany, 3 samples from 3 localities in Czech Republic, and 3 samples from 3 localities in Switzerland, and 1 sample from 1 locality in Hungary contained H. anconai. We studied and measured specimens of the following slide mounts: Belgium: 17 / 7 / 2017, Sint-Katelijne-Waver, 51.077141, 4.526659, Viburnum x burkwoodii Burkwood & Skipwith (Adoxaceae), Raf De Vis, 1 female, D 18 ; 26 / 7 / 2017, Sint-Katelijne-Waver, 51.059258, 4.495511, Rubus sp., Raf De Vis, 1 female, D 23.2 ; 1 / 3 / 2018, Sint Truiden, raspberry, Rik Cleymans, 1 female, D 66.1 ; 18 / 08 / 2018, Hofstade, 50.99639, 4.51389, Rubus sp., Raf De Vis, 1 female, B 4.4 ; 20 / 8 / 2018, Schoten, 51.268127, 4.5169, Rubus sp., Kevin Van Puyvelde, 1 female, B 12.4 ; 30 / 08 / 2018, Machelen a / d Leie, 50.945049, 3.487808, * CO 1 - sequences of single female lines on the same line are identical ** Collection Centre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Population, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, IRD, Montpellier, France “ CBGP - Continental Arthropod Collection ”, https: // doi. org / 10.15454 / D 6 XAKL fig, Justine Dewitte, 1 female, B 16.3 ; 30 / 08 / 2018, Kruishoutem, 50.904045, 3.528591, Rubus sp., Justine Dewitte, 1 female, B 17.2 ; 16 / 09 / 2018, Meldert, 50.939477, 4.134792, Rubus sp., Raf De Vis, 10 females from rearing, B 31.6 ; 30 / 09 / 2018, Maasmechelen, 50.982184, 5.639674, Rubus sp., Raf De Vis, 1 female, B 42.1 ; 17 / 10 / 2018, Borgloon, 50.801239, 5.290275, grape, Eva Reybroeck, 1 female, B 67.5 ; 03 / 2019, Gent, 51.053635, 3.706242, Rubus sp., Lore Vervaet, 3 females from rearing, B 25 ; 27 / 07 / 2020, Pailhe, 50.432287, 5.248216, Rubus sp., Raf De Vis, 1 female, B 164.2 ; France: 29 / 09 / 2018, Treignat, 46.362778, 2.349167, tomato, Dieter Foqué, 2 female B 44.1 - 44.2 ; 29 / 09 / 2018, Treignat, 46.362778,2.349444, tomato, Dieter Foqué, 1 wild female and 3 females from rearing, B 46.2 ; 29 / 09 / 2018, Treignat, 46.366944, 2.344167, Rubus sp., Dieter Foqué, 1 female B 52.3 ; 14 / 10 / 2018, Hyères, 43.1181, 6.1621, Rubus sp., Lore Vervaet, 16 females from rearing, 1 wild specimen B 83.1 ; 17 / 10 / 2018, Allan, 44.5120, 4.7796, Rubus sp., Lore Vervaet, 2 females B 89.2.1 - 2 ; 22 / 07 / 2019, Landrecies, 50.128817, 3.643396, bittersweet, Raf De Vis, 1 female, B 100.1 ; 22 / 07 / 2019, Fontain-au-Bois, 50.128817, 3.643396, Rubus sp., Raf De Vis, 1 female, B 109.2 ; 28 / 12 / 2019, Kaysersberg, 48.141464, 7.266328, Rubus sp., Raf De Vis, 2 females, B 146.1 & D 147.2 ; The Netherlands: 19 / 10 / 2019, Mechelen, 50.783623, 5.940681, Rubus sp., Raf De Vis, 4 females, B 141.4 ; B 141.5.1 - 2, B 141.6 ; 30 / 8 / 2021, Mook, 51.762295, 5.911216, grape, Felix Wäckers, 1 female, B 172.1 ; Germany: 07 / 10 / 2018, Seebach, 48.582689, 8.167126, Rubus sp., Markus Knapp, for rearing and CO 1 - sequennces, no voucher specimen were mounted, B 175.1 ; 18 / 09 / 2023, Auweiler, 51.001925, 6.848739, tomato, Ute Perkons, 5 females from rearing mounted on 15 / 5 / 2024, B 176.1 - 5 ; Czech Republic: 27 / 11 / 2019, Prague, 50.085085, 14.307956, Rubus sp., Raf De Vis, 4 females, B 144.5.1 - 2 & B 144.7.1 - 2 ; 27 / 11 / 2019, Prague, 50.084640, 14.309172,	en	De VisK, Raf M. J., VervaetK, Lore, ReybroeckK, Eva, VanlommelK, Wendy, HavermaetK, Robin Van, Foqué, Dieter, MarcossiK, Ítalo, PalliniK, Angelo, AssisK, Caio Henrique Binda de, LeeuwenK, Thomas Van, UeckermannK, Edward A. (2024): Redescription of Homeopronematus anconai (Baker) (Acari, Iolinidae) and description of Quasihomeopronematus nordestinus n. gen. n. sp. Acarologia 64 (4): 1283-1311, DOI: 10.24349/cu4t-4h6v, URL: https://doi.org/10.24349/cu4t-4h6v
A80287A06858FFA4FE60F95BD005CB50.taxon	materials_examined	Brazil: we received 7 slides From Ítalo Marcossi mounted 24 / 01 / 2022, Viçosa, MG, - 20.7598, - 42.8829, tomato, and additional material from the same culture in alcohol which we mounted in Hoyer. From museum USPB we studied three females on two slides: 11 / 06 / 1993, Amontada, CE, Campo 24, cassava Manihot esculenta Crantz (Euphorbiaceae), I. A. Almeida, 1 female, MZQL 4471 C = 2941 ; 15 / 06 / 1993, ‘ Gov. De Ze Rosado’ (we suppose Governador dix-sept Rosado) RN, Campo 27 Macroptilium sp., (Fabaceae) I. A. Almeida, 2 females, MZQL 4480 C = 2950. Quasihomeopronematus nordestinus n. gen. n. sp. has been found on tomato, casava and Macroptilium sp. Morphological descriptions	en	De VisK, Raf M. J., VervaetK, Lore, ReybroeckK, Eva, VanlommelK, Wendy, HavermaetK, Robin Van, Foqué, Dieter, MarcossiK, Ítalo, PalliniK, Angelo, AssisK, Caio Henrique Binda de, LeeuwenK, Thomas Van, UeckermannK, Edward A. (2024): Redescription of Homeopronematus anconai (Baker) (Acari, Iolinidae) and description of Quasihomeopronematus nordestinus n. gen. n. sp. Acarologia 64 (4): 1283-1311, DOI: 10.24349/cu4t-4h6v, URL: https://doi.org/10.24349/cu4t-4h6v
A80287A0685BFFA4FE60FA86D1CCCC2B.taxon	description	Schruft, 1972: 129 (Figures 1 - 8)	en	De VisK, Raf M. J., VervaetK, Lore, ReybroeckK, Eva, VanlommelK, Wendy, HavermaetK, Robin Van, Foqué, Dieter, MarcossiK, Ítalo, PalliniK, Angelo, AssisK, Caio Henrique Binda de, LeeuwenK, Thomas Van, UeckermannK, Edward A. (2024): Redescription of Homeopronematus anconai (Baker) (Acari, Iolinidae) and description of Quasihomeopronematus nordestinus n. gen. n. sp. Acarologia 64 (4): 1283-1311, DOI: 10.24349/cu4t-4h6v, URL: https://doi.org/10.24349/cu4t-4h6v
A80287A0685BFFA4FE60FE4ED6E5C807.taxon	type_taxon	Type species — Homeopronematus vidae by original designation André (1980: 114).	en	De VisK, Raf M. J., VervaetK, Lore, ReybroeckK, Eva, VanlommelK, Wendy, HavermaetK, Robin Van, Foqué, Dieter, MarcossiK, Ítalo, PalliniK, Angelo, AssisK, Caio Henrique Binda de, LeeuwenK, Thomas Van, UeckermannK, Edward A. (2024): Redescription of Homeopronematus anconai (Baker) (Acari, Iolinidae) and description of Quasihomeopronematus nordestinus n. gen. n. sp. Acarologia 64 (4): 1283-1311, DOI: 10.24349/cu4t-4h6v, URL: https://doi.org/10.24349/cu4t-4h6v
A80287A06853FFADFE60FD5BD011CE17.taxon	diagnosis	Differential diagnosis The genus resembles Homeopronematus but differs in the absence of ps 1. We describe this new genus, following André (1980) who introduced the principle that new combinations of idiosomal or leg chaetotaxy lead to genera. However, we could also have described a subgenus for species having the characteristic of losing ps 1. References can be found for both options. However, if we apply this principle to establish a subgenus based only on the absence of ps 1, this leads to confusion with other genera: • Ueckermaniella would be a subgenus of Metapronematus, both have the same leg chaetotaxy, but the former has four ag and 11 dorsals (3 ps), the latter three ag and 10 dorsals (2 ps). The loss of an ag and a ps seta goes together in this case. • We have several species or genera with the leg chaetotaxy of Neopronematus but with 10 or 11 dorsals instead of nine in Neopronematus (h 2 and ps 2 missing, but we interpret as ps 1 and ps 2 missing): Dasilcoferla nadirae (Silva, Da-Costa & Ferla, 2017) (Da Silva et al. 2017 ; De Vis et al. 2024) with 10 dorsals (ps 1 lacking) and a new Brazilian species with 11 opisthosomals (De Vis et al. in preparation). On the other hand, we find examples where a new genus was not erected: • The subgenus Neotydeolus of Proctotydaeus lacks ps 2, while the other subgenera do not (Kaźmierski 1998). • Pausia litchiae lacks one ps (Da Silva et al. 2017) while Pausia described by Kuznetsov and Lifshitz (1972) does not. André (1980) evidently did not follow the synonymy of Pausia with Naudea (Baker and Delfinado 1976), because besides the opisthosomal chaetotaxy also the leg chaetotaxy is different. Pausia has 11 opisthosomals, six setae on tarsus II and III and five on tarsus IV while Naudea has 10 opisthosomals and seven setae on tarsi II to IV. We also see other characteristics that might be considered for separating genera: • The short forked ag 3 can be found in Quasihomeopronematus as in Homeopronematus (Baker 1968 ; Knop and Hoy 1983 a) but also in all but one species of Neopronematus (N. aegeae Panou, Emmanouel & Kaźmierski, 2000) (Panou et al. 2000 ; Darbemamieh et al. 2015). In conclusion, to avoid increasing genera confusion, we follow André (1980) and create a new genus. Future studies might reorganise the genera in the Pronematinae based on an analysis of all relevant genus characteristics. However, the genus descriptions might need amplification as in most cases they are limited to chaetotaxy, and other characteristics that might be generic are only mentioned in species descriptions. and venter (right) of holotype female.	en	De VisK, Raf M. J., VervaetK, Lore, ReybroeckK, Eva, VanlommelK, Wendy, HavermaetK, Robin Van, Foqué, Dieter, MarcossiK, Ítalo, PalliniK, Angelo, AssisK, Caio Henrique Binda de, LeeuwenK, Thomas Van, UeckermannK, Edward A. (2024): Redescription of Homeopronematus anconai (Baker) (Acari, Iolinidae) and description of Quasihomeopronematus nordestinus n. gen. n. sp. Acarologia 64 (4): 1283-1311, DOI: 10.24349/cu4t-4h6v, URL: https://doi.org/10.24349/cu4t-4h6v
A80287A06848FFB4FE60FACAD72CC9CE.taxon	description	The specimens previously identified as H. staercki we could study are not different from H. anconai: they have identical body and leg chaetotaxy, no differences in the form of the setae could be distinguished, ag 3 is forked, the length of the eupathidia coincide with those H of. anconai, the striae are lobed. In the PCA they fall within the ‘ cloud’ of H. anconai (Figure 14 A). No differences could be detected in the shape of the setae, or the striation density. The dimensions of the Hungarian male we measured fall within the range of the Belgian males. Despite the large number of specimens from different origins we studied, we could not find one specimen that can be clearly distinguished from H. anconai. According to Knop and Hoy (1983 a), the variability within the species is high which is confirmed in this study. The differences as discussed by other authors are very small and are not sufficiently supported by descriptions with (range of) measurements and / or drawings: André (1980) studied the types of H. staercki and found for this species a shorter c 2, a higher striation density and further different “ shape and length of idiosomal setae ” (sic). We found that the variability in the length of c 2 of H. anconai is indeed very high, varying between 15 and 21 µm. The striation leaves us with some doubt but also variability of this characteristic can be observed. Moreover, the density might be influenced by mounting or the state of the specimens at mounting. Finally, the shape and length of the setae are not described in detail. Ripka et al. (2022) stated that the tectal and proral eupathidia on tarsus I of H. anconai are all four equal in length, while in H. staercki the tectals are nearly twice as long as the prorals. Our data show that in H. anconai tectals are nearly twice as long as the prorals, confirming descriptions of other authors (Baker 1968 ; Kuznetsov 1972 ; André 1980). So based on our data and the previous arguments, we synonymise H. staercki with H. anconai as previously suggested by other authors (Knop and Hoy 1983 a ; Ueckermann et al. 2019). Similarly, the specimens identified as Homeopronematus “ cf. staercki sp. nov., Kazmierski ” (see Stojnić et al. 2002) are H. anconai. The measurements of these specimens fall in the range of the European H. anconai specimens (Table 2 and Figure 14). Unguinals and seta. s As for P. ubiquitus, we found two forked unguinals and a seta homologous to s. We confirm that this seta s is erroneously named u′ in Figure 1 a & 1 b in Knop and Hoy (1983 a), as the position of u′ is ventral and proximal to p′ζ and the depicted u′ in Knop and Hoy (1983 a) is in between the two prorals, which is the positions of seta homologous to s. Additionally, it is not forked, while both u) (are forked (Figures 3 & 6 c, d). As in H. anconai, seta homologous to s is also present in all stages of Q. nordestinus n. gen. n. sp., except in the larval stage, as well as that both unguinals are forked.	en	De VisK, Raf M. J., VervaetK, Lore, ReybroeckK, Eva, VanlommelK, Wendy, HavermaetK, Robin Van, Foqué, Dieter, MarcossiK, Ítalo, PalliniK, Angelo, AssisK, Caio Henrique Binda de, LeeuwenK, Thomas Van, UeckermannK, Edward A. (2024): Redescription of Homeopronematus anconai (Baker) (Acari, Iolinidae) and description of Quasihomeopronematus nordestinus n. gen. n. sp. Acarologia 64 (4): 1283-1311, DOI: 10.24349/cu4t-4h6v, URL: https://doi.org/10.24349/cu4t-4h6v
