taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
64671CE3FAE75974B85D80F1E9DC0E94.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1582319	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.130.175665.figure1	Figure 1. Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on the concatenated LSU, ITS, and RPB 2 sequence data of selected genera of Mycosphaerellaceae. The tree topology of the ML analysis was identical to the PP analysis. Support values for maximum likelihood (ML) ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are annotated at the nodes as ML / PP. The tree is rooted with Zasmidium grevilleae (CBS 124107). Type strains are in bold and are marked with a “ T ”, and newly identified isolates in this study are in white. Bar = 0.05 represents the estimated number of nucleotide substitutions per site per branch.	Figure 1. Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on the concatenated LSU, ITS, and RPB 2 sequence data of selected genera of Mycosphaerellaceae. The tree topology of the ML analysis was identical to the PP analysis. Support values for maximum likelihood (ML) ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are annotated at the nodes as ML / PP. The tree is rooted with Zasmidium grevilleae (CBS 124107). Type strains are in bold and are marked with a “ T ”, and newly identified isolates in this study are in white. Bar = 0.05 represents the estimated number of nucleotide substitutions per site per branch.	2026-04-06	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong		Zenodo	biologists	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong			
64671CE3FAE75974B85D80F1E9DC0E94.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1582324	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.130.175665.figure6	Figure 6. Brunswickiella nypae (MFLU 25-0393, holotype). a, b. Leaf spot symptoms on Nypa fruticans; c, d. Conidia attachment on conidiophores and hyphae; e, f. Colony with sporodochia on PDA at 1 month post-incubation (obverse, reverse); h – j Conidia. Scale bars: 5 μm (c, j); 10 μm (d, g – i).	Figure 6. Brunswickiella nypae (MFLU 25-0393, holotype). a, b. Leaf spot symptoms on Nypa fruticans; c, d. Conidia attachment on conidiophores and hyphae; e, f. Colony with sporodochia on PDA at 1 month post-incubation (obverse, reverse); h – j Conidia. Scale bars: 5 μm (c, j); 10 μm (d, g – i).	2026-04-06	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong		Zenodo	biologists	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong			
21D475D3B16F532298D0ABDABABA78F1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1582321	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.130.175665.figure3	Figure 3. Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on the concatenated ITS, GAPDH, CHS - 1, ACT, and TUB 2 sequence data of the Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex. The tree topology of the ML analysis was identical to the PP analysis. Support values for maximum likelihood (ML) ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are annotated at the nodes as ML / PP. The tree is rooted with C. truncatum (CBS 151.35) and C. acidae (MFLUCC 17-2659). Type strains are in bold and are marked with a “ T, ” and newly identified isolates in this study are in white. Bar = 0.02 represents the estimated number of nucleotide substitutions per site per branch.	Figure 3. Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on the concatenated ITS, GAPDH, CHS - 1, ACT, and TUB 2 sequence data of the Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex. The tree topology of the ML analysis was identical to the PP analysis. Support values for maximum likelihood (ML) ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are annotated at the nodes as ML / PP. The tree is rooted with C. truncatum (CBS 151.35) and C. acidae (MFLUCC 17-2659). Type strains are in bold and are marked with a “ T, ” and newly identified isolates in this study are in white. Bar = 0.02 represents the estimated number of nucleotide substitutions per site per branch.	2026-04-06	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong		Zenodo	biologists	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong			
21D475D3B16F532298D0ABDABABA78F1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1582326	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.130.175665.figure8	Figure 8. Colletotrichum siamense (MFLUCC 26-0128). a, b. Leaf spot symptoms on Nypa fruticans; c – e. Colony morphotypes on PDA at 1 month post-incubation (obverse, reverse); f. Conidial masses on PDA; g – h. Conidial attachment and conidiophores; i. Conidial anastomosis; j – o. Conidia; p. Setae. Scale bars: 500 mm (f); 20 μm (g – h, p); 10 μm (i, o); 5 μm (j – n).	Figure 8. Colletotrichum siamense (MFLUCC 26-0128). a, b. Leaf spot symptoms on Nypa fruticans; c – e. Colony morphotypes on PDA at 1 month post-incubation (obverse, reverse); f. Conidial masses on PDA; g – h. Conidial attachment and conidiophores; i. Conidial anastomosis; j – o. Conidia; p. Setae. Scale bars: 500 mm (f); 20 μm (g – h, p); 10 μm (i, o); 5 μm (j – n).	2026-04-06	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong		Zenodo	biologists	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong			
52BE11CAF7D05E01A19C65469E520764.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1582322	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.130.175665.figure4	Figure 4. Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on the concatenated ITS, TEF 1 α, TUB 2, CAL, and HIS 3 sequence data of Diaporthe section Foeniculina. The tree topology of the ML analysis was identical to the PP analysis. Support values for maximum likelihood (ML) ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are annotated at the nodes as ML / PP. The tree is rooted with D. bohemiae (CBS 143347) and D. betulicola (CFCC 51128). Type strains are in bold and are marked with a “ T, ” and newly identified isolates in this study are in white. Bar = 0.04 represents the estimated number of nucleotide substitutions per site per branch.	Figure 4. Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on the concatenated ITS, TEF 1 α, TUB 2, CAL, and HIS 3 sequence data of Diaporthe section Foeniculina. The tree topology of the ML analysis was identical to the PP analysis. Support values for maximum likelihood (ML) ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are annotated at the nodes as ML / PP. The tree is rooted with D. bohemiae (CBS 143347) and D. betulicola (CFCC 51128). Type strains are in bold and are marked with a “ T, ” and newly identified isolates in this study are in white. Bar = 0.04 represents the estimated number of nucleotide substitutions per site per branch.	2026-04-06	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong		Zenodo	biologists	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong			
52BE11CAF7D05E01A19C65469E520764.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1582327	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.130.175665.figure9	Figure 9. Diaporthe arecae (MFLUCC 26-0134). a, b. Leaf spot symptoms on Nypa fruticans; c – e. Colony morphotypes on PDA at 1 month post-incubation (obverse, reverse); f. Conidiomata on alfalfa stem in WA; g. Vertical section of conidioma; h – j. Conidial attachment and conidiophores; k – q. Conidia. Scale bars: 1 mm (f); 50 μm (g); 20 μm (h); 10 μm (i – j, q); 5 μm (k – p).	Figure 9. Diaporthe arecae (MFLUCC 26-0134). a, b. Leaf spot symptoms on Nypa fruticans; c – e. Colony morphotypes on PDA at 1 month post-incubation (obverse, reverse); f. Conidiomata on alfalfa stem in WA; g. Vertical section of conidioma; h – j. Conidial attachment and conidiophores; k – q. Conidia. Scale bars: 1 mm (f); 50 μm (g); 20 μm (h); 10 μm (i – j, q); 5 μm (k – p).	2026-04-06	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong		Zenodo	biologists	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong			
6D1B39BDA250580B836ECC991EBC5A4E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1582320	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.130.175665.figure2	Figure 2. Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on the concatenated ITS, TEF 1 α, and TUB 2 sequence data of Pestalotiopsis. The tree topology of the ML analysis was identical to the PP analysis. Support values for maximum likelihood (ML) ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are annotated at the nodes as ML / PP. The tree is rooted with Pseudopestalotiopsis cocos (CBS 272.29). Type strains are in bold and are marked with a “ T, ” and newly identified isolates in this study are in white, and proposed synonyms are in orange. Bar = 0.03 represents the estimated number of nucleotide substitutions per site per branch.	Figure 2. Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on the concatenated ITS, TEF 1 α, and TUB 2 sequence data of Pestalotiopsis. The tree topology of the ML analysis was identical to the PP analysis. Support values for maximum likelihood (ML) ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are annotated at the nodes as ML / PP. The tree is rooted with Pseudopestalotiopsis cocos (CBS 272.29). Type strains are in bold and are marked with a “ T, ” and newly identified isolates in this study are in white, and proposed synonyms are in orange. Bar = 0.03 represents the estimated number of nucleotide substitutions per site per branch.	2026-04-06	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong		Zenodo	biologists	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong			
CD3260541F4754A682C1D03E0600C03D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1582320	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.130.175665.figure2	Figure 2. Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on the concatenated ITS, TEF 1 α, and TUB 2 sequence data of Pestalotiopsis. The tree topology of the ML analysis was identical to the PP analysis. Support values for maximum likelihood (ML) ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are annotated at the nodes as ML / PP. The tree is rooted with Pseudopestalotiopsis cocos (CBS 272.29). Type strains are in bold and are marked with a “ T, ” and newly identified isolates in this study are in white, and proposed synonyms are in orange. Bar = 0.03 represents the estimated number of nucleotide substitutions per site per branch.	Figure 2. Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on the concatenated ITS, TEF 1 α, and TUB 2 sequence data of Pestalotiopsis. The tree topology of the ML analysis was identical to the PP analysis. Support values for maximum likelihood (ML) ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are annotated at the nodes as ML / PP. The tree is rooted with Pseudopestalotiopsis cocos (CBS 272.29). Type strains are in bold and are marked with a “ T, ” and newly identified isolates in this study are in white, and proposed synonyms are in orange. Bar = 0.03 represents the estimated number of nucleotide substitutions per site per branch.	2026-04-06	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong		Zenodo	biologists	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong			
9E9B3F500BA9542BBA82E5C70163F0E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1582320	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.130.175665.figure2	Figure 2. Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on the concatenated ITS, TEF 1 α, and TUB 2 sequence data of Pestalotiopsis. The tree topology of the ML analysis was identical to the PP analysis. Support values for maximum likelihood (ML) ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are annotated at the nodes as ML / PP. The tree is rooted with Pseudopestalotiopsis cocos (CBS 272.29). Type strains are in bold and are marked with a “ T, ” and newly identified isolates in this study are in white, and proposed synonyms are in orange. Bar = 0.03 represents the estimated number of nucleotide substitutions per site per branch.	Figure 2. Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on the concatenated ITS, TEF 1 α, and TUB 2 sequence data of Pestalotiopsis. The tree topology of the ML analysis was identical to the PP analysis. Support values for maximum likelihood (ML) ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are annotated at the nodes as ML / PP. The tree is rooted with Pseudopestalotiopsis cocos (CBS 272.29). Type strains are in bold and are marked with a “ T, ” and newly identified isolates in this study are in white, and proposed synonyms are in orange. Bar = 0.03 represents the estimated number of nucleotide substitutions per site per branch.	2026-04-06	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong		Zenodo	biologists	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong			
9E9B3F500BA9542BBA82E5C70163F0E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1582325	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.130.175665.figure7	Figure 7. Pestalotiopsis nypae (MFLU 25-0396, holotype). a, b. Leaf spot symptoms on Nypa fruticans; c. Sporodochia on PDA; d, e. Colony on PDA at 1 month post-incubation (obverse, reverse); f – i. Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidial attachment; j – p. Conidia. Scale bars: 500 mm (c); 10 μm (f – p).	Figure 7. Pestalotiopsis nypae (MFLU 25-0396, holotype). a, b. Leaf spot symptoms on Nypa fruticans; c. Sporodochia on PDA; d, e. Colony on PDA at 1 month post-incubation (obverse, reverse); f – i. Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidial attachment; j – p. Conidia. Scale bars: 500 mm (c); 10 μm (f – p).	2026-04-06	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong		Zenodo	biologists	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong			
9E9B3F500BA9542BBA82E5C70163F0E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1582323	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.130.175665.figure5	Figure 5. Split graph displaying the results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of Pestalotiopsis nypae sp. nov. and closely related taxa using Log-Det transformation and splits decomposition options. Φw ≥ 0.05 from the PHI test signifies no substantial recombination in the dataset. The type species are indicated in bold, and the newly identified taxon and isolates are displayed in red.	Figure 5. Split graph displaying the results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of Pestalotiopsis nypae sp. nov. and closely related taxa using Log-Det transformation and splits decomposition options. Φw ≥ 0.05 from the PHI test signifies no substantial recombination in the dataset. The type species are indicated in bold, and the newly identified taxon and isolates are displayed in red.	2026-04-06	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong		Zenodo	biologists	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong			
A5BE837F6D05578C95D73D3ABE83F8F9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1582320	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.130.175665.figure2	Figure 2. Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on the concatenated ITS, TEF 1 α, and TUB 2 sequence data of Pestalotiopsis. The tree topology of the ML analysis was identical to the PP analysis. Support values for maximum likelihood (ML) ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are annotated at the nodes as ML / PP. The tree is rooted with Pseudopestalotiopsis cocos (CBS 272.29). Type strains are in bold and are marked with a “ T, ” and newly identified isolates in this study are in white, and proposed synonyms are in orange. Bar = 0.03 represents the estimated number of nucleotide substitutions per site per branch.	Figure 2. Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on the concatenated ITS, TEF 1 α, and TUB 2 sequence data of Pestalotiopsis. The tree topology of the ML analysis was identical to the PP analysis. Support values for maximum likelihood (ML) ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are annotated at the nodes as ML / PP. The tree is rooted with Pseudopestalotiopsis cocos (CBS 272.29). Type strains are in bold and are marked with a “ T, ” and newly identified isolates in this study are in white, and proposed synonyms are in orange. Bar = 0.03 represents the estimated number of nucleotide substitutions per site per branch.	2026-04-06	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong		Zenodo	biologists	Aumentado, Herbert Dustin R.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Apurillo, Carlo Chris;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard;Jones, E. B. Gareth;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Yu, Long-Feng;Wang, Yong			
