taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
81F72F73801351519AC76BBFFE7B94DF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1779793	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.279.204054.figure5	Figure 5. The newly outlined geographic distribution of each of three major clusters and two varieties of R. franguloides in the Cluster C based on Fig. 4 and Table 4. Dashed ellipses or circles with different colors (blue: Cluster A; purple: Cluster B; green: Cluster C) distinguish each of three clusters from another two. The dotted line within the Cluster C indicates geographic isolation between the two varieties identified in Table 4. Symbols indicate the original identifications, the same as Fig. 2, and type specimens are filled in red color.	Figure 5. The newly outlined geographic distribution of each of three major clusters and two varieties of R. franguloides in the Cluster C based on Fig. 4 and Table 4. Dashed ellipses or circles with different colors (blue: Cluster A; purple: Cluster B; green: Cluster C) distinguish each of three clusters from another two. The dotted line within the Cluster C indicates geographic isolation between the two varieties identified in Table 4. Symbols indicate the original identifications, the same as Fig. 2, and type specimens are filled in red color.	2026-09-18	An, Qianna;Lu, Zhiqiang;Zhou, Xiaolong		Zenodo	biologists	An, Qianna;Lu, Zhiqiang;Zhou, Xiaolong			
6753AECBB22753928EC8CFDB667A91B4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1779793	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.279.204054.figure5	Figure 5. The newly outlined geographic distribution of each of three major clusters and two varieties of R. franguloides in the Cluster C based on Fig. 4 and Table 4. Dashed ellipses or circles with different colors (blue: Cluster A; purple: Cluster B; green: Cluster C) distinguish each of three clusters from another two. The dotted line within the Cluster C indicates geographic isolation between the two varieties identified in Table 4. Symbols indicate the original identifications, the same as Fig. 2, and type specimens are filled in red color.	Figure 5. The newly outlined geographic distribution of each of three major clusters and two varieties of R. franguloides in the Cluster C based on Fig. 4 and Table 4. Dashed ellipses or circles with different colors (blue: Cluster A; purple: Cluster B; green: Cluster C) distinguish each of three clusters from another two. The dotted line within the Cluster C indicates geographic isolation between the two varieties identified in Table 4. Symbols indicate the original identifications, the same as Fig. 2, and type specimens are filled in red color.	2026-09-18	An, Qianna;Lu, Zhiqiang;Zhou, Xiaolong		Zenodo	biologists	An, Qianna;Lu, Zhiqiang;Zhou, Xiaolong			
A0142C4886AC52789D8FF78CD8036E38.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1779793	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.279.204054.figure5	Figure 5. The newly outlined geographic distribution of each of three major clusters and two varieties of R. franguloides in the Cluster C based on Fig. 4 and Table 4. Dashed ellipses or circles with different colors (blue: Cluster A; purple: Cluster B; green: Cluster C) distinguish each of three clusters from another two. The dotted line within the Cluster C indicates geographic isolation between the two varieties identified in Table 4. Symbols indicate the original identifications, the same as Fig. 2, and type specimens are filled in red color.	Figure 5. The newly outlined geographic distribution of each of three major clusters and two varieties of R. franguloides in the Cluster C based on Fig. 4 and Table 4. Dashed ellipses or circles with different colors (blue: Cluster A; purple: Cluster B; green: Cluster C) distinguish each of three clusters from another two. The dotted line within the Cluster C indicates geographic isolation between the two varieties identified in Table 4. Symbols indicate the original identifications, the same as Fig. 2, and type specimens are filled in red color.	2026-09-18	An, Qianna;Lu, Zhiqiang;Zhou, Xiaolong		Zenodo	biologists	An, Qianna;Lu, Zhiqiang;Zhou, Xiaolong			
9F6DC8621CB65F61BCD5C4169C71F21E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1779793	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.279.204054.figure5	Figure 5. The newly outlined geographic distribution of each of three major clusters and two varieties of R. franguloides in the Cluster C based on Fig. 4 and Table 4. Dashed ellipses or circles with different colors (blue: Cluster A; purple: Cluster B; green: Cluster C) distinguish each of three clusters from another two. The dotted line within the Cluster C indicates geographic isolation between the two varieties identified in Table 4. Symbols indicate the original identifications, the same as Fig. 2, and type specimens are filled in red color.	Figure 5. The newly outlined geographic distribution of each of three major clusters and two varieties of R. franguloides in the Cluster C based on Fig. 4 and Table 4. Dashed ellipses or circles with different colors (blue: Cluster A; purple: Cluster B; green: Cluster C) distinguish each of three clusters from another two. The dotted line within the Cluster C indicates geographic isolation between the two varieties identified in Table 4. Symbols indicate the original identifications, the same as Fig. 2, and type specimens are filled in red color.	2026-09-18	An, Qianna;Lu, Zhiqiang;Zhou, Xiaolong		Zenodo	biologists	An, Qianna;Lu, Zhiqiang;Zhou, Xiaolong			
B7FA9E7EBAE457EFAD9B47D204835199.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1779793	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.279.204054.figure5	Figure 5. The newly outlined geographic distribution of each of three major clusters and two varieties of R. franguloides in the Cluster C based on Fig. 4 and Table 4. Dashed ellipses or circles with different colors (blue: Cluster A; purple: Cluster B; green: Cluster C) distinguish each of three clusters from another two. The dotted line within the Cluster C indicates geographic isolation between the two varieties identified in Table 4. Symbols indicate the original identifications, the same as Fig. 2, and type specimens are filled in red color.	Figure 5. The newly outlined geographic distribution of each of three major clusters and two varieties of R. franguloides in the Cluster C based on Fig. 4 and Table 4. Dashed ellipses or circles with different colors (blue: Cluster A; purple: Cluster B; green: Cluster C) distinguish each of three clusters from another two. The dotted line within the Cluster C indicates geographic isolation between the two varieties identified in Table 4. Symbols indicate the original identifications, the same as Fig. 2, and type specimens are filled in red color.	2026-09-18	An, Qianna;Lu, Zhiqiang;Zhou, Xiaolong		Zenodo	biologists	An, Qianna;Lu, Zhiqiang;Zhou, Xiaolong			
B7FA9E7EBAE457EFAD9B47D204835199.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1779789	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.279.204054.figure1	Figure 1. Representative specimens of the R. franguloides complex and Euonymus alatus. A. Type specimen of Microrhamnus taquetii (barcode: A 00003587) from Korea; an annotation by J. - H. Kim (February 1993) on the type sheet identifies this specimen as E. alatus, and this treatment is also supported by Ma (2001); B. Representative specimen of Euonymus alatus (barcode: PE 01700680) from Korea; C. Type specimen of Euonymus alatus var. apertus Loes. (barcode: A 00003586) from China; D. Syntype of Rhamnella franguloides var. franguloides (barcode: K 000723046); E. Holotype of Rhamnella obovalis (barcode: A 00032772); F. Syntype of Berchemia congesta S. Moore (barcode: K 000723049); G. Lectotype of Rhamnella japonica Miq. (barcode: L 0553944); H. Paratype of Rhamnella caudata Merr. (barcode: PE 00023559). Full specimen information and database sources are listed in table SS 1. A. Shows opposite leaves and branches, branches bearing at least two rows of corky wings, subquadrangular branchlets, and rounded winter buds with irregularly and sharply denticulate bud-scale margins. These are key characters of Euonymus alatus, consistent with (B, C). Resembled morphology is shown between (D, G), and between (E, F) or (H).	Figure 1. Representative specimens of the R. franguloides complex and Euonymus alatus. A. Type specimen of Microrhamnus taquetii (barcode: A 00003587) from Korea; an annotation by J. - H. Kim (February 1993) on the type sheet identifies this specimen as E. alatus, and this treatment is also supported by Ma (2001); B. Representative specimen of Euonymus alatus (barcode: PE 01700680) from Korea; C. Type specimen of Euonymus alatus var. apertus Loes. (barcode: A 00003586) from China; D. Syntype of Rhamnella franguloides var. franguloides (barcode: K 000723046); E. Holotype of Rhamnella obovalis (barcode: A 00032772); F. Syntype of Berchemia congesta S. Moore (barcode: K 000723049); G. Lectotype of Rhamnella japonica Miq. (barcode: L 0553944); H. Paratype of Rhamnella caudata Merr. (barcode: PE 00023559). Full specimen information and database sources are listed in table SS 1. A. Shows opposite leaves and branches, branches bearing at least two rows of corky wings, subquadrangular branchlets, and rounded winter buds with irregularly and sharply denticulate bud-scale margins. These are key characters of Euonymus alatus, consistent with (B, C). Resembled morphology is shown between (D, G), and between (E, F) or (H).	2026-09-18	An, Qianna;Lu, Zhiqiang;Zhou, Xiaolong		Zenodo	biologists	An, Qianna;Lu, Zhiqiang;Zhou, Xiaolong			
