taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
CB60802B6BFC577EB99C7E82778E8FE4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552561	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure1	Figure 1. Sexual and asexual forms of Metacapnodiaceae. A. Phialides with a globose to subglobose venter (arrow) and a collarette at the neck, Metacapnodium ericophilum DAOM 234182; B. Globose to subglobose conidiogenous cells produce successive blastic conidia, M. stanhughesii UBC F 35817; C. Synnema (arrow) of tightly compacted conidiophores, bearing conidiogenous cells and conidia at their tips, M. spongiosum (OSC 61673); D. Capnosporium conidia with 2–4 septa, M. stanhughesii UBC F 35817; E. Hormiokrypsis conidia with a straight, multicellular main axis and two multicellular, tapered arms, hormiokrypsis form of Ophiocapnocoma phloiophilia OSC 61673; F. Ascoma with appendages, M. moniliforme DAOM 226251; G. Asci, M. adamantinum OSC 169460; H. Ascospores, M. moniliforme DAOM 226251. Scale bars: 5 µm (A); 20 μm (B, D – H); 50 µm (C).	Figure 1. Sexual and asexual forms of Metacapnodiaceae. A. Phialides with a globose to subglobose venter (arrow) and a collarette at the neck, Metacapnodium ericophilum DAOM 234182; B. Globose to subglobose conidiogenous cells produce successive blastic conidia, M. stanhughesii UBC F 35817; C. Synnema (arrow) of tightly compacted conidiophores, bearing conidiogenous cells and conidia at their tips, M. spongiosum (OSC 61673); D. Capnosporium conidia with 2–4 septa, M. stanhughesii UBC F 35817; E. Hormiokrypsis conidia with a straight, multicellular main axis and two multicellular, tapered arms, hormiokrypsis form of Ophiocapnocoma phloiophilia OSC 61673; F. Ascoma with appendages, M. moniliforme DAOM 226251; G. Asci, M. adamantinum OSC 169460; H. Ascospores, M. moniliforme DAOM 226251. Scale bars: 5 µm (A); 20 μm (B, D – H); 50 µm (C).	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
CB60802B6BFC577EB99C7E82778E8FE4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552564	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure4	Figure 4. Metacapnodium adamantinum (OSC 169460). A. Moniliform hyphae with phialides (arrowheads); B. Ascoma; C. Asci (arrow); D. Ascospores; E. Ascospore bearing a phialide (arrowhead). Scale bars: 20 µm (A, C – E); 50 µm (B).	Figure 4. Metacapnodium adamantinum (OSC 169460). A. Moniliform hyphae with phialides (arrowheads); B. Ascoma; C. Asci (arrow); D. Ascospores; E. Ascospore bearing a phialide (arrowhead). Scale bars: 20 µm (A, C – E); 50 µm (B).	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
F9BC60A61B735DE0BF757481CA53BB98.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552564	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure4	Figure 4. Metacapnodium adamantinum (OSC 169460). A. Moniliform hyphae with phialides (arrowheads); B. Ascoma; C. Asci (arrow); D. Ascospores; E. Ascospore bearing a phialide (arrowhead). Scale bars: 20 µm (A, C – E); 50 µm (B).	Figure 4. Metacapnodium adamantinum (OSC 169460). A. Moniliform hyphae with phialides (arrowheads); B. Ascoma; C. Asci (arrow); D. Ascospores; E. Ascospore bearing a phialide (arrowhead). Scale bars: 20 µm (A, C – E); 50 µm (B).	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
F9BC60A61B735DE0BF757481CA53BB98.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552562	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure2	Figure 2. Maximum likelihood analysis of ITS sequences supports the monophyly of Metacapnodium. Numbers above branches are support values, as transfer bootstrap expectations, Felsenstein bootstrap number and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Verrucariales were selected as the outgroup.	Figure 2. Maximum likelihood analysis of ITS sequences supports the monophyly of Metacapnodium. Numbers above branches are support values, as transfer bootstrap expectations, Felsenstein bootstrap number and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Verrucariales were selected as the outgroup.	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
2D35D849820B534893C7E750C3B120D4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552565	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure5	Figure 5. Metacapnodium atro-olivaceus (DAOM 106914). A. Moniliform hyphae; B. Olivaceous brown M. atro-olivaceus hypha (arrow), beneath much wider, bright brown M. australis hypha from the same mixed subiculum; C. Conidiogenous cell clusters of capnobotrys form; D. Phialides (arrowhead); E. Conidia of capnobotrys form, asterisk designates distal wall thinning. Scale bars: 20 µm (A – C); 10 μm (D, E).	Figure 5. Metacapnodium atro-olivaceus (DAOM 106914). A. Moniliform hyphae; B. Olivaceous brown M. atro-olivaceus hypha (arrow), beneath much wider, bright brown M. australis hypha from the same mixed subiculum; C. Conidiogenous cell clusters of capnobotrys form; D. Phialides (arrowhead); E. Conidia of capnobotrys form, asterisk designates distal wall thinning. Scale bars: 20 µm (A – C); 10 μm (D, E).	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
B4E225457FF75B0BA9088DF7044FF099.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552566	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure6	Figure 6. Metacapnodium australis (DAOM 106914), conidiogenous cells and conidia of capnobotrys form. A. Branched hyphae with conidiogenous cells; B. Enlarged view of conidiogenous cells from 6 A showing conidium attachment at their proximal cells, arrow indicates denticles resulting from secession of conidia; C. Conidia, asterisk designates distal wall thinning; D – G. Hyphae with developing conidiogenous cells. Scale bars: 20 μm (A, B, D – G); 10 μm (C).	Figure 6. Metacapnodium australis (DAOM 106914), conidiogenous cells and conidia of capnobotrys form. A. Branched hyphae with conidiogenous cells; B. Enlarged view of conidiogenous cells from 6 A showing conidium attachment at their proximal cells, arrow indicates denticles resulting from secession of conidia; C. Conidia, asterisk designates distal wall thinning; D – G. Hyphae with developing conidiogenous cells. Scale bars: 20 μm (A, B, D – G); 10 μm (C).	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
B4E225457FF75B0BA9088DF7044FF099.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552562	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure2	Figure 2. Maximum likelihood analysis of ITS sequences supports the monophyly of Metacapnodium. Numbers above branches are support values, as transfer bootstrap expectations, Felsenstein bootstrap number and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Verrucariales were selected as the outgroup.	Figure 2. Maximum likelihood analysis of ITS sequences supports the monophyly of Metacapnodium. Numbers above branches are support values, as transfer bootstrap expectations, Felsenstein bootstrap number and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Verrucariales were selected as the outgroup.	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
07EB3FBFC544550C9E891574BDD4BB5B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552567	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure7	Figure 7. Metacapnodium dingleyae (O 201720). A – E. Capnobotrys form; A, B. Hyphae with conidiogenous cells; C, D. Initial and mature conidia; E. Conidia; F. Phialides (arrowheads); G. Ascoma. Scale bars: 20 μm (A – E, G); 10 μm (F).	Figure 7. Metacapnodium dingleyae (O 201720). A – E. Capnobotrys form; A, B. Hyphae with conidiogenous cells; C, D. Initial and mature conidia; E. Conidia; F. Phialides (arrowheads); G. Ascoma. Scale bars: 20 μm (A – E, G); 10 μm (F).	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
07EB3FBFC544550C9E891574BDD4BB5B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552562	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure2	Figure 2. Maximum likelihood analysis of ITS sequences supports the monophyly of Metacapnodium. Numbers above branches are support values, as transfer bootstrap expectations, Felsenstein bootstrap number and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Verrucariales were selected as the outgroup.	Figure 2. Maximum likelihood analysis of ITS sequences supports the monophyly of Metacapnodium. Numbers above branches are support values, as transfer bootstrap expectations, Felsenstein bootstrap number and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Verrucariales were selected as the outgroup.	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
9B8DFF50A0EB541F8A72515943A2B2D0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552568	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure8	Figure 8. Metacapnodium ericophilum (DAOM 234182). A – C. Moniliform hyphae; D, E. Capnocybe form, synnema; D. Overview; E. Penicillate conidiogenous cells bearing conidia; F. Phialides with subcylindical collarettes (arrowheads); G. Conidia; H. Ascoma initial. Scale bars: 20 µm (A – C, E, G – H); 5 µm (F); 200 µm (D).	Figure 8. Metacapnodium ericophilum (DAOM 234182). A – C. Moniliform hyphae; D, E. Capnocybe form, synnema; D. Overview; E. Penicillate conidiogenous cells bearing conidia; F. Phialides with subcylindical collarettes (arrowheads); G. Conidia; H. Ascoma initial. Scale bars: 20 µm (A – C, E, G – H); 5 µm (F); 200 µm (D).	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
9B8DFF50A0EB541F8A72515943A2B2D0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552562	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure2	Figure 2. Maximum likelihood analysis of ITS sequences supports the monophyly of Metacapnodium. Numbers above branches are support values, as transfer bootstrap expectations, Felsenstein bootstrap number and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Verrucariales were selected as the outgroup.	Figure 2. Maximum likelihood analysis of ITS sequences supports the monophyly of Metacapnodium. Numbers above branches are support values, as transfer bootstrap expectations, Felsenstein bootstrap number and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Verrucariales were selected as the outgroup.	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
B983455C42D05E1EAECF13188BD54B56.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552569	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure9	Figure 9. Metacapnodium juniperi (E 01043363). A. Moniliform hyphae, undergoing anastomosis (arrow); B, C. Phialides (arrowheads) on ascoma initials; D. Ascoma bearing phialides (arrowhead) on appendages; E. Asci (arrow); F. Ascospores. Scale bars: 20 µm.	Figure 9. Metacapnodium juniperi (E 01043363). A. Moniliform hyphae, undergoing anastomosis (arrow); B, C. Phialides (arrowheads) on ascoma initials; D. Ascoma bearing phialides (arrowhead) on appendages; E. Asci (arrow); F. Ascospores. Scale bars: 20 µm.	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
B983455C42D05E1EAECF13188BD54B56.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552562	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure2	Figure 2. Maximum likelihood analysis of ITS sequences supports the monophyly of Metacapnodium. Numbers above branches are support values, as transfer bootstrap expectations, Felsenstein bootstrap number and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Verrucariales were selected as the outgroup.	Figure 2. Maximum likelihood analysis of ITS sequences supports the monophyly of Metacapnodium. Numbers above branches are support values, as transfer bootstrap expectations, Felsenstein bootstrap number and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Verrucariales were selected as the outgroup.	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
CA184EF06723513E8F83E5304E29BA00.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552570	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure10	Figure 10. Metacapnodium moniliforme (DAOM 226251). A. Moniliform hyphae; B, C. Moniliform hyphae with phialides (arrowheads); D – I. Capnobotrys form; D – G. Conidiogenous cells; H. Conidiogenous cell with denticles (arrow) from successive production and secession of conidia; I. Conidia, asterisks designate distal wall thinning; c designates a cornute conidium; J. Conidium of capnosporium form; K. Ascoma initial; L. Ascoma bearing phialides (arrowheads) on appendages; M. Immature and mature asci; N. Ascospores. Scale bars: 20 µm.	Figure 10. Metacapnodium moniliforme (DAOM 226251). A. Moniliform hyphae; B, C. Moniliform hyphae with phialides (arrowheads); D – I. Capnobotrys form; D – G. Conidiogenous cells; H. Conidiogenous cell with denticles (arrow) from successive production and secession of conidia; I. Conidia, asterisks designate distal wall thinning; c designates a cornute conidium; J. Conidium of capnosporium form; K. Ascoma initial; L. Ascoma bearing phialides (arrowheads) on appendages; M. Immature and mature asci; N. Ascospores. Scale bars: 20 µm.	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
CA184EF06723513E8F83E5304E29BA00.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552562	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure2	Figure 2. Maximum likelihood analysis of ITS sequences supports the monophyly of Metacapnodium. Numbers above branches are support values, as transfer bootstrap expectations, Felsenstein bootstrap number and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Verrucariales were selected as the outgroup.	Figure 2. Maximum likelihood analysis of ITS sequences supports the monophyly of Metacapnodium. Numbers above branches are support values, as transfer bootstrap expectations, Felsenstein bootstrap number and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Verrucariales were selected as the outgroup.	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
7F56F13371A35186AD2F6750A204A2C9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552571	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure11	Figure 11. Metacapnodium cf. moniliforme (UBC F 33050). A – G. Wild collected material; A. leaves of Metrosideros sp. covered by mycelia of M. cf. moniliforme and other sooty molds; B – E. Capnobotrys form; B, C. Moniliform hyphae with clusters of conidiogenous cells and conidia; D, E. Conidia of two size classes from the same subiculum, asterisks designating distal wall thinning; c designating cornute conidia; F, G. phialides (arrowheads); H – L. Metacapnodium cf. moniliforme in culture (UBC CCCM F 128); H. Moniliform hyphae with terminal clusters of conidiogenous cells (capnobotrys form); I. Moniliform hypha; J – L. Capnobotrys form; J. Conidiogenous cells and conidia; K. Conidia, asterisks designate distal wall thinning; c designates cornute conidium; L. Conidiogenous cell with denticles (arrow) from successive production and secession of conidia. Scale bars: 20 µm (B, C, H – J); 10 µm (D, E, K, L); 5 µm (F, G).	Figure 11. Metacapnodium cf. moniliforme (UBC F 33050). A – G. Wild collected material; A. leaves of Metrosideros sp. covered by mycelia of M. cf. moniliforme and other sooty molds; B – E. Capnobotrys form; B, C. Moniliform hyphae with clusters of conidiogenous cells and conidia; D, E. Conidia of two size classes from the same subiculum, asterisks designating distal wall thinning; c designating cornute conidia; F, G. phialides (arrowheads); H – L. Metacapnodium cf. moniliforme in culture (UBC CCCM F 128); H. Moniliform hyphae with terminal clusters of conidiogenous cells (capnobotrys form); I. Moniliform hypha; J – L. Capnobotrys form; J. Conidiogenous cells and conidia; K. Conidia, asterisks designate distal wall thinning; c designates cornute conidium; L. Conidiogenous cell with denticles (arrow) from successive production and secession of conidia. Scale bars: 20 µm (B, C, H – J); 10 µm (D, E, K, L); 5 µm (F, G).	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
08461097D5AD57DC84194B78C36BFE67.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552562	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure2	Figure 2. Maximum likelihood analysis of ITS sequences supports the monophyly of Metacapnodium. Numbers above branches are support values, as transfer bootstrap expectations, Felsenstein bootstrap number and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Verrucariales were selected as the outgroup.	Figure 2. Maximum likelihood analysis of ITS sequences supports the monophyly of Metacapnodium. Numbers above branches are support values, as transfer bootstrap expectations, Felsenstein bootstrap number and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Verrucariales were selected as the outgroup.	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
F2B563561FB95E218E06594997CE4EB3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552572	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure12	Figure 12. Metacapnodium novae – zelandiae (DAOM 97302 a). A. Moniliform, branched hyphae; B. Phialides (arrowhead); C – I. Capnocybe form; C – E. Synnematous hyphae from the head of a synnema, showing penicillate branching of elliptical cells, constricted at septa; D. Denticles (arrow) where conidia seceded; F. Overview of synnema; G. Shapes of cells of basal internal synnematous hyphae (E = ellipsoid, P = pyriform, S = subglobose); H. Conidia; I. Conidia bearing phialides (arrowheads). Scale bars: 20 μm (A, C – E, G – I); 5 μm (B); 50 μm (F).	Figure 12. Metacapnodium novae – zelandiae (DAOM 97302 a). A. Moniliform, branched hyphae; B. Phialides (arrowhead); C – I. Capnocybe form; C – E. Synnematous hyphae from the head of a synnema, showing penicillate branching of elliptical cells, constricted at septa; D. Denticles (arrow) where conidia seceded; F. Overview of synnema; G. Shapes of cells of basal internal synnematous hyphae (E = ellipsoid, P = pyriform, S = subglobose); H. Conidia; I. Conidia bearing phialides (arrowheads). Scale bars: 20 μm (A, C – E, G – I); 5 μm (B); 50 μm (F).	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
BF8F837B9EC55C198EFA62EB2C6D15CA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552573	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure13	Figure 13. Metacapnodium pacificus (DAOM 117157 c). A. Intermingled in a subiculum, moniliform hypha of M. pacificus (at left, arrow); hyphae of M. moniliforme (at right, M. mon.) with larger, rounder cells; B – D. Capnobotrys form, clusters of conidiogenous cells; D. Mature, septate conidia near clusters of conidiogenous cells; at the far left (M. sp.), a light brown hypha, possibly of a different Metacapnodium species. Scale bars: 20 μm.	Figure 13. Metacapnodium pacificus (DAOM 117157 c). A. Intermingled in a subiculum, moniliform hypha of M. pacificus (at left, arrow); hyphae of M. moniliforme (at right, M. mon.) with larger, rounder cells; B – D. Capnobotrys form, clusters of conidiogenous cells; D. Mature, septate conidia near clusters of conidiogenous cells; at the far left (M. sp.), a light brown hypha, possibly of a different Metacapnodium species. Scale bars: 20 μm.	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
2D0C91E23D0F50FB9786884EA1D68D24.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552574	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure14	Figure 14. Metacapnodium spongiosum (OSC 61673). A. Moniliform hyphae; B. Phialides (arrowheads); C – E. Capnocybe form, synnema; C. Overview, cy = cylindrical internal hyphae; D. Tips of synnematous hyphae with conidia; E. Conidia. Scale bars: 20 µm (A, D, E); 5 µm (B); 50 µm (C).	Figure 14. Metacapnodium spongiosum (OSC 61673). A. Moniliform hyphae; B. Phialides (arrowheads); C – E. Capnocybe form, synnema; C. Overview, cy = cylindrical internal hyphae; D. Tips of synnematous hyphae with conidia; E. Conidia. Scale bars: 20 µm (A, D, E); 5 µm (B); 50 µm (C).	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
B0648159CDBD52099993A133B4EFB7A5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552575	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure15	Figure 15. Metacapnodium stanhughesii (UBC F 35817, holotype). A. Taxus sp., host of M. stanhughesii; B. Trunk of Taxus sp. colonized by M. stanhughesii (arrow); C – F. Capnobotrys form; C, D, F. Moniliform hyphae with conidiogenous cell clusters; E. Conidia, asterisks designate distal wall thinning; c designates one of the cornute conidia; F. Denticles (arrow) on conidiogenous cell; G. Phialides (arrowheads); H – K. Capnosporium form; H. Conidia (arrows); I. Pores (arrow); K. Capnosporium conidia showing variation in septation. Scale bars: 20 μm (C, D, H – K); 10 μm (E, G); 5 μm (F).	Figure 15. Metacapnodium stanhughesii (UBC F 35817, holotype). A. Taxus sp., host of M. stanhughesii; B. Trunk of Taxus sp. colonized by M. stanhughesii (arrow); C – F. Capnobotrys form; C, D, F. Moniliform hyphae with conidiogenous cell clusters; E. Conidia, asterisks designate distal wall thinning; c designates one of the cornute conidia; F. Denticles (arrow) on conidiogenous cell; G. Phialides (arrowheads); H – K. Capnosporium form; H. Conidia (arrows); I. Pores (arrow); K. Capnosporium conidia showing variation in septation. Scale bars: 20 μm (C, D, H – K); 10 μm (E, G); 5 μm (F).	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
B0648159CDBD52099993A133B4EFB7A5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552570	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure10	Figure 10. Metacapnodium moniliforme (DAOM 226251). A. Moniliform hyphae; B, C. Moniliform hyphae with phialides (arrowheads); D – I. Capnobotrys form; D – G. Conidiogenous cells; H. Conidiogenous cell with denticles (arrow) from successive production and secession of conidia; I. Conidia, asterisks designate distal wall thinning; c designates a cornute conidium; J. Conidium of capnosporium form; K. Ascoma initial; L. Ascoma bearing phialides (arrowheads) on appendages; M. Immature and mature asci; N. Ascospores. Scale bars: 20 µm.	Figure 10. Metacapnodium moniliforme (DAOM 226251). A. Moniliform hyphae; B, C. Moniliform hyphae with phialides (arrowheads); D – I. Capnobotrys form; D – G. Conidiogenous cells; H. Conidiogenous cell with denticles (arrow) from successive production and secession of conidia; I. Conidia, asterisks designate distal wall thinning; c designates a cornute conidium; J. Conidium of capnosporium form; K. Ascoma initial; L. Ascoma bearing phialides (arrowheads) on appendages; M. Immature and mature asci; N. Ascospores. Scale bars: 20 µm.	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
AA2661F2617F5D738F7F50481025B015.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552576	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure16	Figure 16. Metacapnodium vancouverensis (UBC F 35816). A. Leaf surfaces of Pieris japonica colonized by Metacapnodium vancouverensis and other sooty molds; B. Tapering hyphae of doliiform cells; C. Mixed bluish hyphae of M. vancouverensis (to the right) with brown Fumiglobus pieridicola (Fum) hyphae to the left; D, E. Capnobotrys form; D. Cluster of conidiogenous cells; E. Conidia (asterisks designate distal wall thinning). Scale bars: 20 μm (B – D); 10 μm (E).	Figure 16. Metacapnodium vancouverensis (UBC F 35816). A. Leaf surfaces of Pieris japonica colonized by Metacapnodium vancouverensis and other sooty molds; B. Tapering hyphae of doliiform cells; C. Mixed bluish hyphae of M. vancouverensis (to the right) with brown Fumiglobus pieridicola (Fum) hyphae to the left; D, E. Capnobotrys form; D. Cluster of conidiogenous cells; E. Conidia (asterisks designate distal wall thinning). Scale bars: 20 μm (B – D); 10 μm (E).	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
7BCF3CE4E29E53E68CC0921469C6E648.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1552578	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067.figure18	Figure 18. Ophiocapnocoma phloiophilia (OSC 61673). A – E. Young and mature porospores (hormiokrypsis); F. Porospore bearing phialides (arrowhead); G. Perithecium; H. Asci; I – N. Ascospores. Scale bars: 20 µm.	Figure 18. Ophiocapnocoma phloiophilia (OSC 61673). A – E. Young and mature porospores (hormiokrypsis); F. Porospore bearing phialides (arrowhead); G. Perithecium; H. Asci; I – N. Ascospores. Scale bars: 20 µm.	2026-03-04	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.		Zenodo	biologists	Aliabadi, Faezeh;Le Renard, Ludovic;Berbee, Mary L.			
