taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
825087EFFFF9200F8F62F7B92CCD93AD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14828821/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14828821	Figure 1. Summarized results from the retroposon study by Dodt et al. (2017) and the genomic phylogeny of Nilsson et al. (2017) showing supporting (red circles) and conflicting (black circles) retroposons, and mximum likelihood bootstrap support, respectively. Photographs show (from the top) Macropus giganteus, Osphranter rufus, Wallabia bicolor and Notamacropus rufogriseus Photograph credits: C. Fruciano, M. Celik and M. Phillips.	Figure 1. Summarized results from the retroposon study by Dodt et al. (2017) and the genomic phylogeny of Nilsson et al. (2017) showing supporting (red circles) and conflicting (black circles) retroposons, and mximum likelihood bootstrap support, respectively. Photographs show (from the top) Macropus giganteus, Osphranter rufus, Wallabia bicolor and Notamacropus rufogriseus Photograph credits: C. Fruciano, M. Celik and M. Phillips.	2019-07-31	Celik, Mélina;Cascini, Manuela;Haouchar, Dalal;Van Der Burg, Chloe;Dodt, William;Evans, Alistair R;Prentis, Peter;Bunce, Michael;Fruciano, Carmelo;Phillips, Matthew J		Zenodo	biologists	Celik, Mélina;Cascini, Manuela;Haouchar, Dalal;Van Der Burg, Chloe;Dodt, William;Evans, Alistair R;Prentis, Peter;Bunce, Michael;Fruciano, Carmelo;Phillips, Matthew J			
