identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
7F7C87B0D544FFBF8D96FF3B73A74CE6.text	7F7C87B0D544FFBF8D96FF3B73A74CE6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Othniocryptus Sharp 1900	<div><p>Genus Othniocryptus Sharp, 1900</p><p>Othniocryptus Sharp, 1900: 598; Schenkling, 1923: 17; Blackwelder, 1945: 429; Sen Gupta &amp; Crowson, 1971: 18, fig. 4H; Leschen &amp; Węgrzynowicz, 1998: 232; Leschen 2003: 30, 32.</p><p>Type species: Othniocryptus variegatus Sharp, 1900, by monotypy.</p><p>Key to the species of Othniocryptus Sharp, 1900</p><p>1 Antennomere VIII not distinctly wider than VII; metatarsomeres I–IV slightly elongate (&gt; 0.6× metatarsus length); elytra with two complete sinuous black bands formed by differences in pubescence color, plus additional irregular dark markings; species from Panama ........................................................... O. variegatus Sharp, 1900</p><p>- Antennomere VIII distinctly wider than VII; metatarsomeres I–IV more compact (~ 0.5× metatarsus length); elytra with sinuous black bands formed by differences in pubescence color or with a single black macula at mid-length; species from southeastern Brazil ................................................................................. 2</p><p>2 Body brownish; elytra with a sinuous black band at mid-length and a triangular dark macula in scutellar region; pronotum distinctly transverse (length = 0.72–0.75× width); pubescence longer; prosternum brownish medially; median lobe of aedeagus straight apically, anterior struts longer (~ 3.9× lobe length), not excavated apically; states of São Paulo and Minas Gerais ........................................................................ O. ypirangensis sp. nov.</p><p>- Body reddish; elytra with a central black macula along the suture, lacking a complete sinuous band (maybe due to loss of setae); pronotum less transverse (length = 0.85× width); pubescence shorter; prosternum entirely black; male genitalia with median lobe evenly curved, anterior struts shorter (~ 3.7× lobe length), apical expansion distinctly excavated; state of Santa Catarina ................................................................... O. centromaculatus sp. nov.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F7C87B0D544FFBF8D96FF3B73A74CE6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Silva, Thiago J.	Silva, Thiago J. (2026): Othniocryptus Sharp, 1900 (Coleoptera: Erotylidae: Xenoscelinae): description of two new species from Brazil and lectotype designation for O. variegatus Sharp. Zootaxa 5752 (3): 348-362, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5752.3.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5752.3.2
7F7C87B0D544FFBF8D96FBF7759448D2.text	7F7C87B0D544FFBF8D96FBF7759448D2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Othniocryptus variegatus Sharp 1900	<div><p>Othniocryptus variegatus Sharp, 1900</p><p>(Figs 1, 8)</p><p>Othniocryptus variegatus Sharp, 1900: 599, pl. 18, fig. 17; Schenkling, 1923: 17; Blackwelder, 1945: 429.</p><p>Type Material. LECTOTYPE, here designated (unsexed— NHMUK) “ Othniocryptus / variegatus / Type D.S. / Chiriqui // Type // Sp. figured // V. de Chiriqui, / 4000–6000 ft. / Champion. // B.C.A., Col., II(1) // Syntype // [QRcode] / NHMUK015535851 ” . PARALECTOTYPE (unsexed— NHMUK) “ Othniocryptus / variegatus / D.S. / Chiriqui // V. de Chiriqui, / 4000–6000 ft. / Champion. // See slide / Coll. No. // B.C.A., Col., II(1) // Syntype // [QRcode] / NHMUK015535852 ” .</p><p>Diagnosis</p><p>Overall colour light brown; antennomere IV narrower than III; width of antennomere VIII approximately same of VII; length of pronotum ~ 0.8× width; elytra with two transverse sinuous bands made by dark pubescence contrasting with yellow setae, subjacent cuticle black beneath the dark pubescence; length of metatarsomeres I–IV ~ 0.6× length of metatarsus.</p><p>Remarks. The type material of O. variegatus consists of two syntypes deposited at the NHMUK, both from Volcán de Chiriquí, Panama (Fig. 8), which were examined through habitus photographs kindly provided by Keita Matsumoto (Fig. 1). The external characters are given by Sharp (1900) in the original description and later supplemented by Sen Gupta &amp; Crowson (1971) in their discussion of generic features. Two complete sinuous black bands on the elytra are clearly visible in both specimens, along with additional irregular bands as described by Sharp, particularly in the specimen that was illustrated in the original description, NHMUK015535851 (Figs 1A–B). The metatarsus of this specimen appears less slender than that of the other syntype, which may reflect sexual dimorphism, although this difference was not observed in the new species described herein.To account for these minor differences between the two specimens and to ensure nomenclatural stability, the specimen NHMUK015535851 is hereby designated as the lectotype of Othniocryptus variegatus Sharp.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F7C87B0D544FFBF8D96FBF7759448D2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Silva, Thiago J.	Silva, Thiago J. (2026): Othniocryptus Sharp, 1900 (Coleoptera: Erotylidae: Xenoscelinae): description of two new species from Brazil and lectotype designation for O. variegatus Sharp. Zootaxa 5752 (3): 348-362, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5752.3.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5752.3.2
7F7C87B0D545FFB48D96F969775D4E8B.text	7F7C87B0D545FFB48D96F969775D4E8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Othniocryptus ypirangensis Silva 2026	<div><p>Othniocryptus ypirangensis, sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 2–5, 8)</p><p>Type Material. HOLOTYPE: unsexed (MZSP 67395) “ BRASIL: SP, São Paulo, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-46.609997&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-23.587223" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -46.609997/lat -23.587223)">Parque da / Independência</a>. 23°35’14”S, / 46°36’36”W. Light trap. / 16.xi.2023. T.J. Silva, S. Casari &amp; / C. Moreno leg.” PARATYPES: 1♂ (dissected), 1♀ (dissected), 2 unsexed (MZSP 67396 – 67399) “ Pouso Alegre / M. Gerais — Brasil / IX.962 / F.S. Pereira col.”</p><p>Diagnosis</p><p>Body dark brown, elytra with a sinuous black band on mid-length; diameter of 3 eye facets = antennomere II length; antennomere VIII wider than VII; mandibles sexually dimorphic; length of pronotum = 0.72–0.75× width; discrimen extending 0.55× metaventrite length; CuA 1 0.68× length of CuA 1+2; paramerers 3.2× longer than wide bearing 8–10 setae at apex; median lobe straight apically; anterior biflagellate struts about 3.9× length of median lobe with apical expansion not excavated; gonocoxite 2.2× longer than wide; gonostyle 0.24× gonocoxite length.</p><p>Description. Total length = 3.8–4.0mm (holotype = 4.0mm), width = 1.4–1.5mm (holotype = 1.5mm) (n = 5). Body oval-elongate in dorsal view (Fig. 2A), subcylindrical, greatest width at mid-length of elytra, convex dorsally in lateral view (Fig. 2C). Body entirely brownish, opaque, with black marks on pronotum and elytra; disc of pronotum with a subtrapezoidal blackish macula and two black spots on posterior margin, at the beginning of posterior pronotal projection; elytra with a triangular blackish area on scutellar region, one sinuous black band on mid-length, nearly overlapping the black pubescence; sides of prosternum, hypomeron and metasternum black; antennae and legs slightly paler than body. Body densely covered with bicolored, black and yellow, long pubescence; dorsal and ventral surfaces strongly punctate. Head (Figs 2D–E) width = 0.7× pronotal width, gradually narrowed anteriorly, surface slightly convex; strongly and densely punctate dorsally, distance of punctures less than puncture diameter, sparser ventrally; densely covered with semirecumbent pubescence dorsally, associated with punctures. Head width = 0.8–0.9mm; dorsal interocular distance = 0.5–0.6mm; ventral interocular distance = 0.6–0.7mm. Eyes prominent, hemispheric, coarsely faceted, diameter of 3 facets = antennomere II width, ocular setae absent. Posterior portion of vertex differentiated in punctures and pubescence, with a pair of broad stridulatory files; transverse vertexal line absent. Antennae moderately elongate, extending almost to posterior edge of pronotum; antennomere I large, subcylindrical; II cylindrical; III–VII obconical, IV slightly shorter than III and V; VIII obconical, weakly expanded, wider than VII; club large, transversely rounded; antennomeres IX and X subequal, narrowed at base, X slightly wider; XI asymmetrical, 1.3× longer than wide, somewhat pointed at apex. Frontoclypeal suture absent. Clypeus with anterior margin straight, strongly punctate (Fig. 2D). Labrum (Fig. 5A) transverse with anterior angles rounded, densely pubescent. Mandibles (Figs 3A–C, 5B–C) sexually dimorphic; slightly asymmetrical on male (Figs 3A–B), subtriangular, short and broad, deeply emarginate antebasally, before condyle; apex bidentate; apical teeth irregularly serrate on left mandible on male, basal teeth shorter and rounded; laterodorsally pubescent, setae longer near apex; mola well developed, on basal third, subtriangular, with transverse micro ridges, molar surface larger on right mandible on male; prostheca membranous, densely pubescent apically. Maxilla (Figs 3D–E, 5D) with cardo elongate, narrowed at basal half, with few setae on distal half; basistipes elongate, 2× longer than wide at base, sparsely pubescent, with a long seta as long as basistipes near base; mediostipes broad and weakly sclerotized; galea narrow and elongate, rounded and densely pubescent at apex; lacinia almost as long as galea, narrow, covered by pubescence along entire length, setae increasing in size and denser toward apex, which bears a pair of sclerotized hooks; palpiger evident, wide; maxillary palpomeres covered by moderate sparse pubescence; palpomere I elongate and narrowed at middle; II almost as long as wide, abruptly narrowed at base; III as wide and slightly shorter than II; IV fusiform, asymmetrical, apex rounded, as long as the precedent combined, 2× as long as wide. Labium (Fig. 3F) with mentum trapezoidal, 0.5× as long as wide, with triangular carinae on basal half, anterior edge slightly projected at middle, sparsely pubescent laterally; prementum band-like, narrower than mentum, partially membranous, with a wide sclerite between palpi, cleft anteriorly, reaching ligula and bearing short setae; ligula membranous, transverse, widening anteriorly with anterior angles prominent and rounded, densely pubescent; palpiger broad and sclerotized; labial palpomeres moderately pubescent; I elongate, curved and narrowed medially; II short and wide, narrowed at base; III subsecuriform, 1.65× as long as wide. Genal projection with apex rounded; gular area with transverse groove present, curved anteriorly on sides.</p><p>Thorax. Pronotum (Figs 2A, 2D) transverse, strongly convex, widest at posterior two-thirds, length = 0.72– 0.75× width; disc with punctures and pubescence as vertex of head; distinct marginal bead laterally and posteriorly, less distinct anteriorly; anterior angles not projecting forward, rounded in dorsal view; posterior angles weakly obtuse; lateral margins rounded, almost straight near anterior angles; anterior margin evenly rounded; posterior margin broadly projecting posteriorly, projection beginning near posterior angles. Prosternum (Fig. 2B) strongly punctate, distance between punctures = 1–2× puncture diameter, bearing setae shorter than dorsal pubescence; distance from coxae to anterior margin = 1.5× diameter of coxae, anterior margin strongly marginated, finely denticulate with row of anteriorly directed setae; prosternal process convex, about 0.45× as wide as procoxae, very slightly expanded at apex, apex truncate. Scutellar shield transverse, elliptical, 0.43× as long as wide. Elytra (Figs 2A, C) elongate-oval, very convex; 1.7× as long as wide and 2.8× as long as pronotum, greatest width at mid-length; without basal marginal bead; densely and irregularly punctate, without striae, punctures less coarse toward apex, bearing bicolored, semirecumbent setae. Mesoventrite (Fig. 2B) strongly punctate, distance between punctures less than puncture diameter; mesoventral intercoxal process elevated. Metaventrite (Fig. 2B) not strongly transverse, lacking submesocoxal lines, discrimen extending 0.55× of sclerite length; weakly glossy, strongly punctate, bearing short setae; metendosternite (Fig. 4A) with median stalk well developed, 0.88× as long as wide, lamina slender and elongate, anterior process short and broad, anterior tendons widely separated. Hind wing (Fig. 4B) with apical field almost half wing length, medial fleck evident, CuA 1 0.68× length of CuA 1+2, wedge cell present, anal embayment extending to level of half the length of wedge cell. Legs moderately robust, similar in shape and length, with short pubescence. Procoxae slightly oval, mesocoxae circular, metacoxae transverse; trochanters obliquely truncate apically, shorter in anterior legs; femora robust; tibiae slightly longer than femora, weakly expanded toward apex, almost parallel-sided, with pair of apical spurs. Tarsi slender, lacking tarsal pads; tarsomeres I–IV gradually shortening, meso-metatarsomere I slightly longer than protarsomere I; tarsomere IV evident; tarsomere V almost as long as proceeding tarsomeres combined; tarsal ventral pubescence concentrate at apex.</p><p>Abdomen. Ventrite 1 with intercoxal process acute; submetacoxal line absent; relative length of ventrites (medially, including intercoxal process) 2.2 • 1.4 • 1.0 • 1.0 • 1.4; ventrite 5 evenly rounded at posterior margin; all ventrites strongly punctate, separated by 1–3× puncture diameter, bearing short recumbent setae. Male. Genital capsule (Fig. 4C) with proctiger (TIX) spoon-shaped, spiculum gastrale symmetrical, 2.6× length of sclerite; sternite IX elongate, gradually narrowed toward apex, pubescent at posterolateral margin; proctiger (TX) elongate, strongly emarginate anteriorly, apex rounded with fringe of setae; tegmen (Fig. 4D) with basal piece not broadened, poorly sclerotized except for pairs of ventral and dorsal lines of sclerotization; paramerers parallel-sided in dorsal view, 3.2× longer than wide, somewhat flattened, with asymmetrical, irregularly rounded apices, bearing 8–10 setae; median lobe (Figs 4E, 4G) elongate, slightly curved at basal ⅓, straight apically, apex asymmetrically rounded, less sclerotized and bearing sensillae, anterior biflagellate struts about 3.9× length of median lobe with apical expansion not excavated (Fig. 4F), internal sac not very long with sclerotized ejaculatory duct present and fiber-like structure near median lobe. Female. S8 (Fig. 5F) transverse, 0.37× as long as wide, posterior margin straight, pubescence dense with long setae, spiculum ventrale 2.6× sclerite length; ovipositor (Figs 5E–F) not elongate; gonocoxite 2.2× longer than wide at maximum width, curved and rounded at apex, sinuate-type (see Leschen, 2003: 72), densely pubescent with setae as long as gonostyle; gonostyle (Fig. 5F) subapically inserted on gonocoxite, parallel-sided, 0.24× as long as gonocoxite, apex bearing 3–5 setae; spermatheca (Fig. 5G) with distal capsule oval-dilated, spermathecal duct coiled.</p><p>Sexual dimorphism.The only differences found in general morphology between the sexes were in the mandibles. Unlike males, the mandibles of the female (Figs 5B–C) are symmetrical and lack subapical serrations on the left mandible. During the slide mounting, the female’s mandibles were accidentally damaged, which conveniently allowed the visualization of the molar surface.</p><p>Variation. The paratypes exhibit a lighter body coloration than the holotype, with a variable macula on the pronotum and a fainter elytral band.The black triangular macula in the scutellar region of the elytra is more pronounced in the paratypes. This color variation may be attributed to intraspecific differences between the populations from the two collection sites (São Paulo and Minas Gerais), which may be common in the genus, as noted by Leschen (2003). The observed differences could also result from differing collection dates (1962 and 2023) or variation in fixation techniques, with potential alterations commonly seen in older pinned beetles. Aside from differences in body size and general coloration, no additional intraspecific variation was observed.</p><p>Distribution. Southeastern Brazil, in the states of Minas Gerais and São Paulo (Fig. 8).</p><p>Etymology. The species is named after the old denomination of its type locality, the Ipiranga (Ypiranga) District of São Paulo (derived from the Tupi-Guarani language, meaning “red river”), where the holotype was collected.</p><p>Remarks. Othniocryptus ypirangensis sp. nov. can be distinguished from O. centromaculatus sp. nov. by the shape of the pronotum, which is distinctly more transverse and differs in the proportional length at which it is widest. Additionally, it differs in body coloration, being less reddish, with the thorax not completely black ventrally, as well as in male genitalia. The mouthparts and genitalia of the female examined by Leschen (2003), possibly an O. centromaculatus female, is similar to those of the O. ypirangensis (Richard Leschen, personal communication). In comparison to O. variegatus, the metatarsi in O. ypirangensis are not variable among specimens, and the elytral pattern appears to lack the additional and interrupted bands, that may be obfuscated by the loss of white setae, thus fresh, undamaged specimens are required to confirm the colouration. Moreover, O. ypirangensis has subapical serrations on the left mandible of the male, two lacinial spines and ligula wider than prementum, differing in these mouthpart features from an unidentified Othniocryptus species examined by Leschen (2003), which lacked serrations on the mandible, had a single lacinial spine and ligular membrane equal in width to the prementum. Additionally, the wing venation presents a slight difference in CuA 1 compared to an unidentified Othniocryptus wing provided by Lawrence et al. (2021).</p><p>Othniocryptus ypirangensis sp. nov. closely resembles O. variegatus in its elytral pattern. Leschen (2003) examined Othniocryptus specimens from South America and noted potential intraspecific color variation, though he did not specify the regions from which those specimens originated. During recent visits to Brazilian collections housing numerous beetles from the Amazon Forest, no specimens of the genus were found. Since the cladistic study of Leschen (2003) did not include male genital characters and no specimens of the genus were examined from localities between Panama and southeastern Brazil, in addition to the differences listed above, I propose making the new name available for further studies on variation within Othniocryptus, once additional specimens are collected from diverse sites.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F7C87B0D545FFB48D96F969775D4E8B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Silva, Thiago J.	Silva, Thiago J. (2026): Othniocryptus Sharp, 1900 (Coleoptera: Erotylidae: Xenoscelinae): description of two new species from Brazil and lectotype designation for O. variegatus Sharp. Zootaxa 5752 (3): 348-362, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5752.3.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5752.3.2
7F7C87B0D54FFFB68D96FE1A778A4C7B.text	7F7C87B0D54FFFB68D96FE1A778A4C7B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Othniocryptus centromaculatus Silva 2026	<div><p>Othniocryptus centromaculatus sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 6–8)</p><p>Type Material. HOLOTYPE: ♂ (MZSP 67400) “ xii.1952 / Brasilien [Brazil] / Nova Teutonia / 27°11’B[S] – 52°23’L[W] / Fritz Plaumann / 300 – 500 m ”</p><p>Diagnosis</p><p>Body reddish, elytra with a single black macula near suture on mid-length; diameter of 4 eye facets = antennomere II length; antennomere IV narrower than III; antennomere VIII wider than VII; length of pronotum = 0.85× width; discrimen extending 0.62× metaventrite length; paramerers 3.4× longer than wide bearing more than 10 setae at apex; median lobe evenly curved along entire length; anterior biflagellate struts about 3.7× length of median lobe with apical expansion excavated.</p><p>Description. Total length = 3.5mm, width = 1.3mm. Body oval-elongate in dorsal view (Fig. 6A), subcylindrical, greatest width at mid-length of elytra, convex dorsally in lateral view (Fig. 6C). Body reddish, opaque, with black marks on pronotum and elytra; disc of pronotum with elongate subelliptical blackish macula and two black spots on posterior margin, at the beginning of basal pronotal projection; elytra with a triangular black macula on mid-length at suture; prosternum, hypomeron and metasternum black; antennae and legs same color as body. Body densely covered with bicolored long pubescence; dorsal and ventral surfaces strongly and densely punctate (Figs 6A–D). Head (Figs 6D–E) width = 0.79× pronotal width, gradually narrowed anteriorly, surface slightly convex; strongly punctate dorsally, distance of punctures 0.5–2.0× puncture diameter, sparser ventrally; densely covered with semirecumbent pubescence dorsally, associated with punctures. Head width = 0.8mm; dorsal interocular distance = 0.5mm; ventral interocular distance = 0.6mm. Eyes prominent, hemispheric, coarsely faceted, diameter of 4 facets = antennomere II width, ocular setae absent. Antennae moderately elongate, extending almost to posterior edge of pronotum; antennomere I large, subcylindric; II cylindric; III–VII obconic, IV slightly shorter and narrower than III and V; VIII obconic, weakly expanded, wider than VII; club large, transversely rounded; antennomeres IX and X subequals, narrowed at base, X slightly wider; XI asymmetrical, 1.3× longer than wide, somewhat pointed at apex. Frontoclypeal suture absent. Clypeus with anterior margin straight (Fig. 6D). Labrum transverse with anterior angles rounded, densely pubescent. Genal projection with apex rounded; gular area with transverse groove present, curved anteriorly on sides.</p><p>Thorax. Pronotum (Figs 6A–D) weakly transverse, strongly convex, widest at posterior two-thirds, length = 0.85× width; disc with punctures and pubescence as vertex of head; distinct marginal bead laterally and posteriorly, less distinct anteriorly; anterior angles not projecting forward, rounded in dorsal view; posterior angles weakly obtuse; lateral margins rounded, almost straight near anterior angles; anterior margin evenly rounded; posterior margin broadly projecting posteriorly, projection beginning near posterior angles. Prosternum (Fig. 6B) strongly punctate, distance between punctures = 1–2× puncture diameter, bearing setae shorter than dorsal pubescence; distance from coxae to anterior margin = 1.76× diameter of coxae, anterior margin strongly marginated, finely denticulate with row of anteriorly directed setae; prosternal process convex, about 0.51× as wide as procoxae, very slightly expanded at apex, apex truncate. Scutellar shield transverse, elliptical, 0.51× as long as wide. Elytra (Figs 6A, 6C) elongate-oval, very convex; 1.7× as long as wide and 2.8× as long as pronotum, greatest width at mid-length; without basal marginal bead; densely and irregularly punctate, without striae, punctures less coarse toward apex, bearing bicolored, semirecumbent setae. Mesoventrite (Fig. 6B) strongly punctate, distance of punctures less than puncture diameter; mesoventral intercoxal process elevated. Metaventrite (Fig. 6B) not strongly transverse, lacking submesocoxal lines, discrimen extending 0.62× of sclerite length; weakly glossy, strongly punctate, mainly at sides, bearing short setae. Legs moderately robust, similar in shape and length, with short pubescence. Procoxae slightly oval, mesocoxae circular, metacoxae transverse; trochanters obliquely truncate apically, shorter in anterior legs; femora robust; tibiae slightly longer than femora, weakly expanded toward apex, almost parallel-sided, with pair of apical spurs. Tarsi slender, lacking tarsal pads; tarsomeres I–IV gradually shortening, meso-metatarsomere I slightly longer than protarsomere I; tarsomere IV evident; tarsomere V almost as long as proceeding tarsomeres combined; tarsal ventral pubescence concentrate at apex.</p><p>Abdomen. Ventrite 1 with intercoxal process acute; submetacoxal line absent; relative length of ventrites (medially, including intercoxal process) 1.8 • 1.2 • 1.1 • 1.0 • 1.2; ventrite 5 evenly rounded at posterior margin; all ventrites strongly punctate, separated by 2–4× puncture diameter, bearing short recumbent setae. Male. Tegmen (Fig. 7A) with basal piece not broadened, poorly sclerotized except for pairs of ventral and dorsal lines of sclerotization; paramerers parallel-sided in dorsal view, 3.4× longer than wide, somewhat flattened, with asymmetrical, irregularly rounded apices bearing more than 10 setae; median lobe (Figs 7B–C) elongate, evenly curved along entire length, apex asymmetrically rounded, less sclerotized and bearing sensillae, anterior biflagellate struts about 3.7× length of median lobe with apical expansion excavated (Fig. 7D), internal sac not very long with sclerotized ejaculatory duct present and fiber-like structure basally. Female. See remarks.</p><p>Distribution. Southern Brazil, in Santa Catarina state (Fig. 8).</p><p>Etymology. The species is named after the presence of a subrectangular black macula located at the center of the elytral disc, along the suture, which is clearly distinguishable from the reddish background.</p><p>Remarks. The female of Othniocryptus dissected and used in the cladistic work of Leschen (2003) belongs to O. centromaculatus sp. nov., collected at the same site by the same collector. Its morphological characters match those of the female of O. ypirangensis sp. nov. described in this work (R. Leschen pers. comm.). Othniocryptus centromaculatus is clearly distinguishable from other species of the genus by its notably reddish body color, lacking the complete black bands on the elytra and the thorax being entirely black ventrally. Despite the elytral coloration in this genus being partially the result of differences in setae coloration, in O. ypirangensis and O. variegatus the underlying cuticle in the bands is distinctly darkened. Nevertheless, the clearly blackish macula of O. centromaculatus may be more evident due to the partial abrasion of setae in that region. It also differs by having the pronotum less transverse and shorter pubescence compared to the other species. In the male genitalia, it differs from O. ypirangensis in the shape of the median lobe and the excavation (Fig. 7D) of the expanded apex and relative length of the anterior struts. The distinct differences in male genitalia and body coloration are sufficient to recognize these as separate species.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F7C87B0D54FFFB68D96FE1A778A4C7B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Silva, Thiago J.	Silva, Thiago J. (2026): Othniocryptus Sharp, 1900 (Coleoptera: Erotylidae: Xenoscelinae): description of two new species from Brazil and lectotype designation for O. variegatus Sharp. Zootaxa 5752 (3): 348-362, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5752.3.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5752.3.2
