taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
DF9C85D129BF5ECAB0DD078F24B5D08C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1695027	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.134.187344.figure4	Figure 4. Dominikia tatrensis. A. Fused clusters with spores; one single cluster (sc) is indicated; B. Single cluster with spores (sp); C. Radially arranged spores (sp) with subtending hyphae (sh) branched from a centrally positioned thick-walled swollen cell (sc); soil debris (sd) between spores is indicated; D, E. Spore wall layers (swl) 1–4; F – H. Spore wall layers (swl) 1–4 continuous with subtending hyphal wall layers (shwl) 1–4; r in (F) = remnants of shwl 4; septum (s) separating the space between the subtending hyphal lumen and spore interior is indicated; A, B, C, F, G. Spores in PVLG; D, E, H. Spores in PVLG + Melzer’s reagent; A – H. Differential interference microscopy. Scale bars: 50 μm (A, B); 20 μm (C); 10 μm (D – H).	Figure 4. Dominikia tatrensis. A. Fused clusters with spores; one single cluster (sc) is indicated; B. Single cluster with spores (sp); C. Radially arranged spores (sp) with subtending hyphae (sh) branched from a centrally positioned thick-walled swollen cell (sc); soil debris (sd) between spores is indicated; D, E. Spore wall layers (swl) 1–4; F – H. Spore wall layers (swl) 1–4 continuous with subtending hyphal wall layers (shwl) 1–4; r in (F) = remnants of shwl 4; septum (s) separating the space between the subtending hyphal lumen and spore interior is indicated; A, B, C, F, G. Spores in PVLG; D, E, H. Spores in PVLG + Melzer’s reagent; A – H. Differential interference microscopy. Scale bars: 50 μm (A, B); 20 μm (C); 10 μm (D – H).	2026-06-24	Błaszkowski, Janusz;Milczarski, Paweł;Malinowski, Ryszard;Niezgoda, Piotr;Goto, Bruno Tomio;Ronikier, Anna;Stanek, Małgorzata;Janik, Paulina;Zubek, Szymon		Zenodo	biologists	Błaszkowski, Janusz;Milczarski, Paweł;Malinowski, Ryszard;Niezgoda, Piotr;Goto, Bruno Tomio;Ronikier, Anna;Stanek, Małgorzata;Janik, Paulina;Zubek, Szymon			
DF9C85D129BF5ECAB0DD078F24B5D08C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1695025	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.134.187344.figure2	Figure 2. A 50 % majority-rule consensus tree from the Bayesian analysis of 45 S nuc rDNA sequences concatenated with rpb 1 sequences of Dominikia tatrensis (= Isolate 530) representing the ingroup and 13 other Dominikia species, as well as Complexispora multistratosa, Glomus macrocarpum, and Sclerocarpum amazonicum serving as the outgroup. The new species is in bold font. The Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90 and ML bootstrap values ≥ 50 % are shown near the branches, respectively. Bar indicates a 0.05 expected change per site per branch.	Figure 2. A 50 % majority-rule consensus tree from the Bayesian analysis of 45 S nuc rDNA sequences concatenated with rpb 1 sequences of Dominikia tatrensis (= Isolate 530) representing the ingroup and 13 other Dominikia species, as well as Complexispora multistratosa, Glomus macrocarpum, and Sclerocarpum amazonicum serving as the outgroup. The new species is in bold font. The Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90 and ML bootstrap values ≥ 50 % are shown near the branches, respectively. Bar indicates a 0.05 expected change per site per branch.	2026-06-24	Błaszkowski, Janusz;Milczarski, Paweł;Malinowski, Ryszard;Niezgoda, Piotr;Goto, Bruno Tomio;Ronikier, Anna;Stanek, Małgorzata;Janik, Paulina;Zubek, Szymon		Zenodo	biologists	Błaszkowski, Janusz;Milczarski, Paweł;Malinowski, Ryszard;Niezgoda, Piotr;Goto, Bruno Tomio;Ronikier, Anna;Stanek, Małgorzata;Janik, Paulina;Zubek, Szymon			
03A5EDDC75A15A12AC4EF985EBD12F11.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1695024	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.134.187344.figure1	Figure 1. A 50 % majority-rule consensus tree from the Bayesian analysis of 45 S nuc rDNA sequences concatenated with rpb 1 sequences of Durabilispora carpatica (= Isolate 527) and 17 Rhizoglomus species representing the ingroup, as well as Sclerocystis sinuosa and Silvaspora neocaledonica, serving as the outgroup. The new genus and species are in bold font. The Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90 and ML bootstrap values ≥ 50 % are shown near the branches, respectively. Bar indicates a 0.02 expected change per site per branch.	Figure 1. A 50 % majority-rule consensus tree from the Bayesian analysis of 45 S nuc rDNA sequences concatenated with rpb 1 sequences of Durabilispora carpatica (= Isolate 527) and 17 Rhizoglomus species representing the ingroup, as well as Sclerocystis sinuosa and Silvaspora neocaledonica, serving as the outgroup. The new genus and species are in bold font. The Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90 and ML bootstrap values ≥ 50 % are shown near the branches, respectively. Bar indicates a 0.02 expected change per site per branch.	2026-06-24	Błaszkowski, Janusz;Milczarski, Paweł;Malinowski, Ryszard;Niezgoda, Piotr;Goto, Bruno Tomio;Ronikier, Anna;Stanek, Małgorzata;Janik, Paulina;Zubek, Szymon		Zenodo	biologists	Błaszkowski, Janusz;Milczarski, Paweł;Malinowski, Ryszard;Niezgoda, Piotr;Goto, Bruno Tomio;Ronikier, Anna;Stanek, Małgorzata;Janik, Paulina;Zubek, Szymon			
03A5EDDC75A15A12AC4EF985EBD12F11.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1695026	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.134.187344.figure3	Figure 3. Durabilispora carpatica. A. Fused glomerocarps (fg) with spores (sp); B. Cluster of spores (sp) with subtending hypha (sh); C, D. Spore wall layers (swl) 1–4; E – G. Spore wall layers (swl) 1–4 continuous with subtending hyphal wall layers (shwl) 1–4; the septum (s) closing the space between the subtending hyphal lumen and spore interior is indicated; H. Subtending hyphal wall layers (shwl) 1–4; A. Glomerocarps in lactic acid; B, D – F. Spores in PVLG; C, G. Spores in PVLG + Melzer’s reagent; A. Light microscopy; B – H. Differential interference microscopy. Scale bars: 100 μm (A); 20 μm (B); 10 μm (C – H).	Figure 3. Durabilispora carpatica. A. Fused glomerocarps (fg) with spores (sp); B. Cluster of spores (sp) with subtending hypha (sh); C, D. Spore wall layers (swl) 1–4; E – G. Spore wall layers (swl) 1–4 continuous with subtending hyphal wall layers (shwl) 1–4; the septum (s) closing the space between the subtending hyphal lumen and spore interior is indicated; H. Subtending hyphal wall layers (shwl) 1–4; A. Glomerocarps in lactic acid; B, D – F. Spores in PVLG; C, G. Spores in PVLG + Melzer’s reagent; A. Light microscopy; B – H. Differential interference microscopy. Scale bars: 100 μm (A); 20 μm (B); 10 μm (C – H).	2026-06-24	Błaszkowski, Janusz;Milczarski, Paweł;Malinowski, Ryszard;Niezgoda, Piotr;Goto, Bruno Tomio;Ronikier, Anna;Stanek, Małgorzata;Janik, Paulina;Zubek, Szymon		Zenodo	biologists	Błaszkowski, Janusz;Milczarski, Paweł;Malinowski, Ryszard;Niezgoda, Piotr;Goto, Bruno Tomio;Ronikier, Anna;Stanek, Małgorzata;Janik, Paulina;Zubek, Szymon			
79E1939E59C35E6088D8561483942995.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1695026	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.134.187344.figure3	Figure 3. Durabilispora carpatica. A. Fused glomerocarps (fg) with spores (sp); B. Cluster of spores (sp) with subtending hypha (sh); C, D. Spore wall layers (swl) 1–4; E – G. Spore wall layers (swl) 1–4 continuous with subtending hyphal wall layers (shwl) 1–4; the septum (s) closing the space between the subtending hyphal lumen and spore interior is indicated; H. Subtending hyphal wall layers (shwl) 1–4; A. Glomerocarps in lactic acid; B, D – F. Spores in PVLG; C, G. Spores in PVLG + Melzer’s reagent; A. Light microscopy; B – H. Differential interference microscopy. Scale bars: 100 μm (A); 20 μm (B); 10 μm (C – H).	Figure 3. Durabilispora carpatica. A. Fused glomerocarps (fg) with spores (sp); B. Cluster of spores (sp) with subtending hypha (sh); C, D. Spore wall layers (swl) 1–4; E – G. Spore wall layers (swl) 1–4 continuous with subtending hyphal wall layers (shwl) 1–4; the septum (s) closing the space between the subtending hyphal lumen and spore interior is indicated; H. Subtending hyphal wall layers (shwl) 1–4; A. Glomerocarps in lactic acid; B, D – F. Spores in PVLG; C, G. Spores in PVLG + Melzer’s reagent; A. Light microscopy; B – H. Differential interference microscopy. Scale bars: 100 μm (A); 20 μm (B); 10 μm (C – H).	2026-06-24	Błaszkowski, Janusz;Milczarski, Paweł;Malinowski, Ryszard;Niezgoda, Piotr;Goto, Bruno Tomio;Ronikier, Anna;Stanek, Małgorzata;Janik, Paulina;Zubek, Szymon		Zenodo	biologists	Błaszkowski, Janusz;Milczarski, Paweł;Malinowski, Ryszard;Niezgoda, Piotr;Goto, Bruno Tomio;Ronikier, Anna;Stanek, Małgorzata;Janik, Paulina;Zubek, Szymon			
79E1939E59C35E6088D8561483942995.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1695024	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.134.187344.figure1	Figure 1. A 50 % majority-rule consensus tree from the Bayesian analysis of 45 S nuc rDNA sequences concatenated with rpb 1 sequences of Durabilispora carpatica (= Isolate 527) and 17 Rhizoglomus species representing the ingroup, as well as Sclerocystis sinuosa and Silvaspora neocaledonica, serving as the outgroup. The new genus and species are in bold font. The Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90 and ML bootstrap values ≥ 50 % are shown near the branches, respectively. Bar indicates a 0.02 expected change per site per branch.	Figure 1. A 50 % majority-rule consensus tree from the Bayesian analysis of 45 S nuc rDNA sequences concatenated with rpb 1 sequences of Durabilispora carpatica (= Isolate 527) and 17 Rhizoglomus species representing the ingroup, as well as Sclerocystis sinuosa and Silvaspora neocaledonica, serving as the outgroup. The new genus and species are in bold font. The Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90 and ML bootstrap values ≥ 50 % are shown near the branches, respectively. Bar indicates a 0.02 expected change per site per branch.	2026-06-24	Błaszkowski, Janusz;Milczarski, Paweł;Malinowski, Ryszard;Niezgoda, Piotr;Goto, Bruno Tomio;Ronikier, Anna;Stanek, Małgorzata;Janik, Paulina;Zubek, Szymon		Zenodo	biologists	Błaszkowski, Janusz;Milczarski, Paweł;Malinowski, Ryszard;Niezgoda, Piotr;Goto, Bruno Tomio;Ronikier, Anna;Stanek, Małgorzata;Janik, Paulina;Zubek, Szymon			
