taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
B020132470BB51CD8293D747E23FAF34.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1675595	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.134.186271.figure6	Figure 6. Morphological characteristics of Arthrographis guizhouensis (GZAC 25.211, holotype). a – c. Front and reverse of colony on PDA (a), OA (b), and MEA (c) after 14 d at 25 ° C; d – f. Branched and unbranched conidiophores; g, h. Arthroconidia arising directly from the tip or middle of the hyphae; i. Chlamydospores. Scale bars: 10 mm (a – c); 10 μm (d – h); 20 μm (i).	Figure 6. Morphological characteristics of Arthrographis guizhouensis (GZAC 25.211, holotype). a – c. Front and reverse of colony on PDA (a), OA (b), and MEA (c) after 14 d at 25 ° C; d – f. Branched and unbranched conidiophores; g, h. Arthroconidia arising directly from the tip or middle of the hyphae; i. Chlamydospores. Scale bars: 10 mm (a – c); 10 μm (d – h); 20 μm (i).	2026-06-10	Wang, Hai-Yan;Qu, Hong-Qin;Zhao, Yu-Feng;Song, Ke-Yun;Zhang, Hai-Long;Wang, Yan-Ling;Dong, Chun-Bo;Zhang, Yan-Wei;Chen, Wan-Hao;Han, Yan-Feng		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Hai-Yan;Qu, Hong-Qin;Zhao, Yu-Feng;Song, Ke-Yun;Zhang, Hai-Long;Wang, Yan-Ling;Dong, Chun-Bo;Zhang, Yan-Wei;Chen, Wan-Hao;Han, Yan-Feng			
B020132470BB51CD8293D747E23FAF34.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1675592	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.134.186271.figure3	Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of Arthrographis constructed from ML analyses of a combined ACT, ITS, and LSU sequence dataset. ML bootstrap values ≥ 50 % and BI posterior probabilities ≥ 0.70 are given at the nodes (MLBS / BYPP). “ – ” indicates the absence of statistical support. The tree is rooted to Eremomyces bilateralis and Rhexothecium globosum. Ex-type strains are indicated by “ T ” after the strain number, and the new species is indicated in blue bold.	Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of Arthrographis constructed from ML analyses of a combined ACT, ITS, and LSU sequence dataset. ML bootstrap values ≥ 50 % and BI posterior probabilities ≥ 0.70 are given at the nodes (MLBS / BYPP). “ – ” indicates the absence of statistical support. The tree is rooted to Eremomyces bilateralis and Rhexothecium globosum. Ex-type strains are indicated by “ T ” after the strain number, and the new species is indicated in blue bold.	2026-06-10	Wang, Hai-Yan;Qu, Hong-Qin;Zhao, Yu-Feng;Song, Ke-Yun;Zhang, Hai-Long;Wang, Yan-Ling;Dong, Chun-Bo;Zhang, Yan-Wei;Chen, Wan-Hao;Han, Yan-Feng		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Hai-Yan;Qu, Hong-Qin;Zhao, Yu-Feng;Song, Ke-Yun;Zhang, Hai-Long;Wang, Yan-Ling;Dong, Chun-Bo;Zhang, Yan-Wei;Chen, Wan-Hao;Han, Yan-Feng			
5491915BB25E5195A39A8B48B0EC53EE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1675594	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.134.186271.figure5	Figure 5. Morphological characteristics of Coniochaeta guizhouensis (GZAC 25.151, holotype). a – c. Front and reverse of colony on PDA (a), OA (b), and MEA (c) after 14 d at 25 ° C; d. Phialides and conidiogenous cells arising directly from hyphae or the apex of hyphae; e, f. Phialides, conidiogenous cells, and conidia; g, h. Dehiscent apex of conidiogenous cells; i, j. Conidia; k. Yeast-like cells; l. Chlamydospores. Scale bars: 10 mm (a – c); 20 μm (d); 10 μm (e – l).	Figure 5. Morphological characteristics of Coniochaeta guizhouensis (GZAC 25.151, holotype). a – c. Front and reverse of colony on PDA (a), OA (b), and MEA (c) after 14 d at 25 ° C; d. Phialides and conidiogenous cells arising directly from hyphae or the apex of hyphae; e, f. Phialides, conidiogenous cells, and conidia; g, h. Dehiscent apex of conidiogenous cells; i, j. Conidia; k. Yeast-like cells; l. Chlamydospores. Scale bars: 10 mm (a – c); 20 μm (d); 10 μm (e – l).	2026-06-10	Wang, Hai-Yan;Qu, Hong-Qin;Zhao, Yu-Feng;Song, Ke-Yun;Zhang, Hai-Long;Wang, Yan-Ling;Dong, Chun-Bo;Zhang, Yan-Wei;Chen, Wan-Hao;Han, Yan-Feng		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Hai-Yan;Qu, Hong-Qin;Zhao, Yu-Feng;Song, Ke-Yun;Zhang, Hai-Long;Wang, Yan-Ling;Dong, Chun-Bo;Zhang, Yan-Wei;Chen, Wan-Hao;Han, Yan-Feng			
5491915BB25E5195A39A8B48B0EC53EE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1675591	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.134.186271.figure2	Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of Coniochaeta constructed from ML analyses of a combined ITS and LSU sequence dataset. ML bootstrap values ≥ 50 % and BI posterior probabilities ≥ 0.70 are given at the nodes (MLBS / BYPP). “ – ” indicates the absence of statistical support. The tree is rooted to Chaetosphaeria innumera and C. polygonalis. Ex-type strains are indicated by “ T ” after the strain number, and the new species is indicated in blue bold.	Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of Coniochaeta constructed from ML analyses of a combined ITS and LSU sequence dataset. ML bootstrap values ≥ 50 % and BI posterior probabilities ≥ 0.70 are given at the nodes (MLBS / BYPP). “ – ” indicates the absence of statistical support. The tree is rooted to Chaetosphaeria innumera and C. polygonalis. Ex-type strains are indicated by “ T ” after the strain number, and the new species is indicated in blue bold.	2026-06-10	Wang, Hai-Yan;Qu, Hong-Qin;Zhao, Yu-Feng;Song, Ke-Yun;Zhang, Hai-Long;Wang, Yan-Ling;Dong, Chun-Bo;Zhang, Yan-Wei;Chen, Wan-Hao;Han, Yan-Feng		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Hai-Yan;Qu, Hong-Qin;Zhao, Yu-Feng;Song, Ke-Yun;Zhang, Hai-Long;Wang, Yan-Ling;Dong, Chun-Bo;Zhang, Yan-Wei;Chen, Wan-Hao;Han, Yan-Feng			
B2269A5314B6561D90FB41B453D0382D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1675593	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.134.186271.figure4	Figure 4. Morphological characteristics of Spiromyces sinensis (GZAC 25.271, holotype). a – c. Front and reverse of colony on PDA (a), OA (b), and MEA (c) after 14 d at 25 ° C; d. Dense spores from hyphae; e – g. Young spores; h, i. Spores arising mostly directly from hyphae and from tips of hyphae; j. A remnant of the pedicel left behind after spore dehiscence; k. Mature spores; l, m. Young chlamydospores; n, o. Mature chlamydospores. Scale bars: 10 mm (a – c); 20 μm (d); 10 μm (e – o).	Figure 4. Morphological characteristics of Spiromyces sinensis (GZAC 25.271, holotype). a – c. Front and reverse of colony on PDA (a), OA (b), and MEA (c) after 14 d at 25 ° C; d. Dense spores from hyphae; e – g. Young spores; h, i. Spores arising mostly directly from hyphae and from tips of hyphae; j. A remnant of the pedicel left behind after spore dehiscence; k. Mature spores; l, m. Young chlamydospores; n, o. Mature chlamydospores. Scale bars: 10 mm (a – c); 20 μm (d); 10 μm (e – o).	2026-06-10	Wang, Hai-Yan;Qu, Hong-Qin;Zhao, Yu-Feng;Song, Ke-Yun;Zhang, Hai-Long;Wang, Yan-Ling;Dong, Chun-Bo;Zhang, Yan-Wei;Chen, Wan-Hao;Han, Yan-Feng		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Hai-Yan;Qu, Hong-Qin;Zhao, Yu-Feng;Song, Ke-Yun;Zhang, Hai-Long;Wang, Yan-Ling;Dong, Chun-Bo;Zhang, Yan-Wei;Chen, Wan-Hao;Han, Yan-Feng			
B2269A5314B6561D90FB41B453D0382D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1675590	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.134.186271.figure1	Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of Kickxellomycotina constructed from ML analyses of a combined ITS, LSU, and SSU sequence dataset. ML bootstrap values ≥ 50 % and BI posterior probabilities ≥ 0.70 are given at the nodes (MLBS / BYPP). “ – ” indicates the absence of statistical support. The tree is rooted to Piptocephalis corymbifera and Rhopalomyces elegans. Ex-type strains are indicated by “ T ” after the strain number, and the new species is indicated in blue bold.	Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of Kickxellomycotina constructed from ML analyses of a combined ITS, LSU, and SSU sequence dataset. ML bootstrap values ≥ 50 % and BI posterior probabilities ≥ 0.70 are given at the nodes (MLBS / BYPP). “ – ” indicates the absence of statistical support. The tree is rooted to Piptocephalis corymbifera and Rhopalomyces elegans. Ex-type strains are indicated by “ T ” after the strain number, and the new species is indicated in blue bold.	2026-06-10	Wang, Hai-Yan;Qu, Hong-Qin;Zhao, Yu-Feng;Song, Ke-Yun;Zhang, Hai-Long;Wang, Yan-Ling;Dong, Chun-Bo;Zhang, Yan-Wei;Chen, Wan-Hao;Han, Yan-Feng		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Hai-Yan;Qu, Hong-Qin;Zhao, Yu-Feng;Song, Ke-Yun;Zhang, Hai-Long;Wang, Yan-Ling;Dong, Chun-Bo;Zhang, Yan-Wei;Chen, Wan-Hao;Han, Yan-Feng			
