taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
592F87F1FA42FFF9297BF91DFEC9FE1F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/20126073/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20126073	Fig. 2. Cumulative prey curve for the diet of (a) Psammobatis rutrum; (b) Psammobatis extenta; (c) Rioraja agassizii; (d) Rhizoprionodon lalandii ± Confidence Intervals (p=0.05) in the southeastern Brazil, between January 2006 andAugust 2007.	Fig. 2. Cumulative prey curve for the diet of (a) Psammobatis rutrum; (b) Psammobatis extenta; (c) Rioraja agassizii; (d) Rhizoprionodon lalandii ± Confidence Intervals (p=0.05) in the southeastern Brazil, between January 2006 andAugust 2007.	2017-07-03	Viana, Alessandra F.;Valentin, Jean L.;Vianna, Marcelo		Zenodo	biologists	Viana, Alessandra F.;Valentin, Jean L.;Vianna, Marcelo			
592F87F1FA42FFF9297BF91DFEC9FE1F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/20126077/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20126077	Fig. 3. Diet of species analyzed by Costello’s method (1990) as adapted by Amundsen et al. (1996), in the southeastern Brazil, between January 2006 and August 2007, by food items and by groups. (a/b) Psammobatis rutrum: a. Food items: 1) Shrimp (not identified), 2) Teleost fragments, 3) Crustacean fragments, 4) Amphipoda, 5) Brachyura 6) Polychaeta. b. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL) and Polychaeta (POL). (c/d) Psammobatis extenta: c. Food items: 1) Shrimp (not identified), 2) Teleost fragments, 3) Isopoda, 4) Stomatopoda, 5) Nematoda, 6) Polychaeta, 7) Brachyura, 8) Crustacean fragments, 9) Amphipoda. d. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL), Polychaeta (POL), Nematoda (NEM). (e/f) Rioraja agassizii: e. Food items: 1) Teleost fragments, 2) Shrimp (not identified), 3) Brachyura, 4) Crustacean Fragments, 5) Thalassinidae, 6) Nematoda, 7) Stomatopoda, 8) Amphipoda, 9) Lophogastrida. f. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL), Nematoda (NEM). (g/h) Rhizoprionodon lalandii: g. Food items: 1) Teleost fragments, 2) Dactylopterus volitans, 3) Triglidae, Merluccius hubbsi and elasmobranchs, 4) Loligo plei. h. Groups: Teleosts (TEL), Elasmobranchs (ELA), Cephalopoda (CEF).	Fig. 3. Diet of species analyzed by Costello’s method (1990) as adapted by Amundsen et al. (1996), in the southeastern Brazil, between January 2006 and August 2007, by food items and by groups. (a/b) Psammobatis rutrum: a. Food items: 1) Shrimp (not identified), 2) Teleost fragments, 3) Crustacean fragments, 4) Amphipoda, 5) Brachyura 6) Polychaeta. b. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL) and Polychaeta (POL). (c/d) Psammobatis extenta: c. Food items: 1) Shrimp (not identified), 2) Teleost fragments, 3) Isopoda, 4) Stomatopoda, 5) Nematoda, 6) Polychaeta, 7) Brachyura, 8) Crustacean fragments, 9) Amphipoda. d. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL), Polychaeta (POL), Nematoda (NEM). (e/f) Rioraja agassizii: e. Food items: 1) Teleost fragments, 2) Shrimp (not identified), 3) Brachyura, 4) Crustacean Fragments, 5) Thalassinidae, 6) Nematoda, 7) Stomatopoda, 8) Amphipoda, 9) Lophogastrida. f. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL), Nematoda (NEM). (g/h) Rhizoprionodon lalandii: g. Food items: 1) Teleost fragments, 2) Dactylopterus volitans, 3) Triglidae, Merluccius hubbsi and elasmobranchs, 4) Loligo plei. h. Groups: Teleosts (TEL), Elasmobranchs (ELA), Cephalopoda (CEF).	2017-07-03	Viana, Alessandra F.;Valentin, Jean L.;Vianna, Marcelo		Zenodo	biologists	Viana, Alessandra F.;Valentin, Jean L.;Vianna, Marcelo			
592F87F1FA42FFFD297BFC3DFBCFF9F1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/20126073/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20126073	Fig. 2. Cumulative prey curve for the diet of (a) Psammobatis rutrum; (b) Psammobatis extenta; (c) Rioraja agassizii; (d) Rhizoprionodon lalandii ± Confidence Intervals (p=0.05) in the southeastern Brazil, between January 2006 andAugust 2007.	Fig. 2. Cumulative prey curve for the diet of (a) Psammobatis rutrum; (b) Psammobatis extenta; (c) Rioraja agassizii; (d) Rhizoprionodon lalandii ± Confidence Intervals (p=0.05) in the southeastern Brazil, between January 2006 andAugust 2007.	2017-07-03	Viana, Alessandra F.;Valentin, Jean L.;Vianna, Marcelo		Zenodo	biologists	Viana, Alessandra F.;Valentin, Jean L.;Vianna, Marcelo			
592F87F1FA42FFFD297BFC3DFBCFF9F1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/20126077/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20126077	Fig. 3. Diet of species analyzed by Costello’s method (1990) as adapted by Amundsen et al. (1996), in the southeastern Brazil, between January 2006 and August 2007, by food items and by groups. (a/b) Psammobatis rutrum: a. Food items: 1) Shrimp (not identified), 2) Teleost fragments, 3) Crustacean fragments, 4) Amphipoda, 5) Brachyura 6) Polychaeta. b. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL) and Polychaeta (POL). (c/d) Psammobatis extenta: c. Food items: 1) Shrimp (not identified), 2) Teleost fragments, 3) Isopoda, 4) Stomatopoda, 5) Nematoda, 6) Polychaeta, 7) Brachyura, 8) Crustacean fragments, 9) Amphipoda. d. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL), Polychaeta (POL), Nematoda (NEM). (e/f) Rioraja agassizii: e. Food items: 1) Teleost fragments, 2) Shrimp (not identified), 3) Brachyura, 4) Crustacean Fragments, 5) Thalassinidae, 6) Nematoda, 7) Stomatopoda, 8) Amphipoda, 9) Lophogastrida. f. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL), Nematoda (NEM). (g/h) Rhizoprionodon lalandii: g. Food items: 1) Teleost fragments, 2) Dactylopterus volitans, 3) Triglidae, Merluccius hubbsi and elasmobranchs, 4) Loligo plei. h. Groups: Teleosts (TEL), Elasmobranchs (ELA), Cephalopoda (CEF).	Fig. 3. Diet of species analyzed by Costello’s method (1990) as adapted by Amundsen et al. (1996), in the southeastern Brazil, between January 2006 and August 2007, by food items and by groups. (a/b) Psammobatis rutrum: a. Food items: 1) Shrimp (not identified), 2) Teleost fragments, 3) Crustacean fragments, 4) Amphipoda, 5) Brachyura 6) Polychaeta. b. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL) and Polychaeta (POL). (c/d) Psammobatis extenta: c. Food items: 1) Shrimp (not identified), 2) Teleost fragments, 3) Isopoda, 4) Stomatopoda, 5) Nematoda, 6) Polychaeta, 7) Brachyura, 8) Crustacean fragments, 9) Amphipoda. d. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL), Polychaeta (POL), Nematoda (NEM). (e/f) Rioraja agassizii: e. Food items: 1) Teleost fragments, 2) Shrimp (not identified), 3) Brachyura, 4) Crustacean Fragments, 5) Thalassinidae, 6) Nematoda, 7) Stomatopoda, 8) Amphipoda, 9) Lophogastrida. f. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL), Nematoda (NEM). (g/h) Rhizoprionodon lalandii: g. Food items: 1) Teleost fragments, 2) Dactylopterus volitans, 3) Triglidae, Merluccius hubbsi and elasmobranchs, 4) Loligo plei. h. Groups: Teleosts (TEL), Elasmobranchs (ELA), Cephalopoda (CEF).	2017-07-03	Viana, Alessandra F.;Valentin, Jean L.;Vianna, Marcelo		Zenodo	biologists	Viana, Alessandra F.;Valentin, Jean L.;Vianna, Marcelo			
592F87F1FA47FFF82ACEFCE3FBB7FD5F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/20126073/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20126073	Fig. 2. Cumulative prey curve for the diet of (a) Psammobatis rutrum; (b) Psammobatis extenta; (c) Rioraja agassizii; (d) Rhizoprionodon lalandii ± Confidence Intervals (p=0.05) in the southeastern Brazil, between January 2006 andAugust 2007.	Fig. 2. Cumulative prey curve for the diet of (a) Psammobatis rutrum; (b) Psammobatis extenta; (c) Rioraja agassizii; (d) Rhizoprionodon lalandii ± Confidence Intervals (p=0.05) in the southeastern Brazil, between January 2006 andAugust 2007.	2017-07-03	Viana, Alessandra F.;Valentin, Jean L.;Vianna, Marcelo		Zenodo	biologists	Viana, Alessandra F.;Valentin, Jean L.;Vianna, Marcelo			
592F87F1FA47FFF82ACEFCE3FBB7FD5F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/20126077/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20126077	Fig. 3. Diet of species analyzed by Costello’s method (1990) as adapted by Amundsen et al. (1996), in the southeastern Brazil, between January 2006 and August 2007, by food items and by groups. (a/b) Psammobatis rutrum: a. Food items: 1) Shrimp (not identified), 2) Teleost fragments, 3) Crustacean fragments, 4) Amphipoda, 5) Brachyura 6) Polychaeta. b. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL) and Polychaeta (POL). (c/d) Psammobatis extenta: c. Food items: 1) Shrimp (not identified), 2) Teleost fragments, 3) Isopoda, 4) Stomatopoda, 5) Nematoda, 6) Polychaeta, 7) Brachyura, 8) Crustacean fragments, 9) Amphipoda. d. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL), Polychaeta (POL), Nematoda (NEM). (e/f) Rioraja agassizii: e. Food items: 1) Teleost fragments, 2) Shrimp (not identified), 3) Brachyura, 4) Crustacean Fragments, 5) Thalassinidae, 6) Nematoda, 7) Stomatopoda, 8) Amphipoda, 9) Lophogastrida. f. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL), Nematoda (NEM). (g/h) Rhizoprionodon lalandii: g. Food items: 1) Teleost fragments, 2) Dactylopterus volitans, 3) Triglidae, Merluccius hubbsi and elasmobranchs, 4) Loligo plei. h. Groups: Teleosts (TEL), Elasmobranchs (ELA), Cephalopoda (CEF).	Fig. 3. Diet of species analyzed by Costello’s method (1990) as adapted by Amundsen et al. (1996), in the southeastern Brazil, between January 2006 and August 2007, by food items and by groups. (a/b) Psammobatis rutrum: a. Food items: 1) Shrimp (not identified), 2) Teleost fragments, 3) Crustacean fragments, 4) Amphipoda, 5) Brachyura 6) Polychaeta. b. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL) and Polychaeta (POL). (c/d) Psammobatis extenta: c. Food items: 1) Shrimp (not identified), 2) Teleost fragments, 3) Isopoda, 4) Stomatopoda, 5) Nematoda, 6) Polychaeta, 7) Brachyura, 8) Crustacean fragments, 9) Amphipoda. d. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL), Polychaeta (POL), Nematoda (NEM). (e/f) Rioraja agassizii: e. Food items: 1) Teleost fragments, 2) Shrimp (not identified), 3) Brachyura, 4) Crustacean Fragments, 5) Thalassinidae, 6) Nematoda, 7) Stomatopoda, 8) Amphipoda, 9) Lophogastrida. f. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL), Nematoda (NEM). (g/h) Rhizoprionodon lalandii: g. Food items: 1) Teleost fragments, 2) Dactylopterus volitans, 3) Triglidae, Merluccius hubbsi and elasmobranchs, 4) Loligo plei. h. Groups: Teleosts (TEL), Elasmobranchs (ELA), Cephalopoda (CEF).	2017-07-03	Viana, Alessandra F.;Valentin, Jean L.;Vianna, Marcelo		Zenodo	biologists	Viana, Alessandra F.;Valentin, Jean L.;Vianna, Marcelo			
592F87F1FA46FFF82AC7FE22FD6BFCDF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/20126073/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20126073	Fig. 2. Cumulative prey curve for the diet of (a) Psammobatis rutrum; (b) Psammobatis extenta; (c) Rioraja agassizii; (d) Rhizoprionodon lalandii ± Confidence Intervals (p=0.05) in the southeastern Brazil, between January 2006 andAugust 2007.	Fig. 2. Cumulative prey curve for the diet of (a) Psammobatis rutrum; (b) Psammobatis extenta; (c) Rioraja agassizii; (d) Rhizoprionodon lalandii ± Confidence Intervals (p=0.05) in the southeastern Brazil, between January 2006 andAugust 2007.	2017-07-03	Viana, Alessandra F.;Valentin, Jean L.;Vianna, Marcelo		Zenodo	biologists	Viana, Alessandra F.;Valentin, Jean L.;Vianna, Marcelo			
592F87F1FA46FFF82AC7FE22FD6BFCDF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/20126077/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20126077	Fig. 3. Diet of species analyzed by Costello’s method (1990) as adapted by Amundsen et al. (1996), in the southeastern Brazil, between January 2006 and August 2007, by food items and by groups. (a/b) Psammobatis rutrum: a. Food items: 1) Shrimp (not identified), 2) Teleost fragments, 3) Crustacean fragments, 4) Amphipoda, 5) Brachyura 6) Polychaeta. b. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL) and Polychaeta (POL). (c/d) Psammobatis extenta: c. Food items: 1) Shrimp (not identified), 2) Teleost fragments, 3) Isopoda, 4) Stomatopoda, 5) Nematoda, 6) Polychaeta, 7) Brachyura, 8) Crustacean fragments, 9) Amphipoda. d. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL), Polychaeta (POL), Nematoda (NEM). (e/f) Rioraja agassizii: e. Food items: 1) Teleost fragments, 2) Shrimp (not identified), 3) Brachyura, 4) Crustacean Fragments, 5) Thalassinidae, 6) Nematoda, 7) Stomatopoda, 8) Amphipoda, 9) Lophogastrida. f. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL), Nematoda (NEM). (g/h) Rhizoprionodon lalandii: g. Food items: 1) Teleost fragments, 2) Dactylopterus volitans, 3) Triglidae, Merluccius hubbsi and elasmobranchs, 4) Loligo plei. h. Groups: Teleosts (TEL), Elasmobranchs (ELA), Cephalopoda (CEF).	Fig. 3. Diet of species analyzed by Costello’s method (1990) as adapted by Amundsen et al. (1996), in the southeastern Brazil, between January 2006 and August 2007, by food items and by groups. (a/b) Psammobatis rutrum: a. Food items: 1) Shrimp (not identified), 2) Teleost fragments, 3) Crustacean fragments, 4) Amphipoda, 5) Brachyura 6) Polychaeta. b. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL) and Polychaeta (POL). (c/d) Psammobatis extenta: c. Food items: 1) Shrimp (not identified), 2) Teleost fragments, 3) Isopoda, 4) Stomatopoda, 5) Nematoda, 6) Polychaeta, 7) Brachyura, 8) Crustacean fragments, 9) Amphipoda. d. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL), Polychaeta (POL), Nematoda (NEM). (e/f) Rioraja agassizii: e. Food items: 1) Teleost fragments, 2) Shrimp (not identified), 3) Brachyura, 4) Crustacean Fragments, 5) Thalassinidae, 6) Nematoda, 7) Stomatopoda, 8) Amphipoda, 9) Lophogastrida. f. Groups: Crustacea (CRU), Teleosts (TEL), Nematoda (NEM). (g/h) Rhizoprionodon lalandii: g. Food items: 1) Teleost fragments, 2) Dactylopterus volitans, 3) Triglidae, Merluccius hubbsi and elasmobranchs, 4) Loligo plei. h. Groups: Teleosts (TEL), Elasmobranchs (ELA), Cephalopoda (CEF).	2017-07-03	Viana, Alessandra F.;Valentin, Jean L.;Vianna, Marcelo		Zenodo	biologists	Viana, Alessandra F.;Valentin, Jean L.;Vianna, Marcelo			
