identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
D684A970844859BE9F431E4A14427BB0.text	D684A970844859BE9F431E4A14427BB0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Siphliops extenso Kaltenbach & Kluge & Bláha & Patoka & Gattolliat 2026	<div><p>Siphliops extenso gen. nov. et sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8</p><p>Type material.</p><p>Holotype. Indonesia • female larva; Highland Papua Prov., <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=138.93028&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-4.1105556" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 138.93028/lat -4.1105556)">Wamena</a>; 04°06'38"S, 138°55'49"E; 1650 m; 27. vii. 2015; leg. S. Niderer; on slide; GBIFCH 01221843; MZL . Paratypes. 23 larvae; same data as holotype; 6 on slides; GBIFCH 01221829, GBIFCH 01221844, GBIFCH 01221845 (protogonostyli); GBIFCH 01221846 (abdominal sterna), GBIFCH 01588927 (GenBank PX 697239), GBIFCH 01588928 (GenBank PX 697240); MZL; 17 in alcohol; GBIFCH 01581945, GBIFCH 01581946, GBIFCH 01582033, GBIFCH 01582034, GBIFCH 01582066, GBIFCH 01588929 (GenBank PX 697241); MZL • 1 L-S ♂ (on slide), 1 L / S ♀ (on slide), 4 larvae (in alcohol); Highland Papua Prov., Baliem valley, Wamena, river Elagaima, 15–19. viii. 2012, leg. N. Kluge &amp; L. Sheyko; SPbU .</p><p>Description.</p><p>Larva (Figs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). Body length 4.5–5.8 mm. Cerci ~ 0.9 × body length, paracercus ~ 0.5 × body length.</p><p>Cuticular colouration (Fig. 1 a – d). Head, thorax and abdomen dorsally brown, mesonotum darker, pronotum darker along anterior margin. Head, thorax and abdomen ventrally light brown. Legs light brown, apex of femur, tarsus, and claw darker. Caudalii light brown.</p><p>Hypodermic colouration. Dorsally and ventrally dark brown as in Fig. 2 a, b.</p><p>Head (Fig. 2 d). Frons with carina-like elevation.</p><p>Antenna. Length ~ 1.5 × head length.</p><p>Labrum (Fig. 3 a – c). Subrectangular, length ~ 0.6 × maximum width. Distal margin almost straight, medially with nearly V-shaped emargination and small process. Dorsally with pair of sub-median setae and two long, simple, submarginal setae on each side; fine, simple setae scattered on surface. Ventral margin with dense row of long, flattened, apically slightly bent setae.</p><p>Right mandible (Fig. 4 d). Incisor with four denticles, outermost denticle shorter and turned ventrally; kinetodontium with five denticles, innermost denticle with row of fine, simple setae on lateral margin. Prostheca stick-like, apically widened, and denticulate, leaned against kinetodontium. Margin between prostheca and mola almost straight, with row of minute denticles. Tuft of setae on proximal corner of mola present.</p><p>Left mandible (Fig. 4 e). Incisor with five denticles, outermost denticle shorter and turned ventrally; kinetodontium with three denticles. Prostheca robust stick-like, apically widened, denticulate and with short, comb-like structure. Margin between prostheca and mola slightly concave. Tuft of setae on proximal corner of mola absent.</p><p>Hypopharynx and superlinguae (Fig. 3 d). Lingua shorter than superlinguae, apically with well-developed, broad bunch of spine-like setae. Superlinguae distally rounded; lateral margins rounded; fine, long, simple setae along distal margin.</p><p>Maxilla (Fig. 4 a – c). Galea-lacinia ventrally with two simple setae just proximad of canines. Medially with one pectinate, spine-like seta, and row of four simple setae. Maxillary palp longer than galea-lacinia; palp segment II subequal in length to segment I, conspicuously thinner than segment I, apex rounded; setae on maxillary palp fine, simple, scattered over surface of segments I and II.</p><p>Labium (Fig. 3 e – h). Glossae bent toward middle, inner margin with one long, spine-like seta in apical area; apex with three long, robust, spine-like, pectinate setae; outer margin with six or seven long, spine-like setae in apical area; paraglossae wide, narrowing distally; inner margin slightly concave; outer margin strongly convex; apex with three rows of long, robust, distally pectinate setae, proceeding on ventral surface; dorsally with row of three long, spine-like setae near inner margin. Labial palp with segment I 0.7 × length of segments II and III combined. Segment II with well-developed, thumb-like, rounded, distolateral protuberance, dorsally with one spine-like seta near distal outer margin. Segment III oblong, outer margin convex; length ~ 1.4 × maximal width; at base ~ 0.6 × as wide as maximal width of segment II; ventral surface with short, spine-like, simple setae and short, fine, simple setae.</p><p>Thorax. Hind protoptera absent.</p><p>Legs (Fig. 5 a – k). Ratio of leg segments (femur, tibia, tarsus, claw): fore leg 1.2: 1.0: 0.4: 0.2, middle leg 1.1: 1.0: 0.4: 0.1, and hind leg 1.2: 1.0: 0.4: 0.2. Coxa with few spine-like setae, similar to setae along inner margin of femur. Femur. Length of fore femur ~ 3 × maximum width, middle and hind femur slenderer. Outer margin with dense row of long, spine-like, pointed setae; with stout, pointed setae along inner margin (more and larger setae on fore leg, fewer and smaller on middle and hind legs); femoral patch absent on all legs. Tibia with dense row of long, robust, pointed setae on outer, anterior side; with short to medium-length, spine-like setae on and along inner margin. Patella-tibial suture present on all legs, on basal half. Tarsus. Outer margin with row of medium, spine-like setae; inner margin with row of short to medium-length, curved, spine-like setae, increasing in length distally, distalmost seta much longer than other setae. Claw much broader in basal 2 / 3, finger-like in distal 1 / 3, with single row of seven or eight denticles.</p><p>Abdomen. Terga (Fig. 6 a – c). Surface without scale bases; with scattered micropores, especially in lateral parts. Posterior margin of terga: I smooth, without spines; II – X with triangular, pointed spines, narrower and longer toward X; row of spines on tergum IX interrupted in middle part behind bases of submedian setae. Posterolateral corners of abdominal tergum IX with acute prolongation.</p><p>Sterna. Posterior margins of sterna smooth, without spines.</p><p>Tergalii (Fig. 6 e – g). Present on abdominal segments II – VII; tergalii III – V oblique oval, II, VI and VII oblong. Tracheation not visible. Margin with small denticles intercalating short, fine, simple setae; costal and anal margins brown.</p><p>Paraproct (Fig. 6 d). Posterior margin with ~ 5 stout spines. Cercotractor with numerous, marginal, apically split spines.</p><p>Caudalii (Fig. 4 f – h). Cerci and paracercus with densely packed, long swimming setae; distal half of cerci without swimming setae.</p><p>Pose of subimaginal gonostyli under cuticle (Fig. 2 e, f). Based on one premature male larva, subimaginal gonostyli developing under cuticle folded in “ Labiobaetis - type ”: segments II and III directed medially and slightly bent, most caudal point belongs to segment II.</p><p>Male subimago (Fig. 7). Fore wing length 5 mm.</p><p>Head brown. Antennal scape and pedicel brown, flagellum ochre. Turbinate eyes cylindrical, not widened distally, with round facetted surfaces; in last instar larva area with large facets limited to central part of facetted surface (Fig. 2 c). In subimaginal stage, height of turbinate eye less than its width; facetted surface dull reddish brown, stem brownish with ochre, with lighter ring bordering facetted surface.</p><p>Thorax. Subimaginal cuticle with brown and colourless areas, mesonotum brown (Fig. 7 e); imaginal cuticle ochre-brown, equally dark on dorsal, ventral, and lateral surfaces.</p><p>Fore wings with subimaginal cuticle evenly brown (Fig. 7 a) due to brown rings surrounding base of each microtrichium.</p><p>Hind wings absent.</p><p>Legs (Fig. 7 b – d). Subimaginal cuticle mostly ochre with dark-brown microtrichia; femur with brownish outer side and area near apex; tibia with dark-brown markings near base and on inner-apical corner; tarsomeres with dark-brown distal borders. Hypodermis mostly ochre, with reddish-brown apex of femur. In both sexes, tarsus of middle and hind legs relatively short, with two long apical spines (on initial 2 nd and 3 rd tarsomeres); fore tarsus of female (examined in larva ready to moult) with two long apical spines on 2 nd and 3 rd tarsomeres. On all legs of both sexes subimaginal cuticle of last tarsal segment covered with blunt microlepides, each with one or two small points; on other tarsomeres subimaginal cuticle covered with blunt microlepides (Fig. 7 d).</p><p>Abdomen. Subimaginal cuticle mostly ochre with dark-brown microtrichia. Hypodermis with dark-brown hypodermal colouration as in mature larva (as in Fig. 2 a, b), all abdominal terga nearly uniformly dark brown with lateral margins lighter ochre; abdominal sterna mostly brown with lateral and median parts lighter ochre.</p><p>Gonostyli. Judging from the undeveloped genitalia of the examined specimen, distal segments of gonostyli are relatively long (Fig. 7 f).</p><p>Imago. Unknown.</p><p>Egg. Unknown.</p><p>Etymology.</p><p>The specific epithet refers to the conspicuous posterolateral, acute extensions of abdominal tergum IX.</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>New Guinea (Fig. 8).</p><p>Genetics.</p><p>The three COI sequences obtained from specimens of Siphliops extenso gen. nov. et sp. nov. from the same location share the same haplotype (K 2 P 0 %), as it is expected in such a case.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D684A970844859BE9F431E4A14427BB0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Kaltenbach, Thomas;Kluge, Nikita J.;Bláha, Martin;Patoka, Jiří;Gattolliat, Jean-Luc	Kaltenbach, Thomas, Kluge, Nikita J., Bláha, Martin, Patoka, Jiří, Gattolliat, Jean-Luc (2026): Siphliops gen. nov., a new genus of Baetidae (Ephemeroptera) from New Guinea. ZooKeys 1277: 199-216, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1277.185660
7FC4271D288F58F6B973F5B45372CCE3.text	7FC4271D288F58F6B973F5B45372CCE3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Siphliops Kaltenbach & Kluge & Bláha & Patoka & Gattolliat 2026	<div><p>Siphliops gen. nov.</p><p>Figs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8</p><p>Type species.</p><p>Siphliops extenso gen. nov. et sp. nov., by present designation.</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Larva. The following combination of characters distinguishes Siphliops gen. nov. from all other genera of Baetidae: frons with carina-like elevation (Fig. 2 d); both mandibles with incisors and kinetodontium fused up to apex, without setae between prostheca and mola (Fig. 4 d, e); labium with glossae and paraglossae spread, glossae much shorter than paraglossae (Fig. 3 e); labial palp segment II with distolateral protuberance (Fig. 3 f); femur with dense row of long, pointed setae at outer margin (Fig. 5 a – c); tibia with dense row of long, robust, pointed setae on outer, anterior side (Fig. 4 a, b, f); claw markedly broadened in basal 2 / 3, tapering finger-like in distal 1 / 3, with single row of denticles (Fig. 5 j); posterolateral corners of abdominal tergum IX with acute prolongation (Figs 1 a, e, 6 a, c); cerci and paracercus well developed, with dense, long swimming setae, in cerci limited to basal half (Fig. 4 f); subimaginal gonostyli developing under cuticle of male last instar larva folded in “ Labiobaetis - type ” (Fig. 2 e, f; Kluge 2004: 99).</p><p>Description.</p><p>Larva (Figs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6).</p><p>Head (Fig. 2 d). Frons with carina-like elevation between base of antennae.</p><p>Labrum (Fig. 3 a – c). Subrectangular, much wider than long. Distal margin with medial emargination and small process. Dorsally with pair of long, simple, sub-median setae, and few long, simple, submarginal setae.</p><p>Right mandible (Fig. 4 d). Incisor and kinetodontium fused till apex; incisor and kinetodontium with apically rounded denticles; inner margin of innermost denticle of kinetodontium with row of thin setae; prostheca stick-like, distally widened, and denticulate.</p><p>Left mandible (Fig. 4 e). Incisor and kinetodontium fused till apex; incisor and kinetodontium with apically rounded denticles; prostheca robust, distally denticulate and with short, comb-like structure.</p><p>Hypopharynx (Fig. 3 d). Apex of lingua with well-developed bunch of spine-like setae.</p><p>Maxilla (Fig. 4 a – c). Apically with three slender, pointed canines and three denti-setae; distal denti-seta tooth-like, bent in same direction as canines; other denti-setae far separated, slender, bifid, and pectinate; maxillary palp with two segments, apex rounded.</p><p>Labium (Fig. 3 e – h). Glossae and paraglossae spread. Glossae much shorter than paraglossae, basally broad, narrowing toward middle, distal half finger-like; inner margin with one long, spine-like seta in apical area; outer margin with row of long, spine-like setae in apical area; on apex with three long, spine-like, pectinate setae; ventral surface with numerous medium to long fine, simple scattered setae. Paraglossae basally and medially wide, narrowing distally; inner margin slightly concave; outer margin strongly convex; apex with three rows of long, robust, distally pectinate setae; dorsally with row of long, spine-like setae near inner margin. Labial palp with three segments, segment II with well-developed, distomedial thumb-like protuberance.</p><p>Thorax. Hind protoptera absent.</p><p>Legs (Fig. 5 a – k). Coxa with few spine-like setae, similar to setae along inner margin of femur. Femur. Outer margin with dense row of long, spine-like, pointed setae; with stout, pointed setae along inner margin; femoral patch absent on all legs. Tibia with dense row of long, robust, pointed setae on outer, anterior side; with short to medium, spine-like setae on and along inner margin. Tarsus. Outer margin with row of medium, spine-like setae; inner margin with row of short to medium, spine-like setae, increasing in length distally, distalmost seta much longer than other setae. Claw broadened in basal 2 / 3, finger-like in distal 1 / 3, with single row of denticles.</p><p>Abdomen. Terga (Fig. 6 a – c). Posterior margins with triangular, pointed spines. Tergum IX distolaterally with acute prolongation.</p><p>Tergalii (Fig. 6 e – g). Consisting of one lamella; present on segments II – VII.</p><p>Caudalii (Fig. 3 f). Paracercus well developed; paracercus and cerci with dense, long swimming setae, in cerci limited to basal half.</p><p>Paraproct (Fig. 6 d). Posterior margin with stout spines, not produced apically. Cercotractor with numerous, small, marginal spines.</p><p>Larval protogonostyli (Fig. 2 e, f). Based on the investigation of one premature male larva, subimaginal gonostyli developing under cuticle are folded in “ Labiobaetis - type ”: segments II and III directed medially and slightly bent, most caudal point belongs to segment II.</p><p>Male subimago (Fig. 7).</p><p>Thorax. Forewings with double intercalary veins; tarsal segments of all legs of both sexes covered with blunt microlepides (Fig. 7 d). Hind wings absent.</p><p>Etymology.</p><p>Siphliops is an arbitrary combination of Siphl -, with reference to the genus Siphlonurus Eaton, 1868 ( Siphlonuridae), which has a similar abdomen with posterolateral extensions, and the Greek - iops (minnow), with reference to Baetidae, which look and move like small fishes. Gender is masculine.</p><p>Distribution</p><p>(Fig. 8). New Guinea.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7FC4271D288F58F6B973F5B45372CCE3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Kaltenbach, Thomas;Kluge, Nikita J.;Bláha, Martin;Patoka, Jiří;Gattolliat, Jean-Luc	Kaltenbach, Thomas, Kluge, Nikita J., Bláha, Martin, Patoka, Jiří, Gattolliat, Jean-Luc (2026): Siphliops gen. nov., a new genus of Baetidae (Ephemeroptera) from New Guinea. ZooKeys 1277: 199-216, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1277.185660
