taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
276E83F3ABF250D4BB070DABD96598E2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1565692	https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.29.e177205.figure6	Figure 6. Stratigraphic distribution of Cytheropteron Sars, 1866, and Krithe Brady, Crosskey & Robertson, 1874. Core record given as relative species abundance of Cytheropteron carolinae Whatleyand Coles, 1987, Cytheropteron higashikawai Ishizaki, 1981, Cytheropteron aff. lanceae, Cytheropteron perlaria Hao, 1988, Cytheropteron aff. scoresbyi, Cytheropteron sedovi Schneider, 1962, and Cytheropteron tenuialatum Whatleyand Coles, 1987, Krithe dolichodeira Bold, 1946, Krithe hunti Yasuhara, Stepanova, Okahashi, Cronin & Brouwers, 2014, Krithe minima Coles, Whatley & Moguilevsky, 1994, and Krithe spp. Cytheropteron aff. lanceae may include specimens of C. lanceae Yasuhara, Stepanova, Okahashi, Cronin & Brouwers, 2014 and C. irizukii Yasuhara, Stepanova, Okahashi, Cronin & Brouwers, 2014. Cytheropteron aff. scoresbyi may include specimens of C. scoresbyi Whatley & Eynon, 1996, C. aielloi Yasuhara, Okahashi & Cronin, 2009. Specimen counts and color scheme as in Fig. 3.	Figure 6. Stratigraphic distribution of Cytheropteron Sars, 1866, and Krithe Brady, Crosskey & Robertson, 1874. Core record given as relative species abundance of Cytheropteron carolinae Whatleyand Coles, 1987, Cytheropteron higashikawai Ishizaki, 1981, Cytheropteron aff. lanceae, Cytheropteron perlaria Hao, 1988, Cytheropteron aff. scoresbyi, Cytheropteron sedovi Schneider, 1962, and Cytheropteron tenuialatum Whatleyand Coles, 1987, Krithe dolichodeira Bold, 1946, Krithe hunti Yasuhara, Stepanova, Okahashi, Cronin & Brouwers, 2014, Krithe minima Coles, Whatley & Moguilevsky, 1994, and Krithe spp. Cytheropteron aff. lanceae may include specimens of C. lanceae Yasuhara, Stepanova, Okahashi, Cronin & Brouwers, 2014 and C. irizukii Yasuhara, Stepanova, Okahashi, Cronin & Brouwers, 2014. Cytheropteron aff. scoresbyi may include specimens of C. scoresbyi Whatley & Eynon, 1996, C. aielloi Yasuhara, Okahashi & Cronin, 2009. Specimen counts and color scheme as in Fig. 3.	2026-03-20	Jöst, Anna B.;Bauch, Henning A.;Stepanova, Anna;Okahashi, Hisayo;Yasuhara, Moriaki		Zenodo	biologists	Jöst, Anna B.;Bauch, Henning A.;Stepanova, Anna;Okahashi, Hisayo;Yasuhara, Moriaki			
A5807628F7205466B9ED7AF048531637.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1565688	https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.29.e177205.figure2	Figure 2. Synoptic overview of climate state, sampling resolution, and ostracod faunal dynamics. Panels A – F. Share the same x-axis (age given in ka), with decreasing sediment age from right to left. Grey highlights indicate Pleistocene glacial cycles, peach highlight indicates the time of the Mid-Brunhes Event (MBE, ~ 430–350 ka). MIS abbreviates Marine Isotope Stages, which refer to interglacials (i. e., odd numbers; IG, white background, sampling resolution of 5 kyr) and glacials (i. e., even numbers; G, grey background, sampling resolution of 20 kyr). Panel A. Different scales for x-axies applied: blue crosses denote palaeo-sea level data in m relative to the modern sea level (i. e., 0 m) as published in Spratt and Lisiecki 2016 (blue scale, right); black crosses and dots denote global data of benthic δ 18 O data in per mil (‰) relative to the PDB standard as proxy for bottom water temperature published by Lisiecki and Raymo 2005 (black scale, inverted, left). Sampling resolution varied: crosses indicate roughly 1 kyr per sample, while dots indicate binned resolution of 5 kyr per interglacial sample (red rim), and 20 kyr per glacial sample (grey rim); Panel C. orange rims indicate samples of warming phases; blue rims indicate cooling phases.	Figure 2. Synoptic overview of climate state, sampling resolution, and ostracod faunal dynamics. Panels A – F. Share the same x-axis (age given in ka), with decreasing sediment age from right to left. Grey highlights indicate Pleistocene glacial cycles, peach highlight indicates the time of the Mid-Brunhes Event (MBE, ~ 430–350 ka). MIS abbreviates Marine Isotope Stages, which refer to interglacials (i. e., odd numbers; IG, white background, sampling resolution of 5 kyr) and glacials (i. e., even numbers; G, grey background, sampling resolution of 20 kyr). Panel A. Different scales for x-axies applied: blue crosses denote palaeo-sea level data in m relative to the modern sea level (i. e., 0 m) as published in Spratt and Lisiecki 2016 (blue scale, right); black crosses and dots denote global data of benthic δ 18 O data in per mil (‰) relative to the PDB standard as proxy for bottom water temperature published by Lisiecki and Raymo 2005 (black scale, inverted, left). Sampling resolution varied: crosses indicate roughly 1 kyr per sample, while dots indicate binned resolution of 5 kyr per interglacial sample (red rim), and 20 kyr per glacial sample (grey rim); Panel C. orange rims indicate samples of warming phases; blue rims indicate cooling phases.	2026-03-20	Jöst, Anna B.;Bauch, Henning A.;Stepanova, Anna;Okahashi, Hisayo;Yasuhara, Moriaki		Zenodo	biologists	Jöst, Anna B.;Bauch, Henning A.;Stepanova, Anna;Okahashi, Hisayo;Yasuhara, Moriaki			
A5807628F7205466B9ED7AF048531637.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1565691	https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.29.e177205.figure5	Figure 5. Stratigraphic distribution of and Eucythere Brady, 1861, Henryhowella Puri, 1957, Swainocythere Ishizaki, 1981, Rosaliella Yasuhara, Sztybor, Rasmussen, Okahashi, Sato & Tanaka, 2018, and Echinocythereis Puri, 1954. Core record given as relative species abundance of Eucythere argus (Sars, 1866), Eucythere circumcostata? Whatley & Coles, 1987, Eucythere sp. 1, Eucythere spp., Henryhowella asperrima (Reuss, 1850), Swainocythere spp., Rosaliella svalbardensis Yasuhara, Sztybor, Rasmussen, Okahashi, Sato & Tanaka, 2018, Retibythere scaberrima (Brady, 1886), and Echinocythereis echinata (Sars, 1866). Specimen counts and color scheme as in Fig. 3.	Figure 5. Stratigraphic distribution of and Eucythere Brady, 1861, Henryhowella Puri, 1957, Swainocythere Ishizaki, 1981, Rosaliella Yasuhara, Sztybor, Rasmussen, Okahashi, Sato & Tanaka, 2018, and Echinocythereis Puri, 1954. Core record given as relative species abundance of Eucythere argus (Sars, 1866), Eucythere circumcostata? Whatley & Coles, 1987, Eucythere sp. 1, Eucythere spp., Henryhowella asperrima (Reuss, 1850), Swainocythere spp., Rosaliella svalbardensis Yasuhara, Sztybor, Rasmussen, Okahashi, Sato & Tanaka, 2018, Retibythere scaberrima (Brady, 1886), and Echinocythereis echinata (Sars, 1866). Specimen counts and color scheme as in Fig. 3.	2026-03-20	Jöst, Anna B.;Bauch, Henning A.;Stepanova, Anna;Okahashi, Hisayo;Yasuhara, Moriaki		Zenodo	biologists	Jöst, Anna B.;Bauch, Henning A.;Stepanova, Anna;Okahashi, Hisayo;Yasuhara, Moriaki			
